Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(1): 155-158, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147057

ABSTRACT

After reports in 2017 of Brucella neotomae infections among humans in Costa Rica, we sequenced 12 strains isolated from rodents during 1955-1964 from Utah, USA. We observed an exact strain match between the human isolates and 1 Utah isolate. Independent confirmation is required to clarify B. neotomae zoonotic potential.


Subject(s)
Brucella , Brucellosis , Humans , Genomics , Brucella/genetics , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Costa Rica/epidemiology
3.
Front Vet Sci ; 6: 175, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31231665

ABSTRACT

Members of the genus Brucella cluster in two phylogenetic groups: classical and non-classical species. The former group is composed of Brucella species that cause disease in mammals, including humans. A Brucella species, labeled as Brucella sp. BCCN84.3, was isolated from the testes of a Saint Bernard dog suffering orchiepididymitis, in Costa Rica. Following standard microbiological methods, the bacterium was first defined as "Brucella melitensis biovar 2." Further molecular typing, identified the strain as an atypical "Brucella suis." Distinctive Brucella sp. BCCN84.3 markers, absent in other Brucella species and strains, were revealed by fatty acid methyl ester analysis, high resolution melting PCR and omp25 and omp2a/omp2b gene diversity. Analysis of multiple loci variable number of tandem repeats and whole genome sequencing demonstrated that this isolate was different from the currently described Brucella species. The smooth Brucella sp. BCCN84.3 clusters together with the classical Brucella clade and displays all the genes required for virulence. Brucella sp. BCCN84.3 is a species nova taxonomical entity displaying pathogenicity; therefore, relevant for differential diagnoses in the context of brucellosis. Considering the debate on the Brucella species concept, there is a need to describe the extant taxonomical entities of these pathogens in order to understand the dispersion and evolution.

4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(11): 3954-9, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21880970

ABSTRACT

We report a novel IS711 chromosomal location that is specific for the Brucella genotype ST27 previously associated with Pacific marine mammals and human zoonotic infection in New Zealand and Peru. Our data support the previous observation that this peculiar genotype is distinct from those commonly isolated from the Atlantic and currently classified within the species B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis.


Subject(s)
Brucella/classification , Brucella/genetics , Brucellosis/veterinary , Chromosomes, Bacterial , DNA Transposable Elements , Mammals/microbiology , Zoonoses/microbiology , Animals , Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Genotype , Molecular Sequence Data , New Zealand , Peru , Sequence Analysis, DNA
5.
Microbes Infect ; 5(2): 85-93, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12650766

ABSTRACT

Immunogenicity and protective activity against Brucella ovis of detergent-extracted recombinant Omp31 (rOmp31 extract) from Brucella melitensis produced in Escherichia coli, purified rough lipopolysaccharide from B. ovis (R-LPS) and a mixture of rOmp31 extract and R-LPS (rOmp31 extract + R-LPS) were assessed in BALB/c mice. The experimental vaccines were compared with a hot saline extract (HS extract) from B. ovis mainly composed of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) and R-LPS, and known to be protective in mice against a B. ovis infection. Serum antibodies to Omp31 and R-LPS were detected in the corresponding mice using Western blotting with B. ovis whole-cell lysates and ELISA with purified antigens. Protection was evaluated by comparing the levels of infection in the spleens of vaccinated mice challenged with B. ovis. A significantly lower number of B. ovis colony-forming units in spleens relative to unimmunized (saline injected) controls were considered as protection. Mice immunized with rOmp31 extract or rOmp31 extract mixed with R-LPS developed antibodies that bound to the B. ovis surface with similar titers. Vaccination with rOmp31 extract plus R-LPS provided the best protection level, which was comparable with that given by HS extract. Similar protection was also obtained with rOmp31 extract alone and, to a lesser degree, with R-LPS. Comparisons between groups showed that an extract from E. coli-pUC19 (devoid of Omp31) provided no protection relative to either HS extract, rOmp31 extract or rOmp31 extract mixed with R-LPS. In conclusion, the recombinant Omp31 associated or not with B. ovis R-LPS, could be an interesting candidate for a subcellular vaccine against B. ovis infection.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucella/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Lipopolysaccharides/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Brucella/metabolism , Brucella/pathogenicity , Brucella melitensis/genetics , Brucella melitensis/metabolism , Female , Immunization , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Sheep , Spleen/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL