ABSTRACT
The early psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown is greater in people with mental disorders. This study explored the differences in the psychological impact on people with an anxiety disorder by sex in Spain.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Male , Pandemics , Sex Characteristics , Anxiety/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Communicable Disease Control , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , DepressionABSTRACT
Introducción. El impacto psicológico en las etapas iniciales de la pandemia por COVID-19 y el confinamiento fue mayor en personas con trastornos mentales. En este estudio se exploraron las diferencias en el impacto psicológico según el sexo en personas con trastorno de ansiedad en España. Metodología. Estudio transversal, descriptivo y comparativo de los datos aportados por los participantes en una encuesta online anónima realizada entre el 19 y el 26 de marzo de 2020. El cuestionario ad hoc incluyó datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y variables relacionadas con COVID-19,junto con preguntas sobre estrategias de afrontamiento y las versiones en español de la Escala de Escalas de Depresión Ansiedad Estrés (DASS-21) y la Escala de Impacto del Estresor(IES). Se utilizaron análisis descriptivos bivariados y modelos de regresión logística. Resultados. De los 21.207 participantes, se analizaron1617 (7,6%) personas con trastorno de ansiedad autoinformado [1347 (83,3%) mujeres; 270 (16,7%) varones]. El impacto psicológico fue mayor en las mujeres que en los hombres con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cada subescala del DASS-21 y subescalas del IES. Después de ajustar por posibles variables de confusión, se observó que ser mujer se asoció con puntuaciones más altas en las subescalas de pensamientos intrusivos y evitativos. Conclusiones. Nuestro estudio sugiere que las mujeres con trastorno de ansiedad son un grupo vulnerable a un mayor impacto negativo en la salud mental y, especialmente, en los síntomas relacionados con el trastorno de estrés postraumático. (AU)
Background. The early psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown is greater in peoplewith mental disorders. This study explored the differences in the psychological impact on people with an anxiety disorder by sex in Spain. Methods. Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study of the data provided by participants in an anonymous online survey between March 19 and 26, 2020. Thead hoc questionnaire included sociodemographic, clinical,and variable data related to COVID-19, along with questions about coping strategies, and the Spanish versions ofthe Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) andImpact of Event Scale (IES). Descriptive bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were used. Results. Of the 21,207 participants, 1617 (7.6%) people with self-reported anxiety disorder were analyzed [1347(83.3%) females; 270 (16.7%) males]. The psychological impact was greater on women than men with statistically significant differences in each subscale of the DASS-21and subscales of the IES. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, it was observed that being awoman was associated with higher scores on the intrusiveand avoidant thoughts subscales. Conclusions. Our study suggests that women with ananxiety disorder are a group vulnerable to a greater negative impact on mental health and, especially, symptomsr elated to post-traumatic stress disorder. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Psychosocial Impact , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Sex Distribution , Spain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , PsychologyABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Sleep and circadian disturbances have been widely studied in patients with bipolar disorder. However, there is no clear evidence about the role of peripheral biomarkers of the circadian cycle in this population. This systematic review aims to identify potential endocrine blood biomarkers of circadian rhythms and study their relationship with sleep problems in these patients.MethodsAn electronic search was performed of PubMed and PsycINFO databases. It included articles about the topic from 1991 through 2021. The search strategy was: ("peripheral biomarkers" OR "biological markers" OR biomarker OR cortisol OR melatonin OR orexin OR hypocretin) AND (blood OR serum OR plasma) AND (sleep-wake OR "circadian rhythm" OR sleep OR insomnia) AND "bipolar."ResultsAfter excluding duplicates, 92 records were obtained. Only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria (n=499; bipolar disorder=125; unipolar depression=148; schizophrenia=80; controls=146). The endocrine parameters analyzed were: cortisol (3 studies), melatonin (1 study), and orexin-A (1 study). Overall, no significant associations were detected between these biomarkers and sleep disturbances, assessed with subjective (psychometric evaluation) and/or objective (polysomnography) measures.ConclusionThis review highlights the lack of studies exploring the role of endocrine biomarkers related to circadian function in the pathophysiology of sleep disturbances in bipolar disorder. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Sleep , Circadian Rhythm , Sleep Wake Disorders , Bipolar Disorder , Hydrocortisone , MelatoninABSTRACT
