Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 18(1): 220, 2018 09 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30236063

ABSTRACT

In aging societies, the last phase of people's lives changes profoundly, challenging traditional care provision in geriatric medicine and palliative care. Both specialties have to collaborate closely and geriatric palliative care (GPC) should be conceptualized as an interdisciplinary field of care and research based on the synergies of the two and an ethics of care.Major challenges characterizing the emerging field of GPC concern (1) the development of methodologically creative and ethically sound research to promote evidence-based care and teaching; (2) the promotion of responsible care and treatment decision making in the face of multiple complicating factors related to decisional capacity, communication and behavioural problems, extended disease trajectories and complex social contexts; (3) the implementation of coordinated, continuous care despite the increasing fragmentation, sectorization and specialization in health care.Exemplary strategies to address these challenges are presented: (1) GPC research could be enhanced by specific funding programs, specific patient registries and anticipatory consent procedures; (2) treatment decision making can be significantly improved using advance care planning programs that include adequate decision aids, including those that address proxies of patient who have lost decisional capacity; (3) care coordination and continuity require multiple approaches, such as care transition programs, electronic solutions, and professionals who act as key integrators.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Geriatrics/methods , Palliative Care/methods , Advance Care Planning/trends , Aged , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Geriatrics/trends , Humans , Palliative Care/trends
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(8): 1387-1392, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28283831

ABSTRACT

Self-administration of antibiotics using elastomeric pumps has become the most frequently used treatment modality at the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) unit of the University Hospital of Lausanne. However, it remains unknown how comfortable patients feel using this mode of treatment. A questionnaire was offered to all patients treated at the OPAT unit between June 2014 and December 2015. The questionnaire was distributed to 188 patients and 112 questionnaires were returned. Seventy-one patients were treated by self-administration, 21 attended the OPAT unit on a daily basis, and 20 received their antibiotics from home-care nurses. Overall, 83-97% of the patients gave the highest possible scores to the four items evaluating their global satisfaction. Subjects treated by self-administration gave a significantly better rating to 6 of the 17 semi-quantitative questions than the patients treated at the OPAT unit or by home-care nurses. There was no item which was more poorly rated by patients treated by self-administered OPAT than by the other treatment groups. In conclusion satisfaction was high in all patients treated by OPAT. The particularly high satisfaction of patients treated by self-administration of antibiotics with elastomeric pumps suggests that a significant number of patients are happy to take over some responsibility for their treatment. Patients' capacity to appropriate their care themselves should not be underestimated by health care professionals.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Outpatients , Patient Satisfaction , Administration, Intravenous , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland , Young Adult
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 35(5): 839-45, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886452

ABSTRACT

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been recognised as a useful, cost-effective and safe alternative to inpatient treatment, but no formal OPAT unit existed in Switzerland until recently. In December 2013 an OPAT unit was established at Lausanne University Hospital. We review here the experience of this new OPAT unit after 18 months of activity. Patient characteristics, clinical activities and outcomes were recorded prospectively. Need and acceptance was evaluated as number of OPAT courses administered and number of patients refusing OPAT. Safety and efficacy were evaluated as: (1) adverse events linked to antimicrobials and catheters, (2) re-admission to hospital, (3) rate of treatment failures and (4) mortality. Over 18 months, 179 courses of OPAT were administered. Acceptance was high with only four patients refusing OPAT. Urinary tract infections with resistant bacteria and musculoskeletal infections were the most common diagnoses. Self-administration of antibiotics using elastomeric pumps became rapidly the most frequently used approach. Sixteen patients presented with adverse events linked to antimicrobials and catheters. OPAT-related readmissions occurred in nine patients. The overall cure rate was 94 %. This study shows that OPAT is very well accepted by patients and medical staff, even in a setting which has not used this type of treatment approach until now. Self-administration using elastomeric pumps proved to be particularly useful, safe and efficient. OPAT offers a good alternative to hospitalisation for patients presenting with infections due to resistant bacteria that cannot be treated orally anymore and for difficult to treat infections.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Infusions, Parenteral , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Switzerland/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Rev Med Suisse ; 11(473): 1006, 1008-11, 2015 May 06.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26103763

ABSTRACT

Recommendations for malaria prevention for travelers planning a trip in medium to low risk countries differ between countries, despite the fact that people are exposed to the same risk in the travelled country. Decision aids have been developed and tested in a population of travelers planning a trip in such countries n order to present travelers the various prevention options and involve them in the decision. The use of the decision aid showed that he majority of people choose not to take chemoprophylaxis and that they could motivate their choice with valid reasons. The development of decision aids based on recognized quality criteria is foreseen; these will allow to improving the relevance of the recommendations and enable travelers to choose a prevention option that will be the closest to their values and preferences while following to the principles of medical ethics.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/administration & dosage , Malaria/prevention & control , Travel Medicine/methods , Travel , Chemoprevention/methods , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL