First-line zorifertinib for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases: The phase 3 EVEREST trial.

BACKGROUND: Zorifertinib (AZD3759), an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with high blood-brain barrier penetration capability, demonstrated promising intracranial and systemic antitumor activity in phase 1 and 2 studies in central nervous system (CNS)-metastatic patients. METHODS: In this phase 3 EVEREST trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03653546), patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, advanced treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and non-irradiated symptomatic or asymptomatic CNS metastases were randomized (1:1) to zorifertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; control). The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST1.1. FINDINGS: Overall, 439 patients were randomized (zorifertinib n = 220; control n = 219). Most patients had the EGFR L858R mutation (55%) or >3 CNS lesions (54%). Median PFS was significantly longer with zorifertinib versus control (9.6 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.719; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.580-0.893; p = 0.0024). Zorifertinib significantly prolonged intracranial PFS versus control (BICR per modified RECIST1.1: HR, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.352-0.619; investigator per RANO-BM: HR, 0.627; 95% CI, 0.466-0.844). Overall survival (OS) was immature; the estimated median OS was 37.3 months with zorifertinib and 31.8 months with control (HR, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.524-1.283) in patients subsequently treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Safety profiles were consistent with previously reported data for zorifertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Zorifertinib significantly improved systemic and intracranial PFS versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs; adverse events were manageable. Sequential use of zorifertinib and third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed the potential to prolong patients' survival. The results favor zorifertinib as a novel, well-validated first-line option for CNS-metastatic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. FUNDING: This work was funded by Alpha Biopharma (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd., China.

Circulating tumor DNA-based stratification strategy for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Stratification strategies for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are critically demanded. We performed high-throughput panel-based deep next-generation sequencing and low-pass whole genome sequencing on prospectively collected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) specimens from 460 patients in the phase 3 CHOICE-01 study at different time points. We identified predictive markers for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor, including ctDNA status and genomic features such as blood-based tumor mutational burden, intratumor heterogeneity, and chromosomal instability. Furthermore, we established an integrated ctDNA-based stratification strategy, blood-based genomic immune subtypes (bGIS) scheme, to distinguish patients who benefit from the addition of PD-1 inhibitor to first-line chemotherapy. Moreover, we demonstrated potential applications for the dynamic monitoring of ctDNA. Overall, we proposed a potential therapeutic algorithm based on the ctDNA-based stratification strategy, shedding light on the individualized management of immune-chemotherapies for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Savolitinib in patients in China with locally advanced or metastatic treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: results from a single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b confirmatory study.

BACKGROUND: Savolitinib has been approved in China for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping alterations in previously treated patients and those unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. We report results from a treatment-naive cohort of a phase 3b study that was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: This single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b study was done at 48 hospitals in China in adult (≥18 years) patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC who had not received previous systemic antitumour therapy. Patients with a bodyweight of 50 kg or more and those with a bodyweight of less than 50 kg received savolitinib once daily at 600 mg or 400 mg, respectively, in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. The full analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, which was used to assess the efficacy endpoints and baseline and safety data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04923945) and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Aug 31, 2021, and Oct 20, 2023, 125 treatment-naive patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 87 were enrolled and received savolitinib. The median age of patients was 70·0 years (IQR 65·2-75·8) and 51 (59%) of 87 patients were male and 36 (41%) were female. In the full analysis set, the IRC-assessed objective response rate was 62% (95% CI 51-72) and the investigator-assessed objective response rate was 60% (49-70), showing a high concordance rate (84%). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 85 (98%) of 87 patients, with peripheral oedema (54 [62%]) being the most common. Two of these treatment-related adverse events led to death (cardiac failure n=1, unknown reasons n=1). INTERPRETATION: Savolitinib showed manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in treatment-naive patients with advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC. FUNDING: HUTCHMED and AstraZeneca.

Benmelstobart, anlotinib and chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multi-target anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC ('EC alone'; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607 .

Homologous recombination deficiency status predicts response to immunotherapy-based treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a biomarker that predicts response to ovarian cancer treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or breast cancer treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, there are few studies on the prognosis of lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy using HRD as a biomarker. METHODS: We studied the relationship between HRD status and the effectiveness of first-line ICI-based therapy in EGFR/ALK wild-type metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) patients. RESULTS: This study included 22 treatment naïve NSCLC patients. The HRD score ranged from -26.37 to 92.34, with an average of 24.57. Based on analysis of the progression-free survival (PFS) data from the included NSCLC patients, threshold traversal was carried out. HRD (+) was defined as an HRD score of 31 or higher. Kaplan-Meier PFS survival analysis showed prolonged median PFS (mPFS) in NSCLC patients with HRD (+) versus HRD (-) (N/A vs. 7.0 ms, log-rank p = 0.029; HR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.96, likelihood-ratio p = 0.03). In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and HRD score ≥31 (co-status high), the mPFS was temporarily not reached during the follow-up period. In patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% and HRD score <31, the mPFS was 3 ms. Cox regression analysis showed that the hazard ratio of the co-status was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04-0.54), which was a good prognostic factor, and the prognostic effect of co-status was better than that of HRD score alone. CONCLUSION: The HRD status can be identified as an independent significance in NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI-based therapy.

A randomized phase 2 study of HLX22 plus trastuzumab biosimilar HLX02 and XELOX as first-line therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, yet the prognosis of advanced disease remains poor. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04908813). Patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and no prior systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 to 25 mg/kg HLX22 (a novel anti-HER2 antibody) + HLX02 (trastuzumab biosimilar) + oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) (group A), 15 mg/kg HLX22 + HLX02 + XELOX (group B), or placebo + HLX02 + XELOX (group C) in 3-week cycles. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiological review committee (IRRC). FINDINGS: Between November 29, 2021, and June 6, 2022, 82 patients were screened; 53 were randomized to group A (n = 18), B (n = 17), and C (n = 18). With 14.3 months of median follow-up, IRRC-assessed median PFS was prolonged with the addition of HLX22 (A vs. C, 15.1 vs. 8.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.27]; B vs. C, not reached vs. 8.2 months, HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.04-0.52]). Confirmed ORR was comparable among groups (A vs. B vs. C, 77.8% vs. 82.4% vs. 88.9%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 18 (100%), 16 (94.1%), and 17 (94.4%) patients, respectively. One (5.6%) patient in group C reported a grade 5 TRAE. CONCLUSIONS: Adding HLX22 to HLX02 and XELOX prolonged PFS and enhanced antitumor response in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer, with manageable safety. FUNDING: Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

CBX4 plays a bidirectional role in transcriptional regulation and lung adenocarcinoma progression.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Understanding the dysregulated epigenetics governing LUAD progression is pivotal for identifying therapeutic targets. CBX4, a chromobox protein, is reported to be upregulated in LUAD. This study highlights the dual impact of CBX4 on LUAD proliferation and metastasis through a series of rigorous in vitro and in vivo experiments. Further investigation into the underlying mechanism through high-throughput ChIP-seq and RNA-seq reveals that CBX4 functions in promoting LUAD proliferation via upregulating PHGDH expression and subsequent serine biosynthesis, while concurrently suppressing LUAD metastasis by inhibiting ZEB2 transcription. CBX4 facilitates PHGDH transcription through the interaction with GCN5, inducing heightened histone acetylation on the PHGDH promoter. Simultaneously, the inhibition of ZEB2 transcription involves CBX4-mediated recruitment of canonical PRC1 (cPRC1), establishing H2K119ub on the ZEB2 promoter. These findings underscore CBX4's pivotal role as a regulator of LUAD progression, emphasizing its diverse transcriptional regulatory functions contingent upon interactions with specific epigenetic partners. Understanding the nuanced interplay between CBX4 and epigenetic factors sheds light on potential therapeutic avenues in LUAD.

An engineered DNA aptamer-based PROTAC for precise therapy of p53-R175H hotspot mutant-driven cancer.

Targeting oncogenic mutant p53 represents an attractive strategy for cancer treatment due to the high frequency of gain-of-function mutations and ectopic expression in various cancer types. Despite extensive efforts, the absence of a druggable active site for small molecules has rendered these mutants therapeutically non-actionable. Here we develop a selective and effective proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) for p53-R175H, a common hotspot mutant with dominant-negative and oncogenic activity. Using a novel iterative molecular docking-guided post-SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) approach, we rationally engineer a high-performance DNA aptamer with improved affinity and specificity for p53-R175H. Leveraging this resulting aptamer as a binder for PROTACs, we successfully developed a selective p53-R175H degrader, named dp53m. dp53m induces the ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of p53-R175H while sparing wildtype p53. Importantly, dp53m demonstrates significant antitumor efficacy in p53-R175H-driven cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, without toxicity. Moreover, dp53m significantly and synergistically improves the sensitivity of these cells to cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapy drug. These findings provide evidence of the potential therapeutic value of dp53m in p53-R175H-driven cancers.

[Correlation Analysis between Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio 
and the Risk of Malnutrition in Stage IV Primary Lung Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is commonly associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of inflammation in the body and predicts the risk of malnutrition in a variety of diseases; however, its association with malnutrition in lung cancer patients is unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the association between NLR and nutritional status in stage IV primary lung cancer and to further determine the optimal NLR cut-off that best predicts the risk of malnutrition. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 209 patients admitted to the Department of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital with a primary diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer from May 2019 to February 2021 was performed, and the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) was used to examine their nutritional status. Patient demographic information, pathology, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and clinical biochemical indicators were also included. The correlation between NLR and NRS 2002 was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best NLR cut-off predi cting malnutrition risk. Multivariable Logistic regression was used to assess the association between NLR and malnutrition risk. RESULTS: The rate of patients with stage IV primary lung cancer at nutritional risk was 36.36% (76/209). A significant positive correlation was observed between NLR values and NRS 2002 risk score (r=0.765, P<0.001). The ROC curve analysis indicated that an NLR of 3.94 was the optimal cut-off for predicting malnutrition risk (area under the curve=0.747, 95%CI: 0.678-0.815, P<0.001), which showed a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 86%, a positive predictive value of 68%, and a negative predictive value of 77%. Patients in the NLR>3.94 group had a significantly higher risk of malnutrition compared to those in the NLR≤3.94 group (69.49% vs 23.33%, P<0.001). Furthermore, NLR was identified as a risk factor for malnutrition in stage IV primary lung cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is associated with the risk of malnutrition in stage IV primary lung cancer, and NLR can be used as one of the indicators for screening nutritional risk in patients with stage IV primary lung cancer.

Tislelizumab Plus Platinum and Etoposide Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Etoposide as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC (RATIONALE-312): A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) prognosis remains poor. The phase 3 RATIONALE-312 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. METHODS: RATIONALE-312 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in the People's Republic of China. Eligible patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo, with etoposide plus carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo as maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: Between July 22, 2019 and April 21, 2021, 457 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 227) or placebo (n = 230), plus chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were generally balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (April 19, 2023), the median study follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range: 8.6-25.3). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.93]; one-sided p = 0.0040; median: 15.5 [95% CI: 13.5-17.1] versus 13.5 mo [95% CI: 12.1-14.9], respectively). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the tislelizumab versus placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.52-0.78]; p < 0.0001; median: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.3-5.5] versus 4.3 mo [95% CI: 4.2-4.4], respectively). Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 86% of patients in each treatment arm and were mostly hematologic. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited statistically significant clinical benefit and manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ES-SCLC.

Efficacy, Safety, and Population Pharmacokinetics of MW032 Compared With Denosumab for Solid Tumor-Related Bone Metastases: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Equivalence Trial.

Importance: The bioequivalence of denosumab biosimilar has yet to be studied in a 53-week, multicenter, large-scale, and head-to-head trial. A clinically effective biosimilar may help increase access to denosumab in patients with solid tumor-related bone metastases. Objectives: To establish the biosimilarity of MW032 to denosumab in patients with solid tumor-related bone metastases based on a large-scale head-to-head study. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this 53-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 equivalence trial, patients with solid tumors with bone metastasis were recruited from 46 clinical sites in China. Overall, 856 patients were screened and 708 eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either MW032 or denosumab. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MW032 or reference denosumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks until week 49. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percentage change from baseline to week 13 of natural logarithmic transformed urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTx/uCr). Results: Among the 701 evaluable patients (350 in the MW032 group and 351 in the denosumab group), the mean (range) age was 56.1 (22.0-86.0) years and 460 patients were women (65.6%). The mean change of uNTx/uCr from baseline to week 13 was -72.0% (95% CI, -73.5% to -70.4%) in the MW032 group and -72.7% (95% CI, -74.2% to -71.2%) in the denosumab group. These percent changes corresponded to mean logarithmic ratios of -1.27 and -1.30, or a difference of 0.02. The 90% CI for the difference (-0.04 to 0.09) was within the equivalence margin (-0.13 to 0.13); the mean changes of uNTx/uCr and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (s-BALP) at each time point were also similar during 53 weeks. The differences of uNTx/uCr change were 0.015 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.09), -0.02 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.06), -0.05 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.03) and 0.001 (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.10) at weeks 5, 25, 37, and 53, respectively. The differences of s-BALP change were -0.006 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.05), 0.00 (95% CI, -0.07 to 0.07), -0.085 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.01), -0.09 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.02), and -0.13 (95% CI, -0.27 to 0.004) at weeks 5, 13, 25, 37 and 53, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of skeletal-related events (-1.4%; 95% CI, -5.8% to 3.0%) or time to first on-study skeletal-related events (unadjusted HR, 0.86; P = .53; multiplicity adjusted HR, 0.87; P = .55) in the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: MW032 and denosumab were biosimilar in efficacy, population pharmacokinetics, and safety profile. Availability of denosumab biosimilars may broaden the access to denosumab and reduce the drug burden for patients with advanced tumors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04812509.

