Effect of HHFNC therapy on organ oxygenation and brain metabolism in neonates receiving exchange transfusion.

Background: Exchange transfusion therapy is a complex and invasive procedure with a high risk coefficient. This method involves replacing the entire blood of a child with fresh blood with double circulating blood volume in a short period, typically in 1-2 h. This procedure can cause the body's internal environment to be unstable, which can put newborns under a lot of stress. This stress can lead to many, including abnormal laboratory biochemical examination, low or high blood pressure, and apnea. There is also the possibility of secondary infection and, in severe cases, cardiac arrest. This study investigated the effects of Humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) ventilation on hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during exchange transfusion in neonates. Furthermore, the effects on brain metabolism and salivary cortisol during exchange transfusion were also analyzed. Methods: In this study, the control group consisted of 45 cases of children who underwent simple blood exchange between 1 May 2017, and 31 December 2019 control group. The observation group consisted of 33 cases of children who underwent blood exchange under HHFNC support between 1 January 2020, and 30 April 2022. The study compared various physiological parameters between the control and the observation group. These included blood gas analysis, pulmonary artery pressure, ejection fraction, invasive mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cerebral oxygenation, intestinal oxygenation, renal oxygenation, and duration of blood exchange. Furthermore, the study also compared the changes in brain metabolic and salivary cortisol indicators between the two groups of children. Results: The results did not reveal any significant difference in PH, PaO2, and duration of blood exchange between the control and the observation group. However, the observation group's invasive mean arterial pressure, ejection fraction, cerebral oxygenation, intestinal oxygenation, and renal oxygenation were higher than those of the control group. Furthermore, compared with the control group, the pulmonary artery pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 were lower in the observation group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups of children in the relevant clinical indicators (total bilirubin, hemoglobin, SPO2, etc.) after exchange transfusion. After 1 h of blood exchange and after blood exchange, the salivary cortisol levels of the observation group were lower than the control group. The difference was statistically significant. The NAA/Cho and Cho/Cr values of the two groups of children were also significantly different. Conclusion: During blood exchange, unstable hemodynamics substantially impact organ oxygenation. The results of this study suggest that HHFNC and specific ventilation pressure support can improve the respiratory rate and help maintain blood flow stability and organ oxygenation. This technique can also reduce adverse reactions caused by blood exchange, minimizing patient stress and reducing the impact on brain metabolism.

The effect of developmental care on the length of hospital stay and family centered care practice for very low birth weight infants in neonatal intensive care units: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite previous studies suggesting that developmental care can provide benign stimulation to promote neural development of newborns, more evidence is needed regarding the other clinical benefits of developmental care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of implementing developmental care on the length of hospital stay, the improvement of care practice in neonatal intensive care units, as well as the short-term outcome of very low birth weight infants. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING(S) AND PARTICIPANTS: From March 1, 2021 to March 1, 2022, 1400 very low birth weight infants were recruited from 14 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. METHODS: We assigned 14 neonatal intensive care units to either developmental care or standard care. The length of hospital stay of the infants was the primary outcome analyzed at the individual level. Secondary outcomes were family centered care practice including parental involvement, the skin to skin care, exclusive breast milk, oral immune therapy and breastfeeding. The environmental management (noise and light) and the short-term outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The length of hospital stay for the developmental care group was 65 % as long as that for the control group (HR: 0.65, 95 % CI, 0.451-0936, p = 0.021). After controlling the covariables, the adjusted HR = 0.755 (95 % CI, 0.515 to 1.107, p = 0.150). When compared to the control group, the developmental care group had greater access to SSC, with 22 infants (3.8 %) in the developmental care group compared to 13 infants (1.7 %) in the standard care group (p = 0.013). A greater proportion of infants in the developmental care group were fed at the breast, than those in the standard care group (136 [23.6 %] vs 9 [1.1 %]; p = 0.029). Compared to the control group, exclusively breast milk was significantly more favorable in the developmental care group (435 [75.6 %] vs 114 [15.0 %]; p = 0.001). The difference remained significant even after adjusting for covariates. However, the rate of oral immune therapy and parental involvement was similar in the two groups. The average noise and light levels in the developmental care group were significantly lower than those in the standard care group. After adjusting for confounders, the difference remained significant. There were no significant differences among groups in the mortality and major morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Developmental care might have developed an accumulated effect over time on the length of hospital stay among very low birth weight infants. The implementation of developmental care can greatly improve family centered care practices and the neonatal intensive care unit environment. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT05166720. Registration date: 1 March, 2021.

Effects of routine procedures on salivary cortisol in mechanically ventilated neonates.

Even though the stress secondary to invasive procedures has been investigated, less attention has been paid to the stimulation or pain caused by routine procedures on neonates. The changes in salivary cortisol concentration in mechanically ventilated NICU patients during routine procedures were monitored to provide reference and guidance for pain management. 80 mechanically ventilated neonates in the hospital from Sep 2021 to Mar 2022 were selected. The salivary cortisol levels of the neonates were monitored during nursing procedures and were categorized by their risk levels to the following groups: high-risk (endotracheal suctioning and arterial blood sampling), moderate-risk (gastric tube insertion, venipuncture), and low-risk (bedside bathing and diaper changes). The changes in heart rate were also recorded and compared. The concentration of cortisol in the saliva of the neonates was 1.5 ± 0.8 nmol/L during the sleeping state, 6.2 ± 1.3 nmol/L during endotracheal suctioning, 6.4 ± 1.4 nmol/L during arterial blood sampling, 6.1 ± 1.2 nmol/L during venipuncture, 4.4 ± 1.1 nmol/L during gastric tube insertion, 3.5 ± 0.8 nmol/L during bedside bathing, and 3.3 ± 0.9 nmol/L during a diaper change. The results revealed a statistically significant effect between routine procedures on salivary cortisol levels. Compared with the neonates in the control sleep state, there was a significant (P < 0.05) change in salivary cortisol concentration of infants undergoing high and moderate-risk nursing procedures. There was a small but significant (P < 0.05) change in salivary cortisol levels in infants who underwent low-risk procedures compared to infants in the control sleep state. Further, the fluctuation of salivary cortisol levels in routine procedures was more frequent compared with routine handling at night. The fluctuations of salivary cortisol concentration in high-risk procedures were larger than that of infants who underwent low-risk procedures, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). It was also determined that the top four influencing factors on the infants' heart rate were arterial blood sampling venipuncture, intubation, endotracheal suctioning, and gastric tube insertion (P < 0.05). Monitoring the saliva cortisol concentration index and heart rates can reflect the impact of different routine procedures on newborns and can be used to manage neonatal pain in the future.