COVID-19 is an infectious disease that has affected millions of people worldwide, Spain being one of the countries most affected by the pandemic. It is key to study its impact on the mental health of the Spanish population during the lockdown situation.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Avoidance Learning , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Depression , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Community Mental Health Services/methods , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2 , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Introducción: La COVID-19 es una enfermedad infecciosa que está afectando a millones de personas alrededor delmundo, siendo España uno de los países más afectados porla pandemia. Es fundamental evaluar el impacto en la saludmental de la población española durante el periodo de confinamiento. El objetivo es analizar las respuestas desadaptativas en cada comunidad autónoma durante las dos primerassemanas tras la declaración del estado de alarma en España.Metodología. A través de un cuestionario online, serecogieron variables clínicas y sociodemográficas de los participantes del 19 al 26 de marzo. Para estudiar las respuestasdesadaptativas, se utilizaron los cuestionarios DASS-21 y EIE.Resultados. 21.152 personas completaron el cuestionario.La edad media fue 39,75 (DE 14,039) y el 69,6 % eran mujeres.La mayoría de los participantes vivía en Asturias (36,2 %) yCantabria (11,9 %). La respuesta desadaptativa más frecuentede la muestra fueron los síntomas depresivos (46,7 %), seguidadel estrés (33,2 %) y la ansiedad (10,7 %). Los resultados dela DASS-21 desvelaron que en Andalucía [n = 1979 (9,3 %)]se observó un mayor porcentaje en los tres dominios: síntomas depresivos (59,7 %), estrés (41,7 %) y ansiedad (16,2 %).Castilla-La Mancha tuvo el porcentaje más alto de respuestaintrusiva (31,2 %) y Andalucía de respuesta evitativa (55,7 %).Conclusiones. Casi la mitad de la muestra presentórespuestas desadaptativas, siendo los síntomas depresivos yla conducta evitativa las más frecuentes. El impacto sobrela salud mental durante y tras eventos traumáticos de granescala debería de abordarse minuciosamente para minimizarlas respuestas desadaptativas en la población general. (AU)
Introduction: COVID-19 is an infectious disease that hasaffected millions of people worldwide, Spain being one ofthe countries most affected by the pandemic. It is key tostudy its impact on the mental health of the Spanish population during the lockdown situation.The aim is to analyse maladaptive responses in eachautonomous community during the first two weeks afterthe state of emergency was declared in Spain.Material and Methods. Through an online questionnaire, clinical and sociodemographic information was collected from participants between 19 and 26 March 2020. TheDASS-21 and the IES questionnaires were used to evaluatethe maladaptive psychological responses.Results. A total of 21,152 people completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 39.75 (SD 14.039), and 69.6% werewomen. Most of the participants lived in Asturias (36.2%)and Cantabria (11.9%). In the sample as a whole, among themaladaptive responses, depressive symptoms represented thehighest percentage (46.7%), followed by stress (33.2%) andanxiety (10.7%) symptoms. The results of the DASS-21 revealed that a higher proportion of the people from Andalusia[n = 1979 (9.3%))]were affected in all three domains: depressive (59.7%), stress (41.7 %), and anxiety (16.2%) symptoms,Castilla La Mancha had the highest percentage of intrusiveresponse (31.2%), while Andalusia had the highest percentage of avoidance behaviour (55.7%). Conclusions. Almost half of the sample showed maladaptive reactions, depressive symptoms and avoidance behaviour being the most common responses. Repercussionson mental health during and after large-scale traumaticevents should be addressed carefully to minimize maladaptive responses in the general population. (AU)