Nomogram for predicting opioid-induced nausea and vomiting for cancer pain patients.

OBJECTIVE: Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting are frequently observed as an adverse effect in the treatment of cancer-related pain. The factors that affect OINV in cancer patients remain unclear. In this study, we developed a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of OINV in this population using retrospective clinical data. METHODS: We collected data from 416 cancer pain patients, 70% of whom used the training set to analyze demographic and clinical variables. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify significant factors associated with OINV. Then, we construct a prediction nomogram. The validation set comprises the remaining 30%. The reliability of the nomogram is evaluated by bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified five significant factors associated with OINV. The C-index was 0.835 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.828-0.842) for the training set and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.793-0.826) for the validation set. The calibrated curves show a good agreement between the predicted and actual occurrence of OINV. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective study based on five saliency-found variables, we developed and proved a reliable nomogram model to predict OINV in cancer pain patients. Future prospective studies should assess the model's reliability and usefulness in clinical practice.

[Research Progress of BRAF Fusion in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutation is highly malignant and has poor prognosis, and currently Dabrafenib in combination with Trametinib is approved for first-line treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation. In addition to mutations, BRAF fusion can also occur. With the development of gene detection, the detection of BRAF fusion is gradually increasing, but there is a lack of effective therapeutic strategies for BRAF fusion. In this paper, we review the clinical characteristics, mechanism of action, and clinical treatment of BRAF fusion to provide a basis for the treatment of BRAF fusion in NSCLC patients.
.

A deep learning-based interpretable decision tool for predicting high risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients prescribed highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a risk prediction model for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and identify the variables that have the most significant impact on prediction. METHODS: Data from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were collected and subjected to stepwise data preprocessing. Deep learning algorithms, including deep forest, and typical machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM), categorical boosting (CatBoost), random forest, decision tree, and neural network were used to develop the prediction model. After training the model and conducting hyperparameter optimization (HPO) through cross-validation in the training set, the performance was evaluated using the test set. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), partial dependence plot (PDP), and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) techniques were employed to explain the optimal model. Model performance was assessed using AUC, F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and Brier score. RESULTS: The deep forest model exhibited good discrimination, outperforming typical machine learning models, with an AUC of 0.850 (95%CI, 0.780-0.919), an F1 score of 0.757, an accuracy of 0.852, a specificity of 0.863, a sensitivity of 0.784, and a Brier score of 0.082. The top five important features in the model were creatinine clearance (Ccr), age, gender, anticipatory nausea and vomiting, and antiemetic regimen. Among these, Ccr had the most significant predictive value. The risk of CINV decreased with increased Ccr and age, while it was higher in the presence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting, female gender, and non-standard antiemetic regimen. CONCLUSION: The deep forest model demonstrated good discrimination in predicting the risk of CINV in cancer patients prescribed HEC. Kidney function, as represented by Ccr, played a crucial role in the model's prediction. The clinical application of this predictive tool can help assess individual risks and improve patient care by proactively optimizing the use of antiemetics in cancer patients receiving HEC.

A case of endobronchial metastasis of colon cancer mimics sarcoidosis, and a review of related literature.

PURPOSE: Endobronchial metastases (EBM) are defined as bronchoscopically visible lesions histopathologically identical to extrapulmonary tumors. We summarized the literature on endobronchial metastasis of colorectal cancer and give a brief review. METHOD: We present a rare case with an episode mistaken for sarcoidosis and unexpectedly identified as colon cancer by bronchoscopic biopsy. A 53-year-old man with dry cough and dyspnea had diffuse micro lung nodules and lymphadenopathy on CT and PET/CT. He was diagnosed with sarcoidosis and took steroid therapy, but the symptoms could not be alleviated. Bronchoscopy was suggested. He was finally identified with colon cancer by bronchoscopic biopsy, which was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. We summarise the clinical manifestations, imaging, prognosis of EMB of colorectal cancer. RESULT: EBM are rare. Colorectal cancer is common in EBM and the frequency is increasing. CONCLUSION: EBM should be distinguished from primary lung cancer, sarcoidosis.

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations. METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6-17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5-34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5-18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

[Research Progress of Klotho in Lung Neoplasms].

Klotho gene was originally discovered as an anti-aging gene, Klotho protein encoded by Klotho gene is expressed in multiple human tissues, and its most prominent function is the regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Klotho protein possesses various activities, including inhibition of multiple signaling pathways, reducing oxidative stress and suppressing inflammation, and these activities are associated with cancer. Klotho protein is discovered as a universal tumor suppressor, and its expression is associated with tumorigenesis and prognosis of patients. Lung cancer is the most common malignancy tumor, and it is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide because of its high incidence and mortality. This article summarizes the research progress of the role of Klotho on pathogenesis, therapeutic effect and prognosis in lung cancer, in order to provide new biomarker and target for diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer.
.

Prolonged usage of fosaprepitant for prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Even though chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can be well controlled in the acute phase, the incidence of delayed CINV remains high. In this study, we intend to investigate whether prolonged use of NK-1 receptor antagonist (RA) in addition to 5-HT3 RA and dexamethasone (DEX) was more effective in preventing delayed CINV. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, controlled study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant 150 mg given on days 1,3 (prolonged group) versus on day 1 (regular group) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). All patients also treated with palonosetron on day 1 and DEX on days 1-3. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delayed nausea and vomiting. The second endpoint was AEs. All the above endpoints were defined according to CTCAE 5.0. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned to prolonged group and seventy-nine to regular group. Prolonged group demonstrated superiority in controlling delayed CINV to regular group, with statistically significant lower incidence of nausea (6.17% vs 12.66%, P = 0.0056), and slightly lower incidence of grade 1 vomiting (1.62% vs 3.80%, P = 0.0953) in the delayed phase. In addition, prolonged use of fosaprepitant was safe. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding constipation, diarrhea, hiccough, fatigue, palpitation and headache in delayed phase. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of fosaprepitant can effectively and safely prevent delayed CINV in patients receiving HEC.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Unecritinib (TQ-B3101) for patients with ROS1 positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Phase I/II Trial.

This phase I/II trial characterized the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activities of unecritinib, a novel derivative of crizotinib and a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ROS1, ALK, and c-MET, in advanced tumors and ROS1 inhibitor-naive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS1 rearrangements. Eligible patients received unecritinib 100, 200, and 300 mg QD, and 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg BID in a 3 + 3 design during dose escalation and 300 and 350 mg BID during expansion. Phase II trial patients received unecritinib 300 mg BID in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoints included intracranial ORR and safety. The ORR of 36 efficacy evaluable patients in the phase I trial was 63.9% (95% CI 46.2%, 79.2%). In the phase II trial, 111 eligible patients in the main study cohort received unecritinib. The ORR per IRC was 80.2% (95% CI 71.5%, 87.1%) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) per IRC was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.2, 27.0). Additionally, 46.9% of the patients who received recommended phase II dose of 300 mg BID experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Treatment-related ocular disorders and neurotoxicity occurred in 28.1% and 34.4% of patients, respectively, but none was grade 3 or higher. Unecritinib is efficacious and safe for ROS1 inhibitor-naive patients with ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC, particularly patients with brain metastases at baseline, strongly supporting that unecritinib should become one of the standards of care for ROS1-positive NSCLC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03019276 and NCT03972189.

EGFR p.V774M/p.L833V compound mutations in lung adenocarcinoma responded well to almonertinib: a case report.

Background: There are about 10-15% of uncommon EGFR mutations found in NSCLC patients, and their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs still lack sufficient clinical evidence, especially for rare compound mutations. Almonertinib is the third generation of EGFR-TKI that has demonstrated excellent efficacy in classical mutations, however, effects in rare mutations have also been rarely reported. Case presentation: In this case report, we present a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with a rare EGFR p.V774M/p.L833V compound mutations, who achieved long-lasting and stable disease control after first-line Almonertinib targeted therapy. This case report could provide more information for therapeutic strategy selecting of NSCLC patients harboring rare EGFR mutations. Conclusion: We report for the first time the long-lasting and stable disease control with Almonertinib for EGFR p.V774M/p.L833V compound mutations treatment, hoping to provide more clinical case references for the treatment of rare compound mutations.