Introducing a novel hybrid educational boot camp to augment medical student training in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery subinternships are a critical portion of the medical student application to neurosurgery residency programs, allowing programs to assess the student's clinical knowledge, interpersonal skills, work ethic, and character. Despite how critical these auditions are, many students have a poor understanding of expectations prior to beginning these subinternships. Thomas Jefferson University hosted a combined in-person and virtual boot camp session open to all medical students interested in neurosurgery. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of this inaugural course. METHODS: A total of 304 registered participants were sent a survey assessing their attitudes toward neurosurgery subinternships, beliefs about their abilities, and their comfort with various neurosurgical skills. All participants were sent a postsession survey composed of the same questions. The mean scores for responses to pre- and postsession survey questions were recorded based on graduating year and by medical school type (US allopathic [US MD], US osteopathic [US DO], or foreign degree/international medical graduate [IMG]). Differences in means between pre- and postsession survey responses were analyzed using the Student t-test, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 112 presession surveys and 64 postsession surveys were completed, yielding a presession survey response rate of 36.8% and a postsession survey response rate of 21.1%. Seventy-five percent of the postsession survey respondents attended virtually, and 25% were in-person. US MD, US DO, and IMG attendees demonstrated a significantly increased understanding of the expectations of a neurosurgery subintern (p < 0.001). All students had significantly increased confidence in their ability to succeed as subinterns (US MD students and IMGs p < 0.001, US DO students p < 0.05). Regarding procedural confidence, US MD students had increased confidence in craniotomies and cranial plating (p < 0.001). When comparing responses by graduation year, students in the classes of 2024 and 2025 (rising 4th-year and rising 3rd-year medical students, respectively) demonstrated significantly increased understanding of expectations and confidence in their ability to succeed (< 0.001). Seventy-five percent of our postsession survey respondents attended virtually, and 25% were in-person. The in-person cohort had greater improvements in comfort with procedures such as craniotomies, cranial plating, and extraventricular drain placement (in-person vs Zoom mean differences: craniotomies and cranial plating, -2.29, extraventricular drain placement, -2.31) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The boot camp successfully delineated the expectations of neurosurgery subinterns and enhanced the attendees' confidence in their abilities. The authors concluded that a hybrid virtual and in-person format is beneficial and feasible in increasing accessibility to information about neurosurgery subinternships.

A Capstone Course for Senior Medical Students: from Innovative Elective to Required Core Curriculum.

We describe our institution's development and implementation of our Capstone course from a small elective course to the only required fourth-year course. The course's structure evolved from mostly didactic to one including various workshops and simulation sessions. Course content has become increasingly specialty-specific. Implementation requires high faculty and resident involvement. Evaluations indicate a positive impact of the course on participants' self-reported confidence and residency preparedness. Assessment remains pass/fail with more specialty-specific questions. As steadily increasing numbers of medical schools are developing transition to residency courses, we share our Capstone course's evolution and lessons learned over the past nine years. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01880-2.

Profiling injuries sustained following implementation of a progressive load carriage program in United States marine corps recruit training.

BACKGROUND: Load carriage tasks during United States Marine Corps (USMC) recruit training can cause injury. Load carriage conditioning, if optimized, can reduce injury risk. OBJECTIVE: To compare injuries sustained by USMC recruits following participation in either the Original Load Carriage (OLC) program or a Modified Load Carriage (MLC) program. METHODS: Retrospective musculoskeletal injury data were drawn from the USMC San Diego Sports Medicine injury database for recruits completing the OLC (n = 2,363) and MLC (n = 681) programs. Data were expressed as descriptive statistics and a population estimate of the OLC:MLC relative risk ratio (RR) was calculated. RESULTS: The proportion of injuries sustained in the MLC cohort (n = 268; 39% : OLC cohort, n = 1,372 : 58%) was lower, as was the RR (0.68, 95% CI 0.61- 0.75). The leading nature of injury for both cohorts was sprains and strains (OLC n = 396, 29%; MLC n = 66; 25%). Stress reactions were proportionally higher in MLC (n = 17, 6%; OLC n = 4, 0.3%), while stress fractures were proportionately lower (MLC n = 9, 3%; OLC n = 114, 8%). Overuse injuries were lower in MLC (- 7%). The knee, lower leg, ankle, and foot were the top four bodily sites of injuries and the Small Unit Leadership Evaluation (SULE), Crucible, overuse-nonspecific, running, and conditioning hikes were within the top five most common events causing injury. The prevalence rates of moderate severity injury were similar (MLC = 23%; OLC = 24%), although MLC presented both a higher proportion and prevalence of severe injuries (MLC = 6%; OLC = 3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A periodized load carriage program concurrently increased exposure to load carriage hikes while reducing injuries both during the load carriage hikes and overall.

One-week radiology boot camp for pre-clerkship medical students: A novel format improving image interpretation and confidence.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To measure change in radiology knowledge, confidence in radiology skills, and perceptions pertaining to radiology following a one-week boot camp elective for undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A five-day comprehensive radiology boot camp was developed including sessions on image interpretation, procedural skills, and appropriate image ordering. A multiple-choice quiz was administered before and after the elective, utilizing radiology questions from the validated AMSER STARS database. Additionally, a pre- and post-elective survey was administered assessing radiology career interest, confidence in radiology-based skills, and the potential ability of radiology-based skills to increase confidence in specialties other than radiology. Responses from the assessments were analysed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: 15 students enrolled in the course and 14 completed all assessments. The average score on the quiz increased from 50.1% to 66.0% (p<0.001). On the post-elective survey, the average student confidence score increased by more than one point on a six-point Likert scale in each of radiographic interpretation (p=0.004), ultrasound interpretation (p=0.0002), CT/MRI interpretation (p=0.02), general radiology knowledge including procedural skills (p=0.0001), and appropriate image ordering (p=0.004). Average student satisfaction with the elective was 8.1 out of 10. CONCLUSION: A one-week radiology boot camp for pre-clerkship medical students improved radiology knowledge and confidence in radiology skills, showing potential for this format to meet the demand for increased radiology content in undergraduate training. Students indicated that confidence in radiology knowledge would increase confidence on non-radiology clerkship rotations, highlighting the importance of how a one-week radiology bootcamp can impact both future radiology and non-radiology clerkship experiences.

Simulation-based workshop for emergency preparedness in otolaryngology.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a hands-on simulation-based course with emphasis on procedural techniques, clinical reasoning, and communication skills developed to improve junior Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residents' preparedness in managing otolaryngologic emergencies. Methods: Junior OHNS residents and faculty from residency programs in California, Nevada, and Arizona participated in this workshop in 2020 and 2021. The stations featured airway management techniques, ultrasound-guided needle aspiration, nasoseptal hematoma evacuation, and facial fracture repair using various models and cadavers. Participants completed a pre-workshop survey, post-workshop survey, and 2-month follow-up survey that assessed resident anxiety and confidence in three OHNS emergency situations across knowledge, manual skills, and teamwork using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Pre-workshop surveys reported the least anxiety and most confidence in teamwork, but the most anxiety and least confidence in technical skills and knowledge related to foreign body retrieval and airway management. Immediately post-workshop participants reported significant reductions in anxiety and increases in confidence, largest in the manual skills domain, in foreign body retrieval (anxiety: -0.99, confidence: +0.95, p < .01) and airway management stations (anxiety: -0.68, confidence: +1.07, p < .01). Data collected for the epistaxis station showed decreasing confidence and increasing anxiety following the workshop. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a workshop in preparing junior residents in potentially lifesaving otolaryngologic techniques that residents will encounter. Optimizing use of simulation centered training can inform the future of residency education, improving confidence and decreasing anxiety in residents responsible for the safety of patients. Level of Evidence: III.

The Boot Camp Model in Urology: Preparing PGY1 Urology Interns for Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight literature regarding resident boot camps published across surgical specialties with a focus on urology. Herein, we discuss different boot camp iterations, their results, and the integration of simulation into their curriculum. We review program elements such as curriculum, course length, and efficacy as well as areas for continued investigation. RECENT FINDINGS: The field of urology has grown in both the breadth of knowledge and the complexity of procedures. With urology now being an integrated surgical subspecialty, interns often start on the urology service despite limited experience navigating this unique specialty. The boot camp model is one method by which interns and junior residents participate in consolidated training programs to best prepare them for a patient-facing role and the day-to-day demands of residency. Urology programs, both in the USA and abroad, have begun integrating boot camps into their training programs with positive results. Urology boot camps can be a valuable part of training programs for interns to quickly establish medical knowledge, skills, and efficiency. Boot camps should be easily accessible, have sufficient support from institutions, and provide effective training through various methods such as didactics and simulation.

Urology boot camp for medical students: Using virtual technology to enhance undergraduate education.

Objectives: The study aims to describe the methodology of converting the urology boot camp for medical students into a virtual course with key take home points for a successful conversion and to present quantitative and qualitative data demonstrating the impact of the boot camp on improving delegates' knowledge and clinical acumen. Materials and methods: The face-to-face boot camp was converted to a virtual format employing a variety of techniques including; utilizing an online platform to deliver live screened lectures, using online polling software to foster an interactive learning environment and displaying pre-recorded videos to teach practical skills. Validated Multiple Choice Questionnaires (MCQs) were used prior to and after the course. This enabled the assessment of delegates' knowledge of urology according to the national undergraduate curriculum, and paired t tests were used to quantify the level of improvement. Thematic analysis was carried out on post-course delegate feedback to identify highlights of the course and ways of improving future iterations. Results: In total, 131 delegates took part in the pilot virtual course. Of these, 105 delegates completed the pre- and post-course MCQs. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment following the course (p = <0.001) with mean score increasing from 47.5% pre-course to 65.8% post-course. All delegates who attended the most recent implementation of the virtual course (n = 31) felt it improved their knowledge and confidence in urology. Twenty delegates (64.5%) felt that it prepared them for both final year medical school examinations and working as a foundation year doctor. Positive themes in feedback were identified, which included the interactive nature of the course, the quality of teaching, the level and content of information provided and the high yield, concise organization of the teaching schedule. Conclusion: Using virtual technology and innovative educational frameworks, we have demonstrated the successful conversion of the urology boot camp for medical students to a virtual format. At a national level, with support from the British Association of Urological Surgeons, the face-to-face component of the course will continue to run in parallel with the virtual course with the aim of standardizing and improving UK undergraduate urological education. The virtual course has been implemented on an international scale, and this has already shown promising results.

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Boot Camp in Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Education: A Pilot Study.

Objectives: There are limited opportunities in the medical school curriculum to learn about the field of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (ORL) and to acquire relevant clinical skills, especially during preclinical years. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the impact of implementing an ORL boot camp in preclinical undergraduate medical education to help first- and second-year medical students learn about common ORL problems and become more comfortable performing basic ORL clinical skills so that they are better prepared to provide care for patients during clerkships and beyond. Methods: First- and second-year medical students were recruited to a single 3-hour boot camp session consisting of didactics/demonstrations and clinical experiences. The boot camp provided an introduction into the field of ORL, description of common ORL pathologies, associated management and procedures, and demonstrations of basic ORL procedures typically performed in clinic. Under supervision, subjects practiced complete head and neck physical examinations (H&NPE) on their peers including otoscopy, tuning fork tests, examination with a nasal speculum, and oral, basic cranial nerve, and neck examination. Pre- and post-tests assessing subjective (0-5 point Likert scale) and objective (content exam) measures of ORL knowledge, comfort level performing ORL skills, and interest in ORL were used to evaluate the intervention. Results: A total of 17 students participated in the boot camp as part of an extracurricular session. Seventeen students completed pre-tests and 16 completed post-tests. Ratings of self-reported knowledge of ORL (2.06 vs 3.00; P = .019) and comfort level in performing H&NPE (1.76 vs 3.44; P < .001) increased significantly after the boot camp. Mean performance on an ORL content exam also increased significantly from 42.17% to 71.35% (P < .001). Conclusions: An ORL boot camp may be an effective method of teaching for preclinical medical students. Further studies with a larger cohort are warranted.

Developing patient-refined colorectal cancer screening materials: application of a virtual community engagement approach.

INTRODUCTION: In partnership with a federally qualified health center (FQHC), an adapted virtual version of boot camp translation (BCT) was used to elicit input from Spanish-speaking Latino patients and staff to develop messaging and patient education materials for follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal testing. We describe how we adapted an existing in-person BCT process to be delivered virtually and present evaluations from participants on the virtual format. METHODS: Three virtual BCT sessions were facilitated by bilingual staff and conducted via Zoom. These sessions included introductions and discussions on colorectal cancer (CRC), CRC screening, and gathered feedback from participants on draft materials. Ten adults were recruited from the FQHC. A research team member from the FQHC served as the point of contact (POC) for all participants and offered Zoom introductory sessions and/or technology support before and during the sessions. Following the third session, participants were invited to complete an evaluation form about their virtual BCT experience. Using a 5-point Likert Scale (where 5 = strongly agree), questions focused on session utility, group comfort level, session pacing, and overall sense of accomplishment. RESULTS: Average scores ranged from 4.3 to 5.0 indicating strong support towards the virtual BCT sessions. Additionally, our study emphasized the importance of a POC to provide technical support to participants throughout the process. Using this approach, we successfully incorporated feedback from participants to design culturally relevant materials to promote follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: We recommend ongoing public health emphasis on the use of virtual platforms for community engaged work.

Implementing Oncology Pharmacy Boot Camp for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Students at a Regional Conference in Saudi Arabia.

Background Upon graduation, pharmacy students are expected to possess a diverse array of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. A subject-specific boot camp may support bridging the gap between the information and skills gained during clerkships, courses required for pharmacy school after graduation, and skills needed for the job market, as well as the gap between pharmacy school and residency. This research aimed to determine whether an integrated boot camp increased Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) student self-confidence and enhanced students' knowledge in oncology pharmacy. Method APPE students who attended the annual meeting of the Saudi Oncology Pharmacy Assembly (SOPA)/International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) Regional Conference 2021 were voluntarily enrolled in a three-hour oncology-focused boot camp consisting of interactive lectures. Pre- and post-intervention examinations were used to evaluate student learning outcomes and their experience feedback. Result Of 118 students who attended the boot camp, 80 students who met the criteria were included in the study. The pre- and post-intervention examinations were completed by the 80 APPE students. The pre-intervention test results (mean: 66%, standard deviation (SD): 16%) increased by 21.5% after the boot camp (mean: 87.5%, SD: 12%, p = 0.001). Students scored better on each of the 10 test questions, with nine questions demonstrating a statistically significant result. Conclusion The results of this research showed that interns who participated in an oncology boot camp had a higher level of knowledge and confidence in applying key oncology concepts. Interns were satisfied with the chance to engage in the activity, and they agreed to adding boot camps to future conferences would be valuable. This research shows that it is possible to hold a transitional boot camp during conferences to better prepare students for their fields of study and increase their participation in oncology conferences.

The Impact of Surgical Boot Camp on Medical Student Confidence and Imposter Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Transitioning from medical student to surgical intern is accompanied by increased responsibility, stress, and clinical burden. This environment lends itself to imposter syndrome (IS), a psychological condition grounded in self-doubt causing fear of being discovered as fraud despite adequate abilities. We hypothesized a 2-week surgical boot camp for fourth year medical students would improve confidence in technical skills/knowledge and IS. METHODS: Thirty medical students matching into surgical specialties completed the boot-camp in February 2020. Presurveys/postsurveys assessed confidence levels using a 1-5 Likert scale regarding 32 technical skills and knowledge points. The Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) assessed IS, where increasing scores correlate to greater IS. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) subject age was 27 y (26, 28), 20 (66.7%) were male, and 21 (70%) were Caucasian. Of the 30 students, 23 (76.7%) had a break in training with a median [IQR] of 2 [1, 3] y outside of medicine. Confidence scores were significantly improved in all five assessment categories (P < 0.05); however, there was no change in CIPS in median [IQR] presurveys versus postsurveys (65.5 [52, 75] versus 64 [52, 75], P = 0.70). Females had higher mean (standard deviation) pre-CIPS than males (68.4 [15.2] versus 61.6 [14.9], P = 0.02). There was no strong correlation between age and CIPS in the presurvey (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient [SRCC]: 0.29, P = 0.19) or postsurvey (SRCC: 0.31, P = 0.10). While subjects who worked outside of medicine had a stronger relationship with IS (SRCC: 0.37, P = 0.05), multivariable regression analysis did not reveal any significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate for surgical boot-camp training courses to improve trainee skill and confidence. As IS is not improved by boot camp, additional research is needed to identify opportunities to improve IS among surgical trainees.

The need for a course to complete urological education for consultant practice using a simulated 'boot camp' structure at the end of specialist training: A survey-based study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To obtain opinions from urology trainees and consultants regarding the need for, and structure of, a post-specialty training Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) for consultant practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey-based study was conducted, and 'Google Forms' were distributed electronically via social media. Urology specialist trainees (ST) in years 5-7 (ST5-ST7), post-certification of completion of training (CCT) fellows and ST3 boot camp faculty consultants in practice for ≤5 years and >5 years were included. One hundred and seven responses were received. 97.2% of responders thought a pre-consultant USBC was worthwhile; 55.1% selected the course duration to be 2 days. 47.7% felt that the USBC should be delivered post-exam in ST7. 91.6%, 43.9%, 73.8%, 87.9% and 74.8% considered that modules in emergency operative procedures, novel uro-technologies, delivering multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, non-clinical consultant roles and responsibilities, stress and burnout to be important, respectively. 62.6% and 31.8% felt that the course should be wholly or part-funded by Health Education England (HEE). CONCLUSIONS: A post-specialty training, pre-consultant, USBC delivered post-exam in ST7, is worthwhile and should include modules on emergency operative procedures, leading MDTs, non-clinical roles and responsibilities and managing stress and burnout in consultant careers. Ideally, it should be fully/part-funded by HEE.

Student perception and assessment outcomes using a pilot condensed format ("boot camp") in a Fixed Prosthodontics course.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess student perception as well as course outcomes (final written examination grades) when using a pilot condensed format in an undergraduate Fixed Prosthodontics course, which was implemented as a response to the global pandemic of Covid-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course was delivered in a condensed format, with a total of 28 direct contact hours in the Simulation Clinic within a 4 day period. Asynchronous remote learning was employed for the didactic portion of the course. Students completed surveys before and after the course, to assess their perception of the condensed format, and written examination grades were compared with previous years' grades. Data were entered in an Excel database (Microsoft Excel 2016) and analysed using a statistical analysis software program (IBM SPSS Statistics, v26; IBM Corp). The level of significance was set to α = 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, student perception of the condensed format was positive. At the beginning of the course, female students had less confidence in their skills compared to male students (p < .05). Written examination grades were significantly lower compared to previous years' grades (p = .04). CONCLUSION: The use of a condensed format can allow a course to be delivered in smaller student cohorts and provides the ability to reduce the total number of direct contact hours allotted to the course, creating space within the curriculum. Student perception of this format was generally positive. However, written examination scores were negatively impacted, indicating possible knowledge gaps resulting from the condensed course format. More studies are needed to assess the effect of the various curricular modifications that have been implemented due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The First Two Years of the Association of Pediatric Surgery Training Program Directors (APSTPD) Transition to Fellowship Course: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

OBJECTIVE: The first transition to fellowship course for incoming pediatric surgery fellows was held in the US in 2018 and the second in 2019. The course aimed to facilitate a successful transition in to fellowship by introduction of the professional, patient care, and technical aspects unique to pediatric surgery training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the first two years of this course in the US and discuss subsequent evolution of this endeavor. DESIGN: This is a descriptive and qualitative analysis of two years' experience with the Association of Pediatric Surgery Training Program Directors' (APSTPD) Transition to Fellowship course. Course development and curriculum, including clinical knowledge, soft skills, and hands-on skills labs, are presented. Participating incoming fellows completed multiple choice, boards-style pre- and post-tests. Scores were compared to determine if knowledge was effectively transferred. Participants also completed post-course evaluations and subsequent 3- or 12-month surveys inquiring on the lasting impact of the course on their transition into fellowship. Standard univariate statistics were used to present results. SETTING: The first APSTPD Transition to Fellowship course was held at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland in 2018, and the second course was held at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon in 2019. PARTICIPANTS: All fellows entering ACGME-certified Pediatric Surgery fellowships in the United States were invited to participate. Twenty fellows accepted and attended in 2018, and fourteen fellows participated in 2019. RESULTS: There were 34 incoming pediatric surgery fellow participants over 2 years. Faculty represented more than 10 institutions each year. Pre- and post-test scores were similar between years, with a significant improvement of scores after completion of the course (67±10% vs 79±8%, p < 0.001). Feedback from participants was overwhelmingly positive, with skills labs being attendees' favorite component. When asked about usefulness of individual course sessions, more attendees found clinical sessions more useful than soft skills (93% vs 73%, p = 0.011). Almost all (90%) of participants reported the course met its stated purpose and would recommend the course to future fellows. This was further reflected on 3 and 12 month follow up surveys wherein 85% stated they found the course helpful during the first few months of fellowship and 90% would still recommend it. CONCLUSIONS: A transition to fellowship course in the US for incoming pediatric surgery fellows is logistically feasible, effective in transfer of knowledge, and highly regarded among attendees. Feedback from each course has been used to improve the subsequent courses, ensuring that it remains a valuable addition to pediatric surgical training in the US.

Assessing Third-Year Medical Students' Perspective on Point of Care Testing Boot Camp: From Bench to Bedside.

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT), which is also known as bed side-testing, has been integrated into the healthcare system, offering faster results that can lead to improved patient outcomes. POCT was missing from the medical education curriculum in our institute. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe the development and introduce POCT training for medical students in a medical college in Pakistan.Secondary objectives were to evaluate student performance on POCT content and to assess the impact of POCT training via students' feedback. Methodology: The boot camp experience was devised, directed, and facilitated by team constituting of Chemical Pathology faculty members, laboratory technologists and teaching assistants. The program included presentations, demonstrations of POCT instrument handling, supervised hands-on individual performance on glucometer using quality control specimens, competency assessment and sign off followed by interactive case-based discussions. A knowledge quiz via Kahoot was administered at the beginning and end of the experience and scores were compared statistically. Online evaluation and feedback were designed via virtual learning environment based on 10 questions regarding the program and methodology using on a five-point Likert Scale. Frequencies were generated and t-tests were employed to determine pre-post differences. Results: The boot camp was spread over 2 days and ran three hours each day with the third-year medical students class split into two groups (n=80). On knowledge evaluation, the mean group pre and post test scores were 45% and 95% respectively (p-value =< 0.05). On documented structured competency assessment form a score of 95 was achieved by 100% participants. Positive feedback of 4 or more was recorded on the Likert's scale by 100% respondents. Conclusion: This POCT boot camp experience can be used by other institutions and can be applied at different times during the medical school curriculum and other professional education programs. This bootcamp will be helpful to educate medical students, postgraduate trainees and field workers working in rural areas and in low resource settings to deliver reliable POC tests results. Future research should examine these students' competence in achieving POCT skills when they enter in clinical practice.

Development and Evaluation of a Faculty Teaching Boot Camp Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction Medical faculty often assume teaching responsibilities without formal training in teaching skills. The purpose of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate boot camp workshop training faculty in basic teaching competencies. We also describe the transition to a virtual format necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The workshop content was derived from a needs assessment survey and discussion with content experts. Four main content areas were identified: setting expectations, giving feedback, evaluating learners, and teaching in specific settings (outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, procedures/surgery, and small groups). The initial boot camp was a four-hour in-person event. The following year, the boot camp was offered via online videoconference. We used a pre-post survey to assess participant reaction and knowledge acquisition from session content. Results A total of 30 local faculty attended the 2020 in-person boot camp, while 105 faculty from across the state attended the 2021 online boot camp. Statistically significant increases in post-knowledge scores were identified for two sessions in the 2020 boot camp and four sessions in 2021. The participants rated both boot camps favorably with no significant difference between the in-person and online presentations for most ratings but were less satisfied with networking opportunities in the online boot camp. Discussion We describe an effective faculty development boot camp teaching core competencies for medical clinician-educators. We were able to leverage the online teleconferencing platform to deliver the content to a larger number of preceptors at distant sites without sacrificing outcomes of participant satisfaction and improvement in knowledge scores. The online model allowed busy clinicians to participate while multitasking. Comments also highlighted the importance of having an engaged moderator during the online event. Conclusions Many medical schools utilize preceptors in distant locations. We demonstrated the feasibility of reaching a much larger and geographically widespread group of clinical preceptors using a virtual format while still showing improvement in knowledge scores relating to workshop content. For future faculty development, we propose that hybrid models with both in-person and virtual components will be effective in meeting the needs of a geographically distributed faculty.

