Outcomes Comparison for Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in Specialty Surgery Hospitals Versus Tertiary Care Facilities.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative monitoring is crucial in the care of free flap breast reconstruction patients. Tertiary care facilities (TCFs) provide postoperative monitoring in an ICU after surgery. Specialty surgery hospitals (SSHs) do not have ICUs, but these facilities perform free flap breast reconstruction as well. Are outcomes comparable between the 2 facilities in terms of flap reexploration times and overall success? METHODS: Retrospective study including 163 SSH and 157 TCF patients. Primary predictor was facility in which the procedure was performed. Secondary predictors included operative, demographic, and comorbidity data. Primary outcomes were flap take back rate and flap failures. Secondary outcomes were total time from adverse event noticed in the flap to returning to the operating room (OR) and total time from decision made to return to the OR to returning to the OR (decision made). Tertiary outcomes were length of stay, operative times, and blood loss. RESULTS: Patients at the TCF were generally less healthy than SSH patients. Salvage rates and failure rates were similar between the 2 institutions. Adverse event noticed and decision made times did not differ between the 2 facilities. Overall flap success rate was 98.22% at SSH and 98.81% at TCF. No primary or secondary predictors had a significant correlation with increased odds for flap failure. CONCLUSION: SSHs can offer similar outcomes in free flap breast reconstruction with just as effective clinical response times to endangered flaps as found in a TCF. However, surgery at an SSH may best be reserved for healthier patients.

Clinical, Biomechanical, and Anatomic Investigation of Colles Fascia and Pubic Ramus Periosteum for Use During Medial Thighplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The medial thighplasty is a procedure where patients may attain superior mobility, hygiene, and cosmesis. Most surgeons use attachment of the superficial fascial system (SFS) of the thigh flap to the Colles fascia, whereas others attach the SFS to the pubic ramus periosteum. Because of a high complication profile, we aim to elucidate the clinical, biomechanical, and anatomic qualities of the Colles fascia versus the pubic ramus periosteum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 17-year retrospective review documenting clinical complications, a biomechanical analysis of sutures placed in different tissue layers of the thigh, and a histologic analysis surrounding the ischiopubic ramus. Separate suture pull-out strength testing was conducted on cadaveric tissue using an Admet MTEST Quattro with no. 1 Vicryl suture and tissue grips at a displacement rate of 2.12 mm/s. Simultaneous displacement and force were acquired at 100 Hz and with measurements obtained at regular intervals between the pubic symphysis and the ischial tuberosity in both the Colles fascia and the deeper periosteal layers of the thigh. A histologic analysis was performed at 3 points along the ischiopubic ramus using paraffin-embedded large mount tissue sections stained with hematoxylin, eosin, and Gomori trichrome. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent medial thighplasty with a 46.16% complication rate. Suture pull-out force of the suspected superficial Colles fascia sites was, on average, 72.8% less than values from the deeper periosteum tissue. Anchor points in the Colles fascia elongated 17.4% further before failure than those in the periosteum. There was noticeable variability between anchor points and across samples. The histologic sections suggest that the Colles fascia from the different regions of the ischiopubic ramus varies considerably in both continuity and collagen fiber content with no discernible pattern. The periosteal and muscular fascial layers were more continuous histologically with direct attachments into the pubis and ischium. CONCLUSIONS: Anchoring of the SFS to the periosteum did not improve our complication profile when compared with the literature. Both the biomechanical and histologic analyses demonstrate that the Colles fascia is highly variable in organizations with coincident variability in tissue strength. Our results require further study to identify the optimal surgical technique for medial thighplasty.

Refinements in the Techniques of 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expanders is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become popular for its ability to improve expansion parameters and aesthetics, albeit with a higher complication profile. We present data that support redefining 2-stage reconstruction to include tissue expanders regardless of final reconstructive modality to act as a bridge. Furthermore, we show that cooperation with the ablative surgeon and technical refinements support ADM omission from the first stage of reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts from the senior author's (D.A.J.) private practice over a 10-year follow-up period. Inclusion criteria included all women over 18 years who underwent mastectomy and had a tissue expander placed immediately or in a delayed fashion and successfully completed tissue expansion and are finished with the second stage of reconstruction or awaiting second stage of reconstruction. Demographic data, tissue expander filling data, final reconstruction, aesthetic outcome, and complications were tabulated. RESULTS: A total of 118 women (165 breasts) met inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in initial fill volume (P = 0.094), number of visits until final expansion (P = 0.677), or final fill volume (P = 0.985) between the ADM and non-ADM cohorts. In addition, non-ADM patients had superior aesthetic scores with respect to defects other than scarring (P = 0.015), projection (P = 0.013), and inframammary fold quality (P = 0.009). Fifteen percent of women decided to change desired final reconstruction modality during the tissue expansion phase. CONCLUSIONS: This reconstructive algorithm emphasizes surgical cooperation between the ablative and reconstructive surgeon, improved technique, and patient education. This focus translates into maintained tissue expansion, aesthetically pleasing results, and allows for the omission of ADM from reconstruction.

An unusual presentation of presentation of a branchial cleft cyst.

Branchial cleft cysts are congenital anomalies that arise from the aberrant embryological development of the branchial apparatus. The location of a branchial cleft cyst is determined by which branchial cleft failed to obliterate during embryological development, with the second branchial cleft cyst being the most commonly recognized lesion. Although the most common location for branchial cleft cysts is between the external auditory canal and the level of the clavicle, the literature does describe unusual locations. We present a case a 15-year-old boy who had an enlarging lesion on his back that had been present since birth. A presumptive radiologic diagnosis of lymphangioma circumscriptum was made. Upon excision of the lesion and pathologic examination, it was determined to be a branchial cleft cyst. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course, and no recurrence was noted after a 2-year follow-up. Our clinical report demonstrates a lesion on the posterior thorax that proved to be a branchial cleft cyst and should always be part of the differential diagnosis for soft tissue masses of the thorax.

Intraoperative use of bupivacaine for tumescent liposuction: the Robert Wood Johnson experience.

BACKGROUND: Bupivacaine anesthetic is commonly used as a wetting solution additive in tumescent liposuction, but its routine use remains controversial because of a lack of evidence in the current literature. METHODS: In accordance with local institutional review board regulations, a retrospective chart review was conducted of liposuction cases performed from 1997 to 2007 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick, New Jersey. The primary endpoint was adverse perioperative events. Secondary endpoints included length of postanesthesia care unit stay and length of total postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Eighty-seven cases were analyzed and two subsets of patients were identified. In group 1, 24 patients were compared who underwent liposuction as the primary procedure and received bupivacaine, lidocaine, or no additive in their wetting solution. No adverse events were encountered and the average length of stay was not significantly different. In group 2, 20 patients were compared who underwent abdominoplasty and liposuction and received bupivacaine or no additive in their wetting solution. No adverse events occurred and patients receiving bupivacaine had a significantly shorter average length of stay, 19 hours versus 36 hours, compared with controls (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: A review of the experience at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital reveals that the intraoperative use of bupivacaine for tumescent liposuction in 27 cases appeared to be as safe as other tumescent additives. There did not appear to be a significant difference in the incidence of adverse events or postoperative length of stay for patients who underwent liposuction with bupivacaine compared with other wetting solutions. Among a subset of patients who underwent concurrent abdominoplasty and liposuction procedures, patients who received bupivacaine spent significantly less time in the hospital postoperatively than those who did not receive it. Conducting future prospective studies involving larger samples among multiple centers is an essential next step to confirm these findings.