ABSTRACT
AIMS: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is characterized by the accumulation of transthyretin (TTR) protein in the myocardium. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a descriptive summary of the clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of various agents used in ATTR-CM, with a goal of identifying the contemporary gaps in literature and to reveal future research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: The search was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search using several databases for observational and clinical trials investigating the treatment modalities for ATTR-CM was undertaken. We extracted data including study characteristics, primary endpoints, and adverse events from each study. A total of 19 studies were included in our scoping review. 8 were clinical trials and 11 were observational analyses. The drugs evaluated included tafamadis, acoramidis, revusiran, TUDCA and doxycycline, diflusinil, inotersan, eplontersen, and patisiran. Tafamidis has shown to be efficacious in the management of ATTR-CM, particularly when initiated at earlier stages. RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotide drugs have shown promising impacts on quality of life. Additionally, this review identified gaps in the literature, particularly among long-term outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and the translation of research into economic contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple pharmacological options are potential disease-modifying therapies for ATTR-CM. However, many gaps exist in the understanding of these various drug therapies, warranting further research. The future directions for management of ATTR-CM are promising in regard to improving prognostic implications.
ABSTRACT
Medicare beneficiaries' healthcare spending varies across geographical regions, influenced by availability of medical resources and institutional efficiency. We aimed to evaluate whether social vulnerability influences healthcare costs among Medicare beneficiaries. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to determine whether the social vulnerability index (SVI), released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), was associated with average submitted covered charges, total payment amounts, or total covered days upon hospital discharge among Medicare beneficiaries. We used information from discharged Medicare beneficiaries from hospitals participating in the Inpatient Prospective Payment System. Covariate adjustment included demographic information consisting of age groups, race/ethnicity, and Hierarchical Condition Category risk score. The regressions were performed with weights proportioned to the number of discharges. Average submitted covered charges significantly correlated with SVI (ß = 0.50, p < 0.001) in the unadjusted model and remained significant in the covariates-adjusted model (ß = 0.25, p = 0.039). The SVI was not significantly associated with the total payment amounts (ß = -0.07, p = 0.238) or the total covered days (ß = 0.00, p = 0.953) in the adjusted model. Regional variations in Medicare beneficiaries' healthcare spending exist and are influenced by levels of social vulnerability. Further research is warranted to fully comprehend the impact of social determinants on healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Medicare , Patient Discharge , Social Vulnerability , Humans , United States , Medicare/economics , Patient Discharge/economics , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Heart failure (HF) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in women. Population-level analyses shed light on existing disparities and promote targeted interventions. We evaluated HF-related mortality data in women in the United States to identify disparities based on race/ethnicity, urbanization level, and geographic region. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database to identify HF-related mortality in the death files from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted HF mortality rates were standardized to the 2000 US population. We fit log-linear regression models to analyze mortality trends. Age-adjusted HF mortality rates in women have decreased significantly over time, from 97.95 in 1999 to 89.19 in 2020. Mortality mainly downtrended from 1999 to 2012, followed by a significant increase from 2012 to 2020. Our findings revealed disparities in mortality rates based on race and ethnicity, with the most affected population being non-Hispanic Black (age-adjusted mortality rates [AAMR] 90.36), followed by non-Hispanic White (AAMR 83.25), American Indian/Alaska Native (AAMR 64.27), and Asian/Pacific Islander populations (AAMR 37.46). We also observed that nonmetropolitan (AAMR 103.36) and Midwestern (AAMR 90.45) regions had higher age-adjusted mortality rates compared with metropolitan (AAMR 78.43) regions and other US census regions. In conclusion, significant differences in HF mortality rates were observed based on race/ethnicity, urbanization level, and geographic region. Disparities in HF outcomes persist and efforts to reduce HF-related mortality rates should focus on targeted interventions that address social determinants of health, including access to care and socioeconomic status.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Heart Failure , Female , Humans , Cohort Studies , Heart Failure/mortality , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Racial GroupsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a key support modality for cardiogenic shock. The 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart transplant allocation algorithm prioritizes VA-ECMO patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of VA-ECMO in bridging to advanced heart failure therapies. METHODS: We analyzed adult patients from the multicenter Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry receiving VA-ECMO for cardiac support or resuscitation between 2016 and 2021 in the United States, comparing bridge-to-transplant (BTT) and non-BTT intent patients, as well as pre- vs post-2018 patients, on a wide range of demographic and clinical outcome predictors. RESULTS: Of 17,087 patients, 797 received left ventricular assist device (LVAD)/heart transplant, 7,931 died or had poor prognosis, and 8,359 had expected recovery at ECMO discontinuation. Patients supported with BTT intent had lower clinical acuity than non-BTT candidates and were more likely to receive LVAD/transplant. The proportion of patients who received VA-ECMO as BTT and received LVAD/transplant increased after 2018. Post-2018 BTT patients had significantly lower clinical acuity and higher likelihood of transplant than both post-2018 non-BTT patients and pre-2018 BTT patients. ECMO complications were associated with lower likelihood of transplant but were significantly less common post-2018 than pre-2018. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of the 2018 UNOS allocation system, ECMO utilization as BTT or LVAD has increased, and the acuity of BTT intent patients cannulated for ECMO has decreased. There has not yet been an increase in more acute ECMO patients getting transplanted. This may partially explain the post-transplant outcomes of ECMO patients in the current era reported in UNOS.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Adult , Humans , Heart Failure/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a direct myosin activator that augments left ventricular systolic function. This review compares OM to placebo by evaluating its effect on clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A literature search of multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating OM versus placebo was undertaken. Six RCTs comprising 9596 patients were included. Use of OM was associated with a reduced risk of stroke (RR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92). There was no significant mean difference (MD) change in the KCCQ total symptom score (MD: 1.82, 95% CI - 1.33 to 4.97), all-cause death (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.93-1.07), hospital readmissions (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.03), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.05; 95% CI 0.83-1.33), cardiovascular death (RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.10), heart failure (HF) events (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.89-1.02), or a composite of cardiovascular death or HF events (RR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-1.02). In addition, OM was associated with an increased risk of dizziness (RR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.04-1.50) and hypotension (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.01-1.36). Other adverse events including ventricular tachyarrhythmias, (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.82-1.11), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter (RR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.46-1.18), dyspnea (RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.86-1.18), and acute renal injury (RR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.60-1.27) were not significant. CONCLUSION: OM is generally well tolerated. We identified a reduced risk of stroke with use of OM. However, there was no improvement in other clinical outcomes or quality of life. Study protocol was registered in PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022348423).
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Stroke , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Stroke Volume , Stroke/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT
Outcomes for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients remain relatively poor despite significant advancements in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and temporary circulatory support (TCS) technologies. Mortality from CS shows great disparities that seem to reflect large variations in access to care and physician practice patterns. Recent reports of different models to standardize care in CS have shown considerable potential at improving outcomes. The creation of regional, integrated, 3-tiered systems, would facilitate standardized interventions and equitable access to care. Multidisciplinary CS teams at Level I centers would direct care in a hub-and-spoke model through jointly developed protocols and real-time shared decision making. Levels II and III centers would provide early access to life-saving therapies and safe transfer to designated hub centers. In regions with large geographical distances, the implementation of telemedicine-cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) care can be an important resource for the creation of effective systems of care.
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged into a worldwide pandemic of epic proportion. Beyond pulmonary involvement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a significant subset of patients experiences acute kidney injury. Patients who die from severe disease most notably show diffuse acute tubular injury on postmortem examination with a possible contribution of focal macro- and microvascular thrombi. Renal biopsies in patients with proteinuria and hematuria have demonstrated a glomerular dominant pattern of injury, most notably a collapsing glomerulopathy reminiscent of findings seen in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in individuals with apolipoprotein L-1 (APOL1) risk allele variants. Although various mechanisms have been proposed for the pathogenesis of acute kidney injury in SARS-CoV-2 infection, direct renal cell infection has not been definitively demonstrated and our understanding of the spectrum of renal involvement remains incomplete. Herein we discuss the biology, pathology, and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated renal involvement. We discuss the molecular biology, risk factors, and pathophysiology of renal injury associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We highlight the characteristics of specific renal pathologies based on native kidney biopsy and autopsy. Additionally, a brief discussion on ancillary studies and challenges in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is presented.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19/complications , Kidney/pathology , Acute Kidney Injury/pathology , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , COVID-19/pathology , Humans , Kidney Tubular Necrosis, Acute/pathology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ASPIRE and ENDEAVOUR trials have shown cardiovascular adverse effects in patients treated with carfilzomib-based regimens. Therefore, we conducted this meta- analysis of published clinical trials to identify the cumulative incidence and risk of cardiovascular adverse effects due to carfilzomib. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library was performed, and we identified 45 prospective trials of carfilzomib with data on 5583 patients. Among all patients being treated with carfilzomib (N=5,583), 8.9% sustained all grade cardiotoxicity, while 4.4% sustained high-grade cardiotoxicity. All-grade hypertension was present in 13.2%, while the incidence of high-grade hypertension was 5.3%. RESULTS: The observed incidences of all-grade heart failure, edema, and ischemia were 5.1%, 20.7%, and 4.6%, respectively. Likewise, for high-grade heart failure and edema observed incidence was 3.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. There was no difference in the event rate of all and highgrade cardiotoxicity between newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and relapsed/refractory (p-value 0.42 and 0.86, respectively). Likewise, we did not observe any difference in the event rate of all and high-grade cardiotoxicity when carfilzomib was used as a single agent versus when used in combination therapy with other agents (p-value 0.43 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSION: Carfilzomib is associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular toxicity and hypertension. With the increasing utilization of carfilzomib, it is critical for primary care physicians, oncologists and cardiologists to be aware of the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with the use of carfilzomib to recognize and treat baseline cardiovascular risk factors in such patients.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Cardiotoxicity/therapy , Oligopeptides/toxicity , Disease Management , Humans , Incidence , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biological considerations suggest that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors might influence the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether continuing versus discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) affects outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: The REPLACE COVID trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label trial done at 20 large referral hospitals in seven countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older who were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and were receiving a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor before admission. Individuals with contraindications to continuation or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to continuation or discontinuation of their renin-angiotensin system inhibitor using permuted block randomisation, with allocation concealed using a secure web-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was a global rank score in which participants were ranked across four hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, time on renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction during the hospitalisation. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The REPLACE COVID trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04338009. FINDINGS: Between March 31 and Aug 20, 2020, 152 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either continue or discontinue renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy (continuation group n=75; discontinuation group n=77). Mean age of participants was 62 years (SD 12), 68 (45%) were female, mean body-mass index was 33 kg/m2 (SD 8), and 79 (52%) had diabetes. Compared with discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, continuation had no effect on the global rank score (median rank 73 [IQR 40-110] for continuation vs 81 [38-117] for discontinuation; ß-coefficient 8 [95% CI -13 to 29]). There were 16 (21%) of 75 participants in the continuation arm versus 14 (18%) of 77 in the discontinuation arm who required intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation, and 11 (15%) of 75 participants in the continuation group versus ten (13%) of 77 in the discontinuation group died. 29 (39%) participants in the continuation group and 28 (36%) participants in the discontinuation group had at least one adverse event (χ2 test of adverse events between treatment groups p=0·77). There was no difference in blood pressure, serum potassium, or creatinine during follow-up across the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Consistent with international society recommendations, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors can be safely continued in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. FUNDING: REPLACE COVID Investigators, REPLACE COVID Trial Social Fundraising Campaign, and FastGrants.
Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/virology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The estimated prevalence of AL CA in the US is approximately 8-12 cases per million. Almost 30-50% diagnosed cases of AL amyloid in the US have multisystem involvement, including cardiac involvement. Even with the availability of advanced diagnostic testing and novel therapies, prognosis remains poor. It is overlooked as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction leading to a delay in diagnosis when management options are limited and associated with poor survival outcomes. Therefore, the education of physicians is needed to ensure that it would be highly considered as a differential diagnosis. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the advances in the diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis with the aim of educating colleagues who provide care in the primary care setting. We have summarized the pathogenesis of amyloidosis, its association with plasma cell dyscrasias, novel diagnostic and surveillance approaches including echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, histopathologic techniques, systemic biomarkers, and advanced treatment approaches including supportive symptomatic management and standard of care chemotherapy targeting the amyloid deposits. Given the overall poor prognosis of amyloidosis, we have also discussed the role of palliative and hospice care.
Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/diagnosis , Animals , Biomarkers/analysis , Disease Management , Echocardiography , Heart Diseases/complications , Heart Diseases/pathology , Heart Diseases/therapy , Humans , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/complications , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/pathology , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Myocardium/pathology , Paraproteinemias/complicationsABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is associated with high incidence of multiorgan dysfunction and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which facilitates SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry, may be impacted by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), two commonly used antihypertensive classes. In a multicenter, international randomized controlled trial that began enrollment on March 31, 2020, participants are randomized to continuation vs withdrawal of their long-term outpatient ACEI or ARB upon hospitalization with COVID-19. The primary outcome is a hierarchical global rank score incorporating time to death, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of renal replacement or vasopressor therapy, and multiorgan dysfunction severity. Approval for the study has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution, and all participants will provide informed consent. A data safety monitoring board has been assembled to provide independent oversight of the project.
Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , COVID-19/complications , Multiple Organ Failure/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Adult , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Prospective Studies , Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Severity of Illness Index , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a serious illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The symptoms of the disease range from asymptomatic to mild respiratory symptoms and even potentially life-threatening cardiovascular and pulmonary complications. Cardiac complications include acute myocardial injury, arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock and even sudden death. Furthermore, drug interactions with COVID-19 therapies may place the patient at risk for arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy and sudden death. In this review, we summarise the cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 infection and propose a simplified algorithm for patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Patient Care Management/methods , Pneumonia, Viral , Algorithms , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/classification , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/virology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
Cardiac arrest, though not common during coronary angiography, is increasingly occurring in the catheterization laboratory because of the expanding complexity of percutaneous interventions (PCI) and the patient population being treated. Manual chest compression in the cath lab is not easily performed, often interrupted, and can result in the provider experiencing excessive radiation exposure. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provides unique advantages over manual performance of chest compression for treating cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab. Such advantages include the potential for uninterrupted chest compressions, less radiation exposure, better quality chest compressions, and less crowded conditions around the catheterization table, allowing more attention to ongoing PCI efforts during CPR. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not responding to standard ACLS therapy can be transported to the hospital while mechanical CPR is being performed to provide safe and continuous chest compressions en route. Once at the hospital, advanced circulatory support can be instituted during ongoing mechanical CPR. This article summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology and nature of cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab and discusses the mechanics of CPR and defibrillation in that setting. It also reviews the various types of mechanical CPR and their potential roles in and on the way to the laboratory. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1292-1299).
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/trends , Emergency Medical Technicians/trends , Heart Arrest/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
Infective endocarditis is a potentially life threatening condition. It is associated with high mortality and morbidity resulting mostly due to cardiorespiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a modality of treatment used to support hypoxic respiratory failure especially in patients who are already on mechanical ventilation. Continuous renal replacement therapy is added mainly for maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance. Here we report a case series of patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis who were treated with combined extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy. Three patients in the age group 20-60 years were admitted with clinical features suggestive of infective endocarditis. During the course of hospital stay they developed cardiorespiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory hypoxia. It was complicated by heart failure, renal failure and fluid overload which required initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy. All the three patients succumbed in spite of the aggressive treatment. In addition to the role played by each complication, delayed start of continuous renal replacement therapy might have also contributed to the high mortality. Early initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy for management of fluid overload needs to be considered in the management of these critically ill patients.