A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy between Afatinib Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with HAD-B1 for the Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant health challenge globally due to its high mortality. Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has shown superior efficacy over traditional chemotherapy in NSCLC treatment. However, issues like secondary resistance and adverse effects call for alternative therapies. HAD-B1, comprising 4 herbal medicines, has shown promise in lung cancer treatment in both preclinical and clinical settings. This study assesses the combination of HAD-B1 and Afatinib in advanced NSCLC patients to potentially improve outcomes by addressing the limitations of current EGFR-TKI therapies. METHOD: A randomized, open-label trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 with Afatinib in 90 EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Participants were divided into treatment and control groups, receiving Afatinib with or without HAD-B1. The study focused on the initial dose maintenance rate and disease control rate (DCR) of Afatinib, alongside secondary outcomes like survival rates and quality of life, under continuous safety monitoring. RESULTS: Among the 90 participants, no significant difference was found in initial dose maintenance (60.98% in the treatment group vs 52.50% in the control, P = .4414) or DCR (80.49% vs 90.00%, P = .2283). Secondary outcomes like PFS, TTP, and OS showed no notable differences. However, physical functioning significantly improved in the treatment group (P = .0475, PPS group). The control group experienced higher rates of adverse events of special interest and adverse drug reactions (P = .01), suggesting HAD-B1 with Afatinib might enhance physical function without increasing adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Combining HAD-B1 with Afatinib potentially improves quality of life and reduces adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. Further research is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this combination therapy, aiming to advance NSCLC treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/ (ID: KCT0005414).

Strategies for enhancing non-small cell lung cancer treatment: Integrating Chinese herbal medicines with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a global health threat, and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib have achieved significant success in clinical treatment. However, the emergence of resistance limits the long-term efficacy of these treatments, necessitating urgent exploration of novel EGFR-TKIs. This review provides an in-depth summary and exploration of the resistance mechanisms associated with EGFR-TKIs, with a specific focus on representative drugs like gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib. Additionally, the review introduces a therapeutic strategy involving the combination of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) and chemotherapy drugs, highlighting the potential role of CHMs in overcoming NSCLC resistance. Through systematic analysis, we elucidate the primary resistance mechanisms of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC treatment, emphasizing CHMs as potential treatment medicines and providing a fresh perspective for the development of next-generation EGFR-TKIs. This comprehensive review aims to guide the application of CHMs in combination therapy for NSCLC management, fostering the development of more effective and comprehensive treatment modalities to ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Occurrence of respiratory and urinary tract infections in patients treated with docetaxel compared with afatinib based on a health insurance claims database in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The relative occurrence of infection in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs and molecularly targeted drugs is unclear. AIM: To compare the occurrence of respiratory and urinary tract infections in patients treated for lung cancer with docetaxel versus afatinib and to predict the occurrence of the respiratory and urinary tract infections. METHOD: Data on patients who received docetaxel or afatinib were obtained from a health insurance claims database. After propensity score matching, the occurrence of respiratory and urinary tract infections in each group was compared. Factors associated with respiratory and urinary tract infections were evaluated using multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Each group included 855 patients. The occurrence of respiratory infections was significantly higher in the docetaxel group than in the afatinib group (22.6% [193/855] vs. 13.9% [119/855]; p < 0.01). The occurrence of urinary tract infections did not differ significantly by group. Docetaxel was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of respiratory infections (adjusted odds ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-2.29), but not urinary tract infections. CONCLUSION: Patients with lung cancer treated with docetaxel should be closely monitored for the occurrence of respiratory infection in clinical settings.

Afatinib as first-line treatment for advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma harboring uncommon EGFR G719C and S768I co-mutation: A case report and literature review.

Ten percent of non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations harbor uncommon variants. These mutations are mainly involved in lung adenocarcinomas but are rare in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration-approved afatinib for this specific patient population. However, there is limited information regarding the effectiveness of afatinib for LSCC with EGFR mutations. This case report documented a unique case of a patient with LSCC, which had a rare compound EGFR mutation (G719C and S768I) and showed significant response to afatinib treatment, with 10 months of progression-free survival. New NTRK1 and RET gene mutations may play a potential role in the development of acquired resistance to afatinib following clinical progression. This case highlights the importance of genetic profiling in patients with LSCC. Although these patients have a low positive rate of EGFR mutations, searching for EGFR mutations in these patients might broaden their treatment options.

Identification of potential inhibitors for drug-resistant EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer using whole exome sequencing data.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are prevalent in about 50% of lung adenocarcinoma patients. Highly effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the EGFR protein have revolutionized treatment for the prevalent and aggressive lung malignancy. However, the emergence of new EGFR mutations and the rapid development of additional drug resistance mechanisms pose substantial challenge to the effective treatment of NSCLC. To investigate the underlying causes of drug resistance, we utilized next-generation sequencing data to analyse the genetic alterations in different tumor genomic states under the pressure of drug selection. This study involved a comprehensive analysis of whole exome sequencing data (WES) from NSCLC patients before and after treatment with afatinib and osimertinib with a goal to identify drug resistance mutations from the post-treatment WES data. We identified five EGFR single-point mutations (L718A, G724E, G724K, K745L, V851D) and one double mutation (T790M/L858R) associated with drug resistance. Through molecular docking, we observed that mutations, G724E, K745L, V851D, and T790M/L858R, have negatively affected the binding affinity with the FDA-approved drugs. Further, molecular dynamic simulations revealed the detrimental impact of these mutations on the binding efficacy. Finally, we conducted virtual screening against structurally similar compounds to afatinib and osimertinib and identified three compounds (CID 71496460, 73292362, and 73292545) that showed the potential to selectively inhibit EGFR despite the drug-resistance mutations. The WES-based study provides additional insight to understand the drug resistance mechanisms driven by tumor mutations and helps develop potential lead compounds to inhibit EGFR in the presence of drug resistance mutations.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Afatinib and Osimertinib for Patients With PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib. Results: A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib. Conclusion: In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.

Antitumor activity of afatinib in EGFR T790M-negative human oral cancer therapeutically targets mTOR/Mcl-1 signaling axis.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the role and effectiveness of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in oral cancer, focusing on the clinical relevance of EGFR and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1) in head and neck cancers (HNCs). It aims to explore the molecular mechanism of afatinib, a TKI, in treating human oral cancer. METHODS: We conducted an in silico analysis using databases like The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, along with immunohistochemistry staining, to study EGFR and Mcl-1 expression in HNCs. For investigating afatinib's anticancer properties, we performed various in vitro and in vivo analyses, including trypan blue exclusion assay, Western blotting, 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining, flow cytometry, quantitative real-time PCR, Mitochondrial membrane potential assay, overexpression vector construction, transient transfection, and a tumor xenograft model. RESULTS: Higher expression levels of EGFR and Mcl-1 were observed in HNC patient tissues compared to normal tissues, with their co-expression significantly linked to poor prognosis. There was a strong correlation between EGFR and Mcl-1 expressions in oral cancer patients. Afatinib treatment induced apoptosis and suppressed Mcl-1 in oral cancer cell lines without the EGFR T790M mutation. The mechanism of afatinib-induced apoptosis involved the EGFR/mTOR/Mcl-1 axis, as shown by the effects of mTOR activator MHY1485 and inhibitor rapamycin. Afatinib also increased Bim expression, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, and cytochrome c release. It significantly lowered tumor volume without affecting body, liver, and kidney weights. CONCLUSION: Afatinib, targeting the EGFR/mTOR/Mcl-1 axis, shows promise as a therapeutic strategy for oral cancer, especially in patients with high EGFR and Mcl-1 expressions.

[Afatinib Treatment for Advanced Mixed Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 
with CRISPLD2-NRG1 Fusion: A Case Report and Literature Review].

Lung cancer is the most common malignant disease and the leading cause of cancer death in China. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for over 80% of all lung cancers, and the probability of NSCLC gene mutations is high, with a wide variety of types. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection technology, more and more patients with rare fusion gene mutations are detected. Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene is a rare oncogenic driver that can lead to activation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (Her3/ErbB3) mediated pathway, resulting in tumor formation. In this article, we reported a case of mixed NSCLC with CRISPLD2-NRG1 fusion detected by RNA-based NGS, who responsed to Afatinib well after 1 month of treatment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed shrinkage of intracranial lesions. Meanwhile, we also compiled previously reported NSCLC patients with NRG1 rare gene fusion mutation, in order to provide effective references for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
.

Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications.

PURPOSE: In 2013, afatinib was approved for non-small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non-small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous literature demonstrates excessive patient burden and limited benefit as afatinib has spread into more indications. A trial analysis is needed to establish efficacy and risk. METHODS: In this investigation, we screened literature databases and clinical trial registries for trials of afatinib as monotherapy or in combination interventions for cancer treatment. We extracted participant demographics, adverse event characteristics, as well as clinical and surrogate endpoints for each trial. Studies were deemed positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their achieving of primary endpoints as well as their safety. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2444 articles; we excluded 2352 articles for a final inclusion of 92 trials of 8859 patients. Our sample had 49 (53%) positive trials, 27 (29%) negative trials, and 16 (17%) indeterminate trials. The most common off-label indications for afatinib were breast cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The median OS for all trials was 8.4 months, median PFS 3.4 months, and the total ORR was 29.6%. Our study found that trials performed in disease states beyond the initial indications were largely negative with little patient benefit. The adverse events within our trial sample appear to be in line with expectations for toxicity. IMPLICATIONS: These results are consistent with other studies that present similar findings, such as in Carlisle et al which indicate limited efficacy in nonapproved indications. Future trials should keep this potential evidence and patient burden in mind before initiation of those trials. This study contributes to the understanding of afatinib's risk-benefit profile across many clinical applications.

Characterization of Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Following Emergence of the Osimertinib Resistance Mutations, L718Q or G724S: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study in France.

Purpose: The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, is an effective first-line therapy for patients with common EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients become resistant to treatment. In some patients, emergence of tertiary EGFR mutations is implicated as a resistance mechanism. This study describes patients with NSCLC who acquired the rare EGFR mutations, L718Q or G724S, following EGFR TKI treatment. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study undertaken in France from Feb-Nov 2021, in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with an acquired L718Q or G724S mutation. Primary objectives were description of tumor characteristics, progression, and progression under treatment. Results: Nine eligible patients were identified. Acquired resistance to initial EGFR TKI treatment was associated with T790M emergence in six patients, who then received osimertinib monotherapy. Overall, eight patients received osimertinib monotherapy treatment at some point (average treatment duration: 18.3 months). Following the emergence of L718Q or G724S, patients received chemotherapy (n = 4; two of whom subsequently received afatinib), nivolumab (n = 2), afatinib (n = 2), or immunochemotherapy (n = 1). In the four patients who received afatinib after identification of L718Q or G724S, 2 achieved a partial response, one had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Treatment duration was 1.6-31.7 months. In patients with controlled disease (n = 3), progression-free survival was 6.1-31.7 months. Two of these patients had previously received osimertinib. Conclusion: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following emergence of the osimertinib resistance mutations, L718Q or G724S. Afatinib appears to be a promising treatment option in this setting.

GZ17-6.02 kills PDX isolates of uveal melanoma.

GZ17-6.02 has undergone phase I evaluation in patients with solid tumors (NCT03775525). The RP2D is 375 mg PO BID, with an uveal melanoma patient exhibiting a 15% reduction in tumor mass for 5 months at this dose. Studies in this manuscript have defined the biology of GZ17-6.02 in PDX isolates of uveal melanoma cells. GZ17-6.02 killed uveal melanoma cells through multiple convergent signals including enhanced ATM-AMPK-mTORC1 activity, inactivation of YAP/TAZ and inactivation of eIF2α. GZ17-6.02 significantly enhanced the expression of BAP1, predictive to reduce metastasis, and reduced the levels of ERBB family RTKs, predicted to reduce growth. GZ17-6.02 interacted with doxorubicin or ERBB family inhibitors to significantly enhance tumor cell killing which was associated with greater levels of autophagosome formation and autophagic flux. Knock down of Beclin1, ATG5 or eIF2α were more protective than knock down of ATM, AMPKα, CD95 or FADD, however, over-expression of FLIP-s provided greater protection compared to knock down of CD95 or FADD. Expression of activated forms of mTOR and STAT3 significantly reduced tumor cell killing. GZ17-6.02 reduced the expression of PD-L1 in uveal melanoma cells to a similar extent as observed in cutaneous melanoma cells whereas it was less effective at enhancing the levels of MHCA. The components of GZ17-6.02 were detected in tumors using a syngeneic tumor model. Our data support future testing GZ17-6.02 in uveal melanoma as a single agent, in combination with ERBB family inhibitors, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, or with an anti-PD1 immunotherapy.

Afatinib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: A case report with a literature review.

We present a 70-year-old female patient diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (T4N2M1a), who developed afatinib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We have also performed a PubMed/Medline literature review to detect other possible cases of TEN/Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with afatinib treatment and found only 5 other cases reported. To our best knowledge, this is the first case of afatinib-induced TEN successfully treated with cyclosporine.

