Geriatric assessment for therapeutic decision-making regarding renal replacement in elderly patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

UNLABELLED: In patients older than 75 years with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the decision between treatment with dialysis [intention to treat with dialysis (ITD)] or conservative care (CC) is a challenge. Geriatric assessment can be helpful. The aim was to identify which factors had had an influence on decision-making. METHODS: We recruited 56 patients. At baseline we analyzed age, frailty (defined following the criteria of Fried et al. [J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:146-156]), dependence for activities of daily living (ADL), cognitive impairment, depression, comorbidity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. After full information about prognosis and treatment options, the preferences of the patients and families were taken into consideration as determinants in the decision-making process. During the follow-up, we evaluated clinical and laboratory parameters, hospitalization, mortality and reevaluated frailty. RESULTS: Twenty patients opted for CC, and 36 patients opted for ITD. On univariate analysis, the predictive factors of the election of CC were age, prefrailty, cognitive impairment, and dependence for ADL. In the multivariate analysis, age and prefrailty remained as predictors for the choice of CC. Hospitalizations were more frequent in CC. Survival was similar in both groups (p = 0.098). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment could be useful for decision-making about the treatment in elderly patients with CKD. CC may be a good treatment option.

Vitamin D deficiency in dialysis patients: effect of dialysis modality and implications on outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to cardiovascular disease and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to analyze the Vitamin D status of dialysis patients from a single center, study determinants of Vitamin D deficiency, and assess its implications on outcome. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 115 prevalent dialysis patients was carried out, in which clinical and dialysis-related characteristics including routine biochemistry were studied in relation to levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (25[OH]D, chemiluminescence). Survival was assessed after a median follow-up period of 413 days. RESULTS: 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency was present in 51% and 42% of the patients, respectively. Only 7% of the patients showed normal 25(OH)D levels. Peritoneal dialysis patients presented the lowest 25(OH)D levels. Also, a significant difference was found between on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and conventional HD (11 [6 to 16] versus 19 [13 to 27] ng/mL; P < 0.001; 25th to 75th percentiles, conventional HD versus OL-HDF respectively). In multinomial logistic regression analysis, patients on conventional HD had 8.35 greater odds (95% CI [2.04 to 34.20]) of 25(OH)D deficiency than OL-HDF even after adjustment for sex, parathyroid hormone, pH, and Charlson comorbidity index. During the follow-up period, 18 patients died. Both crude and adjusted (hazard ratio, 6.96; 95% CI [1.44 to 33.64]) Cox analysis identified 25(OH)D deficiency as a mortality risk factor. CONCLUSION: This observational study underlines the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in dialysis patients and its strong implications on outcome. Furthermore, our results suggest that OL-HDF was associated with a better preservation of the vitamin D status as compared with conventional HD.