ABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic performance of integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in indolent lymphoma compared with 18F-FDG PET or MRI alone. Methods: Patients with treatment-naive indolent lymphoma who underwent integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) were prospectively enrolled. Agreement between PET, MRI, PET/MRI, BMB, and the reference standard was assessed using kappa statistics. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each method were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the area under the curve (AUC). AUCs of PET, MRI, PET/MRI, and BMB were compared using the DeLong test. Results: Fifty-five patients (24 males and 31 females; mean age: 51.1 ± 10.1 years) were included in this study. Of these 55 patients, 19 (34.5%) had BMI. Two patients were upstaged as extra bone marrow lesions were detected via PET/MRI. 97.1% (33/34) of participants were confirmed as BMB-negative in the PET-/MRI-group. PET/MRI (parallel test) and BMB showed excellent agreement with the reference standard (k = 0.843, 0.918), whereas PET and MRI showed moderate agreement (k = 0.554, 0.577). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for identifying BMI in indolent lymphoma were 52.6%, 97.2%, 81.8%, 90.9%, and 79.5%, respectively, for PET; 63.2%, 91.7%, 81.8%, 80.0%, and 82.5%, respectively, for MRI; 89.5%, 100%, 96.4%, 100%, and 94.7%, respectively, for BMB; and 94.7%, 91.7%, 92.7%, 85.7%, and 97.1%, respectively, for PET/MRI (parallel test). According to ROC analysis, the AUCs of PET, MRI, BMB, and PET/MRI (parallel test) for detecting BMI in indolent lymphomas were 0.749, 0.774, 0.947, and 0.932, respectively. The DeLong test showed significant differences between the AUCs of PET/MRI (parallel test) and those of PET (P = 0.003) and MRI (P = 0.004). Regarding histologic subtypes, the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI for detecting BMI in small lymphocytic lymphoma was lower than that in follicular lymphoma, which was in turn lower than that in marginal zone lymphoma. Conclusion: Integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed excellent sensitivity and accuracy for detecting BMI in indolent lymphoma compared with 18F-FDG PET or MRI alone, demonstrating that 18F-FDG PET/MRI is an optimal method and a reliable alternative to BMB. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05004961 and NCT05390632).
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To investigate the value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the preoperative assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and compare it with 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT. Methods: Thirty-five patients with resectable ESCC were prospectively enrolled and underwent PET/MRI, PET/CT, and CECT before surgery. The primary tumor and regional lymph nodes were assessed by PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiencies were determined with postoperative pathology as a reference standard. The predictive role of imaging and clinical parameters on pathological staging was analyzed. Results: For primary tumor staging, the accuracy of PET/MRI, MRI, and CECT was 85.7%, 77.1%, and 51.4%, respectively. For lymph node assessment, the accuracy of PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI, and CECT was 96.2%, 92.0%, 86.8%, and 86.3%, respectively, and the AUCs were 0.883, 0.745, 0.697, and 0.580, respectively. PET/MRI diagnosed 13, 7, and 6 more stations of lymph node metastases than CECT, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively. There was a significant difference in SUVmax, TLG, and tumor wall thickness between T1-2 and T3 tumors (p = 0.004, 0.024, and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that thicker tumor wall thickness was a predictor of a higher T stage (p = 0.040, OR = 1.6). Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/MRI has advantages over 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CECT in the preoperative assessment of primary tumors and regional lymph nodes of ESCC. 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be a potential supplement or alternative imaging method for preoperative staging of ESCC.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of simultaneous positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and abdominal positron emission tomography/magnet resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in the detection of liver metastases and extrahepatic disease (EHD) in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: Fifty-six patients with CLM underwent conventional imaging (chest and abdomen CT, liver contrast-enhanced CT or MRI) and PET imaging [fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and subsequent liver PET/MRI] for staging or restaging. Diagnostic ability of PET imaging was compared with conventional imaging. Abnormal findings were correlated with follow-up imaging and/or histology. The influence of the PET imaging findings was categorized for each patient in relation to operability and other significant findings. The clinical management included three modalities (surgery for resectable CLM, unresectable CLM with conversion treatment, and systemic therapy). The clinical impact of the imaging modality was analyzed. The operative histopathological analysis and/or imaging follow-up were performed as the standard of reference. RESULTS: This study enrolled a total of 56 patients (median age 60 years, 62.5% were male, 36 with colon cancer and 20 with rectal cancer). For EHD detection, PET/CT detected more EHD than conventional imaging (60.7% vs. 46.4%). PET/CT had different findings in 19 (33.9%) patients, including downstaging in 4 (7.1%) patients and upstaging in 15 (26.8%) patients. For liver lesion detection, PET/MRI showed comparable detection ability with CE-MRI and CE-CT (99.5%, 99.4%, and 86.5%, respectively) based on lesion analysis, much higher than PET/CT (47.5%). PET imaging had a major impact in 10/56 (17.9%) patients (4 from unresectable to resectable, 6 from resectable to unresectable) and a minor impact in 4/56 (7.1%) patients for changing the surgery extent. The therapeutic strategies had been altered in a total of 14/56 patients (25%) after PET/CT and PET/MRI scans. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/CT and abdominal PET/MRI scans can provide accurate information regarding CLM status and EHD, and can affect the management of 25% of the patients by changing the therapeutic strategies determined by conventional imaging. This new modality may serve as a new one-stop method in patients with potentially resectable CLM.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of a delayed positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) scan relative to a single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan for liver metastasis detection. METHODS: In this study, 70 patients with solid malignancies and suspicious liver lesions undergoing 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose [(18F)FDG] PET/CT and subsequent delayed liver PET/MR scans were analyzed. The histopathological analysis and/or imaging follow-up were performed as the standard of reference. Lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), diameter, and tumor to nontumor ratio (T/N) were measured. Lesion detection sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both examinations. RESULTS: (1) The standard of reference revealed 208 liver lesions in 70 patients (metastasis in 56 patients with 196 lesions; benign in 14 patients with 12 lesions). Compared with PET/CT, PET/MR had higher accuracy (98.6% vs. 78.6%), sensitivity (98.2% vs. 76.8%), and specificity (100.0% vs. 85.7%) (2). The therapeutic strategies of 29 patients (41.4%) needed reconsideration after the additional PET/MR, including new metastases detected (13/70), new affected lobes identified (14/70), and false-positive corrected (2/70) (3). PET/MR detected significantly more metastases than PET/CT did, especially with small lesions. The SUVmax of the same lesion correlated well between the two acquisitions, while the delayed PET showed a higher T/N ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In liver metastasis detection, the diagnostic value of the delayed PET/MR is validated to be superior to that of PET/CT, which may aid the clinical decision-making.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The recently available gated T1-weighted imaging with the Dixon technique enables the synchronized gating signal for both MR acquisition and PET reconstruction. Herein, we evaluated the clinical value of this MR-gated PET reconstruction in the thoracic-abdominal PET/MRI compared with non-MR-gated method. METHODS: Twenty patients (28 hypermetabolic target lesions) underwent PET/MRI. Four types of PET images were reconstructed: non-MR-gating + gated attenuation correction (AC) (group A), MR-gating + gated AC (group B), non-MR-gating + breath-hold (BH) AC (group C), and MR-gating + BH AC (group D). A 4-point objective scale (from well match to obvious mismatch was scored from 3 to 0) was proposed to evaluate the mismatch. The detection rate and quantitative metrics were also evaluated. RESULTS: In the patient-based analysis, for groups A through D, the detection rates were 90%, 100%, 85%, and 90% as well as 95%, 100%, 85%, and 85%, assessed by readers 1 and 2, respectively, and significant difference of mismatch score was observed with the highest proportion of 3 points in group B (85%, 90%, 35%, and 40%, and 80%, 90%, 35%, and 20%, assessed by readers 1 and 2, respectively). The lesion-based analysis demonstrated significant differences in quantitative metrics for groups A through D (all P's < 0.05), with the highest quantitative metrics in group B (SUVmax: 7.49 ± 3.37, 8.45 ± 3.82, 6.90 ± 3.24, and 7.69 ± 3.50; SUVmean: 3.90 ± 1.60, 4.34 ± 1.84, 3.67 ± 1.61, and 4.03 ± 1.81; SUVpeak: 5.60 ± 2.50, 6.10 ± 2.80, 5.22 ± 2.40, and 5.65 ± 2.68; signal-to-noise ratio: 136.06 ± 90.58, 136.24 ± 81.63, 99.52 ± 53.16, and 107.57 ± 69.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MR-gated reconstruction using gated AC reduced the mismatch between MR and PET images and improved the thoracic-abdominal PET image quality in simultaneous PET/MRI systems.