Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre in Spain and ALBI Score as a Survival Prognostic Factor.

Background/Aim: Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atez/bev) has been established as first-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, concerns regarding safety and efficacy have been raised, and no biomarkers to predict response have yet been identified. We aimed to evaluate the real-life experience of atez/bev in a Spanish tertiary hospital and identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: A prospective study of consecutive patients with HCC treated with atez/bev was conducted from December 2020 to December 2022. Efficacy was assessed through OS and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AE). Twenty-three patients were included; 91% were males with a mean of 70 years. Thirteen patients were classified as having BCLC-C. Results: The median treatment duration was 126 days (range=567). Median OS was 381 days (95%CI=205-557) with a cumulative probability of death of 13%, 30%, and 49% at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The only factor associated with OS was the ALBI score (HR=5.03; 95%CI=1.3-19.1), which showed an AUROC of 0.906 (95%CI=0.78-1.00) for the risk of death at 18 months follow up. Median PFS was 141 days (95%CI=110-172). Twenty (86.9%) patients experienced AE, which in nine (39.1%) cases led to the definitive discontinuation of the treatment, four of them (17.4%) due to an AE grade 5. Conclusion: The initial experience with atez/bev at our center demonstrated poorer outcomes compared to the original trial (IMbrave150). A careful assessment of the ALBI score may serve as a crucial factor in the selection of systemic treatment for patients with HCC.

The Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events with the Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored the association between irAEs and the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved 105 advanced NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy after progressing on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy from a single academic institution in Serbia. Data were obtained from a hospital lung cancer registry. Among the participants, 63.8% were male, with the majority being current (53.3%) or former smokers (37.1%). About half had a good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1) at the start of atezolizumab treatment. irAEs occurred in 23 patients (21.9%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs (13.03 months) compared to those without (3.4 months) (HR 0.365 [95% CI, 0.195-0.681], p = 0.002). irAEs and ECOG PS 0-1 were predictors of longer mPFS, with irAEs being more common in patients with good performance status (p = 0.01). irAEs were linked to improved mPFS in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab after multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.

The Impact of Infections in Patients Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background: The therapeutic landscape of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) continues to evolve. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), in combination with bevacizumab, has substantially improved outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in patients who develop infections while receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC. Methods: Patients who received atezolizumab and bevacizumab for uHCC at a single hospital network were included. Types and rates of infections were reported. Covariates compared among infected and non-infected cohorts included age, sex, race, comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, immunosuppressive use, chronic infections, number of cycles of ICIs given, antibiotic or antiviral therapies at ICI initiation, and line of therapy (first-line, second-line, greater than second-line). Results: Out of 810 evaluable patients, 34 uHCC patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The mean ± SD age was 66.29 ± 9.39; 28 (82.35%) were males. There were 17 (50%) patients with reported infection, with bacterial infection occurring in 12 (70.59%) patients and COVID-19 in 4 (23.5%). Of the infected patients, eight (47.06%) had one infection, five (29.41%) had two infections, and two (11.76%) had three or more infections. Infected and non-infected patients received a median of 12 (IQR: 5-17) and 4 (IQR: 3-12) ICI cycles (p = 0.18), respectively. Infections did not negatively impact OS or PFS but resulted in treatment delays and discontinuation in 11 (64.71%) and 7 (41.18%) patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, 19 (55.88%) patients died, 9 (52.94%) in the non-infected group vs. 10 (58.82%) in the infected group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: While a broad array of infections occurred in 50% of the patients in this cohort, it did not negatively impact survival outcomes. However, it did impact morbidity, with more all-cause admissions and treatment delays.

Successful desensitization to atezolizumab-induced near-fatal anaphylaxis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Atezolizumab, a humanized antiprogrammed death ligand 1 monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody, is a targeted therapeutic drug known as an immune checkpoint inhibitor. It is currently used to treat various types of cancer, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nonsmall cell lung cancer, urothelial cancer, and breast cancer, and is becoming a therapeutic option in the forefront of oncology treatment. However, it may sometimes lead to undesirable adverse reactions owing to the activation of immune responses in various organs. Cutaneous adverse reactions to atezolizumab are well known; however, cases of anaphylaxis are very rare. In this report, we present the first case of HCC who experienced near-fatal anaphylaxis to atezolizumab in South Korea.

Altered intestinal Streptococcus anginosus and 5α-reductase gene levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated Bacteroides stercoris in atezolizumab/bevacizumab non-responders.

Introduction. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide.Gap statement. Monitoring of HCC and predicting its immunotherapy responses are challenging.Aim. This study explored the potential of the gut microbiome for HCC monitoring and predicting HCC immunotherapy responses.Methods. DNA samples were collected from the faeces of 22 patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) and 85 healthy controls. The gut microbiome was analysed using 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing and quantitative PCR (qPCR).Results. The microbiomes of patients with HCC demonstrated significant enrichment of Lactobacillus, particularly Lactobacillus fermentum, and Streptococcus, notably Streptococcus anginosus. Comparative analysis between Atz/Bev responders (R) and non-responders (NR) revealed a higher abundance of Bacteroides stercoris in the NR group and Bacteroides coprocola in the R group. Using qPCR analysis, we observed elevated levels of S. anginosus and reduced levels of 5α-reductase genes, essential for the synthesis of isoallolithocholic acid, in HCC patients compared to controls. Additionally, the analysis confirmed a significantly lower abundance of B. stercoris in the Atz/Bev R group relative to the NR group.Conclusions. The gut microbiome analysis and specific gene quantification via qPCR could provide a rapid, less invasive, and cost-effective approach for assessing the increased risk of HCC, monitoring patient status, and predicting immunotherapy responses.

Tumor complete response and pyogenic liver abscess secondary to concurrent microwave ablation plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in liver cancer: a case report.

Background: Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) could be fatal even after standard treatment with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, bevacizumab or microwave ablation may cause PLA, respectively. This paper presents the first case of PLA secondary to the concomitant use of microwave ablation with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of liver cancer. Case Description: A 54-year-old Chinese man with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C-stage liver cancer complained of fever and chills twenty-nine days after concurrent microwave ablation plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Post-hospitalization, a computed tomography revealed a rim-enhancing hypodensity within the right lobe of the liver, approximately 8.8 cm in diameter containing foci of gas. Laboratory examination revealed elevated white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, and blood culture indicated the presence of Escherichia coli bacteremia. The patient was diagnosed with PLA complicated by septic shock, and due to recurrent fever, multiple courses of antibiotics (imipenem/cilastatin sodium, cefoperazone/sulbactam, meropenem, respectively) were administered in combination with five percutaneous drainages over the next 90 days. The patient's fever eventually resolved, and the patient was discharged. The patient was re-treated with two cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab initiated in March 2024. An imaging evaluation in May 2023 demonstrated tumor progression. Subsequently, the patient underwent one transarterial chemoembolization procedure and two cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab over the subsequent 2 months. Notably, the patient achieved a complete response at the July 2024 imaging evaluation. Conclusions: In patients undergoing atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the potential risk of PLA versus the antitumor benefit of microwave ablation requires to be assessed. The use of multiple courses of antibiotics over a prolonged period did not appear to influence the effectiveness of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Further studies are, however, needed to substantiate this finding.

Downstaging of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma followed by liver transplantation using immune checkpoint inhibitors: Where do we stand?

Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver disease (CLD) is limited by factors such as tumor size, number, portal venous or hepatic venous invasion and extrahepatic disease. Although previously established criteria, such as Milan or UCSF, have been relaxed globally to accommodate more potential recipients with comparable 5-year outcomes, there is still a subset of the population that has advanced HCC with or without portal vein tumor thrombosis without detectable extrahepatic spread who do not qualify or are unable to be downstaged by conventional methods and do not qualify for liver transplantation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, or nivolumab have given hope to this group of patients. We completed a comprehensive literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, reference citation analysis, and CrossRef. The search utilized keywords such as 'liver transplant', 'HCC', 'hepatocellular carcinoma', 'immune checkpoint inhibitors', 'ICI', 'atezolizumab', and 'nivolumab'. Several case reports have documented successful downstaging of HCC using the atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination prior to LT, with acceptable early outcomes comparable to other criteria. Adverse effects of ICI have also been reported during the perioperative period. In such cases, a 1.5-month interval between ICI therapy and LT has been suggested. Overall, the results of downstaging using combination immunotherapy were encouraging and promising. Early reports suggested a potential ray of hope for patients with CLD and advanced HCC, especially those with multifocal HCC or branch portal venous tumor thrombosis. However, prospective studies and further experience will reveal the optimal dosage, duration, and timing prior to LT and evaluate both short- and long-term outcomes in terms of rejection, infection, recurrence rates, and survival.

