Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(8): 5252-5263, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), reliable indicators that can early and accurately predict treatment response are lacking. This study was conducted to prospectively investigate the potential of early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics as a precise predictor of NAT response and recurrence in CRLM. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 34 patients with CRLM who received NAT, with blood samples collected and subjected to deep targeted panel sequencing at two time points: 1 day before the first and the second cycles of NAT. Correlations of ctDNA mean variant allele frequency (mVAF) dynamics and treatment response were assessed. The performance of early ctDNA dynamics in predicting treatment response was assessed and compared with those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). RESULTS: The baseline ctDNA mVAF was significantly associated with pre-NAT tumor diameter (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). After one cycle of NAT, the ctDNA mVAF declined remarkably (P < 0.0001). The dynamic change in ctDNA mVAF of 50% or more was significantly correlated with better NAT responses. The discriminatory capacity of ctDNA mVAF changes was superior to that of CEA or CA19-9 in predicting radiologic response (area under the curve [AUC], 0.90 vs 0.71 vs 0.61) and pathologic tumor regression grade (AUC, 0.83 vs 0.64 vs 0.67). The early changes in ctDNA mVAF but not CEA or CA19-9 were an independent indicator of recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio, 4.0; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: For CRLM patients receiving NAT, an early ctDNA change is a superior predictor of treatment response and recurrence compared with conventional tumor markers.


Subject(s)
Circulating Tumor DNA , Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Prospective Studies , CA-19-9 Antigen , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy
3.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 14(Supplement): S427-S432, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29970701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib/sorafenib (SU/SO), dendritic cells (DCs), or DC-cytokine-induced killer (CIK) could significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), or 5-year OS for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy between SU/SO combined with DC-CIK and SU/SO monotherapy in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with metastasis after radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients (n = 34) with postoperative mRCC in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2014 were received either SU/SO monotherapy (Group 1, n = 15) or in combination with DC-CIK (Group 2, n = 19). A retrospective study was based on the primary endpoint (PFS) and secondary endpoint (OS). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, in Group 2, as compared with in Group 1, the median PFS was significantly longer (28.0 vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.03). Moreover, the 3-year OS was higher (57.1% vs. 28.6%). The cases of progressive diseases (PDs) and deaths were less in Group 2 than that in Group 1 (PD: 8 vs. 9, deaths: 3 vs. 5); however, the cases of stable diseases were more (11 vs. 6). In addition, the 3-year OS was higher in SU + DC-CIK group than that in SO + DC-CIK group (63.36% vs. 50%). There was no significant difference for PFS between SO + DC-CIK group and SU single agent group. CONCLUSIONS: SU/SO with DC-CIK could significantly prolong the median PFS, improve the 3-year OS rate, prolong the 3-year OS. It is likely to be a new approach for mRCC after radical nephrectomy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells/immunology , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells/metabolism , Dendritic Cells/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Indoles/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Postoperative Care , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL