ABSTRACT
There are geographical, regional, and ethnic differences in the phenotypes and endotypes of patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) in different parts of the world. In Asia, aspects of drug hypersensitivity of regional importance include IgE-mediated allergies and T-cell-mediated reactions, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), to beta-lactam antibiotics, antituberculous drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and radiocontrast agents. Delabeling of low-risk penicillin allergy using direct oral provocation tests without skin tests have been found to be useful where the drug plausibility of the index reaction is low. Genetic risk associations of relevance to Asia include human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B*1502 with carbamazepine SCAR, and HLA-B*5801 with allopurinol SCAR in some Asian ethnic groups. There remains a lack of safe and accurate diagnostic tests for antituberculous drug allergy, other than relatively high-risk desensitization regimes to first-line antituberculous therapy. NSAID hypersensitivity is common among both adults and children in Asia, with regional differences in phenotype especially among adults. Low dose aspirin desensitization is an important therapeutic modality in individuals with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity and coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention. Skin testing allows patients with radiocontrast media hypersensitivity to confirm the suspected agent and test for alternatives, especially when contrasted scans are needed for future monitoring of disease relapse or progression, especially cancers.
Subject(s)
Adult , Child , Humans , Allopurinol , Anaphylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Asia , Asian People , Aspirin , Asthma , Carbamazepine , Cicatrix , Contrast Media , Coronary Artery Disease , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Drug Hypersensitivity , Ethnicity , Hypersensitivity , Penicillins , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Phenotype , Recurrence , Skin TestsABSTRACT
In this paper, Figure 1 was misprinted unintentionally.
ABSTRACT
Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection is indicated for multiple skin conditions such as keloid scars, alopecia areata, and hypertrophic lichen planus. Immediate hypersensitivity reaction remains uncommon. We report on a 24-year-old woman who had received multiple intralesional injections with triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort) plus lidocaine for keloid scar treatment without any reaction for the previous 10 years. The immediate reaction occurred 15 minutes after injection, with numbness on her face and 5 minutes later with urticaria on her chest wall and upper extremities, together with hypotension (blood pressure of 90/60 mmHg). Allergology workup revealed positive skin prick test for triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort). Skin tests for other corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone), excipients (carboxymethylcellulose, benzyl alcohol, and polysorbate 80) and lidocaine were negative, including subcutaneous challenge for lidocaine and oral challenge for carboxymethylcellulose. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction must be considered in cases of multiple applications of triamcinolone acetonide injection.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Alopecia Areata , Anaphylaxis , Benzyl Alcohol , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium , Cicatrix , Drug Hypersensitivity , Excipients , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Hypesthesia , Hypotension , Injections, Intralesional , Keloid , Lichen Planus , Lidocaine , Methylprednisolone , Skin , Skin Tests , Thoracic Wall , Triamcinolone Acetonide , Triamcinolone , Upper Extremity , UrticariaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) is an increasingly recognized clinical entity. ACOS significantly impacts on patient outcome compared to isolated asthma or COPD. However, ACOS definition and diagnosis criteria have not been well standardized. ACOS prevalence and clinical features in Thailand has never been studied. Objective: To investigate the prevalence and clinical features of ACOS compared to isolated asthma or COPD among patients with clinician-diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical features of ACOS compared to isolated asthma or COPD among patients with clinician-diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases. METHODS: Spirometry, skin prick test (SPT) and allergens specific IgE (sIgE) were done. Serum total IgE, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophils were measured. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was performed. Smoking history, pollution, biomass exposure and symptoms (Asthma Control Test [ACT], COPD assessment test [CAT], Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale [MMCR]) were assessed. Patients were classified to isolated asthma, COPD or ACOS according to predefined definitions for this study. RESULTS: A total 92 patients were enrolled: 58 patients with clinician-diagnosed of late onset asthma and 34 with clinician-diagnosed COPD. The mean age was 67.4 years. Thirty-four asthma patients (58.6%) were considered to have ACOS with postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7 and/or presence of emphysema on HRCT. In addition, 10 COPD patients (28.6%) were classified as ACOS if they had bronchodilator reversibility (FEV₁ ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL) and positive SPT or sIgE. Hence, total of 44 from 92 patients (47.8%) with obstructive airway diseases were found to have ACOS, while isolated asthma and COPD were found in 24 patients equally. No difference in symptoms assessed by CAT, ACT, or MMRC was found between 3 groups of patients. Neither serum total IgE nor blood eosinophils counts distinguished ACOS from asthma and COPD (p = 0.83 and p = 0.40). FeNO was higher in pure COPD than ACOS and asthma (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: ACOS is prevalent in late-onset asthma or clinician-diagnosed COPD who were treated in tertiary care clinic. However, we found no difference in symptoms, blood eosinophils or serum total IgE between groups.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cats , Humans , Allergens , Asthma , Biomass , Diagnosis , Dyspnea , Emphysema , Eosinophils , Forced Expiratory Volume , Immunoglobulin E , Nitric Oxide , Prevalence , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Skin , Smoke , Smoking , Spirometry , Tertiary Care Centers , Tertiary Healthcare , Thailand , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asthma in the elderly is severe and associated with poor treatment outcome. Although atopy has an important role in pathogenesis, its role in the elderly is unclear, partly due to immune senescence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the associations of Th2-mediated inflammation with asthma severity in the elderly. METHODS: Consecutive asthmatics older than 60 years without severe exacerbation within 8 weeks were enrolled. Atopic status was determined by positive serum specific IgE or skin prick test to common aeroallergens. Serum total IgE was measured simultaneously to exhaled fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FeNO). Asthma control level was assessed by using Thai Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. RESULTS: Total of 44 elderly asthmatic patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.9 years and mean age of asthma diagnosis was 46.6 years. Seventy-seven percent of patients were female. Atopic status was found in 45.5% of patients. Uncontrolled asthma classified as ACT score < 20 was noted in 25% of elderly asthma, but its association with either high serum total IgE (≥120 IU/mL), high FeNO (≥50 ppb) or atopic status was not detected. CONCLUSION: One-fourth of elderly asthmatics were clinically uncontrolled, while atopy was confirmed in 45.5%. Neither high total IgE, high FeNO nor atopic status was associated with uncontrolled asthma in the elderly. Other factors might play role in asthma severity in the elderly, and has to be further investigated.