Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Materials (Basel) ; 14(24)2021 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34947422

ABSTRACT

Osseointegration is the basis of successful dental implantology and the foundation of cementless arthroplasty and the osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system. Osseointegration has been considered irreversible thus far. However, controlled heating or cooling of dental implants could selectively damage the bone at the bone-implant interface, causing the reversal of osseointegration or "osseodisintegration". This review compares five methods for implant removal, published as patent documents between 2010 and 2018, which have not yet been discussed in the scientific literature. We describe these methods and evaluate their potential for reversing osseointegration. The five methods have several technical and methodological similarities: all methods include a handpiece, a connecting device for coronal access, and a controlling device, as well as the application of mechanical and/or thermal energy. The proposed method of quantifying the temperature with a sensor as the sole means for regulating the process seems inadequate. A database used in one of the methods, however, allows a more precise correlation between a selected implant and the energy needed for its removal, thus avoiding unnecessary trauma to the patient. A flapless, microinvasive, and bone-conserving approach for removing failed dental implants, facilitating successful reimplantation, would benefit dental implantology. These methods could be adapted to cementless medical implants and osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetics. However, for some of the methods discussed herein, further research may be necessary.

2.
Braz Dent J ; 27(1): 37-40, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007343

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to investigate the success and survival of restored endodontically treated teeth (ETT) in a general practice environment related to periodontal parameters. Data from 360 restored ETT treated between 2000 and 2011 were collected. Dates of interventions like restorations, repairs, replacements and extractions were recorded. Additionally, general information about patients and dentitions as well as periodontal status was recorded. Success was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and a multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to assess variables influencing success and survival. After a mean observation time of 4.34 years (range 0.6 - 11.6 years), 19 teeth were extracted and 27 restorations needed repair or replacement. According to the Cox regression, increasing maximum pocket depth of the tooth resulted in a higher risk for failure (p=0.012). In conclusion, periodontal pocket depth was found to be a significant factor in the survival of restored ETT.


Subject(s)
Periodontal Diseases/physiopathology , Root Canal Therapy , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans
3.
Braz. dent. j ; 27(1): 37-40, Jan.-Feb. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777138

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of the present study was to investigate the success and survival of restored endodontically treated teeth (ETT) in a general practice environment related to periodontal parameters. Data from 360 restored ETT treated between 2000 and 2011 were collected. Dates of interventions like restorations, repairs, replacements and extractions were recorded. Additionally, general information about patients and dentitions as well as periodontal status was recorded. Success was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and a multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to assess variables influencing success and survival. After a mean observation time of 4.34 years (range 0.6 - 11.6 years), 19 teeth were extracted and 27 restorations needed repair or replacement. According to the Cox regression, increasing maximum pocket depth of the tooth resulted in a higher risk for failure (p=0.012). In conclusion, periodontal pocket depth was found to be a significant factor in the survival of restored ETT.


Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a taxa de sucesso e de sobrevivência de dentes restaurados e tratados endodonticamente (DTE) em uma clínica privada e relacionar com índices periodontais. Dados de 360 restaurações realizadas em DTE realizadas entre 2000 e 2011 foram coletados. As datas das intervenções, como restaurações, reparos, substituições e extrações foram registradas. Ainda, informações gerais relacionadas aos pacientes, aos dentes envolvidos e ao estado periodontal foram também coletadas. A taxa de sucesso foi analisada utilizando o método estatístico Kaplan-Meier e uma análise multivariada do tipo regressão de Cox foi realizada para avaliar variáveis que influenciaram na taxa de sucesso e de sobrevivência. Depois de um período de observação médio de 4,34 anos (0,6-11,6 anos), 19 dentes foram extraídos e 27 restaurações precisaram de reparo ou substituição. De acordo com a regressão de Cox, o aumento na profundidade de bolsa periodontal do dente resulta em um maior risco de falha (p=0,012). Em conclusão, a profundidade de bolsa periodontal foi considerada como um fator significativo na sobrevivência de dentes restaurados e tratados endodonticamente.


Subject(s)
Humans , Periodontal Diseases/physiopathology , Root Canal Therapy , Dental Restoration Failure
4.
J Endod ; 39(11): 1335-40, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24139251

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study evaluated the survival of endodontically treated teeth (ETTs) and investigated factors influencing restoration and tooth survival. METHODS: Data from 795 ETTs were recorded, and success (restoration still intact) and survival (restoration intact or failed/repaired/replaced and tooth still in situ) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the variables influencing success and survival. RESULTS: At the end of the observation period (mean observation time = 4.48 years), 45 teeth had been extracted (annual failure rate for survival = 1.9% at 9.6 years) and 114 restorations had received a restorative follow-up treatment (annual failure rate for success = 4.9% at 9.6 years). CONCLUSIONS: ETTs showed acceptable survival and success in the long-term. Variables showing significant influence on survival were the number of teeth in the dentition and the presence of decay at the moment the patient entered the practice.


Subject(s)
Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Tooth, Nonvital/therapy , Adult , Community-Based Participatory Research , Crowns/statistics & numerical data , Dental Prosthesis Repair/statistics & numerical data , Dental Restoration Failure/statistics & numerical data , Denture, Overlay/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inlays/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tooth Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL