Importance of tumor size in resectable stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The 8th TNM edition classifies stage III-N2 disease as IIIA and IIIB based on a tumor size cutoff of 5 cm. However, the importance of tumor size on survival in patients with resectable stage III-N2 disease has not been analyzed systematically. METHODS: Survival analysis based on tumor size (>5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm) for 255 consecutive patients with nonbulky (maximal lymph node diameter of 1.5 cm) stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery in our institution. RESULTS: Ninety patients (35.3%) underwent induction chemoradiation therapy (n = 72, 28%) or induction chemotherapy (n = 18, 7%), and 165 patients underwent primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 52, 32%), adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (n = 47, 29%), or adjuvant radiation therapy (n = 14, 13.2%). After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the overall survival was 46.5% at 5 years and 28.9% at 10 years. In tumors 5 cm or less, there was no difference in survival between patients treated with induction or adjuvant therapy. However, in tumors greater than 5 cm, the survival was significantly better after induction therapy compared with adjuvant therapy or surgery alone. Pathologic multi-station N2 disease was more frequently detected in tumors greater than 5 cm (31% vs 18% in tumors ≤5 cm, P = .042), and the rate of R1 resection was lower after induction therapy (2.2% vs 8.5% in primary surgery, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the redefinition of tumors greater than 5 cm with resectable N2 disease to stage IIIB. This change should help to refine the multimodality approach for stage III-N2 lung cancer.

[Lung transplant with ex vivo lung perfusion, Chilean and Latin American first experience]. / Trasplante pulmonar ex vivo . Primera experiencia en Chile y Latinoamérica.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients waiting for a lung transplant worldwide greatly exceeds the number of available donors. Ex vivo lung perfusion is a useful tool that allows marginal donor lungs to be evaluated and reconditioned for a successful lung transplantation. AIM: To describe the first Chilean and Latin American experience in ex vivo lung perfusion for marginal donor lungs before transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive analysis of all ex vivo lung perfusion conducted for marginal donor lungs at a private clinic, from April 2019 to October 2020. High risk donor lungs and rejected lungs from other transplantation centers were included. The "Toronto Protocol" was used for ex vivo lung perfusion. Donor lung characteristics and recipient outcomes were studied. RESULTS: During the study period, five ex vivo lung perfusions were performed. All lungs were reconditioned and transplanted. No complications were associated. There were no primary graft dysfunctions and only one chronic allograft dysfunction. There was no mortality during the first year. The median arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio increased from 266 mm Hg in the donor lung to 419 after 3 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: ex vivo lung perfusion is a safe and useful tool that allows marginal donor lungs to be reconditioned and successfully transplanted.

Trasplante pulmonar ex vivo: primera experiencia en Chile y Latinoamérica / Lung transplant with ex vivo lung perfusion, Chilean and Latin American first experience

Background: The number of patients waiting for a lung transplant worldwide greatly exceeds the number of available donors. Ex vivo lung perfusion is a useful tool that allows marginal donor lungs to be evaluated and reconditioned for a successful lung transplantation. Aim: To describe the first Chilean and Latin American experience in ex vivo lung perfusion for marginal donor lungs before transplantation. Material and Methods: Descriptive analysis of all ex vivo lung perfusion conducted for marginal donor lungs at a private clinic, from April 2019 to October 2020. High risk donor lungs and rejected lungs from other transplantation centers were included. The "Toronto Protocol" was used for ex vivo lung perfusion. Donor lung characteristics and recipient outcomes were studied. Results: During the study period, five ex vivo lung perfusions were performed. All lungs were reconditioned and transplanted. No complications were associated. There were no primary graft dysfunctions and only one chronic allograft dysfunction. There was no mortality during the first year. The median arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio increased from 266 mm Hg in the donor lung to 419 after 3 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion (p = 0.043). Conclusions: ex vivo lung perfusion is a safe and useful tool that allows marginal donor lungs to be reconditioned and successfully transplanted.