A Case of Patient with Atezolizumab-induced Encephalitis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

A 65-year-old man treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted to our hospital with a fever, difficulty in moving, and aphasia. The patient became comatose immediately after admission. Imaging and cerebral fluid tests revealed no evidence of malignancy or infection. A diagnosis of atezolizumab-induced encephalitis was made, and steroid pulse therapy was initiated on admission, immediately after which the patient regained consciousness and was able to talk and walk. He was discharged with slight paralysis of his legs and was able to resume chemotherapy. An early diagnosis and treatment are required to improve the prognosis of encephalitis.

Disease Etiology Impact on Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab: A Real-World, Multicenter Study.

Introduction: The impact of etiology on response to immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being debated, with contrasting findings between early and recent post hoc analyses of IMbrave-150 and metanalyses of clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blockers. As a results, it is not clear whether the first-line systemic treatment atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) is equally effective in viral and nonviral patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 885 HCC patients treated with the first-line A + B from multiple centers from Eastern and Western countries, 53.9% having viral and 46.1% nonviral etiology. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics were analyzed with uni- and multivariate models to explore potential differences on overall survival (OS), time-to-progression (TTP), disease control rates (DCRs) based on etiology and to identify putative prognostic factors in etiology subgroups. Treatment toxicities and access to the second-line treatments and outcomes were also reported and compared between etiologies. Results: Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in median OS (mOS: viral 15.9 months; nonviral 16.3 months), TTP (mTTP: viral 8.3 months; nonviral 7.2 months), and DCRs (viral 78.1%; nonviral 80.8%) based on etiology. Prognostic factors of survival and progression were mainly shared between viral and nonviral etiologies, including alpha-fetoprotein, aspartate transaminase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and ALBI score. Exploratory analyses highlighted a possible stronger association of immunological factors, i.e., NLR and eosinophil count, to treatment outcomes in viral patients. The toxicity profile, the access to and type of the second-line treatments and their outcome in terms of OS almost overlap in the two etiology subgroups. Conclusion: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab efficacy does not vary according to underlying etiology of HCC in a multicenter, real-world population, matching recent post hoc findings from the IMbrave-150 trial. Preliminary analyses suggest that some prognostic factors differ between viral and nonviral patients, potentially due to biological and immunological differences. Prospective and comparative trials stratifying by etiology are warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.

Frontline evaluation: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the up-to-seven criteria.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) compared to lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line systemic therapy for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding the up-to-seven criteria threshold, who are typically unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 consecutive patients with HCC treated at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital between May 2018 and October 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: the Atez/Bev group (21 patients) and the LEN group (28 patients). Eligibility criteria included Child-Pugh A classification, no prior systemic therapy, and ineligibility for resection, ablation, or transplantation. Treatment outcomes were assessed through periodic imaging and laboratory tests, evaluating OS, PFS, ORR, and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics, with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. No significant difference was observed in OS between the Atez/Bev and LEN groups (median OS: 19.80 vs. 22.20 months, p = 0.763). The median PFS was 10.23 months for Atez/Bev and 7.20 months for LEN (p = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR or DCR between the two groups. Common adverse events included elevated AST and ALT levels, with no significant difference in the overall rate of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Atez/Bev and LEN demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety as first-line systemic treatments for patients with BCLC stage B HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria. Both therapeutic options are viable for this population, though further large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Phase I-IV Drug Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Studies.

Despite advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the last few decades, treatment opportunities for patients with HCC remain limited. HCC is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for approximately 90% of all cases worldwide. Moreover, apart from the current pharmacological interventions, hepatic resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay curative approaches for patients with HCC. This systematic review included phase I, II, III, and IV clinical trials (CTs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on current treatments for patients with HCC in Asian populations (2013-2023). A total of 427 articles were screened, and 184 non-duplicate publications were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts, 96 publications were excluded, and another 28 were excluded after full-text screening. The remaining 60 eligible RCTs/CTs were finally included. A total of 60 clinical trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria with 36 drugs used as monotherapy or combination therapy for HCC. Most studies used sorafenib alone or in combination with any of the treatment regimens. Lenvatinib or atezolizumab with bevacizumab was used for HCC after initial sorafenib treatment. Eighteen studies compared the efficacy of sorafenib with that of other drugs, including lenvatinib, cabozantinib, tepotinib, tigatuzumab, linifanib, erlotinib, resminostat, brivanib, tislelizumab, selumetinib, and refametinib. This study provides comprehensive insights into effective treatment interventions for HCC in Asian populations. The overall assessment indicates that sorafenib, used alone or in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, has been the first treatment choice in the past decade to achieve better outcomes in patients with HCC in Asian populations.

Linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis induced by atezolizumab.

Linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare immune-mediated vesiculobullous disease that is reported to be induced by infections or medications. Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets programmed cell death ligand-1 and has been used to treat multiple cancers. Here, we report a case of drug induced LABD following the administration of Atezolizumab.

Five-year survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab in the Phase III IMpower133 study and the Phase III IMbrella A extension study.

OBJECTIVES: IMbrella A is a Phase III extension study that allowed rollover from Roche/Genentech-sponsored atezolizumab trials, including IMpower133, a Phase I/III trial of first-line atezolizumab or placebo plus carboplatin/etoposide in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We report outcomes from an exploratory analysis of IMpower133 with extended time-to-event data for patients who rolled over to IMbrella A. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMpower133 patients could roll over to IMbrella A to receive atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks if they continued to receive atezolizumab at IMpower133 closure or were in survival follow-up after atezolizumab discontinuation. Overall survival and safety were assessed; only serious adverse events and AEs of special interest were collected in IMbrella A. RESULTS: Eighteen of 26 eligible patients rolled over to IMbrella A. At clinical cutoff (March 16, 2023), median follow-up in the atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide arm (IMpower133 and IMbrella A) was 59.4 months. The three-, four-, and five-year overall survival (95 % CI) estimates were 16 % (11 %-21 %), 13 % (8 %-18 %), and 12 % (7 %-17 %), respectively. In IMbrella A, serious adverse events occurred in three patients (16.7 %), and one adverse event of special interest was reported (grade two hypothyroidism). CONCLUSION: This long-term analysis of patients from IMbrella A previously enrolled in IMpower133 provides the first report of five-year overall survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line cancer immunotherapy and chemotherapy. While limited by small patient numbers and lack of long-term data for the IMpower133 control arm, exploratory overall survival analyses in patients treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide compared favorably with historical data with chemotherapy alone. NCT03148418.

Cabozantinib Plus Atezolizumab or Cabozantinib Alone in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Previously Treated With an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: Results From the Phase 1b COSMIC-021 Study.

Introduction: We evaluated efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or cabozantinib alone in advanced NSCLC previously treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Methods: COSMIC-021 (NCT03170960) is a phase 1b, multicenter study in advanced solid tumors. This analysis included patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or BRAF-V600E who progressed on one prior ICI and less than or equal to two prior lines of systemic anticancer therapy. Patients received cabozantinib 40 mg orally/day plus atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks (combination cohort) or cabozantinib 60 mg orally/day (single-agent cabozantinib cohort). Primary end point of the combination cohort was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 by investigator. Outcomes in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort were exploratory. Results: Eighty-one patients assigned to combination therapy and 31 assigned to single-agent cabozantinib received greater than or equal to one dose of study treatment. Median (range) follow-up was 26.1 months (12.1-44.2) and 22.4 months (1.5-29.0), respectively. Objective response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval: 11.7%-30.1%) in combination cohort and 6% (95% confidence interval: 0.8%-21.4%) in single-agent cabozantinib cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients in the combination cohort and 90% in the single-agent cabozantinib cohort; grade 3/4 TRAEs were 44% and 48%, respectively. There were two grade 5 TRAEs: pneumonitis (n = 1, combination) and gastric ulcer hemorrhage (n = 1, single-agent). Neither PD-L1 expression in tumor cells nor tumor mutation burden correlated with outcomes. Conclusions: Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated modest clinical activity and manageable toxicity in advanced NSCLC after progression on prior ICI.

Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy. METHODS: The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP). RESULTS: Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, p = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (p = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.

Atezolizumab-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.

Background and Objectives: Immune check inhibitor (ICI) colitis is one of most common and adverse side effects of ICI. However, there was no case report of ulcerative colitis (UC)-mimicking colitis after atezolizumab use in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to our knowledge. Materials and Methods: We would like to introduce the case of a patient with Stage IV HCC who complained of abdominal pain, diarrhea and rectal bleeding after two cycles of atezolizumab/bevacizumab chemotherapy and was then diagnosed with UC-mimicking colitis. Results: Endoscopy revealed typical findings of UC, suggesting diagnosis of UC-mimicking colitis. The patient was treated with systemic steroids and oral mesalamine, which significantly improved his symptoms, which were also supported by endoscopic findings. The patient resumed chemotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab without any interruption to the chemotherapy schedule. Conclusions: Early endoscopic evaluation is pivotal to diagnosing UC-mimicking colitis. If diagnosed, UC-based treatments such as steroids and mesalamine should be strongly considered. Given previous reports of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare-ups after immunotherapy, routine lower endoscopy, performed together with upper endoscopy before atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy, is promising to patients.

Preliminary Research of Radiolabeled Atezolizumab for the Noninvasive Evaluation of TNBC PD-L1 Expression In Vivo.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is related to the efficacy and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. This study employed an indirect labeling method to synthesize [125I]PI-Atezolizumab. The in vitro stability of [125I]PI-Atezolizumab was assessed through incubation in phosphate buffered saline and fetal bovine serum, revealing sustained stability. Specific binding of [125I]PI-Atezolizumab to MDA-MB-231 cells expressing humanized PD-L1 was assessed through in vitro incubation, yielding a Kd value comparable to that of Atezolizumab. This suggests that the labeling process did not compromise the affinity of the Atezolizumab to PD-L1. Subsequently, pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in normal mice and biodistribution experiments in tumor-bearing mice. A comparison of the biodistribution results between [125I]PI-Atezolizumab and 125I-labeled Atezolizumab indicated better in vivo stability for the former. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging further confirmed the targeted specificity of [125I]PI-Atezolizumab for PD-L1 in MDA-MB-231 xenografts, which were validated by immunohistochemistry staining. This research underscores the utility of [125I]PI-Atezolizumab, prepared via indirect labeling, for monitoring PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer models.

Real-World Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life Associated with Use of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Oncology Patients.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer a new treatment approach for cancer, with an improvement in patient survival. However, it remains unclear whether their use impacts the quality of life of treated patients. This study aims to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients treated with different anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 drugs, including several single or combination therapies. Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted with adult cancer patients who received at least one dose of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. The HRQoL of all adult patients was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 module (QLQ-C30), version 3, Arabic version. Results: A total of 199 patients were found to be eligible for this study. Of these, 93 patients (82 on a single medication and 11 on multiple ICIs) completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 46.7%. The majority of patients were treated with pembrolizumab (39.8%), followed by a smaller number treated with nivolumab (35.5%). Most of the patients were diagnosed with solid and advanced malignancies-88.2% (p = 0.023) and 87.1% (p = 0.021), respectively-with a significant difference between treatment groups. The median functioning score was 84.7%, with no significant difference between treatment groups (p = 0.752). Fatigue and pain were noted in >50% of patients, influencing the overall cohort's score related to these symptoms, with scores of 88.8% and 83.3%, respectively. Although a non-significant variation was found in the scores of all combined symptoms among all groups, ranging from 82.1% to 90.4% (p = 0.931), patients receiving anti-PD-1 + anti-PD-L1 tended to more frequently complain about fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and constipation and hence, exhibited the worst, yet non-significant, scores compared to those of the other groups, with p = 0.234, p = 0.79, p = 0.704, and p = 0.86, respectively. All combined groups scored 83.3% on the global health scale. Nevertheless, the nivolumab-treated patients scored 75%, which was the worst global health score compared with those of the other groups, but this score was not statistically significant (p = 0.809). Conclusions: Our findings revealed no significant difference in the impact of different ICIs on the HRQoL of cancer patients. However, a larger number of cases would be necessary to provide a robust analysis and to yield conclusive results.

Impact of metformin, statin, aspirin and insulin on the prognosis of uHCC patients receiving first line Lenvatinib or Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab.

Recently, in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting, the use of metformin has been associated to a trend toward worse response rate, overall survival and progression free survival in patients who received immunotherapy. The study population included individuals from both Eastern and Western regions with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC and receiving first line treatment with Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Lenvatinib. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional. For the analysis, patients were stratified based on their use of concomitant medication or not. At the time of database lock, 319 deaths were observed: 209 in the Lenvatinib cohort, 110 in the Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab cohort. In the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab arm, 50 (16.5%) patients were on chronic metformin use. At the univariate analysis for OS, patients who used metformin showed significantly shorter OS compared to patients who did not use metformin (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter OS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.1). At the univariate analysis for PFS, patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.0147). No differences were reported in terms of ORR and DCR between patients in metformin group and those in no-metformin group. In the Lenvatinib cohort, 65 (15%) patients were recorded to chronically use metformin. No statistically significant differences in terms of both OS and PFS were found between patients in metformin group and patients in no-metformin group. This analysis unveils a negative prognostic role associated with metformin use specifically within the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab group.