Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the changing landscape of circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages in the local community of Hong Kong throughout 2022. We examined how adjustments to quarantine arrangements influenced the transmission pattern of Omicron variants in a city with relatively rigorous social distancing measures at that time. METHODS: In 2022, a total of 4684 local SARS-CoV-2 genomes were sequenced using the Oxford Nanopore GridION sequencer. SARS-CoV-2 consensus genomes were generated by MAFFT, and the maximum likelihood phylogeny of these genomes was determined using IQ-TREE. The dynamic changes in lineages were depicted in a time tree created by Nextstrain. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between changes in the number of lineages and adjustments to quarantine arrangements. RESULTS: By the end of 2022, a total of 83 SARS-CoV-2 lineages were identified in the community. The increase in the number of new lineages was significantly associated with the relaxation of quarantine arrangements (One-way ANOVA, F(5, 47) = 18.233, p < 0.001)). Over time, Omicron BA.5 sub-lineages replaced BA.2.2 and became the predominant Omicron variants in Hong Kong. The influx of new lineages reshaped the dynamics of Omicron variants in the community without fluctuating the death rate and hospitalization rate (One-way ANOVA, F(5, 47) = 2.037, p = 0.091). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that even with an extended mandatory quarantine period for incoming travelers, it may not be feasible to completely prevent the introduction and subsequent community spread of highly contagious Omicron variants. Ongoing molecular surveillance of COVID-19 remains essential to monitor the emergence of new recombinant variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Genome, Viral , Phylogeny , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hong Kong/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/classification , Physical Distancing , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Child , Aged , Young Adult
2.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1324494, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264489

ABSTRACT

The prolonged incubation period of traditional culture methods leads to a delay in diagnosing invasive infections. Nanopore 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Nanopore 16S) offers a potential rapid diagnostic approach for directly identifying bacteria in infected body fluids. To evaluate the clinical utility of Nanopore 16S, we conducted a study involving the collection and sequencing of 128 monomicrobial samples, 65 polymicrobial samples, and 20 culture-negative body fluids. To minimize classification bias, taxonomic classification was performed using 3 analysis pipelines: Epi2me, Emu, and NanoCLUST. The result was compared to the culture references. The limit of detection of Nanopore 16S was also determined using simulated bacteremic blood samples. Among the three classifiers, Emu demonstrated the highest concordance with the culture results. It correctly identified the taxon of 125 (97.7%) of the 128 monomicrobial samples, compared to 109 (85.2%) for Epi2me and 102 (79.7%) for NanoCLUST. For the 230 cultured species in the 65 polymicrobial samples, Emu correctly identified 188 (81.7%) cultured species, compared to 174 (75.7%) for Epi2me and 125 (54.3%) for NanoCLUST. Through ROC analysis on the monomicrobial samples, we determined a threshold of relative abundance at 0.058 for distinguishing potential pathogens from background in Nanopore 16S. Applying this threshold resulted in the identification of 107 (83.6%), 117 (91.4%), and 114 (91.2%) correctly detected samples for Epi2me, Emu, and NanoCLUST, respectively, in the monomicrobial samples. Nanopore 16S coupled with Epi2me could provide preliminary results within 6 h. However, the ROC analysis of polymicrobial samples exhibited a random-like performance, making it difficult to establish a threshold. The overall limit of detection for Nanopore 16S was found to be about 90 CFU/ml.

3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 103(4): 115726, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691105

ABSTRACT

This study used digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) to determine whether envelope (E) gene-negative and nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive (E-N+) results obtained with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay are reliable. Using droplet digital PCR results as a reference, 18 of 22 E-N+ samples with a low viral load (81.8%) were identified as true positives.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Humans , Nasopharynx , Nucleocapsid/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J Clin Virol ; 131: 104593, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32823131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay is only validated on nasopharyngeal specimens for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Other specimen types such as deep throat saliva (DTS), also known as posterior oropharyngeal saliva and lower-respiratorytract specimens (LRT) including sputum, tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage are not validated. These non-validated specimen types, however, do have significant diagnostic value. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the performance of Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from DTS and LRT specimens. METHODS: 162 specimens from 158 patients with suspected COVID-19 disease were tested with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay. These included 120 DTS and 42 LRT specimens i.e. 35 sputum, 6 tracheal aspirate and one bronchoalveolar lavage. Results were compared to those by the TIB-Molbiol LightMix® SarbecoV E-gene assay. RESULTS: Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay has satisfactory performance when compared with reference method. The positive percent agreement (PPA) of DTS and LRT specimens were 98.86 % & 100 % respectively while the negative percent agreement (NPA) was 100 % for both DTS and LRT specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated with appropriate sample pre-treatment, Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay can be used to test on non-validated specimen types including DTS & LRT specimens.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Respiratory System/virology , Saliva/virology , Specimen Handling/methods , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , Pandemics , Pharynx/virology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 41(5): 428-32, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19122926

ABSTRACT

We investigated the occurrence and diversity of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) enzymes among antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates obtained from human feces. All ESBL-positive isolates were characterized at the molecular level by polymerase chain reaction, sequencing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Eight of 46 antibiotic-resistant E. coli (6 from children and 2 from adults) and 4 of 8 K. pneumoniae (all from adults) isolates were found to be ESBL-positive by the double-disk synergy test. Seven isolates were found to have CTX-M-14, 2 each had CTX-M-24 and CTX-M-38, and 1 had CTX-M-9. In addition, 8 isolates were found to carry TEM-1b or TEM-1c. No SHV-type enzyme was found among the E. coli strains. In 9 strains, the plasmidic bla(CTX-M) determinants were transferable to E. coli by conjugation. Analysis by PFGE showed evidence of clonal and non-clonal spread. The present study shows fecal carriage of organisms producing bla(CTX-M) determinants and underscores the role that commensals could play as a reservoir for their dissemination.


Subject(s)
Cephalosporin Resistance/genetics , Cephalosporinase/genetics , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Feces/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...