Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 29(1): 38-42, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11261909

ABSTRACT

An admixture of thiopentone and propofol was evaluated against propofol for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Eighty-one ASA 1 and 2 18- to 65-year-old patients, premedicated with 7.5 mg midazolam orally were assigned randomly to receive either propofol 1% or an admixture of thiopentone and propofol (1.25% and 0.5% respectively), both at a dose of 0.25 ml x kg(-1). Satisfactory conditions for insertion were achieved with the admixture, which was comparable to propofol (73% vs 85%, P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence or severity of gagging, coughing, inadequate jaw relaxation and laryngospasm. The incidence of hypotension was lower in the admixture group (51% vs 78%, P=0.02). The duration of apnoea was not different between the admixture and propofol group (mean 103s vs 109s respectively, P>0.05). We conclude that thiopentone/propofol admixture can be a suitable alternative to propofol for LMA insertion, producing less hypotension while allowing cost savings of up to 45%. An admixture of thiopentone and propofol (1.25% and 0.5% respectively) can produce suitable conditions compared to propofol 1%, for laryngeal mask insertion. In addition to cost containment, the admixture also produces less hypotension.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Combined , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Laryngeal Masks , Propofol/adverse effects , Thiopental/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthetics, Intravenous/economics , Apnea/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Drug Costs , Female , Gagging/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propofol/economics , Thiopental/economics
2.
Anesth Analg ; 91(5): 1203-6, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11049909

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: We investigated the efficacy of IV atropine for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients. Seventy-five patients undergoing transurethral prostate or bladder surgery were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 25), atropine 5 microg/kg (small-dose atropine, n = 25) or atropine 10 microg/kg (large-dose atropine, n = 25) after the induction of spinal anesthesia. All the patients received an IV infusion of 10 mL/kg 0.9% normal saline over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia. The systolic blood pressure decreased in all three groups after spinal anesthesia. There was a significant increase in the mean heart rate in both atropine groups as compared to the placebo group (placebo group: 78 bpm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.6-78.5; small-dose atropine group: 86 bpm, 95% CI 83.9-88.8; large-dose atropine group: 97 bpm, 95% CI 94.5-100.3; P: = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the incidence of hypotension in patients who received atropine (placebo group: 76%, small-dose atropine group: 52%, large-dose atropine group: 40%, P: = 0.03). The mean dose of ephedrine required was significantly decreased in the atropine groups (placebo group: 12.2 mg [SD= 10.5], small-dose atropine group: 7.4 mg [SD= 10.0], large-dose atropine group: 5.4 mg [SD= 8.7 mg], P: = 0.048). The total amount of IV fluid and number of patients requiring metaraminol in addition to 30 mg of ephedrine were not significantly different among the three groups. Significant side effects, such as confusion, ST segment changes or angina were not detected in any of the patients. We conclude that IV atropine may be a useful supplement to the existing methods in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: IV atropine increases heart rate in a dose-dependent manner in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. It reduces the incidence of hypotension and the dose of ephedrine required. Small-dose atropine may be a useful supplement in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Atropine/administration & dosage , Hypotension/prevention & control , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Sodium Chloride/administration & dosage , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypotension/drug therapy , Hypotension/etiology , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 24(2): 224-30, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9133197

ABSTRACT

The quality of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with propofol augmented by alfentanil was investigated as an alternative technique for rapid tracheal intubation. 119 patients aged between 18 and 60 years (ASA 1 and 2) undergoing elective surgery were prospectively studied in a randomized double-blind controlled fashion. Tracheal intubation facilitated by suxamethonium 1.0 mg/kg alfentanil 15 mu g/kg alfentanil 30 mu g/kg or saline control was compared after propofol induction. The quality of laryngoscopy and intubation were graded according to jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing on intubation. Failure to intubate occurred in 4% and 17% with alfentanil 15 mu g/kg and saline control respectively Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients with alfentanil 30 mu g/kg and suxamethonium 1.0 mg/kg. Alfentanil 15 mu g/kg was not statistically significantly different from saline (P = 0.112). Alfentanil 30 mu g/kg provided similar overall intubating conditions (P = 0.5) to suxamethonium 1.0 mg/kg. Alfentanil in both dosages effectively attenuated the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.


Subject(s)
Alfentanil/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Cough/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopy , Male , Mandible/physiology , Masticatory Muscles/physiology , Middle Aged , Muscle Relaxation , Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents/administration & dosage , Placebos , Prospective Studies , Sodium Chloride , Succinylcholine/administration & dosage
4.
Med J Malaysia ; 46(1): 72-81, 1991 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1836042

ABSTRACT

A good overall assessment of the severity of illnesses of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) is not without problems. The APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) prognostic scoring system enables us to stratify acutely ill patients and compare efficiency of ICU therapy in different hospitals. This preliminary study carried out on 100 consecutive admissions to the ICU in University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur showed the spectrum of ICU admissions and the direct relationship between APACHE II score and mortality.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease/mortality , Chronic Disease/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Acute Disease/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units , Malaysia , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL