Active surveillance of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a non-malignant disease. This is the first study describing the natural course of D-TGCT and evaluating active surveillance as possible treatment strategy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included therapy naïve patients with D-TGCT from eight sarcoma centers worldwide between 2000 and 2019. Patients initially managed by active surveillance following their first consultation were eligible. Data regarding the radiological and clinical course and subsequent treatments were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with primary D-TGCT were initially managed by active surveillance. Fifty-nine patients had an MRI performed around first consultation: D-TGCT was located intra-articular in most patients (n = 56; 95 %) and extra-articular in 14 cases (24 %). At baseline, osteoarthritis was observed in 13 patients (22 %) on MRI. Most of the patients' reported symptoms: pain (n = 43; 70 %), swelling (n = 33; 54 %). Eight patients (13 %) were asymptomatic. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients; the median follow-up was 28 months. Twenty-one patients (36 %) had radiological progression after 21 months (median). Eight of 45 patients (18 %) without osteoarthritis at baseline developed osteoarthritis during follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (64 %) did not clinically deteriorate during follow-up. Finally, eighteen patients (31 %) required a subsequent treatment. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance can be considered adequate for selected therapy naïve D-TGCT patients. Although follow-up data was limited, almost two-thirds of the patients remained progression-free, and 69 % did not need treatment during the follow-up period. However, one-fifth of patients developed secondary osteoarthritis. Prospective studies on active surveillance are warranted.

The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures : Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures?

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the diagnostic accuracy, morbidity and sarcoma incidence of biopsy results in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients (n = 153) presenting with pathological proximal femoral fractures between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients after inadvertent surgery (n = 25) were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic biopsies. RESULTS: Of 112/128 patients who underwent biopsy, nine (8%) biopsies were unreliable either due to being inconclusive (n = 5) or because the diagnosis changed after resection (n = 4). Of impending fractures, 32% fractured following needle core biopsy. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 30 days (interquartile range 21-46). The overall biopsy positive predictive value (PPV) to differentiate between sarcoma and non-sarcoma was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.00). In patients with a previous malignancy (n = 24), biopsy (n = 23) identified the diagnosis in 83% (PPV 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-0.99), of whom five (24%) patients had a new diagnosis. In patients without a history of cancer (n = 61), final diagnosis included carcinomas (n = 24, 39.3%), sarcomas (n = 24, 39.3%), or hematological malignancies (n = 13, 21.3%). Biopsy (n = 58) correctly identified the diagnosis in 66% of patients (PPV 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.90). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of a preoperative biopsy in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures due to the risk of sarcoma in patients with and without a history of cancer. However, biopsy delays the time to definite surgery, results can be inconclusive or false, and it risks completion of impending fractures.

One-Stage Synovectomies Result in Improved Short-Term Outcomes Compared to Two-Stage Synovectomies of Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (D-TGCT) of the Knee: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study.

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors' (D-TGCTs) intra- and extra-articular expansion about the knee often necessitates an anterior and posterior surgical approach to facilitate an extensive synovectomy. There is no consensus on whether two-sided synovectomies should be performed in one or two stages. This retrospective study included 191 D-TGCT patients from nine sarcoma centers worldwide to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between both treatments. Secondary outcomes were rates of radiological progression and subsequent treatments. Between 2000 and 2020, 117 patients underwent one-stage and 74 patients underwent two-stage synovectomies. The maximum range of motion achieved within one year postoperatively was similar (flexion 123-120°, p = 0.109; extension 0°, p = 0.093). Patients undergoing two-stage synovectomies stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred more often after two-stage synovectomies, although this was not statistically different (36% vs. 24%, p = 0.095). Patients treated with two-stage synovectomies exhibited more radiological progression and required subsequent treatments more often than patients treated with one-stage synovectomies (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.036) (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, D-TGCT of the knee requiring two-side synovectomies should be treated by one-stage synovectomies if feasible, since patients achieve a similar range of motion, do not have more complications, but stay for a shorter time in the hospital.

Surgical outcomes of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumours: an international, retrospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour is a rare, locally aggressive, and difficult-to-treat soft tissue tumour. Clinical and surgical outcomes depend on multiple factors, including preoperative diagnostic assessment, the localisation and extent of disease, and possibly the choice of treatment modalities by orthopaedic surgeons. We did a retrospective cohort study to characterise global surgical treatment protocols, and assess surgical outcomes, complications, and functional results in patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumours. METHODS: In this international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated in 31 sarcoma reference centres between Jan 1, 1990, and Dec 31, 2017. Eligible patients were of any age and had histologically proven diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour of large joints. Patient data were retrieved from the local databases of participating centres. Patients with localised-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour were excluded. In the analysis, we only included patients with complete core criteria data regarding admission status, date of treatment, type of treatment at participating centre, and first local recurrence after treatment. We used a non-parametric method to estimate recurrence-free survival at 3, 5, and 10 years after initial surgical resection in a tertiary centre. We used a multivariate Cox regression model to estimate the effect of risk factors. We also present subgroup analyses of disease status at presentation (primary vs recurrent disease) and recurrence-free survival by surgery type (open surgery vs arthroscopic synovectomy), and prespecified risk factors were tested in a univariate and multivariable analyses, with an endpoint of first local recurrence after treatment in a tertiary centre. FINDINGS: Data collection for these analyses occurred between January, 2016, and May, 2018. We received the records of 1192 patients, of which 966 (81%) were surgically treated and had complete information on core criteria. 445 patients were admitted with therapy-naive disease of the knee and were primarily treated in a tertiary centre. Since patients with wait and see treatment do not have a starting date of treatment, these patients were excluded in the calculation of median follow-up time for all patients. For this calculation we used time of surgery as a starting date. 758 (64%) of 1192 patients had knee involvement and 628 (54%) of 1163 patients with complete data on type of surgery had one-staged open synovectomy. At a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR 27-97), recurrent disease developed in 425 (44%) of all 966 surgically treated cases, and recurrence-free survival was 62% (95% CI 59-65) at 3 years, 55% (51-58) at 5 years, and 40% (35-45) at 10 years. Surgical complications were reported in 105 (12%) of 906 patients who had complete data on surgical complications. Pain improved after surgical treatment in 255 (59%) of 434 patients and swelling improved in 328 (72%) of 453 patients who had complete data. INTERPRETATION: This study of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour provides a comprehensive and up-to-date disease overview, assessing the clinical profile and management of the disease in multiple specialised referral centres. Surgical treatment of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumours is not a definitive treatment for every patient because it involves a high risk for local recurrent disease and a relatively high risk for postoperative complications. After surgical treatment in treatment-naive patients, risk factors for recurrent disease in individual patients were not identified in what we believe is the largest cohort to date. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors in Children: A Similar Entity Compared With Adults.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, benign, monoarticular entity. Many case-series in adults are described, whereas TGCT is only incidentally reported in children. Therefore, its incidence rate and natural history in children are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How many cases have been reported of this condition, and what were their characteristics? (2) What is the standardized pediatric incidence rate for TGCT? (3) Is there a clinical difference in TGCT between children and adults? (4) What is the risk of recurrence after open resection in children compared with adults? METHODS: Data were derived from three sources: (1) a systematic review on TGCT in children, seeking sources published between 1990 and 2016, included 17 heterogeneous, small case-series; (2) the nationwide TGCT incidence study: the Dutch pediatric incidence rate was extracted from this nationwide study by including patients younger than 18 years of age. This registry-based study, in which eligible patients with TGCT were clinically verified, calculated Dutch incidence rates for localized and diffuse-type TGCT in a 5-year timeframe. Standardized pediatric incidence rates were obtained by using the direct method; (3) from our nationwide bone and soft tissue tumor data registry, a clinical data set was derived. Fifty-seven children with histologically proven TGCT of large joints, diagnosed and treated between 1995 and 2015, in all four tertiary sarcoma centers in The Netherlands, were included. These clinically collected data were compared with a retrospective database of 423 adults with TGCT. Chi-square test and independent t-test were used to compare children and adults for TGCT type, sex, localization, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, duration of symptoms, and time to followup. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate recurrence-free survival at 2.5 years. RESULTS: TGCT is seldom reported because only 76 pediatric patients (39 female), 29 localized, 38 diffuse, and nine unknown type, were identified from our systematic review. The standardized pediatric TGCT incidence rate of large joints was 2.42 and 1.09 per million person-years in localized and diffuse types, respectively. From our clinical data set, symptoms both in children and adults were swelling, pain, and limited ROM with a median time before diagnosis of 12 months (range, 1-72 months). With the numbers available, we did not observe differences in presentation between children and adults in terms of sex, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, or median time to followup. The 2.5-year recurrence-free TGCT survival rate after open resection was not different with the numbers available between children and adults: 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-100%) versus 89% (95% CI, 83%-96%) in localized, respectively (p = 0.527) and 53% (95% CI, 35%-79%) versus 56% (95% CI, 49%-64%) in diffuse type, respectively (p = 0.691). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of pediatric TGCT is low, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in children with chronic monoarticular joint effusions. Recurrent disease after surgical treatment of this orphan disease seems comparable between children and adults. With targeted therapies being developed, future research should define the most effective treatment strategies for this heterogeneous disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Higher incidence rates than previously known in tenosynovial giant cell tumors.

Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) are rare, benign tumors, arising in synovial lining of joints, tendon sheaths, or bursae. 2 types are distinguished: localized, either digits or extremity, and diffuse lesions. Current TGCT incidence is based on 1 single US-county study in 1980, with an incidence of 9 and 2 per million person-years in localized (including digits) and diffuse TGCT, respectively. We aim to determine nationwide and worldwide incidence rates (IR) in TGCT affecting digits, localized-extremity TGCT and diffuse-type TGCT. Material and methods - Over a 5-year period, the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) identified 4,503 pathology reports on TGCT. Reports affecting digits were solely used for IR calculations. Reports affecting extremities were clinically evaluated. Dutch IRs were converted to world population IRs. Results - 2,815 (68%) digits, 933 (23%) localized-extremity and 390 (9%) diffuse-type TGCT were identified. Dutch IR in digits, localized-extremity, and diffuse-type TGCT was 34, 11 and 5 per million person-years, respectively. All 3 groups showed a female predilection and highest number of new cases in age category 40-59 years. The knee joint was most often affected: localized-extremity (46%) and diffuse-type (64%) TGCT, mostly treated with open resection: localized (65%) and diffuse (49%). Reoperation rate due to local recurrence for localized-extremity was 9%, and diffuse TGCT 23%. Interpretation - This first nationwide study and detailed analyses of IRs in TGCT estimated a worldwide IR in digits, localized-extremity and diffuse TGCT of 29, 10, and 4 per million person-years, respectively. Recurrence rate in diffuse type is 2.6 times higher, compared with localized extremity. TGCT is still considered a rare disease; however, it is more common than previously understood.

Limb Amputation after Multiple Treatments of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumour: Series of 4 Dutch Cases.

In Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumours (TGCT), previously named Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS), a distinction is made between a single nodule (localized-type) and multiple nodules (diffuse-type). Diffuse-type is considered locally aggressive. Onset and extermination of this orphan disease remain unclear. Surgical resection is the most commonly performed treatment. Unfortunately, recurrences often occur (up to 92%), necessitating reoperations and adjuvant treatments. Once all treatments fail or if severe complications occur, limb amputation may become unavoidable. We describe four cases of above-knee amputation after TGCT diagnosis.

Arthroplasty for tenosynovial giant cell tumors.

Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (t-GCTs) can behave aggressively locally and affect joint function and quality of life. The role of arthroplasty in the treatment of t-GCT is uncertain. We report the results of arthroplasty in t-GCT patients. Patients and methods - t-GCT patients (12 knee, 5 hip) received an arthroplasty between 1985 and 2015. Indication for arthroplasty, recurrences, complications, quality of life, and functional scores were evaluated after a mean follow-up time of 5.5 (0.2-15) years. Results - 2 patients had recurrent disease. 2 other patients had implant loosening. Functional scores showed poor results in almost half of the knee patients. 4 of the hip patients scored excellent and 1 scored fair. Quality of life was reduced in 1 or more subscales for 2 hip patients and for 5 knee patients. Interpretation - In t-GCT patients with extensive disease or osteoarthritis, joint arthroplasty is an additional treatment option. However, recurrences, implant loosening, and other complications do occur, even after several years.

Long-term follow-up results of primary and recurrent pigmented villonodular synovitis.

OBJECTIVE: Adequate documentation of the outcome of treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is sparse. Available case series show relatively short follow-up times and often combine locations or subtypes to increase patient numbers. This article describes the long-term follow-up of a single institution's large consecutive series of PVNS. METHODS: Retrospectively, 107 PVNS patients were identified between 1985 and 2011 by searching pathology and radiology records. Treatment complications, recurrences and quality of life were evaluated. Most patients (85.2%) were primarily or secondarily treated at our institution. RESULTS: Both subtypes, localized PVNS [29 (27%)] and diffuse PVNS [75 (70%)] were represented. The knee was affected in 88% of patients. Treatments received were surgery, external beam radiotherapy, radiosynovectomy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy or combinations of these. Forty-nine (46%) patients had prior treatment elsewhere. The mean follow-up from diagnosis until last contact was 7.0 years (range 0.3-27.4) for localized PVNS and 14.5 years (range 1.1-48.7) for diffuse PVNS. The 1- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for diffuse PVNS were 69% and 32%, respectively. Quality of life, estimated by 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores, were not significantly different between localized and diffuse PVNS. However, both patient groups scored lower than the general population norms on the general health component (59.2 and 56.3, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Recurrence rates of PVNS increase with time. Long-term follow-up shows, particularly in diffuse PVNS, it is a continually recurring problem, and over time it becomes increasingly difficult to cure. The quality of life is decreased in patients with PVNS compared with the general population.

Pigmented villonodular synovitis: current concepts about diagnosis and management.

At present, the treatment strategies in patients with localized and diffuse forms of pigmented villonodular synovitis have more or less been standardized. However, these strategies are not optimal because high recurrence rates persist and studies with a sufficient level of evidence are lacking. This systematic review article describes all known treatment options for intra-articular pigmented villonodular synovitis and their clinical results. Based on this research, we provide guidelines to support physicians in making the optimal treatment decisions. Given the rarity of the disease, randomized studies are not to be expected, but an international registry through existing networks would offer the benefit of getting a better insight into the outcome of this disease. Therefore, we propose a basic set of data to be investigated and ideally to be reported on in such a registry.