Utility of a Pilot Neurosurgical Operative Skills Boot Camp in Medical Student Training.

OBJECTIVE: The neurosurgical sub-internship is a crucial step for prospective neurosurgeons. However, the expectations for sub-interns, particularly the technical skills required by residents and attendings, often are unclear. We present survey data on what medical students, residents, and attendings believe are important procedural proficiencies for neurosurgical sub-internships. We incorporated these tasks into a pilot skills-based craniotomy workshop, and here we report on the impact of the session on the neurosurgical training of medical students. METHODS: A 1-day craniotomy lab using cadaveric cranial specimens was conducted for medical students. Surveys querying important competencies for sub-internships were answered by residents and attendings at affiliated hospitals. Pre- and postlab surveys querying interest in and perceptions of neurosurgery, self-assessment of skills, and important competencies for sub-internship preparation were answered by attendees. RESULTS: Medical students, residents, and attendings agreed that burr-hole placement, bone replating, and galea and skin closure were of high importance for sub-interns. There was significant disagreement on the importance of dural opening and closure, establishing a craniotomy, and neuronavigation. The workshop altered perceptions of neurosurgery, with significant changes in recognizing the value of peer mentorship. Students also expressed increased confidence in technical skills, with significant improvements shown in understanding of neurosurgical high-speed drill use (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expectations for sub-interns may be heterogeneous, there is general agreement that proficiency in the initial and final steps of craniotomies, as well as minor procedures, is recommended. Cadaveric labs can improve student engagement in neurosurgery, facilitate interactions with neurosurgical departments, and enhance technical skills.

Virtual curriculum delivery in the COVID-19 era: the pediatric surgery boot camp v2.0.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of a virtual Pediatric Surgery Bootcamp curriculum on resource utilization, learner engagement, knowledge retention, and stakeholder satisfaction. METHODS: A virtual curriculum was developed around Pediatric Surgery Milestones. GlobalCastMD delivered pre-recorded and live content over a single 10-h day with a concluding social hour. Metrics of learner engagement, faculty interaction, knowledge retention, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed during and after the course. RESULTS: Of 56 PS residencies, 31 registered (55.4%; 8/8 Canadian and 23/48 US; p = 0.006), including 42 learners overall. The virtual BC budget was $15,500 (USD), 54% of the anticipated in-person course. Pre- and post-tests were administered, revealing significant knowledge improvement (48.6% [286/589] vs 66.9% [89/133] p < 0.0002). Learner surveys (n = 14) suggested the virtual BC facilitated fellowship transition (85%) and strengthened peer-group camaraderie (69%), but in-person events were still favored (77%). Program Directors (PD) were surveyed, and respondents (n = 22) also favored in-person events (61%). PDs not registering their learners (n = 7) perceived insufficient value-added and concern for excessive participants. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual bootcamp format reduced overall expenses, interfered less with schedules, achieved more inclusive reach, and facilitated content archiving. Despite these advantages, learners and program directors still favored in-person education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Translating principles of precision medicine into speech-language pathology: Clinical trial of a proactive speech and language intervention for infants with classic galactosemia.

Precision medicine is an emerging approach to managing disease by taking into consideration an individual's genetic and environmental profile toward two avenues to improved outcomes: prevention and personalized treatments. This framework is largely geared to conditions conventionally falling into the field of medical genetics. Here, we show that the same avenues to improving outcomes can be applied to conditions in the field of behavior genomics, specifically disorders of spoken language. Babble Boot Camp (BBC) is the first comprehensive and personalized program designed to proactively mitigate speech and language disorders in infants at predictable risk by fostering precursor and early communication skills via parent training. The intervention begins at child age 2 to 5 months and ends at age 24 months, with follow-up testing at 30, 42, and 54 months. To date, 44 children with a newborn diagnosis of classic galactosemia (CG) have participated in the clinical trial of BBC. CG is an inborn error of metabolism of genetic etiology that predisposes up to 85% of children to severe speech and language disorders. Of 13 children with CG who completed the intervention and all or part of the follow-up testing, only one had disordered speech and none had disordered language skills. For the treated children who completed more than one assessment, typical speech and language skills were maintained over time. This shows that knowledge of genetic risk at birth can be leveraged toward proactive and personalized management of a disorder that manifests behaviorally.