Longitudinal Changes in Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Incident Dementia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of baseline and change in vision on the risk of developing dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This longitudinal analysis utilized data from the 2021 and 2022 National Health and Aging Trends Study. Binocular presenting vision was assessed, including distance (DVA) and near (NVA) visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity (CS). Dementia status was defined based on: 1) medical diagnosis of dementia, 2) dementia score, or 3) poor cognitive test performance. RESULTS: Of the 2,159 adults included in this study, weighted mean (SD) age was 77.9 years (5.2), with the majority being female (weighted: 54%), and White (88%). The baseline median (interquartile range [IQR]) DVA was 0.08 (0-0.20) logMAR, NVA was 0.17 (0.09-0.26) logMAR, and CS was 1.80 (1.65-1.85) logCS. Over the 1-year follow up period, 192 (6.6%) adults developed dementia. In time-to-event analyses, baseline DVA (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 1.02-1.14], per 0.1 logMAR), NVA (HR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.01-1.13], per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (HR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03-1.15], per 0.1 logCS) were associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia. Further, change in CS (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25], per 0.1 logCS worse/year), but not VA, was associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Worse baseline VA and CS are associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia. Further, worsening CS over time, but not VA, was associated with higher likelihood of incident dementia. Future work is needed to study interventions targeted at improving vision deficits and examine their impact on decreasing dementia risk.

Concordance Between Self-Reported Visual Difficulty and Objective Visual Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of self-reported visual difficulty (VD) in predicting objective visual impairment (VI) in older adults and explore factors that influence discordance in these classifications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2022). METHODS: Participants reporting blindness or difficulties with distance or near vision were characterized as having VD. Presenting binocular distance visual acuity (VA), near VA, and contrast sensitivity (CS) were assessed. Objective VI was defined as having VI in either distance VA (worse than 20/40), near VA (worse than 20/40), or CS (worse than 1.55 logCS). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare performance of VD in predicting objective VI. To investigate factors that influence discordance, we limited our sample to adults with objective VI and employed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with not reporting VD. Similar analyses were performed to explore factors associated with reporting VD in adults without objective VI. RESULTS: 4,999 adults were included in the 2022 cohort. VD achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 56.0 (95% CI: 55.2, 56.9) in predicting objective VI, with a sensitivity of 15.8 (95% CI: 14.2, 17.5) and specificity of 96.3 (95% CI: 95.5, 96.9). Characteristics associated with not reporting VD in adults with objective VI included: female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.99]), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.78), higher income (≥75k, OR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.14, 3.45]), having ≥4 comorbidities (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.72]), and having depressive symptoms (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.93]). Meanwhile, factors associated with self-reporting VD in the absence of objective VI included Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 2.11 [95% CI: 1.15, 3.86]), higher income (≥75k, OR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.63]), and having anxiety symptoms (OR: 3.05 [95% CI: 1.56, 5.97]). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported visual difficulty is a distinct measure assessing disability and has limited ability in predicting objective VI. Caution is advised when utilizing self-reported visual difficulty as a surrogate measure for objective VI in epidemiological studies, though it may still be an effective way to capture risk of current or future disability.

Vision impairment and food insecurity in the national health and aging trends study.

Introduction: Vision impairment (VI) may further exacerbate older adults' vulnerability to experiencing food insecurity and may be a unique and important target for policies addressing access to nutritional food. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of VI in older adults with food insecurity. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of round 11 (2021) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older. Participants include 2,815 older adults with complete data on at least one objective measure of vision (distance, near or contrast sensitivity) and food insecurity. Food insecurity was assessed using a previously developed indicator of food insecurity in NHATS. VI was defined as binocular visual acuity (VA) worse than 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/40) at distance or its near equivalent, or contrast sensitivity (CS) worse than 1.55 logUnits. Continuous VI measures included distance and near VA (per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (per 0.1 logCS). Results: Participants were majority White (82%) and female (55%), and 3% had food insecurity. Older adults with any VI had a greater prevalence of food insecurity than adults without VI (5.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.05). In fully adjusted regression analyses, individuals with any VI experienced double the odds of food insecurity than individuals without VI (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.6). Distance VI (measured continuously) was associated with 1.2 times the odds of food insecurity (OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, per 0.1 logMAR). All other vision measures trended towards higher odds of food insecurity, though not statistically significant. Discussion: Older adults with VI experience higher rates of food insecurity than their peers. Interventions to improve food security should be targeted towards addressing the specific barriers faced by visually impaired older adults.

Digital Technology Use Among Older Adults With Vision Impairment.

Importance: Telehealth has the potential to improve health for older adults, but many access disparities exist, including for those with vision impairment (VI). Objective: To examine the associations between VI and digital technology access measures in US older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study that included Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Beneficiary data were obtained from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) 2021; data collection was conducted from June 2020 through January 2021. Data were analyzed September 2023. Exposure: VI, measured on categorical (distance and near VI [>0.30 logMAR], contrast sensitivity impairment [CSI; <1.55 logCS], and any VI [distance VI, near VI, or CSI]), and continuous (distance and near acuity [logMAR] and contrast sensitivity [logCS]) scales. Main Outcomes: Self-reported outcomes of digital technology access from the technological environment component of the NHATS. Results: Of the 2822 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [5.6] years; 1605 female [54.7%]) included in this study, patients self-identified with the following race and ethnicity categories (weighted percentages): 575 non-Hispanic Black (8.0%), 132 Hispanic (7.0%), 2019 non-Hispanic White (81.7%), and 63 non-Hispanic other race (3.4%), which included American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or other specified race. A total of 1077 of 2822 patients (32.3%) had any VI. In multivariable logistic regression models, older adults with any VI had lower odds of having or knowing how to use a cellphone (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88), computer (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79), or tablet (OR, 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54-0.85) than peers without VI. In other models, near VI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), computer (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75), or tablet (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81) compared with no near VI. CSI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99) or computer (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93) compared with no CSI. Distance VI was only associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a cellphone (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95). Any VI and individual categorical VI measures were not associated with other outcomes of digital health- and nonhealth-related experiences. Similar associations were noted when vision was examined on a continuous scale. However, worse distance acuity (per 0.1 logMAR) was associated with being less likely to visit with family or friends on a video call (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and to order or refill prescriptions online (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that older US adults with VI were less likely to have access to digital technology than peers without VI, although no differences were noted in the report of digital health- and nonhealth-related activities. These findings highlight the potential for inequities that may arise in telehealth for older adults with VI and the necessity to develop strategies to improve accessibility of telemedicine for all.

The Quantitative Impact of Visual Function on Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity in Older United States Adults: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Analysis.

Purpose: To explore the impact of objective vision measures on novel metrics of objectively-measured physical activity (PA) in a nationally representative sample of United States (US) older adults. Design: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Participants: Adults had their distance and near visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) tested. Any objective vision impairment (VI), defined as any VI in distance VA, near VA, or CS, was the primary exposure. Physical activity data were collected using the Actigraph CentrePoint Insight Watch worn for 7 days. Methods: Multivariable regression models were used to investigate the association between vision and PA measures. All analyses accounted for the survey design and models were adjusted for age, sex, race, living arrangement, education, and comorbidities. Main Outcome Measures: Physical activity metrics included (1) total daily activity (active minutes per day, number of active bouts, and mean length of active bouts), (2) activity fragmentation, and (3) time until 75% activity. An active bout was defined as ≥ 1 consecutive active minute. Activity fragmentation was defined as the probability of an active minute being followed by a sedentary minute, with higher values indicating more fragmented activity. Time until 75% activity was defined as the time taken to complete 75% of daily PA starting from their first active bout. Results: Among 723 participants, sampled from 10 443 338 older adults in the US, 30% had any objective VI. Any objective VI was significantly associated with lower number of active minutes per day (7.8% fewer [95% confidence interval {CI}: -13.6% to -1.7%]), shorter active bouts (7.0% shorter [95% CI: -12.3% to -1.4%]), and greater activity fragmentation (2.5% [95% CI: 0.8% to 4.2%]), while no associations were found with number of active bouts. Time until 75% activity did not significantly differ between adults with any objective VI and those without (P = 0.34). Conclusions: Older US adults with any objective VI displayed lower total daily activity, as well as more fragmented, shorter periods of PA, despite having a similar number of active bouts compared to their normally sighted counterparts. Implementing interventions that increase bout duration may help promote PA in adults with VI. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Association of concussion/brain injury symptoms and diagnosis with mental and social well-being in 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) children.

BACKGROUND: Population-based data regarding the associations between prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis and mental/social well-being is lacking for U.S. children. METHODS: Associations between prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis (reported by parents of children ages 5-17 from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey) and current mental/social well-being were determined in multivariable models. RESULTS: Amongst 2020 US children, 8.7% and 5.3% had previous symptoms and diagnosis of concussion/brain injury, respectively. 23% of children with symptoms were never checked for a concussion/brain injury, with younger children at higher risk of not getting checked after symptomatic head trauma. Prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis was associated with a higher likelihood of current depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.21-2.14; p < 0.001), anxiety (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.52-2.82; p < 0.001), difficulty making friends (OR = 1.57; 95% = 1.06-2.33; p = 0.03), use of medications for mental/social/behavioral issues (OR = 1.69; CI = 1.21-2.36; p = 0.002), and mental health therapy/counseling (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.13-2.04; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: U.S. children with prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis have a higher rate of mental and social disturbances and a more frequent need for mental health services. Nearly one-quarter of children with significant symptoms after head trauma are never checked for a concussion/brain injury; routine concussion evaluation after head trauma should be emphasized especially in younger children.

Vision Impairment and Psychosocial Function in US Adults.

Importance: Vision impairment and psychosocial function, including symptoms of depression and anxiety and social isolation, are a major cause of morbidity in the US. However, there is a lack of nationally representative studies assessing associations between both objective and subjective vision impairment with psychosocial function following the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To provide updated national estimates on the associations of vision impairment with depressive and anxiety symptoms and social isolation in US adults 65 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study round 9 (2019) and 11 (2021), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. Binocular distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were tested. Objectively measured vision impairment was defined as having vision impairment in either distance visual acuity (worse than 20/40), near visual acuity (worse than 20/40), or contrast sensitivity (worse than 1.55 logCS). Self-reported vision impairment was defined based on participants' report on their vision status. Data were analyzed in May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depressive and anxiety symptoms assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire. Social isolation was defined based on living arrangement, communication frequency, and activity participation responses. Results: Among 2822 community-dwelling adults sampled from a population of 26 182 090, the mean (SD) age was 78.5 (5.6) years; 1605 individuals (54.7%) were female; 1077 (32.3%) had objectively measured vision impairment, and 203 (6.4%) had self-reported vision impairment. In adjusted models, all outcomes were significantly associated with objectively measured vision impairment, including depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.26-2.58), anxiety symptoms (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.13-2.67), and severe social isolation (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.05-3.87). Similarly, depressive symptoms (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.44-3.88) and anxiety symptoms (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.09-4.05) but not severe social isolation symptoms (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.78-5.49) were significantly associated with self-reported vision impairment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, vision impairment was associated with several psychosocial outcomes, including symptoms of depression and anxiety and social isolation. These findings provide evidence to support prioritizing research aimed at enhancing the health and inclusion of people with vision impairment.

COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Among US Older Adults with Vision Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study 2021.

PURPOSE: To examine the associations between vision impairment (VI) and COVID-19 testing and vaccination services in older US adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed data from adults ≥ 65 years who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (year 2021), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Exposure: Distance VI (<20/40), near VI (<20/40), contrast sensitivity impairment (CSI) (<1.55 logCS), and any VI (distance, near, or CSI). Outcomes: Self-reported COVID-19 testing and vaccination. RESULTS: Of 2,822 older adults, the majority were female (weighted; 55%) and White (82%), and 32% had any VI. In fully-adjusted regression analyses, older adults with any VI had similar COVID-19 vaccination rates to adults without any VI (OR:0.77, 95% CI:0.54-1.09), but had lower odds of COVID-19 testing (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.68-0.97). Older adults with distance (OR:0.47, 95% CI:0.22-0.99) and near (OR:0.68, 95% CI:0.47-0.99) VI were less likely to be vaccinated for COVID-19, while those with CSI were less likely to test for COVID-19 (OR:0.76, 95% CI:0.61-0.95), as compared to peers without respective impairments. The remaining associations were not significant (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings highlight inequities in the COVID-19 pandemic response for people with vision disability and emphasize the need for equitable prioritization of accessibility of healthcare services for all Americans.

Factors Associated With Receipt of Crosslinking for Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with receipt of standard fluence epithelium-off crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus (KCN). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study reviewed electronic health records of treatment-naive patients with KCN seen at the Wilmer Eye Institute between January 2017 and September 2020. Tomographic data were derived from Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) devices. Multivariable population-average model using generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, sex, race, national area deprivation index, vision correction method, and disease severity was used to identify factors associated with receipt of CXL. RESULTS: From 583 patients with KCN, 97 (16.6%) underwent CXL for KCN. Patients who received CXL in at least 1 eye were significantly younger (mean 24.0 ± 7.8 years) than patients who had never undergone CXL (33.4 ± 9.3 years) ( P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Black patients had 63% lower odds of receiving CXL for KCN (OR: 0.37, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79) versus White patients, and older age was protective against receipt of CXL (OR: 0.89 per 1-year increase, 95% CI, 0.86-0.93). Comparison of characteristics by race demonstrated that Black patients presented with significantly worse vision, higher keratometric indices (K1, K2, and Kmax), and thinner corneal pachymetry at baseline versus White or Asian patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical cohort of patients with KCN from a tertiary referral center, Black patients were less likely to receive CXL presumably because of more advanced disease at presentation. Earlier active population screening may be indicated to identify and treat these patients before they become ineligible for treatment and develop irreversible vision loss. Such strategies may improve health equity in KCN management.

Population prevalence of dual sensory loss in community-dwelling US adults 71 years and older: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

BACKGROUND: Existing estimates for the prevalence of dual sensory loss (vision and hearing) among older adults are either based on self-reported measures or aggregated for older age groups. Current and detailed estimates based on objective measures are needed for public health, clinical, and policy decision-making. METHODS: We estimated the prevalence of dual sensory loss (DSL) using National Health Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 11 data (2021). We restricted to community-dwelling adults aged ≥71 years with complete sensory testing data (N = 2579). Hearing loss was defined by a 4-frequency (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) pure tone average for the better-hearing ear (>25 decibel hearing level). Vision loss was defined by the presence of distance, near (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution >0.30), or contrast sensitivity loss (log contrast sensitivity <1.55). Participants were categorized into three groups: no sensory loss, single sensory loss (vision or hearing loss), and DSL (hearing and vision). Sensory loss prevalence was estimated by age group and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In weighted analyses, among older Medicare beneficiaries (53% female, 7% Black, 6% Hispanic), 28% had no sensory loss and 22% had DSL. Prevalence of DSL increased with age. Most adults aged ≥90 years experienced DSL (59%), as opposed to single (39%) or no sensory loss (2%). DSL prevalence was greater among older adults with low education attainment (34%) and household income (43%). A higher proportion of older adults with a college education (17%), or from wealthier households (16%), had no sensory loss. CONCLUSIONS: One in 5 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥71 years have DSL, increasing to 3 in 5 for those aged ≥90 years. Prevalence is higher among older adults with low education attainment and from low-income households, characteristics associated with low treatment. Policies increasing access and affordability of vision and hearing care could benefit millions of older Americans experiencing sensory loss.

STEM doctorate recipients with disabilities experienced early in life earn lower salaries and are underrepresented among higher academic positions.

There is paucity of data examining disparities in salary and representation for disabled scientists, which is needed to advance inclusion and equity for people with disabilities in STEM. Using data from the 2019 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (United States, N = 1,148,817), we show that doctorate recipients working in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) with disabilities experienced early in life (at age <25 yr) earned US$10,580 less per year (95% CI: -$13,661, -$7,499) than non-disabled workers. In the subset of academic workers, doctorate recipients with early disabilities earned $14,360 less (95% CI: -$17,546, -$11,175) than those without disabilities. We observed an underrepresentation of academics with disabilities in higher faculty ranks (χ2: 647.2; P < 0.0001), among Deans/Presidents (χ2: 27.4; P = 0.0004) and among those with tenure (χ2: 525; P < 0.0001). These findings support a need to expand inclusion efforts, provide equal opportunities for career advancement and improve working conditions for people with disabilities in STEM.

Racial Variation in Visual Impairment of Patients With Keratoconus at Presentation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate racial disparities in the severity of keratoconus (KCN) at presentation, their intersection with socioeconomic variables, and other factors associated with visual impairment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined medical records of 1989 patients (3978 treatment-naive eyes) with a diagnosis of KCN seen at Wilmer Eye Institute between 2013 and 2020. A multivariable regression model adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance type, KCN family history, atopy, smoking status, and vision correction method examined factors associated with visual impairment, defined as a best available visual acuity of worse than 20/40 in the better eye. RESULTS: Demographically, Asian patients were the youngest (33.4 ± 14.0 years) ( P < 0.001), and Black patients had the highest median area deprivation index (ADI) of 37.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 21.0-60.5] ( P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed a higher risk of visual impairment for Black (OR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.71-2.95) versus White patients. Medicaid (OR 2.59, 95% CI, 1.75-3.83) and Medicare (OR 2.48, 95% CI, 1.51-4.07) were also associated with a higher odds of visual impairment compared with private insurance, and active smokers were more likely to have visual impairment than those with no prior smoking history (OR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.42-3.30). Eyes of Black patients had the highest maximum keratometry (Kmax) (56.0 ± 11.0D) ( P = 0.003) and the lowest thinnest pachymetry (463.2 ± 62.5 µm) ( P = 0.006) compared with eyes of other races. CONCLUSIONS: Black race, government-funded insurance, and active smoking were significantly associated with increased odds of visual impairment in adjusted analyses. Black race was also associated with higher Kmax and lower thinnest pachymetry, suggesting that Black patients have more severe disease at presentation.

Disparities in Eye Care Utilization by Self-Reported Vision Difficulty and Diabetes Status in the United States.

PURPOSE: To assess differences in eye care utilization by vision difficulty (VD), diabetes status, and sociodemographic characteristics for American adults. METHODS: The analysis pooled cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (2010-2018) from US adults ≥ 18 years. The outcome measure was eye care utilization in the past year. The primary independent variable included four groups: no VD or diabetes, only diabetes, only VD, and diabetes and VD. VD was defined as self-reported difficulty seeing even with glasses or contacts. Diabetic status was defined as ever receiving this diagnosis by a health professional. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between eye care utilization, VD, diabetic status, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 284,599 adults included in this study, the majority were female (55%), White (73%), and non-Hispanic (84%). In regression analysis, as compared to adults without diabetes or VD, adults with both diabetes and VD had the greatest utilization (OR = 2.49, 99% CI = 2.18-2.85). Females had higher utilization than men (OR = 1.45, 99% CI = 1.41-1.50). Higher levels of education was associated with greater utilization (OR = 1.82, 99% CI = 1.72-1.92). White and American Indian adults without diabetes had higher utilization compared to other races (OR = 1.17, 99% CI = 1.12-1.24, 0.98-1.39). CONCLUSION: While adults with VD and diabetes are better connected to eye care, significant eye care disparities persist for marginalized groups in the U.S. Identifying and understanding these disparities and eliminating barriers to care is critical to better support all patient populations.

Using Objective Vision Measures to Explore the Association of Vision Impairment With Cognition Among Older Adults in the United States.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between vision impairment (VI) and cognitive function using objective measures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis with a nationally representative sample. METHODS: The association between VI and dementia was investigated in a US population-based, nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years, using objective vision measures. Exposures included distance VI (>20/40), near VI (>20/40), contrast sensitivity impairment (CSI) (<1.55), any objective VI (distance and near visual acuity, or contrast), and self-reported VI. The main outcome measure was dementia status defined based on survey reports, interviews, and cognitive tests. RESULTS: A total of 3026 adults were included in this study; the majority were female (55%) and White (82%). The weighted prevalence rates were 10% for distance VI, 22% for near VI, 22% for CSI, 34% for any objective VI, and 7% for self-reported VI. Across all measures of VI, dementia was more than twice as prevalent in adults with VI compared to their peers without (P < .001 for all). In adjusted models, all measures of VI were associated with higher odds of dementia (distance VI: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.44; near VI: OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29-2.18; CSI: OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.45-2.62; any objective VI: OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.43-2.35; self-reported VI: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.20-2.89). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample of older US adults, VI was associated with increased odds of dementia. These results suggest that maintaining good vision and eye health may help preserve cognitive function in older age, although more research is needed to investigate the potential benefits of interventions that focus on vision and eye health on cognitive outcomes.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Eye Care Utilization in a National Sample of People with Diabetes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of social determinants of health (SDoH) with eye care utilization among people with diabetes mellitus using the 2013-2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants ≥ 18 years of age with self-reported diabetes. METHODS: The SDoH in the following domains were used: (1) economic stability; (2) neighborhood, physical environment, and social cohesion; (3) community and social context; (4) food environment; (5) education; and (6) health care system. An aggregate SDoH score was calculated and divided into quartiles, with Q4 representing those with the highest adverse SDoH burden. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association of SDoH quartile with eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months. A linear trend test was conducted. Domain-specific mean SDoH scores were calculated, and the performance of domain-specific models was compared using area under the curve (AUC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: Of 20 807 adults with diabetes, 43% had not used eye care. Greater adverse SDoH burden was associated with decrements in odds of eye care utilization (P < 0.001 for trend). Participants in the highest quartile of adverse SDoH burden (Q4) had a 58% lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.47) of eye care utilization than those in Q1. The domain-specific model using economic stability had the highest performing AUC (0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Among a national sample of people with diabetes, adverse SDoH were associated with decreased eye care utilization. Evaluating and intervening upon the effects of adverse SDoH may be a means by which to improve eye care utilization and prevent vision loss. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Disparities in influenza vaccination for U.S. adults with disabilities living in community settings by race/ethnicity, 2016-2021.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data examining disparities in influenza vaccination at the intersection of disability and race. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of influenza vaccination between U.S. adults (≥18 years) with and without disabilities living in community settings, and to examine changes in influenza vaccination over time by disability status and race/ethnicity groups. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2016-2021). We calculated the annual age-standardized prevalence of influenza vaccination (last 12 months) in individuals with and without disabilities (2016-2021), and examined percentage changes (2016-2021) by groups of disability status and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, the annual age-standardized prevalence of influenza vaccination was consistently lower in adults with disabilities as compared to those without disabilities. In 2016, 36.8% (95%CI: 36.1%-37.4%) of adults with disabilities had an influenza vaccine versus 37.3% (95%CI: 36.9%-37.6%) of those without disabilities. In 2021, 40.7% (95%CI: 40.0%-41.4%) and 44.1% (95%CI: 43.7%-44.5%) of adults with and without disabilities had an influenza vaccine. The percentage change in influenza vaccination from 2016 to 2021 was lower among people with disabilities (10.7%, 95%CI: 10.4%-11.0%; vs. no disability: 18.4%, 95%CI: 18.1%-18.7%). Among adults with disabilities, Asian adults reported the largest percentage increase in influenza vaccination (18.0%, 95% CI: 14.2%, 21.8%; p: 0.07), and Black, Non-Hispanics adults reported the lowest (2.1%, 95% CI: 1.9%, 2.2%; p: 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to increase influenza vaccination in the U.S. should address barriers faced by people with disabilities, particularly the intersectional barriers faced by people with disabilities from racial and ethnic minority groups.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Claims-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report 1) demographic and clinical characteristics for US patients with keratoconus undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and 2) complication rates for the 2 procedures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 2010 to 2018 health records for patients with keratoconus age younger than 65 years using the IBM MarketScan Database. A multivariable model adjusting for potential confounders was used to determine factors associated with receiving DALK over PK. Rates of complications 90 days and 1 year postoperatively were calculated. For select complications only (repeat keratoplasty, glaucoma surgery, and cataract surgery), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were additionally constructed over a period of up to 7 years. RESULTS: A total of 1114 patients with keratoconus (mean age: 40.5 ± 12.6 years) were included in the analysis. Hundred nineteen received DALK, and 995 received PK. Regional differences exist, with patients in the north central United States having greater odds of receiving DALK than northeastern patients (OR = 5.08, 95% confidence interval, 2.37-10.90). Rates of endophthalmitis, choroidal hemorrhage, infectious keratitis, graft failure, graft rejection, postoperative cataract, glaucoma, or retinal surgery were all low at 90 days and 1 year. Complication rates for DALK and PK were both low beyond 1 year for repeat keratoplasty, cataract, and glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There are regional differences between DALK and PK utilization rates. In addition, DALK and PK complication rates in this nationally representative sample are low at 1 year and beyond, but further studies are needed to assess whether longer-term complications differ by procedure type.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Vision Loss From Cataracts and Cataract Surgery Utilization in the United States-A National Health Interview Survey Analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of social determinants of health (SDOH) factors and cataract-related outcomes disparities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, with a nationally representative sample. METHODS: We used publicly available data from the 2008, 2016, and 2017 National Health Interview Survey data sets. Outcome measures included self-reported prevalence for ever been diagnosed with cataract, vision loss secondary to cataracts, and the likelihood of undergoing cataract surgery. Survey-weighted, multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and other relevant covariates, were used to examine the association between SDOH factors and cataract-related outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 81,551 participants were included, who were predominantly between 18 and 44 years of age (49.6%), female (51.7%), and White (74.8%). Multivariable regression models with age as a covariate showed that individuals who were not working were more likely to report having cataracts than those who were working (P < .001). Those who needed but could not afford medical care in the past year were more likely to report vision loss secondary to cataracts than their counterparts (P < .001). Uninsured participants were less likely to report undergoing cataract surgery than those with private insurance (P = .03). Individuals with higher income (poverty-income ratio: 1.00-2.99 vs <1.00) were more likely to report undergoing cataract surgery (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Several SDOH factors were associated with disparities in rates of cataract-related outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of ophthalmologists screening for social risks in patients with cataract, as these social factors are important barriers for access to care.

