In-hospital survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter real-world data study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to healthcare systems globally. Millions of people have been infected, and millions of deaths have been reported worldwide. Glucocorticoids have attracted worldwide attention for their potential efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids with different dosages and treatment durations have been studied in patients with different severities, with a suitable dosage and treatment duration not yet defined. This study aimed to investigate whether in-hospital survival differs between critically ill patients treated with low-dose glucocorticoids, high-dose glucocorticoids or no glucocorticoids. All critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Charité Hospital-Universitätsmedizin Berlin between February 2020 and December 2021 with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving supplemental oxygen were eligible to participate in this multicenter real-world data study. Patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups: the high corticosteroid dose (HighC) group (receiving 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), the low corticosteroid dose (LowC) group (receiving less than 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), or the no corticosteroid (NoC) group. Overall survival and risk effects were compared among groups within the total observation period, as well as at 35 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of death between the treatment groups. Out of 1561 critically ill COVID-19 patients, 1014 were included in the baseline analysis. In the survival study, 1009 patients were assigned to the NoC (n = 346), HighC (n = 552), or LowC group (n = 111). The baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except for age, BMI, APACHE II score, SOFA and SAPS II. While the 35-day survival did not show any differences, a landmark analysis of the patients surviving beyond 35 days revealed differences between groups. The restricted mean survival time was 112 days in the LowC group [95% CI: 97 - 128], 133 days in the HighC group [95% CI: 124 - 141] and 144 days in the NoC group [95% CI: 121 - 167]. The multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that, regardless of age, sex, health status or invasive oxygenation, a low-dose treatment increased the hazard of death of critically ill COVID-19 patients by a factor of 2.09 ([95% CI: 0.99, 4.4], p = 0.05) and a high-dose corticosteroid treatment increased the risk by a factor of 1.07 ([95% CI: 0.53, 2.15], p = 0.85) compared to no treatment with glucocorticoids. The analysis reveals that corticosteroid treatment does not influence the survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit within 35 days. Our evaluations further suggest that regardless of ventilation status, the decision-making process for administering corticosteroid therapy should account for the individual severity of the illness.

The influence of concomitant antidepressant and antipsychotic medication on antidepressant effect and seizure duration of electroconvulsive therapy.

Background: A significant proportion of patients with a depressive disorder show resistance to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic antidepressant treatments. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still one of the most effective treatment methods, especially in the acute phase. In everyday clinical practice, this usually accompanies pharmacological treatment. It has been shown that pharmacological treatment following acute ECT treatment reduces the rate of relapses. However, the effect of various antidepressants (ADs) and antipsychotics (APs) on the effect during the course of ECT has rarely been investigated. Methods: In this retrospective chart review study, the data of 104 depressive patients treated with ECT were examined. We analyzed the influence of concomitant administration of AD and AP or no psychotropic medication on the effect of ECT using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We further analyzed the influence of the ADs Bupropion, Venlafaxine, and Sertraline or no AD and the influence of augmentation with Aripiprazole or Quetiapine or Olanzapine. Results/discussion: Psychotropic medication did not have an impact on antidepressant efficacy of ECT as measured with the MADRS scores. In addition, the comparison between the antidepressant or antipsychotic medications themselves did not show any significant difference. However, we found a significantly different seizure duration depending on the antidepressant substance that patients received during ECT (p = .008). ECT treatment itself led to a highly significant reduction of 13.3 points in the MADRS (p <.001). Conclusion: Taken together, our study underlines that concomitant psychotropic medication while doing electroconvulsive therapy does not bare the risk of prolonged seizure duration or does it reduce the effectiveness of ECT. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the effect of treatment with antidepressants in combination with antipsychotics while doing ECT. In light of our results, this combination therapy is safe and effective. Bearing in mind the delay in onset of antidepressant action of medication and the importance of antidepressant medication for relapse prevention, this study further supports the recommendation that psychotropic medication should be given in adjunction to ECT.

Feasibility of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - An Ambispective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce postoperative complications. The feasibility of GDFT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients under general anesthesia has not yet been demonstrated. We examined whether GDFT could be applied in patients undergoing TAVR in general anesthesia and its impact on outcomes. METHODS: Forty consecutive TAVR patients in the prospective intervention group with GDFT were compared to 40 retrospective TAVR patients without GDFT. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective TAVR in general anesthesia, no participation in another interventional study. Exclusion criteria were lack of ability to consent study participation, pregnant or nursing patients, emergency procedures, preinterventional decubitus, tissue and/or extremity ischemia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease grade IV, atrial fibrillation or other severe heart rhythm disorder, necessity of usage of intra-aortic balloon pump. Stroke volume and stroke volume variation were determined with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and optimized according to a predefined algorithm using 250 ml of hydroxyethyl starch. RESULTS: Stroke volume could be increased by applying GDFT. The intervention group received more colloids and fewer crystalloids than control group. Total volume replacement did not differ. The incidence of overall complications as well as intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were comparable between both groups. GDFT was associated with a reduced incidence of delirium. Duration of anesthesia was shorter in the intervention group. Duration of the interventional procedure did not differ. CONCLUSION: GDFT in the intervention group was associated with a reduced incidence of postinterventional delirium.

In-hospital mortality after prehospital endotracheal intubation versus alternative methods of airway management in trauma patients. A cohort study from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

PURPOSE: Prehospital airway management in trauma is a key component of care and is associated with particular risks. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the gold standard, while extraglottic airway devices (EGAs) are recommended alternatives. There is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness. In this retrospective analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®, we compared ETI with EGA in prehospital airway management regarding in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma. METHODS: We included cases only from German hospitals with a minimum Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 2 and age ≥ 16 years. All patients without prehospital airway protection were excluded. We performed a multivariate logistic regression to adjust with the outcome measure of hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included n = 10,408 cases of whom 92.5% received ETI and 7.5% EGA. The mean injury severity score was higher in the ETI group (28.8 ± 14.2) than in the EGA group (26.3 ± 14.2), and in-hospital mortality was comparable: ETI 33.0%; EGA 30.7% (27.5 to 33.9). After conducting logistic regression, the odds ratio for mortality in the ETI group was 1.091 (0.87 to 1.37). The standardized mortality ratio was 1.04 (1.01 to 1.07) in the ETI group and 1.1 (1.02 to 1.26) in the EGA group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mortality rates between the use of ETI or EGA, or the ratio of expected versus observed mortality when using ETI.

How Would I Treat My Own Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Perioperative Considerations From the Anesthesiologist Perspective.

A thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) can be potentially life-threatening due to its associated risk of rupture. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, performed as endovascular repair and/or open surgery, is the recommended therapy of choice. Hemodynamic instability, severe blood loss, and spinal cord or cerebral ischemia are some potential hazards the perioperative team has to face during these procedures. Therefore, preoperative risk assessment and intraoperative anesthesia management addressing these potential hazards are essential to improving patients' outcomes. Based on a presented index case, an overview focusing on anesthetic measures to identify perioperatively and manage these risks in TAAA repair is provided.

Influence of a chronic beta-blocker therapy on perioperative opioid consumption - a post hoc secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blocker (BB) therapy plays a central role in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. An increasing number of patients with cardiovascular diseases undergoe noncardiac surgery, where opioids are an integral part of the anesthesiological management. There is evidence to suggest that short-term intravenous BB therapy may influence perioperative opioid requirements due to an assumed cross-talk between G-protein coupled beta-adrenergic and opioid receptors. Whether chronic BB therapy could also have an influence on perioperative opioid requirements is unclear. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational (BioCog) study was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective noncardiac surgery as well as total intravenous general anesthesia without the use of regional anesthesia and duration of anesthesia ≥ 60 min. Two groups were defined: patients with and without BB in their regular preopreative medication. The administered opioids were converted to their respective morphine equivalent doses. Multiple regression analysis was performed using the morphine-index to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: A total of 747 patients were included in the BioCog study in the study center Berlin. 106 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37 were on chronic BB. The latter were preoperatively significantly more likely to have arterial hypertension (94.6%), chronic renal failure (27%) and hyperlipoproteinemia (51.4%) compared to patients without BB. Both groups did not differ in terms of cumulative perioperative morphine equivalent dose (230.9 (BB group) vs. 214.8 mg (Non-BB group)). Predictive factors for increased morphine-index were older age, male sex, longer duration of anesthesia and surgery of the trunk. In a model with logarithmised morphine index, only gender (female) and duration of anesthesia remained predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic BB therapy was not associated with a reduced perioperative opioid consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02265263 ) on the 15.10.2014 with the principal investigator being Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Claudia Spies.

Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies.

Haemodynamic monitoring and management are cornerstones of perioperative care. The goal of haemodynamic management is to maintain organ function by ensuring adequate perfusion pressure, blood flow, and oxygen delivery. We here present guidelines on "Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery" that were prepared by 18 experts on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und lntensivmedizin; DGAI).

Feasibility of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - An Ambispective Analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce postoperative complications. The feasibility of GDFT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients under general anesthesia has not yet been demonstrated. We examined whether GDFT could be applied in patients undergoing TAVR in general anesthesia and its impact on outcomes. Methods: Forty consecutive TAVR patients in the prospective intervention group with GDFT were compared to 40 retrospective TAVR patients without GDFT. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective TAVR in general anesthesia, no participation in another interventional study. Exclusion criteria were lack of ability to consent study participation, pregnant or nursing patients, emergency procedures, preinterventional decubitus, tissue and/or extremity ischemia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease grade IV, atrial fibrillation or other severe heart rhythm disorder, necessity of usage of intra-aortic balloon pump. Stroke volume and stroke volume variation were determined with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and optimized according to a predefined algorithm using 250 ml of hydroxyethyl starch. Results: Stroke volume could be increased by applying GDFT. The intervention group received more colloids and fewer crystalloids than control group. Total volume replacement did not differ. The incidence of overall complications as well as intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were comparable between both groups. GDFT was associated with a reduced incidence of delirium. Duration of anesthesia was shorter in the intervention group. Duration of the interventional procedure did not differ. Conclusion: GDFT in the intervention group was associated with a reduced incidence of postinterventional delirium.

Cross-regulation of antibody responses against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and commensal microbiota via molecular mimicry.

The commensal microflora provides a repertoire of antigens that illicit mucosal antibodies. In some cases, these antibodies can cross-react with host proteins, inducing autoimmunity, or with other microbial antigens. We demonstrate that the oral microbiota can induce salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies via molecular mimicry. Anti-Spike IgG antibodies in the saliva correlated with enhanced abundance of Streptococcus salivarius 1 month after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Several human commensal bacteria, including S. salivarius, were recognized by SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and induced cross-reactive anti-Spike antibodies in mice, facilitating SARS-CoV-2 clearance. A specific S. salivarius protein, RSSL-01370, contains regions with homology to the Spike receptor-binding domain, and immunization of mice with RSSL-01370 elicited anti-Spike IgG antibodies in the serum. Additionally, oral S. salivarius supplementation enhanced salivary anti-Spike antibodies in vaccinated individuals. Altogether, these data show that distinct species of the human microbiota can express molecular mimics of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, potentially enhancing protective immunity.

The role of beta-blocker drugs in critically ill patients: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: The role of ß-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of ß-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of ß-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's care process. METHODS: The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of ß-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus. RESULTS: The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of ß-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration. CONCLUSION: ß-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.

