Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 2601, 2022 05 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35552388

The requirement for Cas nucleases to recognize a specific PAM is a major restriction for genome editing. SpCas9 variants SpG and SpRY, recognizing NGN and NRN PAMs, respectively, have contributed to increase the number of editable genomic sites in cell cultures and plants. However, their use has not been demonstrated in animals. Here we study the nuclease activity of SpG and SpRY by targeting 40 sites in zebrafish and C. elegans. Delivered as mRNA-gRNA or ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, SpG and SpRY were able to induce mutations in vivo, albeit at a lower rate than SpCas9 in equivalent formulations. This lower activity was overcome by optimizing mRNA-gRNA or RNP concentration, leading to mutagenesis at regions inaccessible to SpCas9. We also found that the CRISPRscan algorithm could help to predict SpG and SpRY targets with high activity in vivo. Finally, we applied SpG and SpRY to generate knock-ins by homology-directed repair. Altogether, our results expand the CRISPR-Cas targeting genomic landscape in animals.


CRISPR-Associated Protein 9 , Gene Editing , Animals , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9/genetics , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9/metabolism , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Gene Editing/methods , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida/genetics , RNA, Messenger , Zebrafish/genetics , Zebrafish/metabolism
2.
CRISPR J ; 4(1): 32-42, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538637

The Cas9 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) is the most popular enzyme for CRISPR technologies. However, considering the wide diversity of microorganisms (discovered and still unknown), a massive number of CRISPR effectors are being and will be identified and characterized in the search of optimal Cas variants for each of the many applications of CRISPR. In this context, a versatile and efficient multicellular system for CRISPR editing such as Caenorhabditis elegans would be of great help in the development of these effectors. Here, we highlight the benefits of using C. elegans for the rapid evaluation of new CRISPR effectors, and for optimizing CRISPR efficiency in animals in several ways such as by modulating the balance between repair pathways, modifying chromatin accessibility, or controlling the expression and activity of nucleases and guide RNAs.


Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Gene Editing , Animals , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Caenorhabditis elegans/physiology , Endonucleases , Gene Knock-In Techniques , Models, Animal , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida , Streptococcus pyogenes/enzymology
3.
Genetics ; 211(4): 1143-1154, 2019 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30696716

CRISPR-based genome-editing methods in model organisms are evolving at an extraordinary speed. Whereas the generation of deletion or missense mutants is quite straightforward, the production of endogenous fluorescent reporters is more challenging. We have developed Nested CRISPR, a cloning-free ribonucleoprotein-driven method that robustly produces endogenous fluorescent reporters with EGFP, mCherry or wrmScarlet in Caenorhabditis elegans This method is based on the division of the fluorescent protein (FP) sequence in three fragments. In the first step, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) donors (≤200 bp) are used to insert the 5' and 3' fragments of the FP in the locus of interest. In the second step, these sequences act as homology regions for homology-directed repair using a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) donor (PCR product) containing the middle fragment, thus completing the FP sequence. In Nested CRISPR, the first step involving ssDNA donors is a well-established method that yields high editing efficiencies, and the second step is reliable because it uses universal CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) and PCR products. We have also used Nested CRISPR in a nonessential gene to produce a deletion mutant in the first step and a transcriptional reporter in the second step. In the search for modifications to optimize the method, we tested synthetic single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), but did not observe a significant increase in efficiency. To streamline the approach, we combined all step 1 and step 2 reagents in a single injection and were successful in three of five loci tested with editing efficiencies of up to 20%. Finally, we discuss the prospects of this method in the future.


CRISPR-Cas Systems , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Animals , Gene Editing/methods , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism
...