Contemporary incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis and other major adverse cardiac events in the year after XIENCE V implantation: results from the 8,061-patient XIENCE V United States study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of clinical events after XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) stenting. BACKGROUND: The XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval) study is a prospective, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration-required post-approval study to examine safety and effectiveness in real-world settings. After an initial 5,062 patients, 2,999 more were included as part of the DAPT (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) trial (total n = 8,061). METHODS: One-year clinical events, including stent thrombosis (ST), cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion failure, and target lesion revascularization, were adjudicated according to Academic Research Consortium criteria, with ST and cardiac death/MI as primary and co-primary endpoints. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were assessed by multivariable analysis. A time-dependent covariate assessed the association between DAPT usage and ST. RESULTS: Roughly 61% were off-label; 85.6% remained on DAPT without interruption through 1 year. Incidences of definite/probable ST, cardiac death/MI, target lesion failure, and target lesion revascularization were 0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61% to 1.03%), 7.1% (95% CI: 6.51% to 7.68%), 8.9% (95% CI: 8.30% to 9.60%), and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.82% to 4.75%), respectively. Several independent clinical and angiographic predictors were identified for each outcome. Predictors of ST included DAPT interruption ≤ 30 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.63, 95% CI: 2.69 to 27.73, p = 0.0003), renal insufficiency (HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.71 to 8.09, p = 0.0009), and total stent length (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.47, p < 0.0001). A DAPT interruption >30 days was not predictive of ST. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-world population, XIENCE V demonstrated low event rates at 1 year, with several independent predictors. Early DAPT interruption (≤ 30 days) was the most potent predictor of ST, whereas delayed interruption (>30 days) was not predictive. (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval Study; NCT00676520).

A new era of prospective real-world safety evaluation primary report of XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System condition-of-approval post-market study).

OBJECTIVES: The XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Condition-of-Approval Post-Market study) sought to: 1) evaluate the safety of everolimus-eluting coronary stent systems (EECSS) in a contemporary cohort of real-world subjects; and 2) prospectively test the quality of event reporting with analysis of matched patients from the randomized SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) trial. BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of EECSS in selected "standard-risk" patients. METHODS: The XIENCE V USA trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in unselected patients. The primary endpoint was Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST); the co-primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction at 1 year. Secondary analyses included: 1) stratification by standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts; and 2) late ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption. RESULTS: Of 5,054 participants (1,875 standard-risk; 3,179 extended-risk), 4,958 (98.1%) reached 1-year follow-up. The rate of ARC-defined definite and probable ST was 0.84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60% to 1.14%) in the overall population and 0.33% (95% CI: 0.12% to 10.72%) and 1.14% (95% CI: 0.80% to 11.58%) in the standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts, respectively. No late ST was observed after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption in either cohort after 6 months. The composite rate of cardiac death and ARC-defined myocardial infarction was 6.5% (95% CI: 5.79% to 17.17%) in the overall population, 3.8% (95% CI: 2.98% to 14.78%) in the standard-risk cohort, and 8.0% (95% CI: 7.09% to 19.02%) in the extended-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study comprehensively reports ST rates for EECSS in a contemporary real-world population. The absence of ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption beyond 6 months in standard-risk and high-risk patients is notable. Consistent safety outcomes between matched standard-risk cohorts from the XIENCE V USA study and the SPIRIT IV randomized trial suggest that this study affords a reliable benchmark for understanding the safety of EECSS in the context of real-world clinical practice. (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval Study; NCT00676520).

The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type.