Influence of timing of Levosimendan administration on outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Purpose: Though a subgroup analysis has shown improved survival for patients suffering severely reduced ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, RCTs were not able to demonstrate overall beneficial effects of perioperative Levosimendan in cardiac surgery. This might be due to Levosimendan's pharmacokinetics reaching a steady-state concentration only 4-8 h after administration. Thus, this study now analysed the influence of timing of Levosimendan administration on perioperative outcome in cardiac surgery patients preoperatively presenting with severely reduced ventricular function and therefore considered at high-risk for intra- or postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. We hypothesized that prolonged preoperative Levosimendan administration ("preconditioning") would reduce mortality. Methods: All adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2018 perioperatively receiving Levosimendan were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study (n = 498). Patients were stratified into 3 groups: Levosimendan started on the day prior to surgery ("preop"), Levosimendan started on the day of surgery ("intraop") or post ICU admission ("postop"). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, outcomes defined according to proposed standard definitions for perioperative outcome research were compared between groups. Results: After PSM, there were no significant differences in patients' characteristics, comorbidities and type/priority of surgery between groups. Compared to intraop or postop Levosimendan treatment, preop treated patients had significantly lower in-hospital-mortality (preop vs. intraop. vs. postop = 16,7% vs. 33,3% vs. 42,3%), duration of mechanical ventilation and rate of continuous renal replacement therapy. Conclusions: Prolonged preoperative treatment with Levosimendan of cardiac surgery patients preoperatively presenting with severely reduced left ventricular function might be beneficial in terms of postoperative outcome. Our results are in line with recent experts' recommendations concerning the prolonged perioperative use of Levosimendan. We strongly recommend that future randomized trials include this "preconditioning" treatment as an experimental arm.

Serum TGF-ß as a predictive biomarker for severe disease and fatality of COVID-19.

For targeted intervention in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is a high medical need for biomarkers that predict disease progression and severity in the first days after symptom onset. This study assessed the utility of early transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) serum levels in COVID-19 patients to predict disease severity, fatality, and response to dexamethasone therapy. Patients with severe COVID-19 had significantly higher TGF-ß levels (416 pg/mL) as compared to patients with mild (165 pg/mL, p < 0.0001) or moderate COVID-19 (241 pg/mL; p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics area under the curve values were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.99, cut-off: 255 pg/mL) for mild versus severe COVID-19, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.65-1.0, cut-off: 202 pg/mL) for moderate versus severe COVID-19. Patients who died of severe COVID-19 had significantly higher TGF-ß levels (453 pg/mL) as compared to convalescent patients (344 pg/mL), and TGF-ß levels predicted fatality (area under the curve: 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-0.96). TGF-ß was significantly reduced in severely ill patients treated with dexamethasone (301 pg/mL) as compared to untreated patients (416 pg/mL; p < 0.05). Early TGF-ß serum levels in COVID-19 patients predict, with high accuracy, disease severity, and fatality. In addition, TGF-ß serves as a specific biomarker to assess response to dexamethasone treatment.

Die perioperative Gabe von Tranexamsäure. / The Perioperative Application of Tranexamic Acid.

The application of tranexamic acid (TXA) during endoprosthetic surgical procedures has significantly increased in recent years. Due its ability to reduce perioperative blood loss and avert the need for blood transfusions as well as wound drainage, TXA is becoming part of a 'standard practice'. However, TXA is currently not approved for the application during endoprosthetic procedures and therefore, a benefit-risk analysis should always be conducted. Prophylactic administration of TXA without prior patient consent is only justified if fibrinolytic bleeding is expected and there are no contraindications or relevant risk factors for thromboembolic complications. Respectively, no patient consent is required when a therapeutic dose of TXA is administered in the context of fibrinolytic bleeding. The following guidelines provide updated recommendations based on the current state of knowledge on TXA optimal timing, routes of administration and dosing regimen.

A comprehensive echocardiographic analysis during simulated hypovolaemia: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Peri-operative and critically ill patients often experience mild to moderate hypovolaemic shock with preserved mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and decreased stroke volume index (SVI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters during simulated mild to moderate central hypovolaemia. DESIGN: This was a prospective preclinical study. SETTING: Laboratory trial performed in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy male volunteers underwent graded central hypovolaemia using a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) chamber with a stepwise decrease to simulate a mild (-15 mmHg), mild-to-moderate (-30 mmHg), and moderate state of hypovolaemic shock (-45 mmHg). During every stage, a transthoracic echocardiography examination (TTE) was performed by a certified examiner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic and diastolic myocardial performance markers, as well as cardiac volumes were recorded during simulated hypovolaemia and compared to baseline values. RESULTS: During simulated hypovolaemia via LBNP, SVI decreased progressively at all stages, whereas MAP and HR did not consistently change. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction decreased at -30 and -45 mmHg. Simultaneously with SVI decline, LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS), tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion (TAPSE), and right ventricular RV S' and left-atrial end-systolic volume (LA ESV) decreased compared to baseline at all stages. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, simulated central hypovolaemia using LBNP did not induce consistent changes in MAP and HR. SVI decreased and was associated with deteriorated right- and left-ventricular function, observed with echocardiography. The decreased filling status was characterised by decreased LA ESV. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03481855.

Identification of Perioperative Procedural and Hemodynamic Risk Factors for Developing Colonic Ischemia after Ruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

(1) Background: This retrospective study evaluated perioperative and intensive care unit (ICU) variables to predict colonic ischemia (CI) after infrarenal ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) surgery. (2) Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of the patients treated for infrarenal RAAA from January 2011 to December 2020 in our hospital. (3) Results: A total of 135 (82% male) patients were admitted to ICU after treatment of infrarenal RAAA. The median age of all patients was 75 years (IQR 68-81 years). Of those, 24 (18%) patients developed CI, including 22 (92%) cases within the first three postoperative days. CI was found more often after open repair compared to endovascular treatment (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.021). Laboratory findings in the first seven PODs revealed statistically significant differences between CI and non-CI patients for serum lactate, minimum pH, serum bicarbonate, and platelet count. Norepinephrine (NE) was used in 92 (68%) patients during ICU stay. The highest daily dose of norepinephrine was administered to CI patients at POD1. Multivariable analysis revealed that NE > 64 µg/kg (RD 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001), operating time ≥ 200 min (RD 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.31, p = 0.042), and pH < 7.3 (RD 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.35, p = 0.019), significantly predicted the development of CI. A total of 23 (17%) patients died during the hospital stay, including 8 (33%) patients from the CI group and 15 (7%) from the non-CI group (p = 0.032). (4) Conclusions: CI after RAAA is a sever complication occurring most frequently within the first 3 postoperative days. Our study identified many surrogate markers associated with colonic ischemia after aortic RAAA, including norepinephrine dose > 64 µg/kg, operating time ≥ 200 min, and PH < 7.3. Future studies are needed to support these results.

[Risk factors for postoperative hypoxemia during transport to the postanesthesia care unit and influence of transport monitoring : A retrospective propensity score-matched databank analysis]. / Risikofaktoren für postoperative Hypoxämie während des Transportes in den Aufwachraum und Einfluss von Transport-Monitoring : Eine retrospektive Propensity-Score-gematchte Datenbankanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Within a central operating room area, after general anesthesia (GA) patients are at risk of hypoxemia during transport to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU); however, specific risk factors have not been conclusively clarified and uniform recommendations for monitoring vital signs during transport within a central operating room area complex do not exist. The purpose of this retrospective database analysis was to identify risk factors for hypoxemia during this transport and to determine whether the use of transport monitoring (TM) affects the initial value of peripheral venous oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the PACU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This analysis was performed on a retrospectively extracted dataset of procedures in GA within a central operating room area of a tertiary care hospital from 2015 to 2020. The emergence from GA was conducted in the operating room with subsequent transport to the PACU. The transport distance was between 31 and 72 m. Risk factors for initial hypoxemia in the PACU, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 90%, were determined using multivariate analysis. After splitting the dataset into patients without TM (group OM) and with TM (group MM) and propensity score matching, the influence of TM on initial SpO2 and the Aldrete score after arrival in the PACU were examined. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From a total of 22,638 complete datasets included in the analysis, 8 risk factors for initial hypoxemia in PACU were identified: age > 65 years, body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), intraoperative airway driving pressure (∆p) > 15 mbar and positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) > 5 mbar, intraoperative administration of a long-acting opioids, first preoperative SpO2 < 97%, and last SpO2 < 97% measured after emergence from anesthesia before transport. At least 1 risk factor for postoperative hypoxemia was present in 90% of all patients. After propensity score matching, 3362 datasets per group remained for analysis of the influence of TM. Patients transported with TM revealed a higher SpO2 at PACU arrival (MM 97% [94; 99%], OM 96% [94; 99%], p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, this difference between groups remained in the presence of one or more risk factors (MM 97% [94; 99%], OM 96% [94; 98%], p < 0.001, n = 6044) but was not detectable in the absence of risk factors for hypoxemia (MM 97% [97; 100%], OM 99% [97; 100%], p < 0.393, n = 680). Furthermore, the goal of an Aldrete score > 8 at PACU arrival was achieved significantly more often in monitored patients (MM 2830 [83%], OM: 2665 [81%], p = 0.004). Critical hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%) at PACU arrival had an overall low occurrence within propensity matched datasets and showed no difference between groups (MM: 161 [5%], OM 150 [5%], p = 0.755). According to these results, consistent use of TM leads to a higher SpO2 and Aldrete score at PACU arrival, even after a short transport distance within an operating room area. Consequently, it appears to be reasonable to avoid unmonitored transport after general anesthesia, even for short distances.

