Impact of a high sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol on the safety and emergency department length of stay of chest pain in an academic tertiary hospital: a quality improvement study.

PURPOSE: High-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) accelerated diagnostic protocols are highly recommended for evaluating acute coronary syndromes. Our goal was to improve care for chest pain patients through the safe adoption of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in our academic Emergency Department (ED) with an aim to reduce mean ED length of stay for chest pain patients by 1 h over 1.5 years. Pre-accelerated diagnostic protocol, our mean ED length of stay for chest pain patients was 9.0 h. METHODS: Using the Model for Improvement, we implemented a two-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol and conducted two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and education efforts to improve accelerated diagnostic protocol compliance and decrease ED length of stay. Using control charts, we measured the mean monthly ED length of stay for chest pain patients to look for special cause evidence of improvement. Process measures measured compliance with the accelerated diagnostic protocol. Balancing measures included the ED length of stay for abdominal pain patients and the number of admissions and deaths at 7 days for chest pain patients. RESULTS: Mean ED length of stay for chest pain patients decreased from 9.0 to 8.2 h post-accelerated diagnostic protocol. The mean time between troponins decreased from 3.9 to 3.0 h, and the percentage of second troponins repeated at < 2.75 h increased from 22.3% to 58.6%. For abdominal pain patients, ED length of stay decreased from 10.8 to 10.5 h. No chest pain patients died within 7 days pre- or post-accelerated diagnostic protocol. Pre-accelerated diagnostic protocol, 0.84% (41/4,905) were admitted within 7 days. Post-accelerated diagnostic protocol and accelerated diagnostic protocol compliant, 0.70% (13/1,844) were admitted. Post-accelerated diagnostic protocol and accelerated diagnostic protocol non-compliant, 1.1% (13/1,183) were admitted. CONCLUSION: We safely introduced a hsTn accelerated diagnostic protocol in an academic ED. ED length of stay decreased for chest pain patients but did not meet our 1-h goal.

RéSUMé : OBJECTIF : Les protocoles de diagnostic accélérés à haute sensibilité de la troponine (hsTn) sont fortement recommandés pour évaluer les syndromes coronariens aigus. Notre objectif était d'améliorer les soins pour les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques grâce à l'adoption en toute sécurité d'un protocole de diagnostic accéléré dans notre service d'urgence universitaire (ED) dans le but de réduire la durée moyenne de séjour des patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques d'une heure sur 1,5 an. Protocole de diagnostic pré-accéléré, notre durée moyenne de séjour aux urgences pour les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques était de 9 heures. MéTHODES: À l'aide du Modèle d'amélioration, nous avons mis en œuvre un protocole de diagnostic accéléré de deux heures et mené deux cycles Plan-Do-Study-Act et des efforts d'éducation pour améliorer la conformité du protocole de diagnostic accéléré et réduire la durée du séjour aux urgences. À l'aide de tableaux de contrôle, nous avons mesuré la durée moyenne mensuelle du séjour aux urgences pour les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques afin de rechercher des preuves d'amélioration de cause spéciale. Le processus mesure la conformité au protocole de diagnostic accéléré. Les mesures d'équilibrage comprenaient la durée du séjour aux urgences pour les patients souffrant de douleurs abdominales et le nombre d'admissions et de décès à sept jours pour les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques. RéSULTATS: La durée moyenne du séjour aux urgences chez les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques a diminué de 9,0 à 8,2 heures après le protocole de diagnostic accéléré. Le temps moyen entre les troponines a diminué de 3,9 à 3,0 heures, et le pourcentage de deuxième troponines répétées à moins de 2,75 heures a augmenté de 22,3 % à 58,6 %. Pour les patients souffrant de douleurs abdominales, la durée du séjour aux urgences a diminué de 10,8 à 10,5 heures. Aucun patient souffrant de douleurs thoraciques n'est décédé dans les sept jours précédant ou suivant le protocole de diagnostic accéléré. Protocole de diagnostic pré-accéléré, 0,84 % (41/4905) ont été admis dans les sept jours. Protocole de diagnostic post-accéléré et protocole de diagnostic accéléré conforme, 0,70% (13/1844) ont été admis. Le protocole diagnostique post-accéléré et le protocole diagnostique accéléré non conforme, 1,1% (13/1,183) ont été admis. CONCLUSION: Nous avons introduit en toute sécurité un protocole de diagnostic accéléré hsTn dans un ED académique. La durée de séjour des patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques a diminué, mais n'a pas atteint notre objectif d'une heure.

A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain.

The emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS-ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS-ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS-ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53-0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08-2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02-0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45-106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79-0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS-ADP identified a considerable number of low-risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30-days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application.

Frequency, compliance, and yield of cardiac testing after high-sensitivity troponin accelerated diagnostic protocol implementation.

BACKGROUND: Among persons presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac troponin (cTn) testing is commonly used to detect acute myocardial injury. Accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) guide clinicians to integrate cTn results with other clinical information to decide whether to order further diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in the rate and yield of stress test or coronary CT angiogram following cTn measurement in patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department pre- and post-transition to a high-sensitivity (hs-cTn) assay in an updated ADP. METHODS: Using electronic health records, we examined visits for chest pain at five emergency departments affiliated with an integrated academic health system 1-year pre- and post-hs-cTn assay transition. Outcomes included stress test or coronary imaging frequency, ADP compliance among those with additional testing, and diagnostic yield (ratio of positive tests to total tests). RESULTS: There were 7564 patient-visits for chest pain, including 3665 in the pre- and 3899 in the post-period. Following the updated ADP using hs-cTn, 862 (23.5 per 100 patient visits) visits led to subsequent testing versus 1085 (27.8 per 100 patient visits) in the pre-hs-cTn period, (P < 0.001). Among those who were tested, the protocol-compliant rate fell from 80.9% to 46.5% (P < 0.001), but the yield of those tests rose from 24.5% to 29.2% (P = 0.07). Among tests that were noncompliant with ADP guidance, yield was similar pre- and post-updated hs-cTn ADP implementation (pre 13.0%, post 15.4% (P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: Implementation of hs-cTn supported by an updated ADP was associated with a lower rate of stress testing and coronary CT angiogram.

Age differences in the safety and effectiveness of the HEART Pathway accelerated diagnostic protocol for acute chest pain.

BACKGROUND: The HEART Pathway is a validated protocol for risk stratifying emergency department (ED) patients with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Its performance in different age groups is unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate its safety and effectiveness among older adults. METHODS: A pre-planned subgroup analysis of the HEART Pathway implementation study was conducted. This prospective interrupted time series accrued adult ED patients with possible ACS who were without ST-elevation across three US sites from 11/2013-01/2016. After implementation, providers prospectively used the HEART Pathway to stratify patients as low-risk or non-low-risk. Patients were classified as older adults (≥65 years), middle-aged (46-64 years), and young (21-45 years). Primary safety and effectiveness outcomes were 30-day death or MI and hospitalization at 30 days, determined from health records, insurance claims, and death index data. Fisher's exact test compared low-risk proportions between groups. Sensitivity for 30-day death or MI and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for hospitalization and objective cardiac testing were calculated. RESULTS: The HEART Pathway implementation study accrued 8474 patients, of which 26.9% (2281/8474) were older adults, 45.5% (3862/8474) middle-aged, and 27.5% (2331/8474) were young. The HEART Pathway identified 7.4% (97/1303) of older adults, 32.0% (683/2131) of middle-aged, and 51.4% (681/1326) of young patients as low-risk (p < 0.001). The HEART Pathway was 98.8% (95% CI 97.1-100) sensitive for 30-day death or MI among older adults. Following implementation, the rate of 30-day hospitalization was similar among older adults (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.55) and cardiac testing increased (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.51). CONCLUSION: The HEART Pathway identified fewer older adults as low-risk and did not decrease hospitalizations in this age group.

Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.

Acute chest pain is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint. Evaluating patients for acute coronary syndrome is challenging because missing the diagnosis carries substantial morbidity, mortality, and medicolegal consequences. However, over-testing is associated with increased cost, overcrowding, and possible iatrogenic harm. Over the past two decades, multiple risk scoring systems have been developed to help emergency providers evaluate patients with acute chest pain. The ideal risk score balances safety by achieving high sensitivity and negative predictive value for major adverse cardiovascular events while also being effective in identifying a large proportion of patients for early discharge from the ED. This review examines contemporary risk scores used to risk stratify patients with acute chest pain.

Chest Pain: Who Needs Additional Testing Beyond ECG and Troponin?

In the first case, we describe a 45-year-old man who presented to the emergency department for evaluation of chest pain. He reported having chest discomfort 5 days prior that lasted a few minutes after an altercation with his coworker. In the second case, we describe a 54-year-old woman with history of well-controlled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia who presented to the ED with a 10-day history of intermittent sharp and burning chest pain in the substernal region, 5/10 intensity, lasting 15-20 minutes, associated with exertion. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

The disutility of stress testing in low-risk HEART Pathway patients.

BACKGROUND: The HEART Pathway identifies low-risk chest pain patients for discharge from the Emergency Department without stress testing. However, HEART Pathway recommendations are not always followed. The objective of this study is to determine the frequency and diagnostic yield of stress testing among low-risk patients. METHODS: An academic hospital's chest pain registry was analyzed for low-risk HEART Pathway patients (HEAR score ≤ 3 with non-elevated troponins) from 1/2017 to 7/2018. Stress tests were reviewed for inducible ischemia. Diagnostic yield was defined as the rate of obstructive CAD among patients with positive stress testing. T-test or Fisher's exact test was used to test the univariate association of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and HEAR score with stress testing. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and HEAR score with stress testing. RESULTS: There were 4743 HEART Pathway assessments, with 43.7% (2074/4743) being low-risk. Stress testing was performed on 4.1% (84/2074). Of the 84 low-risk patients who underwent testing, 8.3% (7/84) had non-diagnostic studies and 2.6% (2/84) had positive studies. Among the 2 patients with positive studies, angiography revealed that 1 had widely patent coronary arteries and the other had multivessel obstructive coronary artery disease, making the diagnostic yield of stress testing 1.2% (1/84). Each one-point increase in HEAR score (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.45-3.24) and being male (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.49) were associated with testing. CONCLUSIONS: Stress testing among low-risk HEART Pathway patients was uncommon, low yield, and more likely in males and those with a higher HEAR score.

Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin.

PURPOSE: To assess the extent to which accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs), compared to traditional care, identify patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with chest pain who are at low cardiac risk and eligible for early ED discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 290 patients admitted to hospital for further evaluation of chest pain following negative ED workup (no acute ischemic electrocardiogram [ECG] changes or elevation of initial serum troponin assay). Demographic data, serial ECG and troponin results, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score, cardiac investigations, and outcomes (confirmed acute coronary syndrome [ACS] at discharge and major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) over 6 months of follow-up were analyzed. A validated ADP (ADAPT-ADP) was retrospectively applied to the cohort, and processes and outcomes of ADP-guided care were compared with those of care actually received. RESULTS: Patients had mean (±SD) TIMI score of 1.8 (±1.7); six (2.0%) patients were diagnosed with ACS at discharge. At 6 months, one patient (0.3%) re-presented with ACS and two (0.6%) died of non-coronary causes. The ADAPT-ADP defined 97 (33.4%) patients as being at low risk and eligible for early ED discharge, but who instead incurred mean hospital stay of 1.5 days, with 40.2% in telemetry beds, and 21.6% subject to non-invasive testing with only one positive result for coronary artery disease. None had a discharge diagnosis of ACS or developed MACE at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional care, application of the ADAPT-ADP would have allowed one-third of chest pain patients with initially negative investigations in ED to have been safely discharged from ED.

An accelerated diagnostic protocol for the early, safe discharge of low-risk chest pain patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION: Can an accelerated 2-hour diagnostic protocol using the cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measurement as the only biomarker be implemented to allow an earlier and safe discharge of low-risk chest pain patients? ARTICLE CHOSEN: Than M, Cullen L, Aldous S, et al. 2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59(23):2091-8. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) for possible cardiac chest pain could identify low-risk patients suitable for early discharge using cTnI as the sole biomarker.

Comparison of new point-of-care troponin assay with high sensitivity troponin in diagnosing myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare a new improved point of care cardiac troponin assay (new POC-cTnI) with 1. its predecessor (old POC-cTnI) and 2. a high sensitivity assay (hs-cTnI) for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by 30 days. METHODS: This is a single centre observational study, set in Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand. Patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic chest pain underwent blood sampling at 0 h and 2h post presentation for analysis with the 3 cTnI assays for the outcome of AMI and for analysis using an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP-normal 2h troponins, normal electrocardiograms and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 0 or ≤ 1) for 30 day MACE. RESULTS: Of 962 patients, 220 (22.9%) had AMI. Old POC-cTnI was least sensitive at 70.0% (65.4-73.9%) by 2h (p<0.001). New POC-cTnI, sensitivity 93.6% (89.9-96.2%) had similar sensitivity to hs-cTnI, sensitivity 95.0% (91.5-97.3%) (p = 0.508). There were 231 (24.0%) patients with 30 day MACE. When used as part of the ADP, all assays had 100% (98.0-100%) sensitivity using TIMI = 0. Sensitivities of new POC-cTnI ADP, 98.3% (95.4-99.4%), old POC-cTnI, 96.5% (93.2-98.4%) and hs-cTnI, 98.7% (96.0-99.7%) were similar (p = 0.063-0.375) using TIMI ≤ 1. CONCLUSIONS: A new POC-cTnI has improved sensitivity for AMI and MACE compared with its predecessor and comparable sensitivity to a high sensitivity assay. Now that sensitivities of the POC assay are improved, the new assay may be a useful alternative to central laboratory assays when rapid turn-around times are not possible.

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Risk scores and accelerated diagnostic protocols can identify chest pain patients with low risk of major adverse cardiac event who could be discharged early from the ED, saving time and costs. We aimed to derive and validate a chest pain score and accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) that could safely increase the proportion of patients suitable for early discharge. METHODS: Logistic regression identified statistical predictors for major adverse cardiac events in a derivation cohort. Statistical coefficients were converted to whole numbers to create a score. Clinician feedback was used to improve the clinical plausibility and the usability of the final score (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score [EDACS]). EDACS was combined with electrocardiogram results and troponin results at 0 and 2 h to develop an ADP (EDACS-ADP). The score and EDACS-ADP were validated and tested for reproducibility in separate cohorts of patients. RESULTS: In the derivation (n = 1974) and validation (n = 608) cohorts, the EDACS-ADP classified 42.2% (sensitivity 99.0%, specificity 49.9%) and 51.3% (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 59.0%) as low risk of major adverse cardiac events, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficient for categorisation of patients as low risk was 0.87. CONCLUSION: The EDACS-ADP identified approximately half of the patients presenting to the ED with possible cardiac chest pain as having low risk of short-term major adverse cardiac events, with high sensitivity. This is a significant improvement on similar, previously reported protocols. The EDACS-ADP is reproducible and has the potential to make considerable cost reductions to health systems.

Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to validate a new high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) assay in a clinical protocol for assessing patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain. BACKGROUND: Protocols using sensitive troponin assays can accelerate the rule out of acute myocardial infarction in patients with low-risk (suspected) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: This study evaluated 2 prospective cohorts of patients in the emergency department with ACS in an accelerated diagnostic pathway integrating 0- and 2-h hs-TnI results, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores, and electrocardiography. Strategies to identify low-risk patients incorporated TIMI risk scores= 0 or ≤ 1. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, 1,635 patients were recruited and had 30-day follow-up. A total of 247 patients (15.1%) had a MACE. The finding of no ischemic electrocardiogram and hs-TnI ≤ 26.2 ng/l with the TIMI = 0 and TIMI ≤ 1 pathways, respectively, classified 19.6% (n = 320) and 41.5% (n = 678) of these patients as low risk; 0% (n = 0) and 0.8% (n = 2) had a MACE, respectively. In the secondary cohort, 909 patients were recruited. A total of 156 patients (17.2%) had a MACE. The TIMI = 0 and TIMI ≤ 1 pathways classified 25.3% (n = 230) and 38.6% (n = 351), respectively, of these patients as low risk; 0% (n = 0) and 0.8% (n = 1) had a MACE, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for TIMI = 0 in the primary cohort were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.5% to 100%), 23.1% (95% CI: 20.9% to 25.3%), and 100% (95% CI: 98.8% to 100%), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for TIMI ≤ 1 in the primary cohort were 99.2 (95% CI: 97.1 to 99.8), 48.7 (95% CI: 46.1 to 51.3), and 99.7 (95% CI: 98.9 to 99.9), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative value for TIMI ≤ 1 in the secondary cohort were 99.4% (95% CI: 96.5 to 100), 46.5% (95% CI: 42.9 to 50.1), and 99.7% (95% CI: 98.4 to 100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An early-discharge strategy using an hs-TnI assay and TIMI score ≤ 1 had similar safety as previously reported, with the potential to decrease the observation periods and admissions for approximately 40% of patients with suspected ACS. (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation [APACE] Study, NCT00470587; A 2 hr Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess patients with chest Pain symptoms using contemporary Troponins as the only biomarker [ADAPT]: a prospective observational validation study, ACTRN12611001069943).

Predictive value of a 4-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol in patients with suspected ischemic chest pain presenting to an emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Currently recommended risk stratification protocols for suspected ischemic chest pain in the emergency department (ED) includes point-of-care availability of exercise treadmill/nuclear tests or CT coronary angiograms. These tests are not widely available for most of the ED's. This study aims to prospectively validate the safety of a predefined 4-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) using chest pain, ECG, and troponin T among suspected ischemic chest pain patients presenting to an ED of a tertiary care hospital in Oman. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients aged over 18 years with suspected ischemic chest pain presenting within 12 hours of onset along with normal or non-diagnostic first ECG and negative first troponin T (<0.010 µg/l) were recruited from September 2008 to February 2009. Low-probability acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients at 4-hours defined as absent chest pain and negative ECG or troponin tests were discharged home and observed for 30-days for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (Group I: negative ADP). High-probability ACS patients at 4-hours were defined by recurrent or persistent chest pain, positive ECG or troponin tests and were admitted and observed for in-hospital MACE (Group II: positive ADP). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients were recruited and 110 patients completed the study. The overall 30-day MACE in this cohort was 15% with a mortality of less than 1%. 30-days MACE occurred in 8/95 of group I patients (8.4%) and 9/15 of the in-hospital MACE patients in group II. The ADP had a sensitivity of 52% (95% CI: 0.28-0.76), specificity of 93% (0.85-0.97), a negative predictive value of 91% (0.83-0.96), a positive predictive value of 60% (0.32-0.82), negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (0.30-0.83) and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.2 (3.3-20) in predicting MACE. CONCLUSION: A 4-hour ADP using chest pain, ECG, and troponin T had high specificity and negative predictive value in predicting 30-day MACE among low probability ACS patients discharged from ED. However, 30-day MACE in ADP negative patients was relatively high in contrast to guideline recommendations. Hence, there is a need to establish ED chest pain unit and adopt new protocols especially adding a point-of-care exercise treadmill test in the ED.