BACKGROUND: Although previous reports of carotid stenting with embolic protection (CAS) have focused on clinical outcomes of death, stroke and myocardial infarction, there are few data available characterizing the strokes that occur during CAS, thus limiting understanding of potential mechanisms. This report examines the timing, location, severity, and type of strokes occurring with CAS in the Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Unanticipated or Rare Events (CAPTURE) study. METHODS: The CAPTURE is a prospective, multicenter registry conducted to assess outcomes of CAS in the postapproval setting after device approval. A neurologist examined the patients before the procedure, at 24 hours and 30 days post-procedure. The primary end point was a composite of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days post-procedure. Strokes and all neurologic events suspected to be strokes were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Adjudication Committee using prespecified definitions. Source documents of all patients with strokes in this cohort were reviewed. RESULTS: The 30-day results were available for 3500 patients. The 30-day primary end point event rate of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was 6.3% (95% confidence interval: 5.5%-7.1%), and the rate of major stroke and death was 2.9% (95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 3.5). 4.8% of patients experienced a stroke (3.9% ipsilateral and 0.9% nonipsilateral, 2% major). A majority of stroke symptoms (57.7%) were noted post-procedure and pre-discharge, whereas 22.3% were noted during the procedure and 20% postdischarge. A similar timing distribution regardless of preprocedural symptomatic status was found.Overall, 41% (69 of 170) of all strokes were major. The incidence of major strokes was statistically significantly greater among symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients, 4.6% (22 of 482) and 1.6% (47 of 3018), respectively. There were more minor than major strokes in asymptomatic patients (63% vs. 37%; P=0.10), whereas stroke severity was equally distributed in symptomatic patients. Among the ipsilateral strokes, almost half (44%) were major, whereas only one-quarter (26%) of the nonipsilateral strokes were major.Overall, 23% of the major strokes were hemorrhagic and 94% of these strokes were noted on the ipsilateral side. There was a tendency toward more major hemorrhagic strokes in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (36% vs. 17%; P=0.07). Fifty-four percent of the strokes post-procedure and pre-discharge were major, whereas 27% of the strokes postdischarge were major. Furthermore, 65% of hemorrhagic strokes were noted post-procedure and pre-discharge, 30% postdischarge. CONCLUSIONS: Strokes related to CAS seem to become clinically apparent after the procedure but before discharge in the majority of events. Nevertheless, a significant minority of stroke symptoms follows discharge from the hospital, typically after 24 hours. Timing of stroke after CAS seems to be similar to timing of stroke after carotid endarterectomy. Moreover, nearly 1 in 5 strokes occur in a nonipsilateral distribution, with the exception of intraprocedural events, which were all ipsilateral to the stent being implanted. Hemorrhagic stroke seemed to be more prevalent in the strokes occurring in the post-procedure period. These descriptors of stroke severity, location, and timing may provide insight in to the mechanistic causes of adverse neurologic outcomes in CAS.

A pilot, prospective evaluation of a novel alternative for maintenance therapy of breast cancer-associated lymphedema [ISRCTN76522412].

BACKGROUND: Prospective investigations of complete decongestive lymphatic physiotherapy (CDPT), including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), have validated the efficacy of these interventions for the initial reduction of edema and long-term maintenance of limb volume in lymphedema. However, CDPT demands substantial time and effort from patients to maintain these benefits; the treatments are not always well-accepted, and patients may suffer from a deterioration in quality-of-life or a time-dependent loss of initial treatment benefits. A new device designed for home use by the patient, the Flexitouch, has been developed to mechanically simulate MLD. We have undertaken a prospective, randomized, crossover study of the efficacy of the Flexitouch, when compared to massage, in the self-administered maintenance therapy of lymphedema. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, crossover study of maintenance therapy was performed in 10 patients with unilateral breast cancer-associated lymphedema of the arm. Each observation phase included self-administered treatment with the Flexitouch or massage, 1 hour daily for 14 days, respectively, followed by crossover to the alternate treatment phase. Each treatment phase was preceded by a 1 week treatment washout, with use of garment only. The sequence of treatment was randomly assigned. The potential impact of treatment modality on quality of life was assessed with serial administration of the SF-36. RESULTS: Statistical analysis disclosed that the order of treatment had no outcome influence, permitting 10 comparisons within each treatment group. Post-treatment arm volume reduced significantly after the Flexitouch, but not after self-administered massage. The patients' mean weight decreased significantly with Flexitouch use, but not with massage. The Flexitouch device was apparently well-tolerated and accepted by patients. Serial SF-36 administration showed no deterioration in physical or psychosocial scores compared to baseline measurements; there were no statistical differences in scores when the two treatment modalities were compared. CONCLUSION: This short-term prospective evaluation of the Flexitouch suggests that the device may provide better maintenance edema control than self-adiminstered massage in breast cancer-associated lymphedema. The apparent ease of use and reliability of response to the device suggest that further broad-scale testing is warranted.