A prospective phase IIA multicenter double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of inhaled Tobramycin in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (iToVAP).

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of ventilated pneumonia is often unsuccessful, even when patients are treated according to current guidelines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the adjunctive inhaled Tobramycin in patients with pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens in addition to the standard systemic treatment. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 26 patients in medical and surgical ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen patients were assigned to the Tobramycin Inhal group and 12 patients to the control group. The microbiological eradication of the Gram-negative pathogens was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.001). The probability of eradication was 100% in the intervention group [95% Confidence Interval: 0.78-1.0] and 25% in the control group [95% CI: 0.09-0.53]. The increased eradication frequency was not associated with increased patient survival. CONCLUSION: Inhaled aerosolized Tobramycin demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia. The probability of eradication in the intervention group was 100%. However, the successful eradication was not associated with a reduction in systemic anti-infective therapy, a shorter ICU stay, or even a survival benefit. In the presence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens that are sensitive only to colistin and/or aminoglycosides, supplemental inhaled therapy with nebulizers suitable for this purpose should be considered in addition to systemic antibiotic therapy.

Quality contract 'prevention of postoperative delirium in the care of elderly patients' study protocol: a non-randomised, pre-post, monocentric, prospective trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium (POD) is seen in approximately 15% of elderly patients and is related to poorer outcomes. In 2017, the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss) introduced a 'quality contract' (QC) as a new instrument to improve healthcare in Germany. One of the four areas for improvement of in-patient care is the 'Prevention of POD in the care of elderly patients' (QC-POD), as a means to reduce the risk of developing POD and its complications.The Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Health Care identified gaps in the in-patient care of elderly patients related to the prevention, screening and treatment of POD, as required by consensus-based and evidence-based delirium guidelines. This paper introduces the QC-POD protocol, which aims to implement these guidelines into the clinical routine. There is an urgent need for well-structured, standardised and interdisciplinary pathways that enable the reliable screening and treatment of POD. Along with effective preventive measures, these concepts have a considerable potential to improve the care of elderly patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The QC-POD study is a non-randomised, pre-post, monocentric, prospective trial with an interventional concept following a baseline control period. The QC-POD trial was initiated on 1 April 2020 between Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the German health insurance company BARMER and will end on 30 June 2023. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients 70 years of age or older that are scheduled for a surgical procedure requiring anaesthesia and insurance with the QC partner (BARMER). Exclusion criteria included patients with a language barrier, moribund patients and those unwilling or unable to provide informed consent. The QC-POD protocol provides perioperative intervention at least two times per day, with delirium screening and non-pharmacological preventive measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (EA1/054/20). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04355195.