Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 90(7): 2130-41, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22247112

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this work were to assess alternative linear reaction norm (RN) models for genetic evaluation of Angus cattle in Brazil. That is, we investigated the interaction between genotypes and continuous descriptors of the environmental variation to examine evidence of genotype by environment interaction (G×E) in post-weaning BW gain (PWG) and to compare the environmental sensitivity of national and imported Angus sires. Data were collected by the Brazilian Angus Improvement Program from 1974 to 2005 and consisted of 63,098 records and a pedigree file with 95,896 animals. Six models were implemented using Bayesian inference and compared using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC). The simplest model was M(1), a traditional animal model, which showed the largest DIC and hence the poorest fit when compared with the 4 alternative RN specifications accounting for G×E. In M(2), a 2-step procedure was implemented using the contemporary group posterior means of M(1) as the environmental gradient, ranging from -92.6 to +265.5 kg. Moreover, the benefits of jointly estimating all parameters in a 1-step approach were demonstrated by M(3). Additionally, we extended M(3) to allow for residual heteroskedasticity using an exponential function (M(4)) and the best fitting (smallest DIC) environmental classification model (M(5)) specification. Finally, M(6) added just heteroskedastic residual variance to M(1). Heritabilities were less at harsh environments and increased with the improvement of production conditions for all RN models. Rank correlations among genetic merit predictions obtained by M(1) and by the best fitting RN models M(3) (homoskedastic) and M(5) (heteroskedastic) at different environmental levels ranged from 0.79 and 0.81, suggesting biological importance of G×E in Brazilian Angus PWG. These results suggest that selection progress could be optimized by adopting environment-specific genetic merit predictions. The PWG environmental sensitivity of imported North American origin bulls (0.046 ± 0.009) was significantly larger (P < 0.05) than that of local sires (0.012 ± 0.013). Moreover, PWG of progeny of imported sires exceeded that of native sires in medium and superior production levels. On the other hand, Angus cattle locally selected in Brazil tended to be more robust to environmental changes and hence be more suitable when production environments for potential progeny is uncertain.


Subject(s)
Cattle/genetics , Cattle/physiology , Weight Gain/genetics , Animals , Brazil , Environment , Female , Genotype , Linear Models , Male
2.
J Anim Sci ; 83(8): 1766-79, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16024695

ABSTRACT

Multiple-breed genetic models recently have been demonstrated to account for the heterogenous genetic variances that exist between different beef cattle breed groups. We extend these models to allow for residual heteroskedasticity (heterogeneous residual variances), specified as a function of fixed effects (e.g., sex, breed proportion, breed group heterozygosity) and random effects such as contemporary groups (CG). We additionally specify the residual distributions to be either Gaussian or based on heavier-tailed alternatives such as the Student's t or Slash densities. For each of these three residual densities using either homoskedastic (homogeneous variance) or heteroskedastic error specifications, we analyzed 22,717 postweaning gain records from a Nelore-Hereford population based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo animal model implementation. The heteroskedastic Student's t error model (with estimated df = 7.33 +/- 0.48) was clearly the best-fitting model based on a pseudo-Bayes factor criterion. Breed group heterozygosity and, to a lesser extent, calf sex seemed to be marginally important sources of residual heteroskedasticity. Specifically, the residual variance in F1 animals was estimated to be 0.70 +/- 0.16 times that for purebreds, whereas the male residual variance was estimated to be 1.13 +/- 0.09 times that for females. The CG effects were important random sources of residual heteroskedasticity (i.e., the coefficient of variation of CG-specific residual variances was estimated to be 0.72 +/- 0.06). Purebred Nelores were estimated to have a larger genetic variance (124.84 +/- 21.75 kg2) compared with Herefords (40.89 +/- 6.70 kg2) under the heteroskedastic Student's t error model; however, the converse was observed from results based on a homoskedastic Student's t error model (46.24 +/- 10.90 kg2 and 60.11 +/- 8.54 kg2, respectively). These results indicate that allowing for robustness to outliers and accounting for heteroskedasticity of residual variances has potentially important implications for variance component and genetic parameter estimates from data on multiple-breed populations.


Subject(s)
Cattle/genetics , Genetic Variation , Models, Genetic , Animals , Breeding , Cattle/growth & development , Environment , Female , Inheritance Patterns , Male , Monte Carlo Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL