A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover-style trial of buspirone in functional dysphagia and ineffective esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM) is the manometric correlate of Functional Dysphagia (FD). Currently, there is no accepted therapy for either condition. Buspirone is a serotonin modulating medication and has been shown to augment esophageal peristaltic amplitude in healthy volunteers. We aimed to determine if buspirone improves manometric parameters and symptoms in patients with overlapping IEM/FD. METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover-style trial of 10 patients with IEM/FD. The study consisted of two 2-week treatment arms with a 2-week washout period. Outcomes measured at baseline, end of week 2, and week 6 include high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-14 (MDQ-14), and the GERD-HRQL. RESULTS: The mean age of our 10 patients was 53 ± 9 years and 70% were female. After treatment with buspirone, 30% of patients had normalization of IEM on manometry; however, there was 30% normalization in the placebo group as well. Comparing buspirone to placebo, there was no statistically significant difference in the HREM parameters measured. There was also no statistically significant difference in symptom outcomes for buspirone compared to placebo. Of note, patients had a statistically significant decrease in the total GERD-HRQL total score when treated with placebo compared to baseline levels. DISCUSSION: Despite previous data demonstrating improved esophageal motility in healthy volunteers, our study shows no difference in terms of HREM parameters or symptom scores in IEM/FD patients treated with buspirone compared to placebo. Further research is necessary to identify novel agents for this condition.

Influence of body mass index on the prevalence and progression of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a retrospective analysis (.).

OBJECTIVE: High body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Our aim was to determine if prevalence of dysplasia in BE varies by BMI and study the effect of BMI on progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with endoscopic evidence of BE confirmed by presence of intestinal metaplasia on histology from January 2000 to December 2012 at Cleveland Clinic. Patient demographics, BMI and endoscopic findings such as length of BE, dysplasia in BE and size of hiatal hernia were reviewed. Dysplasia was classified as no dysplasia (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), HGD and EAC. RESULTS: In this cohort of 1239 patients, average BMI was 29.8 ± 6 kg/m(2). There were 228 (18.4%) in group with BMI <25, 236 (19%) in BMI group 25-27.4, 262 (21.1%) in BMI 27.5-29.9, 303 (24.5%) in BMI 30-34.9, 126 (10.2%) in BMI 35-39.9 and 86 (6.8%) in BMI ≥40. Lower BMI groups had lower prevalence of dysplasia while higher BMI groups had higher prevalence of dysplasia (p = 0.002). During mean follow up of 31.6 ± 26 months, there were 14 cases of HGD/EAC in NDBE group and 29 cases of HGD/EAC in LGD group. BMI or BMI change was not associated with progression to HGD/EAC in NDBE. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI was associated with higher prevalence of dysplasia in BE. But once in a surveillance program, higher BMI is not associated with progression of dysplasia in NDBE.