Pyrotinib as a salvage treatment for patients with HER-2 positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma after the progression of afatinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of afatinib or pyrotinib has been demonstrated in HER2-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, the efficacy of pyrotinib after afatinib progression has yet to be determined. METHOD: Patients with HER2 mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma administered afatinib or pyrotinib monotherapy were enrolled. Those who received pyrotinib after afatinib were further analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. A swimming plot was used to describe the specific treatments. Additionally, patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) were established from HER2-amplified NSCLC patient samples to investigate the antitumor activity of pyrotinib in HER2-amplified tumor cells in vitro. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were enrolled, 13 of whom were administered pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. No statistical difference in PFS of pyrotinib was observed between patients whether be treated after afatinib progression or not (6.7 months vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.817), thus indicating that progression on afatinib did not affect the efficacy of pyrotinib. Further analysis was conducted on the former patients, which comprising eight patients administered interval chemotherapy after progression on afatinib. Two patients achieved PR after pyrotinib treatment. No independent factors were found to influence the PFS of pyrotinib. PDTOs confirmed the anti-tumor activity of pyrotinib in NSCLC tumor cells with HER2 amplification. CONCLUSIONS: Progression after prior afatinib treatment does not influence the efficacy of pyrotinib treatment. Pyrotinib may be a salvage option for patients with HER2 mutation who have experienced progression on afatinib.

Real-world analysis of afatinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations: a multicenter study in Vietnam.

Background: Afatinib is indicated for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and uncommon mutations. However, real-world studies on this topic are limited. This study aimed to evaluate afatinib as first-line therapy for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients and methods: A retrospective study included 92 patients with advanced NSCLC with uncommon and compound EGFR mutations, treated with afatinib as first-line therapy. Patients were followed up and evaluated every 3 months or when symptoms of progressive disease arose. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events. Results: The G719X EGFR mutation had the highest occurrence rate (53.3% for both monotherapy and the compound). By contrast, the compound mutation G719X-S768I was observed at a rate of 22.8%. The ORR was 75%, with 15.2% of patients achieving complete response. The overall median TTF was 13.8 months. Patients with the G719X EGFR mutation (single and compound) had a median TTF of 19.3 months, longer than that of patients with other mutations, who had a median TTF of 11.2 months. Patients with compound EGFR mutations (G719X and S768I) demonstrated a median TTF of 23.2 months compared to that of 12.3 months for other mutations. Tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg achieved a longer median TTF of 17.1 months compared to 11.2 months with 40 mg. Median TTF differed between patients with and without brain metastasis, at 11.2 and 16.9 months, respectively. Rash (55.4%) and diarrhea (53.3%) were the most common adverse events, primarily grades 1 and 2. Other side effects occurred at a low rate. Conclusion: Afatinib is effective for locally advanced metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with G719X, compound G719X-S768I mutations, and tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg had a longer median TTF than those with other mutations.

"ACHILLES" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in EGFR Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).

Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three "uncommon" EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for "uncommon" EGFR mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these "uncommon" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations is needed.

Colorectal cancer harboring EGFR kinase domain duplication response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a rare, recurrent oncogenic variant that constitutively activates EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we report the case of a 70-year-old man with resectable colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. He relapsed with multiple liver metastases and received standard chemotherapy until his disease became refractory. Comprehensive genomic profiling of his postoperative colorectal cancer tissue revealed EGFR-KDD. He was treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), afatinib and achieved a partial response (- 55%) after 8 weeks; however, he developed massive malignant ascites after 13 weeks. Osimertinib, another EGFR-TKI, controlled his tumors for 9 months. Patient-derived cancer organoids from his malignant ascites confirmed sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The findings suggest that EGFR-TKIs can be a potential treatment option for this molecular subgroup.

Activity of afatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring novel uncommon EGFR mutations with or without co-mutations: a case report.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represent first-line standard of care in unresectable EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, 10-20% of patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC have uncommon EGFR variants, defined as mutations other than L858R substitutions or exon 19 deletions. NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations may demonstrate lower sensitivity to targeted agents than NSCLC with L858R or exon 19 deletion mutations. Prospective clinical trial data in patients with NSCLC uncommon EGFR mutations are lacking. Afatinib is a second-generation TKI and the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for some of the more prevalent uncommon EGFR mutations. We present a series of seven case reports describing clinical outcomes in afatinib-treated patients with NSCLC harboring a diverse range of extremely rare mutations with or without co-mutations affecting other genes. EGFR alterations included compound mutations, P-loop αC-helix compressing mutations, and novel substitution mutations. We also present a case with NSCLC harboring a novel EGFR::CCDC6 gene fusion. Overall, the patients responded well to afatinib, including radiologic partial responses in six patients during treatment. Responses were durable for three patients. The cases presented are in line with a growing body of clinical and preclinical evidence that indicating that NSCLC with various uncommon EGFR mutations, with or without co-mutations, may be sensitive to afatinib.

Development of TRIB3-Based Therapy as a Gene-Independent Approach to Treat Retinal Degenerative Disorders.

Inherited retinal degeneration (RD) constitutes a heterogeneous group of genetic retinal degenerative disorders. The molecular mechanisms underlying RD encompass a diverse spectrum of cellular signaling, with the unfolded protein response (UPR) identified as a common signaling pathway chronically activated in degenerating retinas. TRIB3 has been recognized as a key mediator of the PERK UPR arm, influencing various metabolic pathways, such as insulin signaling, lipid metabolism, and glucose homeostasis, by acting as an AKT pseudokinase that prevents the activation of the AKT → mTOR axis. This study aimed to develop a gene-independent approach targeting the UPR TRIB3 mediator previously tested by our group using a genetic approach in mice with RD. The goal was to validate a therapeutic approach targeting TRIB3 interactomes through the pharmacological targeting of EGFR-TRIB3 and delivering cell-penetrating peptides targeting TRIB3 → AKT. The study employed rd10 and P23H RHO mice, with afatinib treatment conducted in p15 rd10 mice through daily intraperitoneal injections. P15 P23H RHO mice received intraocular injections of cell-penetrating peptides twice at a 2-week interval. Our study revealed that both strategies successfully targeted TRIB3 interactomes, leading to an improvement in scotopic A- and B-wave ERG recordings. Additionally, the afatinib-treated mice manifested enhanced photopic ERG amplitudes accompanied by a delay in photoreceptor cell loss. The treated rd10 retinas also showed increased PDE6ß and RHO staining, along with an elevation in total PDE activity in the retinas. Consequently, our study demonstrated the feasibility of a gene-independent strategy to target common signaling in degenerating retinas by employing a TRIB3-based therapeutic approach that delays retinal function and photoreceptor cell loss in two RD models.

Targeting the EGFR pathway: An alternative strategy for the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex?

INTRODUCTION: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is caused by variants in TSC1/TSC2, leading to constitutive activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1. Therapy with everolimus has been approved for TSC, but variations in success are frequent. Recently, caudal late interneuron progenitor (CLIP) cells were identified as a common origin of the TSC brain pathologies such as subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGA) and cortical tubers (CT). Further, targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with afatinib, which is expressed in CLIP cells, reduces cell growth in cerebral TSC organoids. However, investigation of clinical patient-derived data is lacking. AIMS: Observation of EGFR expression in SEGA, CT and focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) 2B human brain specimen and investigation of whether its inhibition could be a potential therapeutic intervention for these patients. METHODS: Brain specimens of 23 SEGAs, 6 CTs, 20 FCD2Bs and 17 controls were analysed via immunohistochemistry to characterise EGFR expression, cell proliferation (via Mib1) and mTOR signalling. In a cell-based assay using primary patient-derived cells (CT n = 1, FCD2B n = 1 and SEGA n = 4), the effects of afatinib and everolimus on cell proliferation and cell viability were observed. RESULTS: EGFR overexpression was observed in histological sections of SEGA, CT and FCD2B patients. Both everolimus and afatinib decreased the proliferation and viability in primary SEGA, tuber and FCD2B cells. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that EGFR suppression might be an effective alternative treatment option for SEGAs and tubers, as well as other mTOR-associated malformations of cortical development, including FCD2B.

A phase I dose-escalation study of pulsatile afatinib in patients with recurrent or progressive brain cancer.

Background: Afatinib (BIBW2992; Gilotrif®) is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB; EGFR) family. It inhibits EGFR, HER2, and HER4 phosphorylation, resulting in tumor growth inhibition and regression. This phase I dose-escalation trial of pulsatile afatinib examined the safety, drug penetration into the central nervous system, preliminary antitumor activity, and recommended phase II dose in patients with progressive or recurrent brain cancers. Methods: Afatinib was taken orally once every 4 days or once every 7 days depending on dose cohort, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: A total of 24 patients received the investigational agent and were evaluable for safety analyses, and 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Dosing was administered at 80 mg every 4 days, 120 mg every 4 days, 180 mg every 4 days, or 280 mg every 7 days. A recommended phase II dose of pulsatile afatinib was established at 280 mg every 7 days as there were no dose-limiting toxicities in any of the dosing cohorts and all toxicities were deemed manageable. The most common drug-related toxicities were diarrhea, rash, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, stomatitis, pruritus, and limb edema. Out of the 21 patients evaluable for efficacy, 2 patients (9.5%) exhibited partial response based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria and disease stabilization was seen in 3 patients (14.3%). Conclusions: Afatinib taken orally was safe and well-tolerated up to 280 mg every 7 days in brain cancer patients.