Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 310(1): 195-202, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797768

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence, microbial profile, and clinical risk factors of maternal bacteremia associated with intrapartum fever (IPF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, in a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center between 2012 and 2018. Demographic and labor characteristics of women, who delivered at term (37+0/7-41+6/7) and developed bacteremia following IPF were compared to a control group of women with IPF but without bacteremia. RESULTS: During the study period there were 86,590 deliveries in our center. Of them, 2074 women (2.4%) were diagnosed with IPF, of them, for 2052 women (98.93%) the blood maternal cultures were available. In 26 patients (1.25%) maternal bacteremia was diagnosed. A lower rate of epidural anesthesia (84.6% vs 95.9%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of antibiotics prophylaxis treatment prior to the onset of fever (30.8%.vs 12.1%, p = 0.006) were observed in patients who developed maternal bacteremia in comparison to those who have not. Maternal hyperpyrexia developed after initiation of antibiotics or without epidural anesthesia remained significantly associated with maternal bacteremia after applying a multivariate analysis, (Odds Ratio 3.14 95% CI 1.27-7.14, p = 0.009; 4.76 95% CI 1.35-12.5, p = 0.006; respectively). CONCLUSION: Maternal fever developing after initiation of antibiotics or without epidural is associated with maternal bacteremia.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Fever , Humans , Female , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Risk Factors , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/microbiology , Fever/etiology , Prevalence , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/microbiology
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 268: 116-120, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902748

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Breast augmentations are among the most common interventional cosmetic procedures performed nowadays, but scarcity of data exists on its effects on breastfeeding. Our aim was to evaluate whether breast augmentation adversely affects breastfeeding. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using database of a 2.3-million-member state mandate health maintenance organization (HMO). We identified primigravida women with a singleton pregnancy who delivered between the years 1998-2016, at gestational age of >34 weeks of gestation. Study group included women with breast augmentation surgery, which compared to control group of women who did not undergo breast augmentation. The primary outcome was documentation of any breastfeeding during the first three months postpartum. RESULTS: Overall, 14,919 women were included, of them, 3913 and 11,006 women with and without breast augmentation, respectively. Women with breasts augmentation were younger (29.8 ± 3.6 years vs. 30.9 ± 4.0 years, p < 0.001), had lower pre-pregnancy BMI (25.2 ± 5.0 vs. 26.36 ± 5.0 Kg/m2, p < 0.001), belong to higher socioeconomic status level and less religious communities. Breastfeeding rates in the study group were lower as compared to controls (70.7% VS 85.1%; p < 0.0001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.42(95% CI: 0.38-0.461). Maternal diabetes mellitus and advanced maternal age were associated with a lower likelihood of breastfeeding (95% CI:0.45-0.78, p-value < 0.0001), while belonging to religious communities were associated with higher breastfeeding rates (95% CI: 1.34-1.99, p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Women with breast augmentation tend to breastfeed less than women without breast augmentation, during the first three month of postpartum.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Mammaplasty , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(6): 1421-1427, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909089

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregnancy outcome of patients who undergo laparoscopy during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study, conducted in a single university-affiliated tertiary care medical center, comparing pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopy during pregnancy to women without operations during pregnancy. The study group (n = 232) included all pregnant women who underwent a single laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy (4-28 weeks of gestation) which culminated in delivery between 2006 and 2017; this study group was matched to a control group (n = 463) without surgical intervention during pregnancy, in a 2:1 ratio by maternal age, parity, and multiple gestation. RESULTS: The main pregnancy outcomes included preterm birth, cesarean section, small for gestational age (≤ 10 percentile), and Apgar score of less than 7 in 5 min. Laparoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk for cesarean section (32.3% vs. 24.6%, adjusted OR = 1.9, CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.011). We found no difference between the groups with regard to other outcomes, including rates of preterm birth (12.1% vs. 10.4%, adjusted OR = 1.3, CI 0.64-2.72, p = 0.451). In a subgroup analysis of the study group, various perioperative parameters such as operation duration, hospitalization length, and others, did not correlate with adverse pregnancy outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy during pregnancy may be associated with an increased rate of cesarean section. We did not find an increase in any other pregnancy or neonatal complication. Different perioperative parameters did not appear to predict adverse pregnancy outcome.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adult , Apgar Score , Case-Control Studies , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Maternal Age , Parity , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/etiology , Retrospective Studies
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708867

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the morphokinetic parameters of pre-implantation development between embryos of women of advanced maternal age (AMA) and young women. Methods: Time-lapse microscopy was used to compare morphokinetic variables between 495 embryos of AMA women ≥ age 42 years and 653 embryos of young patients ( 0.05). Conclusions: While early morphokinetic parameters do not reflect dynamics unique to embryos of older women, a tendency toward developmental arrest was observed, which would likely be even more pronounced at later stages of development.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL