Systemic lidocaine versus erector spinae plane block for improving quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: A prospective, triple-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: A single tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: 126 adults aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: intravenous lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 2 mg/kg/h) plus bilateral ESPB with saline (25 mL per side); bilateral ESPB with 0.25% ropivacaine (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion; or bilateral ESPB with saline (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The non-inferiority of lidocaine versus ESPB was assessed with a margin of -6 points and 97.5% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes included 24-h area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores, morphine consumption, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: 124 patients completed the study. Median (IQR) 24-h QoR-15 scores were 123 (117-127) for lidocaine, 124 (119-126) for ESPB, and 112 (108-117) for placebo. Lidocaine was non-inferior to ESPB (median difference  -1, 97.5% CI: -4 to ∞). Both lidocaine (median difference 9, 95% CI: 6-12, P < 0.001) and ESPB (median difference 10, 95% CI: 7-13, P < 0.001) were superior to placebo. AUC for pain scores and morphine use were lower with lidocaine and ESPB versus placebo (P < 0.001 for all), with no significant differences between lidocaine and ESPB. One ESPB patient reported a transient metallic taste; no other block-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous lidocaine provides a non-inferior quality of recovery compared to ESPB without requiring specialized regional anesthesia procedures. Lidocaine may offer a practical and accessible alternative within multimodal analgesia pathways.

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Rats by Blocking the Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Current.

Purpose: Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using lidocaine provides effective localized analgesia but its duration is limited. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine enhances lidocaine IVRA is unclear but may involve modulation of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. Materials and Methods: Lidocaine IVRA with varying dexmedetomidine concentrations was performed in the tails of Sprague-Dawley rats. Tail-flick and tail-clamping tests assessed IVRA analgesia and anesthesia efficacy and duration. Contributions of α2 adrenergic receptors and HCN channels were evaluated by incorporating an α adrenergic receptor antagonist, the HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288, and the HCN channel agonist forskolin. Furthermore, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology quantified the effects of dexmedetomidine on HCN channels mediating hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons. Results: Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently extended lidocaine IVRA duration and analgesia, unaffected by α2 receptor blockade. The HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288 also prolonged lidocaine IVRA effects, while the HCN channel activator forskolin shortened effects. In dorsal root ganglion neurons, dexmedetomidine concentration-dependently inhibited Ih amplitude and shifted the voltage-dependence of HCN channel activation. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine prolongs lidocaine IVRA duration by directly inhibiting HCN channel activity, independent of α2 adrenergic receptor activation. This HCN channel inhibition represents a novel mechanism underlying the anesthetic and analgesic adjuvant effects of dexmedetomidine in IVRA.

Efficacy of intraoperative systemic lidocaine on quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of intraoperative systemic lidocaine administration in major abdominal surgeries. We tested the hypothesis that systemic lidocaine is associated with an enhanced early quality of recovery in patients following laparoscopic colorectal resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly allocated 126 patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lidocaine (1.5 mg kg-1 bolus over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion at 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of surgery) or identical volumes and rates of saline. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 score assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were areas under the pain numeric rating scale curve over time, 48-h morphine consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS: Compared with saline, systemic lidocaine improved the Quality of Recovery-15 score 24 h postoperatively, with a median difference of 4 (95% confidence interval: 1-6; p = 0.015). Similarly, the area under the pain numeric rating scale curve over 48 h at rest and on movement was reduced in the lidocaine group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, these differences were not clinically meaningful. Lidocaine infusion reduced the intraoperative remifentanil requirements but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption (p < 0.001 and p = 0.34, respectively). Additionally, patients receiving lidocaine had a quicker and earlier return of bowel function, as indicated by a shorter time to first flatus (log-rank p < 0.001), yet ambulation time was similar between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, intraoperative systemic lidocaine resulted in statistically but not clinically significant improvements in quality of recovery (see Graphical Abstract).Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR1900027635.

Systemic lidocaine failed to clinically improve the overall quality of recovery following laparoscopic colorectal resection.Systemic lidocaine reduced intraoperative remifentanil and time to first flatus but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption.No differences emerged in patient-reported outcomes like opioid side effects, mobility, or satisfaction between groups postoperatively.

