Early evaluation of natural killer activity in post-transplant acute myeloid leukemia patients.

The focus of this study was to investigate NK cell reconstitution early after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We were particularly interested in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) since patients with this disease may display an altered NK cell function. The function and the phenotype of donor-derived NK cells obtained from 35 allografted patients 30 and 60 days after HSCT for AML or other-than-AML hematological malignancies has been assessed. NK functional status was investigated by measuring the degranulation capacity (externalization of CD107a) of NK cells against human K562. We also concomitantly determined the concentration of selected cytokines known to modulate NK function and/or receptor expression. At day 30, donor-derived AML and non-AML NK cells could efficiently degranulate when exposed to leukemic K562 targets. At day 60, we observed a reduced NK degranulation potential in AML patients only. Decreased NK activity in AML patients was concomitant to NKp46 and NKp30 down-regulation. AML NK cells were chronically exposed to low IL-2 levels following HSCT. TGF-beta(1) was undetectable in all patients. In AML, the functional activity of donor-derived NK cells is remarkable at day 30 but may strongly decrease two months after HSCT. Therefore, in this condition, early NK immune-modulation might improve HSCT outcome.

Prediction and diagnosis of bone metastases in well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine cancer: a prospective comparison of whole body magnetic resonance imaging and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare the sensitivity of whole body (WB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) for the diagnosis of bone metastases (BMs) in patients with well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine cancer (WD-GEP-EC) and to determine predictive factors of BM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WB-MRI and SRS were prospectively performed in 79 patients with bronchial (11), thymic (five), gastric (two), duodeno-pancreatic (24), ileal (26), colic (one), or unknown primary (10) WD-GEP-EC. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (46%) had 333 BMs involving 119 skeletal segments. WB-MRI and SRS were equally sensitive for detecting patients with BM (86 vs. 81%; P = 0.56), with 33% of the patients diagnosed with only one procedure. WB-MRI detected more BMs than SRS (80 vs. 57%; P = 0.017). Compared with SRS, WB-MRI detected more spine BMs (96 vs. 45%; P < 0.001) and tended to detect more pelvic and lower limb BMs (P = 0.054 and P = 0.06, respectively). Compared with WB-MRI, SRS detected more skull BMs (100 vs. 0%; P < 0.001) and tended to detect more rib BMs (P = 0.08). Sternal and upper-limb BMs were equally detected with WB-MRI and SRS (P = 0.32 and P = 0.46, respectively). Bone staging with SRS and spine MRI rather than WB-MRI would have detected 92% of the patients with BMs and 83% of all BMs. The extent of liver involvement and bronchial-thymic primary tumors were independent predictive factors for BM. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend bone staging with SRS and spine MRI in all patients with bronchial-thymic or unknown primary WD-GEP-EC. In case of duodeno-pancreatic or ileal primary, bone imaging may be restricted to patients with liver metastases.

Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy.

BACKGROUND: The oncology community usually perceives phase I oncology trials as associated with poor or limited benefits and substantial risks. There is scarce data concerning outcome and survival of patients enrolled in current phase I oncology trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all phase I oncology trials conducted by investigators from the Adult Phase I Unit at Institut Gustave Roussy from 2003 to 2006. We report data concerning patient demographics, treatment outcome, toxicity, survival and type of care after trial exit. RESULTS: We analyzed 10 trials involving 180 participants. The overall response rate was 7.2%. Disease control (objective response plus stable disease) was achieved in 48.2% of patients. The rate of toxic death was 0.5%. In all, 38% of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 toxic events. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a time between diagnosis of disease and inclusion in the phase I trial > or =24 months and evidence of disease control were statistically significant predictors of improved OS. CONCLUSION: Current phase I oncology trials are safe and are associated with clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients.