Robotic Repair of Acute Traumatic Diaphragmatic Injury From an Abdominal Approach: A Case Report.

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury is a rare condition with a significant mortality risk and may cause a herniation of an intraperitoneal organ into the pleural space. In the acute phase, traumatic diaphragmatic hernia (TDH) may be repaired with laparotomy or thoracotomy and is often associated with multiple concurrent injuries. This case report highlights a rare clinical scenario of blunt traumatic DH in a 62-year-old male with approximately seven centimeters of stomach herniating into the left pleural space, repaired with minimally invasive surgery. This was done via a transabdominal approach with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hernia repair and institution of biologic mesh and represents an important opportunity that potentially reduces the morbidity risk involved with open surgeries.

Caring for Families of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury Early During Hospitalization: A Feasibility Study of the SAFIR© Intervention.

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a complex family nursing intervention (SAFIR©) designed to support families of patients with acquired brain injuries during the early phase of hospitalization, using a one-group pre- and post-test design with a one-month follow-up. Family members participated in four family meetings. Quantitative data were collected using an intervention protocol checklist and questionnaires. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, written open-ended questions, and note-taking. Feasibility outcomes revealed a family recruitment rate of 15.4% and a retention rate of 100%. Protocol adherence ranged from 94% in Phase 1 to 78% in Phase 3. Our results indicated that the intervention was meaningful and suitable for family members (n=7), healthcare provider (n=1), and nursing managers (n=6). From a sustainability perspective, our findings suggest the need to formally involve the entire inter-professional team in the intervention. Further evaluation of the intervention is warranted through a large-scale experimental.

The Patient Perspective of an Inpatient Addiction Medicine Unit Implemented in an Urban Northern Acute Care Hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Background: An Addiction Medicine Unit (AMU) represents a promising approach to enhancing hospital care for individuals who use substances, but there is limited research to understand patients' perspectives on AMUs. Therefore, the study objectives involved exploring patients' experiences with the AMU. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 patients to gather their perspectives about the AMU. The AMU offers specialized inpatient addiction support, integrating medical and psychosocial interventions while facilitating connections to community supports to stabilize patients and manage addiction-related issues using a harm reduction philosophy. Results: Factors identified by patients that lead to positive experiences with the AMU included: efficient access to high-quality acute medical care, specialized addiction care, and additional support for non-medical needs. Patients emphasized the benefits of having peer support workers on staff, the overall positive interactions with staff, and how different these experiences were from their hospital admissions outside of the AMU. Factors identified by patients that should be considered in an AMU included: the ease of access to substances, negative interactions with other patients, and self-stigma/internalized discrimination. Also, the patient perspective reflected varied views on harm reduction. Patients' perception of the impact of an AMU overall reflected that the AMU is an effective way to deliver comprehensive treatment, to address the needs of PWUS, both medical and substance-use-related issues. They identified that the unit's intentional harm reduction philosophy facilitated access to care and positive patient-staff interactions, emphasizing the unit's progress in reducing fear and judgment and rebuilding trust in the healthcare system. Conclusion: The introduction of a new AMU in a Northern urban acute care hospital in Ontario has yielded positive patient experiences. The AMU model shows potential to re-establish trust between patients and providers, but ongoing efforts are needed to address underlying stigma to be more effective.

Nurses' experiences with ad-hoc patient education in an Austrian acute care setting - A qualitative multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to explore nurses' experiences with ad-hoc patient education (AHPE) in an acute inpatient setting. METHODS: We conducted nine focus groups with 34 nurses. Data was analysed using thematic analysis and the social-ecological model (SEM). FINDINGS: We identified two main themes. 1) characteristics of AHPE: the complexity, contents, and timing of AHPE, as well as features of successful AHPE. The central phenomenon was the subconscious and incidental nature of AHPE. This negatively impacts charting and recognition of patient education as a core nursing responsibility. 2) requirements for successful AHPE, using the SEM: a) interpersonal level: nurses' own expertise, personality traits, and attitude; b) intrapersonal level: relationship building, communication at eye-level, and recognising patients' receptivity and education needs; c) institutional level: environmental factors (time, space, and clear responsibilities within care teams) and the charting system; d) social level: recognition and appreciation for the value of patient education. CONCLUSION: AHPE often occurs subconciously and unreflected. Patient education can positively impact patient outcomes; however, this requires a complex interaction of factors on multiple systemic levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Awareness raising for AHPE, its value for patients and society, and its proper charting is needed on multiple levels to ensure patient safety and the peace of mind of care teams.

