Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
2.
Lupus ; 32(3): 431-437, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36631440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus are known to have dysregulated immune responses and may have reduced response to vaccination against COVID-19 while being at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. The aim of this study was to identify whether vaccine responses were attenuated in SLE and to assess disease- and treatment-specific associations. METHODS: Patients with SLE were matched by age, sex and ethnic background to healthcare worker healthy controls (HC). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies were measured at 4-8 weeks following the second COVID-19 vaccine dose (either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) using a CE-marked combined ELISA detecting IgG, IgA and IgM (IgGAM). Antibody levels were considered as a continuous variable and in tertiles and compared between SLE patients and HC and associations with medication, disease activity and serological parameters were determined. RESULTS: Antibody levels were lower in 43 SLE patients compared to 40 HC (p < 0.001). There was no association between antibody levels and medication, lupus disease activity, vaccine type or prior COVID infection. Higher serum IgA, but not IgG or IgM, was associated with being in a higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody level tertile (OR [95% CI] 1.820 [1.050, 3.156] p = 0.033). Similarly, higher lymphocyte count was also associated with being in a higher tertile of anti-SARS-CoV-2 (OR 3.330 [1.505, 7.366] p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE have lower antibody levels following 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines compared to HC. In SLE lower lymphocyte counts and serum IgA levels are associated with lower antibody levels post vaccination, potentially identifying a subgroup of patients who may therefore be at increased risk of infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , BNT162 Vaccine , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Vaccination , Lymphocyte Count , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin M
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(2): 668-675, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686924

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BILAG-2004 index is associated with the development of damage in a cohort of SLE patients. Mortality and development of damage were examined. METHODS: This was a multicentre longitudinal study. Patients were recruited within 12 months of achieving fourth ACR classification criterion for SLE. Data were collected on disease activity, damage, SLE-specific drug exposure, cardiovascular risk factors, antiphospholipid syndrome status and death at every visit. This study ran from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse mortality and development of new damage. Poisson regression was used to examine potential explanatory variables for development of new damage. RESULTS: A total of 273 SLE patients were recruited with total follow-up of 1767 patient-years (median 73.4 months). There were 6348 assessments with disease activity scores available for analysis. During follow-up, 13 deaths and 114 new damage items (in 83 patients) occurred. The incidence rate for development of damage was higher in the first 3 years before stabilizing at a lower rate. Overall rate for damage accrual was 61.1 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 50.6, 73.8). Analysis showed that active disease scores according to BILAG-2004 index (systems scores of A or B, counts of systems with A and BILAG-2004 numerical score) were associated with development of new damage. Low disease activity (LDA) states [BILAG-2004 LDA and BILAG Systems Tally (BST) persistent LDA] were inversely associated with development of damage. CONCLUSIONS: BILAG-2004 index is associated with new damage. BILAG-2004 LDA and BST persistent LDA can be considered as treatment targets.


Subject(s)
Heart Disease Risk Factors , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32019728

ABSTRACT

Advances in therapeutics, including a wider use of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have substantially improved the management of rheumatic diseases, resulting in more women with severe disease considering pregnancy. Every clinical rheumatologist has encountered a woman who wishes to have a pregnancy - or who presents already pregnant - and who values the importance of reliable information on rheumatic diseases and safety of medications in pregnancy. This chapter summarises current evidence and knowledge on the use of 'Medications in pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with rheumatic diseases' and considers paternal medication use at the time of conception.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Feeding , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Rheumatology
13.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 13(1): 42-6, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23472494

ABSTRACT

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease associated with significant morbidity. The 2009 NICE guidance advises on the management of patients with RA. In this study, we undertook a survey to assess the implementation of the guidance into practice across the Midlands. In total, 19 rheumatology units participated, of which nine have designated early inflammatory arthritis clinics (EIAC). Data for 311 patients with RA attending clinics were collected during a two week period. The median time from symptom onset to first visit was four months. Of the patients, 95.6% were seen within 12 weeks of referral. Of those seen in EIAC, 75.9% had erosions documented on X-rays versus 49.4% of non-EIAC patients. In addition, 57.9% of patients were offered combination disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) therapy in EIAC, versus 30.4% in non-EIAC units. Monthly disease-activity scores were calculated more in patients attending EIAC than non-EIAC units (51.1% versus 25.4%). Based on our results, there is significant regional variation in implementation of the NICE guidance. In addition, patients with RA attending EIACs are more likely to receive a treat-to-target approach.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Disease Management , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...