ABSTRACT
Autoimmune bullous diseases are systemic disorders with autoantibodies that result in blisters. Aim of this study was to indicate the spectrum and treatment modalities of five types of bullous disorders most prevalent in the south of Iran: pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus (PF), epidermolysis bullousa aquisita (EBA), bullous pemphigoid (BP), and pemphigoid gestationis (PG). Patients with PV, PF, BP, EBA, and PG were included in this study. The data regarding the age, sex, and the treatment used for PV, PF, and BP were recorded and analyzed in our center, a tertiary referral center. T-test and Mann-Whitney test for independent samples were used for the analysis of parametric and nonparametric variables, respectively. Chi-square test was used for frequencies. Of the 441 patients included in this study, 82.9% had PV, 4.7% PF, 8.5% BP, 1.5% EBA, and 1.3% PG. 93.5% of patients with PV, 95.3% with PF, and 100% with patients with BP were treated and responded to first line therapies with one or two medications. The most frequent autoimmune bullous disease was PV, followed by PF. For PV and PF, combination of prednisolone and azathioprine was the most frequent first line medication. In the patients with BP, prednisolone monotherapy was the most frequent one. Only a minority of patients with PV and PF needed the third or fourth medications.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The seat selection and classroom dynamics may have mutual influence on the student performance and participation in both assigned and random seating arrangement. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to understand the influence of seat selection on educational achievement. METHODS: The seating positions of the medical students were recorded on an architectural plan during each class session and the means and standard deviations of the students' locations were calculated in X and Y orientations. The locations of the students in the class were analyzed based on three architectural classifications: interactional zone, distance from the board, and access to the aisles. Final exam scores were used to measure the students' educational achievement. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the student's locations in the class and their attendance and educational achievements. CONCLUSION: two factors may effect on educational achievement: student seating in the high interactional zone and minimal changes in seating location. Seating in the high interaction zone was directly associated with higher performance and inversely correlated with the percentage of absences. This observation is consistent with the view that students in the front of the classroom are likely more motivated and interact with the lecturer more than their classmates.