Cataracts.

94 million people are blind or visually impaired globally, and cataract is the most common cause of blindness worldwide. However, most cases of blindness are avoidable. Cataract is associated with decreased quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Most cases of cataract occur after birth and share ageing and oxidative stress as primary causes, although several non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors can accelerate cataract formation. In most patients, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation is the preferred treatment and is highly cost-effective. There has been an increase in the use of comprehensive cataract surgical services, including diagnoses, treatment referrals, and rehabilitation. However, global inequity in surgical service quality is still a limitation. Implementation of preoperative risk assessment, risk reduction strategies, and new surgical technologies have made cataract surgery possible at an earlier stage of cataract severity with the expectation of good refractive outcomes. The main challenge is making the service that is currently available to some patients accessible to all by use of universal health coverage.

Self-Reported Vision Impairment and Food Insecurity in the US: National Health Interview Survey, 2011-2018.

PURPOSE: To determine if vision impairment (VI) is associated with food insecurity among the United States (US) adults. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of US adults ≥18 years below a threshold of 150% poverty from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), years 2011-2018. Outcome measures included food insecurity status, based on response to the NHIS adult (10-item) food insecurity tool, either as a binary (food secure or insecure) or ordinal (high, marginal, low, and very low) variable. VI was defined as self-reported trouble seeing, even when wearing glasses or contact lenses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders examined associations between VI and food insecurity. RESULTS: Participants (N = 62075) were majority female (57%), White (62%), and non-Hispanic (74%). Of them, 16% reported VI and 28% were food insecure. In fully adjusted logistic regression models, adults with VI had 216% higher odds (95% CI = 2.01-2.31) of being food insecure than adults without VI. Further, there was a dose-response relationship between VI and food insecurity noted in a multinomial model: VI predicted 159% higher risk of marginal food security (95% CI = 1.44-1.75), 197% higher risk of low food security (95% CI = 1.80-2.16), and 295% higher risk of very low food security (95% CI = 2.69-3.22), as compared to high food security. CONCLUSION: VI is associated with food insecurity, increasingly so among adults with highest levels of food insecurity in this national sample of low-income US adults. This data highlights the need for targeted interventions to address and reduce the burden of food insecurity among US adults with VI.