Differences in health care utilisation between elderly from ethnic minorities and ethnic Dutch elderly.

INTRODUCTION: In the Netherlands, as in other Western countries, ethnic minority elderly are more often in poorer health than the indigenous population. The expectation is that this health disadvantage results in more frequent use of health care services. METHODS: We studied registered data on the proportion of health care receivers, frequency of use, and health care costs collected by a major Dutch health insurance company in 2010. Data from 10,316 Turkish, 14,490 Moroccan, 8,619 Surinamese, and 1,064 Moluccan adults aged 55 years and older were compared with data from a sample of 33,725 ethnic Dutch older adults. RESULTS: Unadjusted and adjusted (for age and gender) analyses showed the following. Moluccans had lower usage levels for all types of health care services. Use of primary health care facilities was higher for Turks, Moroccans, and Surinamese compared with the ethnic Dutch, with the exception that physical therapy was less frequently used among the Turks and Moroccans. Use of hospital care was lower, except for the Surinamese, who had a similar level of usage to that of the ethnic Dutch. CONCLUSIONS: The health disadvantage previously observed within most ethnic minority elderly populations does not result in an overall more frequent use of health care services. Further research is needed for the interpretation of the ethnic variations in health care use as potentially inequitable, by taking medical need, patient treatment preferences, and treatment adherence into account.

Does recognition of depression in primary care affect outcome? The PREDICT-NL study.

BACKGROUND: Detection rates of depression in primary care are <50%. Studies showed similar outcome after 12 months for recognized and unrecognized depression. Outcome beyond 12 months is less well studied. OBJECTIVE: We investigated recognition of depression in primary care and its relation to outcome after 6, 12 and 39 months. METHODS: Data were used from a prospective cohort study of 1293 consecutive general practice attendees (PREDICT-NL), who were followed up after 6 (n = 1236), 12 (n = 1179) and 39 (n = 752) months. We measured the presence and severity of major depressive disorder (MDD) according to DSM-IV criteria and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and mental function with Short Form 12 (SF-12). Recognition of depression was assessed using international classification of primary care codes (P03 and P76) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (N06A) codes from the GP records (6 months before/after baseline). RESULTS: At baseline, 170 (13%) of the participants had MDD, of whom 36% were recognized by their GP. The relative risk of being depressed after 39 months was 1.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-2.7] for participants with recognized depression compared to unrecognized depression. At baseline, participants with recognized depression had more depressive symptoms (mean difference PHQ-9 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-3.9) and worse mental function (mean difference mental component summary -3.8, 95% CI -7.8 to 0.2) than unrecognized depressed participants. After 12 and 39 months, mean scores for both groups did not differ but were worse than those without depression. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with MDD is recognized in primary care. Those who were unrecognized had comparable outcome after 12 and 39 months as participants with recognized depression.