Interclinician agreement on the recognition of selected respiratory clinical signs in dogs and cats with abnormal breathing patterns.

In humans, classification of abnormal breathing patterns (ABP) and recognition of ancillary respiratory signs are difficult, as reflected by poor-to-moderate interclinician agreement. The aims of this study were to assess interclinician agreement for respiratory sign recognition in dogs and cats and evaluate the influence of clinical experience on agreement. Dogs and cats with ABP were recruited from three hospitals. Included animals were evaluated by three clinicians at each hospital before therapeutic intervention. Consensual definitions for each respiratory clinical sign were provided to all clinicians. Interclinician agreement was measured via Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient statistics. Influence of clinical experience on interobserver agreement was studied via mixed-effects logistic regression. One-hundred and fifteen dogs and 49 cats with ABP were recruited. Out of 12 clinical signs evaluated, only stertor (kappa, 0.80), stridor (kappa, 0.64), attenuation of heart/lung sounds (kappa, 0.60), and goose honking (kappa, 0.84) in dogs, and stertor (kappa, 0.65) and open-mouth breathing (kappa, 0.75) in cats, were considered sufficiently reliable among clinicians. Agreement on respiratory rate estimation was good in both species (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.75). The greater the difference in clinical experience between two clinicians, the lower the odds of agreement between the two clinicians' respiratory physical examination findings. Interclinician agreement was demonstrated to be poor for recognition of most respiratory clinical signs in dogs and cats. Teaching and clinical experience acquisition should be encouraged to improve respiratory clinical sign recognition.

Association between respiratory clinical signs and respiratory localization in dogs and cats with abnormal breathing patterns.

The diagnostic values of respiratory signs have been under-investigated in pets. The study aim was to explore commonly assumed associations between respiratory signs and disease localization in pets with abnormal breathing patterns (ABP). Dogs and cats with ABP presenting to three hospitals were included if investigations permitted disease localization. Hypothesized associations between respiratory signs and disease location were evaluated via mixed-effects logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive diagnostic likelihood ratio were calculated. One-hundred and fifteen dogs and 49 cats with ABP were recruited. Confirmed associations included: inspiratory effort with extra-thoracic airway disease (odds ratio [OR], 9.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.0-27.2); expiratory effort with intra-thoracic airway disease (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.3-18.1); paradoxical breathing and attenuation of heart/lung sounds with pleural space disease (paradoxical breathing: OR, 4.5; 95% CI 1.7-12.1; sound attenuation: OR, 11.5; 95% CI 4.0-33.3); decreased nasal airflow and stertor with nasal/pharyngeal disease (nasal airflow: OR, 26.2; 95% CI 8.1-84.8; stertor: OR, 155.2; 95% CI 24.9-968.8); stridor with laryngeal or tracheal disease (laryngeal disease: OR, 39.9; 95% CI 7.6-209.0; tracheal disease: OR, 32.4; 95% CI 4.2-248.0); tracheal sensitivity with bronchial disease (OR, 3.8; 95% CI 1.5-9.6); crackles with pulmonary or bronchial disease (pulmonary disease: OR, 5.4; 95% CI 2.1-13.8; bronchial disease: OR, 3.9; 95% CI 1.6-9.8); and goose honking with tracheal disease (all dogs with goose honking had tracheal involvement). Select respiratory signs provide guidance to localize and prioritize causes of the underlying respiratory disease in pets, allowing targeted interventions in animals with ABP.

Blood cultures and blood microbiota analysis as surrogates for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis in dogs with bacterial pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of canine bacterial pneumonia relies on airway lavage to confirm septic, suppurative inflammation, and a positive bacterial culture. Considering risks of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collection, minimally invasive methods like culture or next generation sequencing of blood would be appealing. In dogs with bacterial pneumonia, our study aims included (1): determining proportion of agreement between cultivable bacteria in BALF and blood (2); characterizing BALF, blood, and oropharyngeal (OP) microbiota and determining if bacteria cultured from BALF were present in these communities; and (3) comparing relatedness of microbial community composition at all three sites. Bacterial cultures were performed on BALF and blood. After DNA extraction of BALF, blood and OP, 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were generated, sequenced, and compared to a bacterial gene sequence database. RESULTS: Disregarding one false positive, blood cultures were positive in 2/9 dogs (5 total isolates), all 5 isolates were present in BALF cultures (16 total isolates). Based on sequencing data, all sites had rich and diverse microbial communities. Comparing cultured BALF bacterial genera with sequenced taxa, all dogs had ≥1 cultured isolate present in their microbiota: cultured BALF isolates were found in microbiota of BALF (12/16), blood (7/16), and OP (6/11; only 7 dogs had OP swabs). Of 394 distinct taxa detected in BALF, these were present in 75% OP and 45% blood samples. BALF community composition was significantly different than OP (p = 0.0059) and blood (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Blood cultures are insensitive but specific for cultured BALF bacteria in canine bacterial pneumonia. Cultivable BALF bacteria were present in BALF, blood and OP microbiota to differing degrees.

The utility of point-of-care ultrasound right-sided cardiac markers as a screening test for moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension in dogs.

Dogs with respiratory disease can develop pulmonary hypertension (PH), a comorbid condition that can impact therapy and prognosis. Without confirmation using the criterion standard of echocardiography, this complication may be missed. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a simple, non-invasive screening test that may suggest PH. It was hypothesized that in dogs POCUS right-sided cardiac markers (R-SCM) at the subxiphoid view would predict moderate to severe PH confirmed by echocardiography. Forty-three client-owned dogs that underwent respiratory evaluation with POCUS and echocardiography were included. POCUS R-SCM evaluated in the subxiphoid view included subjective caudal vena cava distention (CVCsx), CVCsx >1cm, gallbladder wall edema and ascites. PH was defined by tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG) as mild (30-49.9mmHg), moderate (50-74.9mmHg) or severe (>75mmHg). POCUS subxiphoid views were blindly evaluated post hoc and compared to echocardiography. Chi square test and one-way ANOVA were used to evaluate correlations between POCUS R-SCM and echocardiographic diagnosis of moderate to severe PH. Twenty-six dogs with PH, and 17 dogs without PH, were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the presence or absence of any R-SCM between dogs with and without PH. When dogs with no PH and mild PH were grouped and compared to dogs with moderate to severe PH (i.e., dogs for which treatment for PH would be recommended), no significant differences in R-SCM were noted. POCUS R-SCM using the CVCsx view was not a sensitive screening test to identify dogs with PH in this study population.