ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Conocer el impacto de la intervención educativa realizada sobre los profesionales de una zona básica de salud y su grupo de participación comunitaria, que conforman el grupo intervención (GI), y analizar su repercusión en la cobertura vacunal alcanzada para gripe en el grupo de riesgo (gestantes y puérperas) comparándola con su zona básica vecina, que conforma el grupo control (GC), durante la temporada vacunal 2019/20. Diseño: Estudio cuasiexperimental de intervención comunitaria. Emplazamiento: Dos zonas básicas de salud pertenecientes al departamento de salud Elche-Crevillente, España. Participantes: Gestantes y puérperas de 2 zonas básicas de salud y el grupo de participación comunitaria. Los profesionales de salud directamente relacionados con la campaña vacunal de gripe. Intervenciones: Sesión formativa al GI previa a la campaña de gripe 2019/20. Mediciones principales: Actitudes hacia la vacunación de gripe en profesionales sanitarios mediante el cuestionario validado CAPSVA y la cobertura vacunal de las gestantes y puérperas a través del Registro de Vacunas Nominal y su aceptación a la vacuna en la consulta de la matrona. Resultados: Los datos de cobertura vacunal en gripe registrados en el Registro de Vacunas Nominal para las mujeres gestantes y puérperas fue del 26,4% (n=207) en el GI y del 19,7% (n=144) en el GC (p=0,001), con una razón de incidencia del 1,34, lográndose así un 34% más de vacunación en el GI. La aceptación para la vacunación en las consultas de la matrona también fue elevada, inmunizándose en el GI el 96,5% vs. el 89,0% en el GC, con un RR=1,09 (IC 95% 1,01-1,62).Conclusiones: Estrategias de formación conjunta a profesionales y activos de la comunidad mejoran los resultados de cobertura vacunal.
Objective: To know the impact of the educational intervention carried out on the professionals of a basic health area and their community participation group, which make up the intervention group (IG), and to analyze its repercussion on the vaccination coverage achieved for influenza in the risk group (pregnant and puerperal women) comparing it with its neighboring basic zone, which makes up the control group (CG), during the 2019/20 vaccination season. Design: Quasi-experimental study of community intervention. SiteTwo basic health zones belonging to the Elche-Crevillente health department, Spain. Participants: Pregnant and postpartum women from 2 basic health areas and the community participation group. Health professionals directly related to the flu vaccination campaign. Interventions: Training session for the IG prior to the 2019/20 flu campaign. Main measurements: Attitudes towards influenza vaccination in health professionals through the validated CAPSVA questionnaire and the vaccination coverage of pregnant and postpartum women through the Nominal Vaccine Registry and their acceptance of the vaccine in the midwife's office. Results: The influenza vaccination coverage data recorded in Nominal Vaccine Registry for pregnant and puerperal women was 26.4% (n=207) in the IG and 19.7% (n=144) in the CG (p=0.001), with an incidence ratio of 1.34, thus achieving 34% more vaccination in the IG. Acceptance for vaccination in the midwife's office was also high, with 96.5% immunization in IG vs. 89.0% in CG, with a RR=1.09 (95% CI 1.01-1.62). Conclusions: Joint training strategies for professionals and community assets improve the results of vaccination coverage.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnant Women , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Vaccination Coverage , Community Participation , Spain , Primary Health Care , Vaccination , VaccinesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To know the impact of the educational intervention carried out on the professionals of a basic health area and their community participation group, which make up the intervention group (IG), and to analyze its repercussion on the vaccination coverage achieved for influenza in the risk group (pregnant and puerperal women) comparing it with its neighboring basic zone, which makes up the control group (CG), during the 2019/20 vaccination season. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study of community intervention. SITE: Two basic health zones belonging to the Elche-Crevillente health department, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant and postpartum women from 2 basic health areas and the community participation group. Health professionals directly related to the flu vaccination campaign. INTERVENTIONS: Training session for the IG prior to the 2019/20 flu campaign. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Attitudes towards influenza vaccination in health professionals through the validated CAPSVA questionnaire and the vaccination coverage of pregnant and postpartum women through the Nominal Vaccine Registry and their acceptance of the vaccine in the midwife's office. RESULTS: The influenza vaccination coverage data recorded in Nominal Vaccine Registry for pregnant and puerperal women was 26.4% (n=207) in the IG and 19.7% (n=144) in the CG (p=0.001), with an incidence ratio of 1.34, thus achieving 34% more vaccination in the IG. Acceptance for vaccination in the midwife's office was also high, with 96.5% immunization in IG vs. 89.0% in CG, with a RR=1.09 (95% CI 1.01-1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Joint training strategies for professionals and community assets improve the results of vaccination coverage.
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage , Cross-Sectional Studies , VaccinationABSTRACT
ANTECEDENTES: La aparición de nuevas enfermedades infecciosas, como el COVID-19, supone un reto en el seguimiento de la gestación y la prevención de complicaciones obstétricas y neonatales. La revisión exploratoria tiene el objetivo de revisar la información disponible en mujeres embarazadas infectadas por los coronavirus MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 para evaluar las similitudes y diferencias en las características clínicas de las madres y los resultados neonatales. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica (revisión exploratoria) acorde a las pautas de PRISMA entre marzo y abril del 2020 en las bases de datos de MEDLINE, SciELO, y CUIDEN y el Centro de Información sobre el COVID-19 de Elsevier. RESULTADOS: Analizamos 20 artículos con un total de 102 casos: 9 de MERS-CoV, 14 de SARS-CoV y 79 de SARS-CoV-2. La fiebre (75,5%) y la neumonía (73,5%) resultaron ser los síntomas más frecuentes en las gestantes infectadas. Las complicaciones obstétricas más frecuentes fueron la amenaza de parto prematuro (23,5%) y la cesárea (74,5%). No se documentó ninguna transmisión vertical en los neonatos. CONCLUSIONES: Los tres coronavirus producen una neumonía con sintomatología muy similar, resultando más leve en el caso de SARS-CoV-2. A pesar de las complicaciones obstétricas documentadas, los resultados neonatales son favorables en su mayoría. Es preciso aumentar el conocimiento para mejorar y prevenir las complicaciones obstétricas y neonatales de estas infecciones en mujeres embarazadas
BACKGROUND: The appearance of new infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, poses a challenge in monitoring pregnancy and preventing obstetric and neonatal complications. A scoping review has the objective to review the information available in pregnant women infected with the MERS-CoV, SARSCoV, SARS-CoV-2 coronaviruses to assess the similarities in terms of and differences in the clinical characteristics of the mothers and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: We carried out a bibliographic search (scoping review) according to the PRISMA guidelines between March and April 2020 in the MEDLINE, SciELO, and CUIDEN databases and the Elsevier COVID-19 Information Center. RESULTS: We analyzed 20 articles with a total of 102 cases. 9 of MERS-CoV, 14 of SARS-CoV and 79 of SARS-CoV-2. Fever (75.5%) and pneumonia (73.5%) were the most frequent symptoms in infected pregnant women. The most frequent obstetric complications were the threat of premature delivery (23.5%) and caesarean section (74.5%). No vertical transmission was documented in any of the infants. CONCLUSIONS: All three coronaviruses produce pneumonia with very similar symptoms, being milder in the case of SARSCoV2. Despite documented obstetric complications, neonatal outcomes are mostly favorable. Increased knowledge is needed to improve and prevent obstetric and neonatal complications from these infections in pregnant women