Barriers to learning and performing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable adjunct to traditional imaging and physical exam. Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners (AGACNPs) serve as primary providers for acutely ill patients across the country, yet there is limited literature to describe the AGACNP experience with POCUS training and clinical application. PURPOSE: This integrative review was to describe barriers to learning and performing POCUS that AGACNP's experience, identify necessary components of a successful POCUS curriculum, and synthesize evidence to propose solutions. METHOD: CINAHL, PubMed, and Ovid databases were systematically searched for publications. Two reviewers completed the quality appraisal of the 12 articles identified during the literature search. RESULTS: Common barriers include: formal training; access to ultrasound machines; quality assurance; time to perform exams; inability to use findings in documentation/decision making. Low confidence may be an underrepresented barrier. Successful training programs include an introductory class with mixed didactic and hands-on training, training with live models, direct supervision and image review by experts, and longitudinal training. CONCLUSION: Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners are capable of learning and incorporating POCUS use into clinical practice. Broad solutions can be instituted to remove barriers, but more research is needed to describe necessary components of a successful POCUS training program.

Association of Pneumatosis Intestinalis With Surgical Outcomes and Mortality: A Matched, Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.

Background: To determine the clinical importance of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) on surgical decision-making and patient outcomes. Methods: A matched cohort observational study was conducted including all clinical encounters for both ambulatory and inpatient care at UCLA Health between February 15, 2006 and January 31, 2023. Patients were initially identified using encounter diagnostic codes for "other specified diseases of intestine." A radiologic diagnosis of PI was then assessed using natural language processing techniques followed by confirmation using manual chart review. Patients who did not have PI served as a control group. Patient comorbidity was assessed using Elixhauser comorbidity scores. Logistic regression and Cox hazard analyses were used to assess associations between PI and mortality. The main outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients undergoing surgery and, of those, how many required bowel resections. Results: Of the 16,728 patients identified by diagnostic coding, 315 were confirmed to have a diagnosis of PI. The 90-day mortality rate for all patients with PI was 29%. Surgery was performed for 62 patients (20%), of whom 46 (72%) underwent bowel resection and 16 (28%) underwent abdominal exploration alone. Most patients underwent surgery for peritonitis (37%), bowel obstruction (31%), and/or pneumoperitoneum (23%) in association with PI; whereas only 8% of patients received surgery exclusively for PI. There was no statistically significant association between PI and mortality with logistic regression conditioned on other risk factors for mortality. In contrast, survival analysis of a matched cohort demonstrated a small effect of PI on mortality (hazard ratio = 1.24: 95% confidence interval = 1.16-1.32, P = 0.021). Conclusions: Most patients with a diagnosis of PI survive without requiring surgery. Of those who undergo surgery, nearly all have indications for laparotomy exclusive of PI. Mortality in patients who have pneumatosis is strongly associated with comorbid disease, with little to no independent association with PI. Our findings suggest that the presence of PI should not be a primary indication for surgical intervention.

Balancing Urgency and Strategy in the Surgical Management of a Complex Case of Gallstone Ileus: A Surgical-Video-Based Case Report of a 60-Year-Old Female.

Gallstone ileus is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of gallstone disease, characterized by the obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract by a gallstone, typically at the ileocecal valve. This condition predominantly affects elderly patients and carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality due to delayed diagnosis and the complexity of associated comorbidities. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and cholelithiasis who presented with a four-day history of intermittent epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and an inability to pass stool or flatus. Initial imaging studies, including ultrasonography and computed tomography, revealed a biliary-enteric fistula with a large obstructing gallstone at the ileocecal valve. Despite conservative management with intravenous fluids, nasogastric tube suction, and antibiotics, the patient's symptoms persisted, necessitating surgical intervention. A midline laparotomy was performed, during which the gallstone was successfully removed via enterotomy. The patient recovered without complications and was discharged in stable condition. The complexity of management, particularly in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, necessitates careful consideration between the one-stage and two-stage surgical approaches. In this case, the decision to perform an enterotomy without immediate cholecystectomy reflects a two-stage strategy, aimed at minimizing operative risk while addressing the immediate obstruction. This approach underscores the need for individualized management plans, where the choice between one-stage and two-stage surgery is guided by the patient's overall clinical status.

Opioid-specific harm reduction in the emergency department: how staff provide harm reduction and contextual factors that impact their capacity to engage in harm reduction practice.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (ED) staff, including nurses and physicians, are most directly involved in the care of people who use unregulated substances, and are ideally positioned to provide harm reduction interventions. Conceptualizing the ED as a complex adaptive system, this paper examines how ED staff experience opioid-specific harm reduction provision and engage in harm reduction practice, including potential facilitators and barriers to engagement. METHODS: Using a mixed methods approach, ED nurses and physicians completed a self-administered staff survey (n = 99) and one-on-one semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Five additional interviews were completed with clinical leaders. Survey data were analyzed to generate descriptive statistics and to compute scale scores. De-identified interview data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach, which was informed by the theory of complex adaptive systems, as well as understandings of harm reduction as both a technical solution and a contextualized social practice. The final analysis involved mixed analysis through integrating both quantitative and qualitative data to generate overarching analytical themes. RESULTS: Study findings illustrated that, within the context of the ED as a complex adaptive system, three interrelated contextual factors shape the capacity of staff to engage in harm reduction practice, and to implement the full range of opioid-specific harm reduction interventions available. These factors include opportunities to leverage benefits afforded by working collaboratively with colleagues, adequate preparation through receiving the necessary education and training, and support in helping patients establish connections for ongoing care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for harm reduction provision across all health and social care settings where people who use unregulated opioids access public sector services. In the context of the ED, attention to contextual factors including teamwork, preparedness, and connections is warranted to support that ED staff engage in harm reduction practice.

The temporal trend and disparity in short-term health impacts of fine particulate matter in California (2006-2019).

Most epidemiological studies assume that the relationship between short-term air pollution exposure and health outcomes is constant over time, which ignores potential changes in population composition and particulate matter emission sources. Limited studies have assessed changes in the relationship between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and adverse health outcomes over time, with mixed results. Additionally, there is a need to identify which subgroups are disproportionately impacted over time by PM2.5-related health consequences. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether temporal trends exist in the relationships between daily PM2.5 exposure and circulatory and respiratory acute care utilization in California from 2006 to 2019. We further assessed whether certain subpopulations are more susceptible to PM2.5 exposure by demographic characteristics and extreme wildfire frequency. Daily PM2.5 concentrations estimated from a stacked ensemble model and daily cause-specific acute care utilization and demographic data from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information. We analyzed this relationship using modified two-stage Bayesian hierarchical models, where we first did not consider temporal trends, then stratified by two periods, and finally flexibly considered non-linear changes over time. Increases in circulatory (0.56 %; 95 % credible interval (CI): 0.17 %, 0.96 %) and respiratory acute care utilization risk (2.61 %; 95%CI: 2.29 %, 2.94 %) were found with every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 on the same day and previous two days. These risks were found to increase over time, where 0.13 % (95%CI: 0.02 %, 0.22 %) and 1.40 % (95%CI: 1.24 %, 1.54 %) increases were identified for circulatory and respiratory acute care utilizations, respectively, from the first (2006-2012) to second period (2013-2019). Differences by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and extreme wildfire frequency were noted. These findings confirm that air pollution guidelines should consider the dynamic nature of epidemiological dose-response and can provide insight for targeted air pollution control and adaptation policies designed to reduce PM2.5 exposure, particularly for the most susceptible subpopulations.

Associations Between Prehabilitation and Postoperative Healthcare Utilization for Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation has potential to improve outcomes in value-based care models. We examined the associations between receipt of prehabilitation (physical therapy [PT] services within 30 days preoperatively) and postoperative healthcare utilization in a national cohort of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 5% fee-for-service claims from the Medicare Limited Data Set to identify unilateral elective inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures (n = 25,509) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures (n = 40,091) from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2021. Associations between prehabilitation and postoperative healthcare utilization were analyzed in mixed-effects generalized linear models adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level factors. We report adjusted odds ratios (OR) or % differences. RESULTS: Prehabilitation (13.1% THA, 13.1% TKA) was not significantly associated with institutional post-acute care discharge, 30-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. For TKA, prehabilitation was significantly associated with decreased odds of an extended hospital length of stay (OR = 0.86, P = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in an institutional post-acute care facility (-5.71%, P = 0.004). In both THA and TKA, prehabilitation was associated with decreased use of 90-day home health physical and/or occupational therapy (THA: OR = 0.82, P = 0.001; TKA: OR = 0.67, P < 0.001). In contrast, prehabilitation in both cohorts was associated with increased odds of receiving any 90-day outpatient PT (THA: OR = 2.08, P < 0.001; TKA: OR = 2.48, P < 0.001) and an increased number of 90-day outpatient PT visits (THA: +4.04%, P = 0.01; TKA: +5.21%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was associated with some decreases in postoperative healthcare utilization, particularly for TKA. Associations of preoperative physical therapy with increased postoperative outpatient physical therapy may reflect variation in referral patterns or patient access. These results highlight the importance of continued research into the impact of prehabilitation on healthcare utilization, patient outcomes, and episode costs. Additionally, further research should identify which patients would benefit the most from prehabilitation to increase the value of care.

Postpartum Emergency Care Visits Among North Carolina Medicaid Beneficiaries, 2013-2019.

Objective: To describe the rate, timing, and primary diagnosis codes for emergency care visits up to 8 weeks (56 days) after live birth among Medicaid beneficiaries in North Carolina (NC). Materials and Methods: Using a linked dataset of Medicaid hospital claims and certificates of live birth, which included Medicaid beneficiaries who had a live-born infant in NC between January 1, 2013, and November 4, 2019, and met inclusion criteria (n = 321,879), we estimated week-specific visit rates for emergency care visits that did not result in hospital admission (outpatient) and those that did (inpatient). We assessed the 10 leading diagnosis code categories for emergency care visits and described the characteristics of people with 0, 1, or ≥2 outpatient emergency care visits. Results: One in eight (12.4%) Medicaid beneficiaries had an emergency care visit that did not result in inpatient hospital admission during the first 8 weeks postpartum. Visit rates peaked in postpartum week 2. Diagnosis codes for nonspecific symptoms and substance use were the two leading diagnosis code categories for outpatient emergency care visits. Respiratory concerns and gastrointestinal concerns were the two leading diagnosis code categories for inpatient emergency care visits. Compared with those with zero outpatient emergency care visits, a greater proportion of people with ≥2 visits had less than a high school education, used tobacco during pregnancy, had Medicaid insurance outside of pregnancy, had mental health as a medical comorbidity, and/or had ≥2 medical comorbidities. Conclusions: These findings support scheduling health care visits early in the postpartum period, when emergency care visits are most frequent, and point to unmet needs for substance use support.

Minimizing the Risk of Diagnostic Errors in Acute Care for Older Adults: An Interdisciplinary Patient Safety Challenge.

Modern healthcare systems are increasingly organized according to diagnosis-specific clinical pathways and treatment protocols. At the same time, the number of patients with complex problems and needs that do not fit the single-diagnosis approach is rising, contributing to a high prevalence of diagnostic errors. In this article, we focus on the risk of diagnostic errors arising from missed or incomplete diagnosis and assessment of older adult patients' care needs in the first hours of acute hospitalizations in EDs. This focus is important for improving patient safety, as clinical decisions made in EDs impact patient safety in the subsequent steps of the process, thereby potentially causing new risks to arise. Based on our discussion of clinical decision-making and diagnostic errors in the acute care context, we propose a more comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to improvements in patient safety that integrates organizational and clinical research and examines where, when, how, and why risks to patient safety arise in and across different clinical-organizational contexts.

Evaluating Thrombolysis Rates and Emergency Department Time Targets in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Need for Personalized Medicine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the era of personalized medicine, standard protocols regarding the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focus on time targets alone without tailoring the protocol to the specific patient and hospital characteristics to increase IV thrombolysis rates and improve outcomes for these patients by considering organizational differences and patient-related factors that influence adherence to target times at the emergency department level. With this in mind, we evaluate the effect of achieving ED time targets from standard protocol and patient-related risk factors on the intravenous (IV) thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For our research, we enrolled people who arrived at the ED with signs of recent AIS with an onset of less than 4.5 h. Initially, 355 patients were included in the study, but through careful screening, only 258 were considered eligible to participate. Of the final group of 258 patients, only 46 received intravenous thrombolysis treatment. RESULTS: In our study, when we are analyzing ED times in patients admitted with stroke symptoms in the therapeutic window, we found statistically significantly decreased ED times for patients that performed IV thrombolysis compared to patients not performing as follows: a median of 100 min in onset-to-ED door time (p < 0.001), a door-to-physician time (ED doctor) of 4 min (p = 0.009), door-to-blood-samples of 5 min (p = 0.026), a door-to-CT time of 15.5 min (p = 0.009), and door-to-CT results of 37 min (p < 0.001). In addition, patients who received intravenous thrombolysis were found to be significantly older (p < 0.001), with lower height and weight (p < 0.001 for both) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (9 ± 4.94 vs. 13.85 ± 2.41, p < 0.001). The logistic regression analysis indicated that the onset-to-ED time (p < 0.001) and the door-to-physician time (p = 0.014) for emergency medicine physicians are significant predictors of the likelihood of administering thrombolysis. By analyzing the impact of comorbidities, we observed that dyslipidemia, chronic arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are significant predictive factors for performing IV thrombolysis (the presence of dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus are predictive factors for performing IV thrombolysis, while the presence of arterial hypertension is not). CONCLUSIONS: The ED time targets that significantly influenced IV thrombolysis in our study were the onset-to-ED door time and the time it takes for the ED doctor to assess the AIS patient (door-to-physician time). The IV thrombolysis rate for these patients was 17.83%, lower than expected despite achieving most ED time targets, with the presence of chronic arterial hypertension as a significant predictive patient-related factor for not performing it. Even though our reported hospital's thrombolysis rate is favorable compared to international reports, there is always room for improvement. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols to customized standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols customize standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right.

A "Whole Child Approach": Parent Experiences with Acute Care Hospitalizations for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Behavioral Health Needs.

Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) experience increased hospitalizations as compared to the general population, particularly in the context of mental health crises. Given the unique needs of children with ASD and behavioral health needs that can either lead to or emerge during hospitalization, an understanding of hospital experiences is critical. To date, research on caregiver experiences in acute care medical hospital settings is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate caregiver experiences with inpatient care for children with ASD and behavioral health needs, including factors and practices that impacted or were desirable for care. Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 12 parents of children with ASD admitted to a large pediatric hospital. Data were analyzed using interpretive description. Emerging themes pointed to the child, family, and staff factors and practices that intersect to influence hospitalization experiences. Child factors included the child's communication, sensory, behavioral, medical, and safety needs. Family factors included the family's relationship with the healthcare team, own needs, and advocacy experiences. Staff factors included staff communication practices, comfort, and knowledge when providing care. Overall, this research demonstrates the complexity of factors and practices that impact the behavioral health hospitalization experience for children with ASD and their caregivers. Experiences varied widely and were guided by the unique needs of each child. Findings point to care practices that can be adopted to best meet the needs of all stakeholders during hospitalization and offer implications for future educational initiatives.

The Experience of Hospitalisation for People Living With Dementia: A Qualitative Exploration of How Context Shapes Experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Dementia has become an increasingly pressing issue in healthcare systems, and acute care settings such as hospitals have been shown to be particularly problematic for people living with dementia. People living with dementia are hospitalised at higher rates than those without and often have poor experiences and outcomes of hospitalisation. To support the evolution of hospital systems to better meet the needs of people living with dementia, it is important to consider the relationship between the context of the hospital and the experiences of people living with dementia and their caregivers. The term context refers to the environment and conditions that shape experiences and includes elements such as policies, procedures, design and social norms. A greater understanding of the relationship between the hospital context and the experiences of people living with dementia will support the future development of interventions to modify contextual elements to improve the experiences of people living with dementia. Our aim was to explore the relationship between the experiences of people living with dementia and their caregivers in hospital, and the contextual elements of the hospital. METHODS: In this interpretive descriptive study, we conducted interviews with people living with dementia and caregivers of people living with dementia about their experiences in hospital. Interviews were conducted with people living with dementia (n = 3), caregivers of people living with dementia (n = 8) and one dyad of a person living with dementia and their caregiver (n = 1) about the hospitalisation of the person living with dementia. Using inductive and deductive methods of analysis, we describe contextual factors that shape their experiences. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate how the hospital context shaped the experiences of people living with dementia and their caregivers while the person living with dementia was hospitalised. The themes reflect elements of the hospital context: communication systems, the value of caregivers, the focus on acute physical needs, staff capacity, the physical environment and normalised practices. The findings suggest that there are aspects of the hospital context that can be modified to influence the experiences of people living with dementia and their caregivers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how the context of hospital shapes the experiences of people living with dementia and their caregivers and points to aspects of the context that health system leaders could explore to begin to improve the capacity of hospitals to support people living with dementia. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study provides evidence of the need for health system leaders and practitioner to explore how the hospital context shapes the experiences of people wtih dementia and their caregivers, and begins to explore ways that contextual changes can improve their experiences.