Enhancing bone formation using absorbable AZ31B magnesium alloy membranes during distraction osteogenesis: A new material study.

Purpose: To investigate whether the use of absorble AZ31B magnesium alloys over distraction gaps improves the quality and quantity of regenerated bone better than the use of Collagen membranes. Methods: Fifteen mixed-breed dogs were randomly divided into the experimental (n = 10) and control (n = 5) groups. In the experimental group, two devices were implanted along the mandible; one side with absorble AZ31B and the other side with Collagen. The control animals did not undergo osteotomy or distraction. After a consolidation time of two months, 30 specimens were harvested, and newly created bone was identified using CBCT and micro-CT. Results: The Collagen membranes were absorbed completely, and the AZ31B membranes became irregular and rough. Mandible length was successfully extended approximately 1 cm. More bone formation was found after using AZ31B than Collagen, and there was a significant difference in width reduction between experimental sites treated with AZ31B (0.11 ± 0.04 cm) and Collagen (0.42 ± 0.06 cm) (p < 0.05). Trabecular thickness was also significantly higher in AZ31B (0.338 ± 0.08 cm) and control (0.417 ± 0.05 cm) than Collagen (0.178 ± 0.04 cm) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: An AZ31B membrane barrier is biocompatible and absorbable which can maintain the distraction gap and provide support to the attached osteoprogenitors by providing space for them to proliferate.

Measurement and multiplexing of ultra-low duty cycle Nyquist pulse sequences.

In this paper, we propose a novel, to the best of our knowledge, method to our knowledge for generating and accurately measuring Nyquist pulse sequences with an ultra-low duty cycle of only 0.037, which breaks the limitations caused by the noise and bandwidth of the optical sampling oscilloscope (OSO) by using a narrow-bandwidth real-time oscilloscope (OSC) and an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA). By this method, it is found that the bias point drift of the dual parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator (DPMZM) is the main cause of the distortion of the waveform. In addition, we increase the repetition rate of Nyquist pulse sequences by a factor of 16 by multiplexing the unmodulated Nyquist pulse sequences.

Fluoxetine alleviates postoperative cognitive dysfunction by attenuating TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway activation in aged mice.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication following surgery among elderly patients. Emerging evidence demonstrates that neuroinflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of POCD. This study tested the hypothesis that fluoxetine can protect against POCD by suppressing hippocampal neuroinflammation through attenuating TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway activation. SUBJECTS: Aged C57BL/6 J male mice (18 months old) were studied. TREATMENT: Aged mice were intraperitoneally injected with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) or saline for seven days before splenectomy. In addition, aged mice received an intracerebroventricular injection of a TLR4 agonist or saline seven days before splenectomy in the rescue experiment. METHODS: On postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, we assessed hippocampus-dependent memory, microglial activation status, proinflammatory cytokine levels, protein levels related to the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway, and hippocampal neural apoptosis in our aged mouse model. RESULTS: Splenectomy induced a decline in spatial cognition, paralleled by parameters indicating exacerbation of hippocampal neuroinflammation. Fluoxetine pretreatment partially restored the deteriorated cognitive function, downregulated proinflammatory cytokine levels, restrained microglial activation, alleviated neural apoptosis, and suppressed the increase in TLR4, MyD88, and p-NF-κB p65 in microglia. Intracerebroventricular injection of LPS (1 µg, 0.5 µg/µL) before surgery weakened the effect of fluoxetine. CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine pretreatment suppressed hippocampal neuroinflammation and mitigated POCD by inhibiting microglial TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway activation in aged mice.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients and Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled patients scheduled for unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients were randomly allocated to receive thoracic paravertebral block either with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (PVB group) or an equal volume of saline (control group). The primary outcome was the quality of patient recovery at 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery scale. The secondary outcomes included the area under the curve of pain scores over time, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative 24 h morphine consumption. Results: We analyzed the data of 70 recruited participants. The median Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 h postoperatively was 127 (interquartile range, 117-133) in the PVB group, which was significantly higher than 114 (interquartile range, 109-122) in the control group, with a median difference of 10 points (95% confidence interval, 5-14; P<0.001). The area under the curve of pain scores over time was lower in patients receiving thoracic PVB than in those receiving saline block (P<0.001). The median time to first rescue analgesia in the PVB group (10.8 h, interquartile range 7.1-22.8 h) was longer than that in the control group (1.9 h, interquartile range 0.5-4.3 h) (P<0.001). Similarly, the median postoperative 24-hour morphine consumption was nearly half as low in the PVB group as in the control group (P<0.001). The occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were significantly higher in the control group (P=0.016 and P=0.023, respectively). Conclusion: Preoperative ultrasound-guided single injection of thoracic paravertebral block with ropivacaine improved the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Experimental Design of Vertical Distraction Osteogenesis Using Simple 3 Screws.

