Simulation-based team-training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), rapid treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is crucial for good clinical outcome. Weekly simulation-based team-training of the stroke treatment team was implemented, resulting in faster treatment times. The aim of this study was to assess whether this time reduction led to a higher proportion of stroke mimics (SMs) among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS, and whether these SM patients were harmed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: All suspected AIS patients treated with IVT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were prospectively registered. In 2017, weekly in situ simulation-based team-training involving the whole stroke treatment team was introduced. To analyze possible unintended effects of simulation training, the proportion of SMs among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS were identified by clinical and radiological evaluation. Additionally, we identified the extent of symptomatic ICH (sICH) in IVT-treated SM patients. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, 959 patients were treated with IVT for symptoms of AIS. After introduction of simulation training, the proportion of patients treated with IVT who were later diagnosed as SMs increased significantly (15.9% vs. 24.4%, p = .003). There were no ICH complications in the SM patients treated before, whereas two SM patients suffered from asymptomatic ICH after introduction of simulation training (p = 1.0). When subgrouping SMs into prespecified categories, only the group diagnosed with peripheral vertigo increased significantly (2.5% vs. 8.6%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training of the acute stroke treatment team was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients treated with IVT for a suspected AIS who were later diagnosed with peripheral vertigo. The proportion of other SM groups among IVT-treated patients did not change significantly. No sICH was detected in IVT-treated SM patients.

Impact of immediate and continuous heart rate feedback by dry electrode ECG on time to initiation of ventilation after birth: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: 3%-8% of newborns need positive pressure ventilation (PPV) after birth. Heart rate (HR) is considered the most sensitive indicator of the newborns' condition and response to resuscitative interventions. According to guidelines, HR should be assessed and PPV initiated within 60 s after birth in non-breathing newborns. Dry electrode ECG can provide accurate feedback on HR immediately after birth and continuously during resuscitation. The impact of early and continuous HR feedback is unknown. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre randomised controlled trial seeks to determine if HR feedback by dry electrode ECG immediately after birth and continuously during newborn resuscitation results in more timely initiation of PPV, improved ventilation and short-term outcomes compared with standard HR assessment.In all newborns≥34 gestational weeks, the dry electrode ECG sensor is placed on the upper abdomen immediately after birth as an additional modality of HR assessment. The device records and stores HR signals. In intervention subjects, the HR display is visible to guide decision-making and further management, in control subjects the display is masked. Standard HR assessment is by stethoscope, gel-electrode ECG and/or pulse oximetry (PO).Time of birth is registered in the Liveborn app. Time of initiation and duration of PPV is calculated from video recordings. Ventilation parameters are retrieved from the ventilation monitor, oxygen saturation and HR from the PO and gel-electrode ECG monitors.The primary endpoint is proportion of resuscitated newborns who receive PPV within 60 s after birth. To detect a 50% increase with power of 90% using an overall significance level of 0.05 and 1 interim analysis, 169 newborns are needed in each group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval by the Norwegian National Research Ethics Committee West (2018/338). Parental consent is sought at routine screening early in pregnancy. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03849781.