ABSTRACT
Fracture of the hallucial sesamoids is a pathology that causes difficulty for surgeons and patients. Because of the low incidence and the fact that up to 64-90 % heal with non-operative management, there is a lack of clear guidance in the literature for the surgical treatment of sesamoid fracture in cases of failure of non-operative management. Here long term follow up of an alternative method of surgical treatment of sesamoid fracture recalcitrant to nonoperative management is presented. 32 individuals were treated with temporary surgical immobilisation of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint using either crossed wires or two orthogonally placed two hole plates. The patients then underwent removal of the construct at 8 weeks post op after confirmation of healing on a CT scan. There was a 94 % union rate. Return to work was 61 days (15-90) return to sport 80 days (64-112) with no immediate complications and no recurrence. At last follow up mean 10 years (4-16) only 2 patients had gone on to asymptomatic non-union and one patient developed arthritis between the sesamoid and the metatarsal head. No patient has required further surgical intervention. This retrospective cohort of patients demonstrate that this method of treatment is a valuable option in the management of sesamoid fracture which does not alter the biomechanics of the foot and has none of the long term complications of sesamoidectomy or partial sesamoidectomy.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Bone healing in femoral reconstructions using intercalary allografts can be compromised in a tumour context. There is also a high revision rate for non-union, infection, and fractures in this context. The advantages and disadvantages of an associated vascularised fibula graft (VFG) are still a matter of debate. METHODS: In a multicentre study, we retrospectively analysed 46 allograft reconstructions, operated on between 1984 and 2017, of which 18 were associated with a VFG (VFG+) and 28 without (VFG-), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We determined the cumulative probability of bone union as well as the mid- and long-term revision risks for both categories by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate Cox model. We also compared the MSTS scores. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of VFG+ reconstruction were observed in the survival analyses for the probability of bone union (log-rank, p = 0.017) and in mid- and long-term revisions (log-rank, p = 0.032). No significant difference was observed for the MSTS, with a mean MSTS of 27.6 in our overall cohort (p = 0.060). The multivariate Cox model confirmed that VFG+ was the main positive factor for bone union, and it identified irradiated allografts as a major risk factor for the occurrence of mid- and long-term revisions. CONCLUSION: Bone union was achieved earlier in both survival and Cox model analyses for the VFG+ group. It also reduced the mid- and long-term revision risk, except when an irradiated allograft was used. In case of a tumour, we thus recommend using VFG+ from a fresh-frozen allograft, as it appears to be a more reliable long-term option.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Femoral Neoplasms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Allografts/pathology , Autografts , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Transplantation , Femoral Neoplasms/surgery , Fibula/pathology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The gold standard for intramedullary nailing (IMN) in humeral shaft fracture treatment is bipolar interlocking. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in two cohorts of patients treated with IMN with or without distal interlocking. We hypothesized that there was no significant difference between isolated proximal interlocking and bipolar interlocking in terms of consolidation and clinical results. METHODS: One hundred twenty-one acute humeral shaft fractures were retrospectively included in group WDI (without distal interlocking screw, n = 74) or in group DI (with distal interlocking screw, n = 47). One hundred six patients (87.60%) could be verified by an X-ray, and 63 (52.07%) could be examined clinically. Fracture union at 6 months was the primary outcome, and the second was the final clinical outcome for shoulder and elbow after at least 6 months of follow-up. Pain, operating time, and radiation time were also analyzed. RESULTS: The two groups were not significantly different for population, fractures, or immobilization duration. No significant difference was found for bone union (WDI 89.06% vs DI 83.33%, p = 0.51), shoulder or elbow functional outcomes, or pain. However, there were significant differences in advantage to the WDI group for operating time (WDI 63.09 ± 21.30 min vs DI 87.96 ± 30.11 min, p < 0.01) and fluoroscopy time (WDI 59.06 ± 30.30 s vs DI 100.36 ± 48.98 s, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it seems that there were no significant differences between proximal unipolar and bipolar interlocking for humeral shaft fractures in terms of consolidation and clinical outcomes. WDI avoided the additional operating time and fluoroscopy time and risks linked to DI.
Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Adult , Aged , Bone Nails , Bone Screws , Diaphyses/diagnostic imaging , Diaphyses/injuries , Diaphyses/surgery , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Humeral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Morphological studies of the humerus have shown that the position of the bicipital groove varies with the individual and the retroversion of the humeral head. Depending on the authors, these two parameters are independent or associated. This study evaluated the relationship between the humeral head axis and its retroversion and the bicipital groove relative to the humeral biepicondylar line. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy cadaveric humeri were scanned to obtain 3D reconstructions. Views of the 3D reconstruction from above showed the bicondylar line, the bicipital groove and the humeral head on a single image. After measuring the humeral retroversion angle and the bicipital groove angle relative to the bicondylar line, we assessed the relationship between these two angles with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a significant linear correlation between the angle of the groove and the angle of humeral retroversion based on the 70 cadaveric humeral bones (the p-value was 7.510-7, the correlation coefficient was -0.5515, and the 95% confidence interval was (-0.6962; -0.3636)). Our study thus demonstrates that the less lateralized the bicipital groove is, the greater the humeral retroversion will be. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a linear relationship between humeral head retroversion and bicipital groove lateralization. Within our reliability interval, this relationship can be used in clinical practice to evaluate retroversion without resorting to CT of the entire humerus.
Subject(s)
Humerus/anatomy & histology , Shoulder Joint/anatomy & histology , Adult , Bone Retroversion , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Humerus/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze dual mobility cup survival rate on young patients under 50 years old at more than 20 years of follow up. METHODS: One hundred thirty seven hips with a first generation of dual mobility Bousquet cup (Serf) were included. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 41 years and the mean follow-up was 21.9 years. RESULTS: Twenty year follow-up cup survival rate was 77%. No dislocation occurred, 44 hips were revised (including 21 cup aseptic loosenings isolated, 15 Intra Prosthetic Dislocations), seven hips were lost to follow-up, 11 patients died, and 75 hips were still in situ. CONCLUSION: First generation dual mobility cup survival on young patient was comparable with literature results. The main complications, cup aseptic loosening and intra prosthetic dislocation, were wear-related. With improvements of the defects of first generation dual mobility, we might expect an even better survival rate with contemporary DM cups.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Hip Joint/surgery , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head affects mainly young patients with high functional needs this increases the risk of dislocation. Dual mobility cups known for low rate of dislocation and high mobility range seems indicated. We evaluate functional efficiency, survival and dislocation rate of dual mobility cup for total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis in young patients. Monocentric retrospective clinical study, from 2000 to 2008. With a clinical analysis in pre-operative and over ten years of follow-up of one cohort of patients under 55 years old with an indication of THA for ONFH. The judgement criteria was: clinical scores at the maximal follow-up, the dislocation rate, and the cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up. Forty THA in 31 patients, nine bilateral cases, 23 males and eight females with average age of 44 (±4) years old. In pre-operative: PMA 11 (±3.3), HHS 50,8 (±15.5). At the final follow-up of 129.8 (±33.8) months: PMA (17.4 ± 1.12), HHS (95.7 ± 6.9), no dislocation. We had 11 deaths on average at 95.2 ± 47.3 months. The cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up is 100% without revisions or long-term dislocation. Analysis concludes to very significant functional improvement without any dislocation despite the young population with high level of activity. Thus, dual mobility cups is a reliable choice preventing dislocation with a very good survival rate without premature wear, preserving mobility and activity.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Femur Head/surgery , Hip Dislocation/etiology , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/surgery , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Female , Femur Head/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Dislocation/surgery , Humans , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Allograft hip composite prosthesis (APC) is a type of reconstruction after resection of the proximal femur. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes after an APC reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were retrospectively included (14 revision total hip replacements, 30 primary malignant bone tumors, two metastasis). RESULTS: The mean length of femoral bone resection was 16.4 cm (7 to 27). With a mean follow-up of 14.7 years (6.3 to 32.6), Postel-Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.7 (8 to 21), Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score at 23.1 or 77% (15 to 29), and abductor strength at 3.4 (2 to 5). Allograft resorption was minor for 20 patients (44.4%), moderate for 13 patients (28.9%), and severe for 12 patients (26.7%). Host-allograft shaft bone fusion was achieved in 37 cases (84.1%). Trochanteric fracture occurred in 26 cases (59.1%). Length of femoral resection, allograft bone resorption, and trochanteric fracture did not have an effect on functional outcomes. At ten years follow-up, overall revision-free and femoral stem survivals were 54.1 ± 0.8% and 81.4 ± 0.6% respectively. No parameter evaluated influenced the survivorship. CONCLUSION: APC is a reliable reconstruction adapted for huge proximal femoral bone resections. Trochanteric fracture and allograft bone resorption do not seem to influence functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Femur/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Joint Diseases/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Child , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Prosthesis , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In the literature, there are several techniques for measuring the glenoidal version of the scapula. The superiority of the scannographic measurement over the standard radiologic measures seems evident. The main problems are the evaluation and the reproducibility of these methods, which are dependent on the quality of the CT scan and the orientation of its sections. We pinpoint a simple method of the "scapular triangle", the reliability of which deserves special consideration. The aim of this study is to report a simple and reproducible computed tomography method to measure the glenoidal version. METHODS: Thrity-one shoulder CT scans, performed on patients attending the emergency department of the University Hospital of Dijon between January 2012 and April 2013 for shoulder trauma, were evaluated retrospectively. The CT scan must include the entire body of scapula to allow measurements to be made with both methods: the conventional method of Friedman and our new method of the "scapular triangle". Two independent operators performed inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility. We compared both techniques with Pearson's test. RESULT: Pearson's test showed a trend line according to a linear correlation between the two methods with a p value of 7.791(-10) and a correlation coefficient of 0.85 with the 95% confidence interval (0.7213; 0.929). CONCLUSION: The method of the "scapular triangle" is easily applicable on most sections of the CT scan of scapula whether or not it takes the whole body. It is more reliable and reproducible and could be used by any radiologist.
Subject(s)
Scapula/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, University , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The present study describes the macroscopic and microscopic features of the squared ligament of the elbow (SLE). In addition, the SLE biomechanical behavior and contribution to the forearm stability were also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten forearms from freshly frozen cadavers were used for this work. Each forearm was mounted in an experimental frame for quantification of longitudinal and transverse stability. Macroscopic features and biomechanical behavior were analyzed on dynamic videos obtained during forearm rotation. Then, the SLE was harvested from the 10 forearms for microscopic analysis on histological slices stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron. RESULTS: Two main SLE configurations were identified. One in which the SLE had three distinct bundles (anterior, middle, posterior) and another in which it was homogeneous. The anterior part of the SLE had a mean length of 11.2 mm (±2.4 mm) and a mean width of 1.2 mm (±0.2 mm) while the posterior part had a mean length of 9.9 mm (±2.2 mm) and a mean width of 1 mm (±0.2 mm). Microscopic examination showed that the SLE is composed of a thin layer of arranged collagen fibers. During forearm rotation, the SLE progressively tightens upon pronation and supination by wrapping around the radial neck. Tightening of the SLE during forearm rotation provides transverse and longitudinal stability to the forearm, mainly in maximal pronation and supination. CONCLUSION: The SLE is a true ligament and provides forearm stability when it is stretched in pronation and supination.
Subject(s)
Elbow Joint/anatomy & histology , Elbow/anatomy & histology , Forearm/physiology , Ligaments, Articular/anatomy & histology , Pronation/physiology , Supination/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Elbow Joint/physiology , Forearm/anatomy & histology , Humans , Ligaments, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments, Articular/physiology , Microscopy , Radius/anatomy & histology , RotationABSTRACT
Clavicle duplication is a rare anatomical variation of the scapular belt: only seven cases have been reported in the literature to date, and only one took note of the existence of a duplication of the acromioclavicular joint. Two hypotheses have been proposed to interpret this variation: genetic factors, or trauma occurred in the growth period. Clavicle duplication should not be mistaken for a quite frequent coracoclavicular joint widely described. The authors report the case of a left acromioclavicular joint duplication in a 51-year-old male patient presenting with left shoulder pain. This case was the first of literature providing 3D CT-scan images.