Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Eng Technol ; 45(7): 532-545, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34060967

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, there are several diseases which affect different systems of the body, producing changes in the correct functioning of the organism and the people lifestyles. One of them is Parkinson's disease (PD), which is defined as a neurodegenerative disorder provoked by the destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the brain, resulting in a set of motor and non-motor symptoms. As this disease affects principally to ancient people, several researchers have studied different treatments and therapies for stopping neurodegeneration and diminishing symptoms, to improve the quality patients' lives. The most common therapies created for PD are based on pharmacological treatment for controlling the degeneration advance and the physical ones which do not reveal the progress of patients. For this reason, this review paper opens the possibility for using wearable motion capture systems as an option for the control and study of PD. Therefore, it aims to (1) study the different wearable systems used for capture the movements of PD patients and (2) determine which of them bring better results for monitoring and assess PD people. For the analysis, it uses papers based on experiments that prove the functioning of several motion systems in different aspects as monitoring, treatment and diagnose of the disease. As a result, it works with 30 papers which describe the factors mentioned before. Additionally, the paper uses journals and literature review about the pathology, its characteristics and the function of wearable sensors for the correct understanding of the topic.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Wearable Electronic Devices , Brain , Humans , Motion , Movement , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis
2.
J Med Eng Technol ; 45(5): 380-393, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847217

ABSTRACT

Neck injuries and pathologies are widespread and cause disability. Clinicians use different tools to measure the cervical spine' mobility to diagnose different disorders. There are many reliable assessment methods for this purpose, but their benefits have not been deeply investigated and compared, as well as their measurement results. This review aims to summarise the advantages, accuracy, and reliability, of measurement tools and devices used in studies or trails related to the neck and cervical spine evaluation, to evidence the use of inertial sensors and compare them, to highlight the best assessment systems and their characteristics. A literature review has been performed in a range of five years, to obtain information about cervical spine evaluation. Studies that met the established inclusion criteria were selected and classified according their pathology studied, objectives and methodologies followed when evaluating the cervical spine functionality. Studies were described chronologically highlighting the tools employed, where the motion capture systems and cervical range of motion devices stood out as the most used and reliable methods. Cervical spine assessment studies employing systems with inertial sensors as an accurate method, is not evidenced in the sample. However, they are widely tested and different studies validate these systems for their clinical area use, obtaining high reliability and repeatability. Thereby, this review argues that inertial sensors have proven to be a portable, and easy to use tool for the evaluation of neck and its related pathologies, with a great accuracy level.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...