Frailty Explains Variation in Emergency Department Use for Older Veterans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: Older adults were critically vulnerable to disruptions in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is not known if changes in ED utilization varied based on patient characteristics. Using a cohort of older Veterans, we examined changes in ED visit rates based on four characteristics of interest: age, race, area deprivation index, and frailty. Methods: Participants were aged ≥65, with ≥2 visits in primary or geriatric clinics between 02/02/2018-05/07/2019. An adjusted negative binomial regression model was constructed for each characteristic. We report mean counts of all ED visits by quarter for subgroups separately, and report rate ratios to compare ED visits in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic to the year before. Results: Patients with complete case data numbered 38,871. During the first two quarters, all subgroups had decreased ED visits, with more variation in the third and fourth quarters. The very highly frail, who had the highest mean estimated count of ED visits per person through both pre-COVID and COVID periods, also had a significant decrease in their ED visits during multiple quarters of the pandemic to a greater degree than other frailty subgroups. Conclusion: Stratifying older adults by frailty identified patient subgroups with the greatest variation in ED visits during COVID. Very highly frail patients warrant special attention to understand how variation in ED utilization affects patient outcomes.

Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study.

Introduction: With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment. Methodology: The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two. Results: A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by "Strong Agreement"; 16 (13.3%) reached by "Agreement"; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided. Discussion: The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process. Conclusion: The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.

Exploring the Experiences and Perceptions of the Utilisation of Structured Clinical Handover Frameworks by Nurses Working in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in implementing structured clinical handover frameworks to improve clinical handover processes. Research postulates that structured clinical handover frameworks increase the quality of handovers; yet inconsistencies enacting these frameworks exist which has a potential to jeopardise the quality of communication during handovers thereby defeating the purpose of these frameworks. AIM: This scoping review aims to analyse and synthesise what is currently known of the nurses' experiences and perceptions in implementing structured clinical handover frameworks and identify knowledge gaps in relation to this topic area. DESIGN: A scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist. METHODS: A systematic search of five electronic databases was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed primary research studies which met the predetermined eligibility criteria. In total, 301 studies were imported into COVIDENCE, screened and assessed for eligibility resulting in 23 studies remaining. From the eligible studies, data was extracted, collated, appraised, summarised and interpreted. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINHAL, ProQuest, EMCARE, Web of Science and Informit. RESULTS: Twenty three studies were included in this review which yielded the following major themes: (1) quality and completeness of information transfer; (2) interprofessional collaboration; (3) challenges impacting the experience of implementing the structured clinical handover frameworks and (4) perceived impacts on quality, patient safety and health outcomes. CONCLUSION: There are key benefits and issues experienced and perceived by nurses implementing structured clinical handover frameworks and this review identifies opportunities for further improvements. Future research should explore the perceived associations with patient outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review highlights the importance of structured clinical handover frameworks, the nurses' experiences in implementing these frameworks and strategies to improve the effectiveness of these frameworks. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: No Patient or Public Contributions as this study is a review of published primary evidence.

Dementia-Friendly Hospital-The Perspective of Professional Dementia Experts.

AIM: To investigate the professional dementia experts' understanding of a dementia-friendly hospital to identify its characteristics. DESIGN: We used a qualitative design embedded in a case study. A total of 16 semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 17 professional dementia experts. Using inductive content analysis, the interviews were analysed in a participatory manner involving a group of researchers and dementia experts. RESULTS: We identified six characteristics of dementia-friendly hospitals: Proud to be dementia-friendly-That's what we want; Seeing the human being-Taking care of everyone; Having everyone on board-It's a collective task; Being professional-It takes more than being nice and kind; Rethinking the 'running' system-We have to change, not them; and Being part of the community-Thinking beyond the hospital. CONCLUSION: The concept of a dementia-friendly hospital seems complex and requires a rethinking of the traditional hospital. For a conceptualisation, the involvement of people with dementia and their relatives is important to gain a comprehensive understanding. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: A dementia-friendly hospital is characterised by professional care that comprises a safe, familiar and supportive environment, is prepared but also flexible, has everyone on board, and sees the human being. To become dementia-friendly, individual interventions such as training courses can be a starting point. However, an overall concept is required that also includes components that contribute to successful implementation and a welcoming culture of people with dementia. IMPACT: Our findings on the perspective of professional dementia experts contribute to the conceptualisation of dementia-friendly hospitals. REPORTING METHOD: We reported our study according to the COREQ checklist. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The investigation of the perspective of professional dementia experts is one part of a larger study. In this overall DEMfriendlyHospital study, we interviewed professional dementia experts, people with dementia and their relatives and also involved them in a participatory manner in various stages of the research process.