Distraction osteogenesis devices are complicated. To simplify these devices, we used 3 simple screws and 1 rubber band to realize the idea and analyzed histologic changes induced by mechanical forces. Ten female New Zealand white rabbits were studied. A left or right side of the mandible was randomly selected as the experimental side (ES). The unilateral mandible was distracted, and 2 fixation screws and 1 traction screw were implanted. When the traction screw was rotated downward, the opposite force made the osteotomy block move in opposite directions to increase the bone height. The control side (CS) was not processed. The results were assessed after 20 days of traction. Bone height in the ES increased by 5 mm. Toluidine blue staining showed that the number of osteoblasts per unit area on the ES was higher than that of the CS ( P <0.01). PerkinElmer showed that the expressions of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ( P =0.016) and collagen-I ( P =0.000) on the ES were higher than those on the CS. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the number of mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus on the ES was significantly greater than the CS. The results confirmed that the 3 screws vertically increase the bone height. Mechanical force signals stimulate tissue activity and lead to significant cell proliferation and differentiation in the traction zone. Collagen-I may induce osteogenesis in the early stage of traction.

Regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine enhances the quality and duration of lidocaine intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA). However, the two administration routes have not been directly compared regarding effects on tourniquet tolerance time with lidocaine IVRA. Additionally, it remains unclear whether the prolonged tourniquet tolerance stems from the direct peripheral action of dexmedetomidine or indirect systemic analgesic effects. METHODS: We conducted forearm IVRA in 12 healthy volunteers using a crossover design on two separate study days. One day, the systemic dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous infusion of 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (20 mL) in one arm, followed by 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) forearm IVRA in the contralateral arm. On the other day, the regional dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous 0.9% saline infusion (20 mL) in one arm, followed by combined 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) and 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine forearm IVRA in the opposite arm. After a two-week washout period, participants crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. The primary outcome was tourniquet tolerance time, from initiating IVRA until the patient-reported tourniquet pain numerical rating scale exceeded three. RESULTS: The tourniquet tolerance time was longer with regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine (36.9 ± 7.6 min vs 23.3 ± 6.2 min, respectively), with a 13.6 min mean difference (95% CI: 10.8 to 16.4 min, p < 0.001). Regional dexmedetomidine also hastened sensory onset and extended sensory recovery compared to systemic administration. Delayed sedation after tourniquet release occurred in 5 of 12 subjects receiving regional dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: The addition of regional dexmedetomidine to lidocaine prolonged tourniquet tolerance time in forearm IVRA to a greater extent compared to systemic dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300067978.

The addition of regional dexmedetomidine prolongs tourniquet tolerance time with lidocaine forearm IVRA.Regional dexmedetomidine accelerates sensory block onset time and extends sensory block recovery time when supplemented with lidocaine forearm IVRA.Delayed sedative effects following tourniquet release were witnessed in some participants administered regional dexmedetomidine.

Validation of the translated version of the EVAN-G scale in a Chinese-speaking population.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to translate the French version of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire (EVAN-G) scale, a validated questionnaire for assessing perioperative patient satisfaction, into a Chinese version and validate it in Chinese-speaking patients. METHODS: We developed the Chinese version of the EVAN-G (EVAN-GC) scale based on the original French version of the EVAN-G. The EVAN-GC scale, the Short version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (S-STAI), and the McGill pain questionnaire (MGPQ) were administered on the WeChat mini program. We invited patients to complete these questionnaires within 4 to 24 h after surgery. The psychometric validation of the EVAN-GC scale included validity, reliability, and acceptability. RESULTS: Among 220 patients, 217 (98.6%) completed the EVAN-GC scale after surgery. The item-internal consistency revealed good construct validity. Compared with the total scores of the S-STAI and MGPQ, the EVAN-GC scale showed excellent convergent validity (ρ = - 0.32, P < 0.001; ρ = - 0.29, P < 0.001). The EVAN-GC scale could differentiate between groups, which showed good discriminate validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.85) of the translated scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability, and a 36-patient subsample retest evidenced good test-retest reliability (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001). In addition, the median [interquartile range] time of completing the EVAN-GC scale was 3.7 [2.9-4.9] min. CONCLUSIONS: The EVAN-GC scale has good psychometric properties similar to those of the original French version. The EVAN-GC scale is a valid and reliable measurement to assess patient satisfaction in Chinese-speaking patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100049555.

Remimazolam for the Prevention of Emergence Delirium in Children Following Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Under Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Purpose: To identify the effectiveness of remimazolam at the end of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy for preventing emergence delirium in children under sevoflurane anesthesia. Patients and Methods: One hundred and four patients aged 3-7 years scheduled for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 (intervention, n=52) or 0.9% normal saline (control, n=52) at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence delirium, defined as a Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score ≥10. Secondary outcomes were peak PAED score, emergence time, postoperative pain intensity, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, parental satisfaction, and postoperative behavior changes three days postoperatively. Results: Emergence delirium occurred in 6 of 51 (12%) patients receiving remimazolam versus 22 of 50 (44%) patients receiving saline (risk difference 32% [95% confidence interval, 16% to 49%], relative risk 0.27 [95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.60]; P<0.001). The peak PAED scores (median [interquartile range]) were lower in the remimazolam group than in the saline group (7 [6-8] versus 9 [8-11], P<0.001). Likewise, parental satisfaction was improved in the remimazolam group compared with the saline group (9 [8-10] versus 8 [7-8], P<0.001). There was no difference between groups concerning postoperative pain scores, length of PACU stay, or postoperative behavior changes. Conclusion: In children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, administration of remimazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 at the end of the surgery, compared with 0.9% saline, resulted in a significantly lower likelihood of emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia.

Discharge readiness after remimazolam versus propofol for colonoscopy: A randomised, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is potentially a practical option for procedural sedation in colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that remimazolam could provide a noninferior discharge time to propofol for ambulatory colonoscopy. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, noninferiority clinical trial. SETTING: Ambulatory endoscopy centre. PATIENTS: A total of 132 adult participants undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive propofol or remimazolam for sedation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was discharge time after a colonoscopy, assessed using the Modified Postanaesthetic Discharge Scoring System scale. Secondary outcomes included induction time, emergence time, the extent of recovery upon arrival in the postanaethesia care unit, fatigue, endoscopist and patient satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS: The median discharge time was 24 min in the remimazolam group versus 21 min in the propofol group, with a difference of 2 min [95% confidence interval (CI), 0 to 4 min], meeting the criteria for noninferiority. Injection pain occurred in 11 of 66 (17%) participants receiving remimazolam versus 32 of 66 (49%) participants receiving propofol ( P  < 0.001); hypotension occurrence was 20% versus 47%, ( P  < 0.001), respectively, and bradycardia 6% versus 20%, ( P  = 0.019), respectively. Compared with propofol, the patient satisfaction score was higher in the remimazolam group ( P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For sedation in ambulatory colonoscopy, compared with propofol, remimazolam provides a noninferior discharge time. Furthermore, remimazolam is associated with less injection pain, lower risks of hypotension and bradycardia, and improved patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2100048678.

Fluoxetine for reducing postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after total knee replacement: study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication following major surgical procedures. The underlying pathophysiology is poorly understood, but the role of neuroinflammation is strongly implicated. Given the antineuroinflammatory and neuroprotective effects of fluoxetine, we hypothesise that fluoxetine may reduce the cumulative incidence of POCD in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, superiority trial. Five hundred elderly patients undergoing unilateral TKA will be randomly assigned to the fluoxetine and placebo groups. The fluoxetine group will receive fluoxetine 20 mg daily 8 weeks preoperatively, and the placebo group will receive placebo capsules daily 8 weeks preoperatively. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of POCD at 1 month postoperatively. The secondary outcomes include the occurrence of delirium, the area under the curve of the Numeric Rating Scale pain scores over time, and sleep disturbance. Data on all the results, risk factors and adverse events will also be collected and analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Fujian Provincial Hospital Ethics Board has approved the protocol for this trial (identifier number: K2021-01-009). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100050424.

Efficacy of systemic lidocaine in postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic lidocaine may reduce pain intensity and accelerate postoperative recovery. However, the efficacy of systemic lidocaine in cognitive function has not been established. This study protocol is designed to clarify the effectiveness of lidocaine in postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. One thousand and twenty elderly patients will be randomly allocated in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either systemic lidocaine (a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/hour until the end of the surgery) or identical volumes and rates of 0.9% saline. The primary outcome measure is the prevalence of POD during the first 5 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include emergence agitation, the area under the curve of the Numeric Rating Scale pain scores over 48 hours, postoperative 48-hour cumulative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery of bowel function, quality of recovery, and patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethical Committee of the Fujian Provincial Hospital approved the study protocol (ref: K2021-06-018). Other participating subcentres must also obtain ethics committee approval before the start of the study. We will obtain written informed consent from each patient before they are randomised. This study will be presented at scientific conferences and submitted to international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100050314.

Efficacy of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative systemic lidocaine has become widely accepted as an adjunct to general anesthesia, associated with opioid-sparing and enhanced recovery. We hypothesized that perioperative systemic lidocaine improves postoperative pain and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients aged 18 to 65 undergoing VATS were eligible for participation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients enrolled in this study were randomized to receive either system lidocaine (a bolus of 1.5 mg kg-1, followed by an infusion of 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of the surgical procedure) or identical volumes and rates of 0.9% saline. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a global QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, cumulative opioid consumption, emergence time, length of PACU stay, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the global QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively between the lidocaine and saline groups (median 117, IQR 113.5-124, vs. median 116, IQR 111-120, P = 0.067), with a median difference of 3 (95% CI 0 to 6, P = 0.507). Similarly, postoperative pain scores, postoperative cumulative opioid consumption, PACU length of stay, the occurrence of PONV, and patient satisfaction were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our current findings do not support using perioperative systemic lidocaine as a potential strategy to improve postoperative pain and enhance QoR in patients undergoing VATS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR1900027515).

Study on the Biosensor Based on Biomimetic PDA Vesicles Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer for the Determination of Ovarian Cancer Marker miRNA-21.

In recent years, more and more research is being conducted on microRNAs and their involvement in the regulation of autophagy phagocytosis which is closely related to tumor growth. MicroRNA-21 is a kind of small RNA that can regulate gene expression and plays a significant role in autophagy of tumor cells. But the detection of microRNAs had always been a problem in the field of biological analysis. In this study, we designed a new fluorescent sensor for the detection of miRNA-21. The sensor was based on the successful signal reporting by E36-encapsulated vesicles and the specific interaction between E36 and miRNA-21. In the presence of miRNA, the E36/miRNA-21 complex formed and served as a donor molecule inside the acceptor PDA vesicles to amplify the fluorescence through FRET. Additionally, the sensor was applied to detect miRNA-21 in complex biological samples with satisfactory results.

Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam premedication to prevent emergence delirium in children undergoing strabismus surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is being used increasingly as a premedicant in the paediatric population. However, the effectiveness of pre-operative intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication, compared with oral midazolam, for emergence delirium is not well characterised. OBJECTIVE: To identify the effectiveness of pre-operative intranasal dexmedetomidine for emergence delirium in the paediatric patient population following general anaesthesia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Single university teaching hospital, from September 2013 to August 2014. PATIENTS: One hundred and fifty-six patients undergoing anaesthesia for strabismus surgery were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to receive premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg (the dexmedetomidine group), oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg (the midazolam group), or 0.9% saline (the placebo group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence delirium assessed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. Secondary outcomes included the quality of the inhalational induction, emergence time, postoperative pain intensity, length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit, the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and parents' satisfaction. RESULTS: The incidence of emergence delirium was lower in patients given dexmedetomidine compared with that in patients given midazolam (11.5 versus 44%, relative risk = 0.262, 95% confidence interval 0.116 to 0.592) or 0.9% saline (11.5 versus 49%, relative risk = 0.235, 95% confidence interval 0.105 to 0.525). Likewise, the incidence of PONV was lower in the dexmedetomidine group (3.8%) than that in the midazolam (22%; P = 0.006) or placebo (29.4%; P < 0.001) groups. However, there was no difference among the groups concerning postoperative pain scores and length of postanaesthesia care unit stay. CONCLUSION: In paediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg premedication decreases the incidence of emergence delirium and PONV, and improves parents' satisfaction compared with oral midazolam. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01895023).

Ketamine Enhances Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Induced Sedation in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine premedication in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 66 children with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, aged 3-7 years undergoing tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly allocated to receive intranasal premedication with either dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg-1 (Group D) or dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg-1 and ketamine 2 mg kg-1 (Group DK). The primary outcome was the sedation level assessed by the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) 30 min after intervention. The minimal clinically relevant difference in the MOAA/S score was 0.5. Secondary outcomes included sedation onset time, parental separation anxiety, acceptance of mask induction, emergence time, emergence delirium, postoperative pain intensity, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and adverse effects. RESULTS: At 30 min after premedication, the MOAA/S score was lower in Group DK than in Group D patients (median: 1.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-2.0 vs median: 3.0, IQR: 2.0-3.0; P<0.001), with a median difference of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.0, P<0.001). Patients in Group DK showed considerably faster onset of sedation (15 min, 95% CI: 14.2-15.8 min) than Group D (24 min, 95% CI: 23.2-24.8 min), with a median difference of 8.0 min (95% CI: 7.0-9.0 min, P<0.001). Both parental separation and facemask acceptance scores were lower in Group DK than in Group D patients (P=0.012 and P=0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in emergence time, incidence of emergence delirium, postoperative pain scores, and length of stay in the PACU between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intranasal premedication with a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine produced better sedation for pediatric tonsillectomy than dexmedetomidine alone.

Impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative quality of recovery in video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Regional anesthesia improves postoperative analgesia and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. We examine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on QoR after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients who scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly allocated patients to receive preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (ESPB group) or normal saline (Control group). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was QoR as measured by the 40-item QoR questionnaire (QoR-40) score at postoperative day 1. Secondary results were post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, acute postoperative pain, cumulative opioid consumption, the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: The global QoR-40 score at postoperative day 1 (median, interquartile range) was significantly higher in the ESPB group (174, 170 to 177) than the control group (161.5, 160 to 165), estimated median difference 11 (95% CI 9 to 13, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, single-injection of ESPB reduced PACU discharge time, acute postoperative pain, and cumulative opioid consumption. Correspondingly, the median patient satisfaction scores were higher in the ESPB group than the control group (9 versus 7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative single-injection thoracic ESPB with ropivacaine improves QoR, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction after VATS.

Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks enhance the quality of recovery in patients undergoing thyroid cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Regional anesthesia can improve postoperative analgesia and enhance the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. This trial evaluates the effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) on QoR in patients undergoing thyroid cancer surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: Seventy-four ASA I-II female patients scheduled for thyroid cancer surgery were included to the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive pre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral SCPB with 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% or normal saline on each side. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the quality of recovery, which was assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). Secondary endpoints were acute postoperative pain, time to first rescue analgesia, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and dizziness, and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: The global QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively was significantly higher in the SCPB group (Median [IQR], 118 [115-120]) than the control group (110 [106-112]) with a median difference of 8 (95% CI: 6 to 10, P < .001). Compared with the control group, pre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral SCPB reduced postoperative pain up to 24 h and the incidence of PONV, as well as the length of PACU stay. Additionally, the patient satisfaction scores were improved in the SCPB group (P = .024). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral SCPB with ropivacaine enhances the quality of recovery, postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction, alleviates the incidence of PONV, and accelerates the PACU discharge following thyroid cancer surgery.