Selectivity of beta-blockers, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in people with hypoglycaemia: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The association of beta-blockers and their selectivity with mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with and without hypoglycaemia is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insulin-treated patients with diabetes were identified within the UK CPRD database. All-cause deaths, cardiovascular events, and hypoglycaemic episodes were captured to assess the interaction between beta-blocker therapy and selectivity with hypoglycaemia. 13,682 patients, of which 2036 (14.9%) with at least one hypoglycaemic episode, were included; 3148 deaths and 1235 cardiovascular events were recorded during a median of 2.3 and 4.7 years in patients with and without incident hypoglycaemia, respectively. Treatment with any beta-blocker was not associated with risk of death in both patients with and without hypoglycaemia, without significant interaction. Compared to no therapy, non-selective beta-blockers were associated with higher risk of death in patients without hypoglycaemia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.93 [1.26-6.83] in the fully adjusted model) but not in those with hypoglycaemia; interactions was not significant. For beta1-selective beta-blockers, there was no association with mortality in both patients with and without hypoglycaemia, without significant interaction. After missing data imputation, results were consistent for non-selective beta-blockers (HR in patients without hypoglycaemia 1.59 [1.22-2.08]) while indicated a reduced risk of death for beta1-selective beta-blockers in patients with hypoglycaemia (HR 0.76 [0.61-0.94]). Due to few cardiovascular events, complete-case analysis compared only any vs no beta-blocker therapy and indicated no associations with therapy or interaction by hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypoglycaemic episodes, treatment with beta1-selective beta-blockers may potentially reduce the risk of death. These explorative findings and the potential role of confounding by indication need to be evaluated in other studies.

Clinical inertia with regard to intensifying therapy in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin.

AIM: To investigate whether clinical inertia, the failure to intensify treatment regimens when required, exists in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink database between January 2004 and December 2011, with follow-up until December 2013. RESULTS: A total of 11 696 patients were included in the analysis. Among all patients, 36.5% had their treatment intensified during the study period; of these, the treatment of 50.0, 42.5 and 7.4% was intensified with bolus or premix insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, respectively. The median time from initiation of basal insulin to treatment intensification was 4.3 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1, 4.6]. Among patients clinically eligible for treatment intensification [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol)], 30.9% had their treatment regimen intensified. The median time to intensification in this group was 3.7 years (95% CI 3.4, 4.0). Increasing age, duration of diabetes, oral antihyperglycaemic agent usage and Charlson comorbidity index score were associated with a significant delay in the time to intensification (p < 0.05). Among patients with HbA1c ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol), 32.1% stopped basal insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies should be developed to increase the number of patients undergoing therapy intensification and to reduce the delay in intensifying therapy for suitable patients on basal insulin. Initiatives to support patients continuing on insulin are also required.