ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The XEN Gel Stent (AbbVie Pharmaceuticals) is a device made from Gelatin; a well-known material in the medical field that is firm enough to hold its shape and soft enough to conform to tissues and reduce the risk of erosion. The Gel Stent creates a permanent outflow connection between the anterior chamber and subconjunctival space. AREAS COVERED: Validation testing done on the Gel Stent to evaluate biocompatibility and durability of the material as well as real-world experience are included and discussed in this paper. EXPERT OPINION: Correlating the results of the preclinical testing, study outcomes available in the published literature, and the surgeons' experiences, the device and materials have shown to have an acceptable biocompatibility and durability profile, with a stable, nondegradable, and permanent implant.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma Drainage Implants , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Anterior Chamber , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , StentsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ocular safety of a novel microfistula implant and its composite materials in an animal model. METHODS: The anterior chambers of 12 rabbit eyes were injected with either glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin extract or balanced salt solution and were followed by serial slit lamp examinations over 3 days. The eyes of 18 canines underwent microfistula implantation or a sham procedure. The animals were monitored over the subsequent 12 months, using serial slit lamp examinations, indirect ophthalmoscopy, tonometry, specular microscopy, and high-resolution ultrasonography. Ocular tissues were examined histopathologically on postoperative days 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365. RESULTS: Glutaraldehyde cross-linked porcine gelatin did not induce significant intraocular inflammation in the rabbit model. The microfistula implant was well tolerated and did not stimulate significant tissue response in the canine eye. The microfistula tube did not undergo structural change or degradation over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In nonprimate mammals, the material composing the microfistula implant and the implant itself do not induce significant inflammation or tissue reaction.