Fabrication of Anti-glaucoma Nanofibers as Controlled-Release Inserts for Ophthalmic Delivery of Brimonidine Tartrate: In Vivo Evaluation in Caprine Eye.

Purpose: Chronic ailments usually decrease the quality of life due to the requirement for repetitive administration of drugs. Glaucoma is a chronic eye disease occurred because of increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Controlled-release inserts can overcome this challenge by a gradual release of the antiglaucoma drugs. This study aimed to fabricate ocular inserts of brimonidine tartrate (BMD) for the management of glaucoma. Methods: Different polymers including poly (D, L-lactide), polycaprolactone, cellulose acetate, and Eudragit RL100® were used to develop the BMD-loaded nanofibrous inserts by electrospinning technique. The inserts were characterized. The morphology and drug-polymer compatibility were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and in vitro drug release in PBS. The IOP-lowering efficacy and irritancy of optimized formulation were assessed in the caprines. Results: SEM images demonstrated nanofibers with uniform morphology and a mean diameter<300 nm were fabricated. The nanofibers were high-strength and flexible enough to be placed in the conjunctival sac. FTIR showed drug-polymer compatibility. In vitro release study indicated a sustained-release profile of the drug during 6 days for inserts. In vivo evaluation indicated that the optimized formulation is capable of maintaining the IOP in a non-glaucomatous range for an extended duration of 6 days. In addition, the formulation was non-irritant to the caprine eye. Conclusion: Due to the prolonged IOP-lowering efficiency, BMD-loaded nanofibrous inserts can be considered suitable for the controlled release of drugs and thus enhance patient compliance by reducing the frequency of administration.

The Efficacy and Safety Associated with Switching from Concomitant Brimonidine and Ripasudil, or Brimonidine or Ripasudil Monotherapy to a Fixed Combination of Brimonidine and Ripasudil in Glaucoma Patients.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate switching from brimonidine and ripasudil, and brimonidine or ripasudil, to a fixed combination of brimonidine and ripasudil, and evaluate the associated efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients. Methods: Glaucoma patients undergoing treatment with at least brimonidine and ripasudil (n = 25) or treatment with at least brimonidine or ripasudil (n = 45) were evaluated in this retrospective study. After switching patients taking brimonidine and ripasudil, or brimonidine or ripasudil, to a ripasudil/brimonidine fixed-combination, ophthalmic suspension (RBFC), intra-ocular pressure (IOP), conjunctival hyperemia and superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) were evaluated before and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after switching to RBFC. Results: No significant differences in the IOPs were observed after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, a significant decrease was observed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks in the baseline IOP, from 17.0 ± 4.4 mmHg to 15.7 ± 3.2 mmHg (p < 0.01), 14.3 ± 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.01) and 14.4 ± 4.1 mmHg (p < 0.01), respectively, after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. No significant changes were noted for the SPK score or conjunctival hyperemia score at any of the visits after switching to RBFC. Conclusions: Throughout the 24-week evaluation period, the IOP was maintained after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, there was a significant decrease in the IOP after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. These results demonstrate that RBFC is safe for use in the treatment of glaucoma patients.

Severe Central Nervous System and Respiratory Depression in a Neonate Following Accidental Oral Ingestion of Brimonidine Tartrate.

Brimonidine is a third-generation alpha-2 adrenergic agonist and is classified as an ocular hypotensive agent. It is used for chronic glaucoma treatment by lowering intraocular pressure, crucial for preventing blindness. Brimonidine works by reducing aqueous humor production and increasing uveoscleral outflow. The improper use of brimonidine in children can result in severe adverse effects. If brimonidine eye drops are ingested orally, it can cause significant depression of the cardiorespiratory and central nervous systems. This is a case report of a 27-day-old neonate, who presented with central nervous system and respiratory depression after accidental ingestion of one drop of brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution. On arrival, he was having shallow breathing, a low Glasgow Coma Scale score, pinpoint pupils, and absent deep tendon reflexes. Gastric lavage was performed and supportive treatment was started. The patient showed gradual improvement and completely recovered within 48 hours.

Sustained release of brimonidine from conjunctival sac insert to reduce intraocular pressure for glaucoma treatment.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is one of the major irreversible blinding eye diseases in the world. Reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) is the primary treatment option, and taking eye drops daily is the common method. However, short drug duration and poor bioavailability of eye drops may lead to unsatisfied therapeutic effects and inadequate patient compliance. METHODS: A brimonidine-loaded silicone rubber insert (BRI@SR@PT) was prepared by loading brimonidine into a surface-modified silicone rubber ring, followed by polydopamine/thermoplastic polyurethane coatings. The physical properties, in vitro cytocompatibility and drug release of BRI@SR@PT were investigated. The BRI@SR@PT was administrated in the conjunctival sac of rabbit eyes, and its in vivo drug release, IOP-lowering efficacy and biosafety were assessed. RESULTS: The BRI@SR@PT presented great thermal stability and excellent elasticity. The BRI@SR@PT was able to release BRI sustainably for 28 days with little toxicity in vitro. Compared to BRI eye drops, the BRI@SR@PT effectively lowered IOP for 21 days based on the sustained BRI release with great biosafety when administrated in conjunctival sac of rabbit eyes in a noninvasive fashion. CONCLUSIONS: The conjunctival sac insert (BRI@SR@PT), as a promising drug-delivery platform, may provide a sustained IOP-lowering treatment for patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma, without the need for invasive procedures.

Symptomatic bradycardia associated with topical brimonidine gel (Mirvaso) administration: a case report.

Background: Bradycardia can have a number of different aetiologies, including as a side effect of medications. Brimonidine is a rare, but recognized, cause of bradycardia. Brimonidine is indicated in the treatment of facial erythema in rosacea when given as topical brimonidine gel (Mirvaso). It may also be administered as eye drops for raised intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Brimonidine is an alpha-2 agonist, which if systemically absorbed can present with bradycardia, hypotension, and dizziness. The authors are unaware of any other case reports regarding topical administration of Mirvaso in an adult and symptomatic bradycardia. Case summary: We present the case of a 78-year-old man with a background of rosacea, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertension who had two separate admissions with symptomatic bradycardia. Electrocardiograms showed sinus bradycardia with AV block first degree, with rate recorded as low as 31 b.p.m. during a syncopal episode. These episodes of symptomatic bradycardia were intermittent and had a temporal association with topical administration of Mirvaso. He had no further episodes of bradycardia on discontinuation of Mirvaso and has remained symptom free for over 6 months. Discussion: The topical administration of Mirvaso should be avoided to broken or inflamed skin. This is owing to the increased risk of systemic absorption, which as in this case report, may present with bradycardia. This case reiterates the importance of completing a full medication history including all topical and parenteral medications in patients with arrhythmia.

Comparison of allergy prevalence using brinzolamide 1.0% / brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination with and without ß-blocker in glaucoma patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma treatment often involves multi-drug regimens, which can lead to poor adherence and side effects. Fixed-dose combinations aim to improve adherence and reduce side effects compared to traditional therapies. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ocular allergy in glaucoma patients using brinzolamide 1.0%/brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination (BBFC), with and without concurrent ß-blocker. METHODS: Of these, 176 patients used a ß-blocker concurrently, whereas 96 patients did not. Allergy prevalence, allergy type, and allergy occurrence time were compared between the concurrent and non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage groups. Ocular allergies were classified and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Allergy prevalence was 10.23% and 15.63% (p = 0.193), whereas allergy occurrence time was 15.92 ± 13.80 months and 6.26 ± 6.20 months (p = 0.04) in the concurrent and non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that half of the allergies in the concurrent ß-blocker-usage group occurred within 12.5 months, with the BBFC discontinuation rate gradually increasing up to 36 months. Contrarily, half of the allergies in the non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage group occurred within 3.3 months, with a rapid increase in BBFC discontinuation rate the first 6 months. Intergroup differences in allergy types were significant (p = 0.015). Among all patients with allergy, the average allergy occurrence time of blepharoconjunctivitis, papillary conjunctivitis, and follicular conjunctivitis was 12.52, 9.53, and 13.23 months, respectively. Follicular conjunctivitis tended to occur later than papillary conjunctivitis (p = 0.042). In the concurrent ß-blocker-usage group, follicular conjunctivitis was the most prevalent allergy type (61.1%), whereas papillary conjunctivitis was the most common (66.7%) in in the non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage group. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of ß-blocker with BBFC decreases allergy prevalence, delays allergy onset, and predominantly results in follicular conjunctivitis, thereby facilitating longer treatment duration. Understanding these characteristics of allergy in BBFC users is useful to manage patients and improve treatment adherence. This study provides insights into the role of ß-blockers in modulating ocular allergy in BBFC-treated glaucoma patients, highlighting implications for clinical practice and patient education.

Effect of brimonidine on vascular density and imagej-derived flow index of optic nerve head and macula in primary open angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of brimonidine on vascular density and flow index of optic nerve head (ONH) and macula in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Twenty-three brimonidine-naïve POAG patients were started on brimonidine. They underwent OCTA ONH and macula before commencing brimonidine and one month thereafter. Systemic arterial blood pressure (SABP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at each visit to calculate mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP). The OCT angiograms were analyzed using ImageJ software to calculate ONH and macular flow indices. RESULTS: Thirty-seven eyes (23 patients) with a mean age of 56.7 ± 12.49 years were included of whom 60.8% were males. Brimonidine was associated with an increase in the superficial flow index (SFI) (P-value = 0.02) and optic nerve head flow index (ONHFI) (P-value = 0.01). Also, superficial vascular density (SVD) for whole image, superior-hemi and fovea increased (P-value = 0.03, 0.02, 0.03 respectively). ONH inferior-hemi vascular density decreased (P-value = 0.01) despite an increase in inferior quadrant retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) (P-value = 0.03). There was no statistically significant correlation between flow indices and MOPP at baseline and follow-up. A moderate negative correlation was found between SVD and DVD at the fovea and MOPP at baseline and follow-up (P-value = 0.03, 0.05) (P-value = 0.02, 0.01) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine was associated with an increase in SFI, ONHFI and SVD indicating improved GCC and RNFL perfusion in POAG. Despite the increase in inferior quadrant RNFLT, the concomitant decrease in inferior-hemi ONHVD precluded a conclusion of hemodynamically-mediated improvement of RNFLT.

Exploring Neuroprotective Effects of Topical Brimonidine in Experimental Diabetic Retinopathy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of blindness worldwide, characterized by neurovascular dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the impact of brimonidine, a selective adrenoceptor agonist, on diabetic retinal neurodegeneration, recognizing the critical role of neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Streptozotocin-induced diabetes was established in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats to mimic diabetic retinopathy. Rats, except non-diabetic control rats, received topical applications of 0.15% brimonidine tartrate (treatment group) or balanced salt solution (diabetic control group) twice daily following diabetes induction. Each group comprised six randomly assigned animals. Retinal samples were analyzed using immunofluorescence staining, apoptosis assay, and western blot. RESULTS: Topical brimonidine treatment reduced apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells at 8 weeks after induction of diabetes (p<0.05). Glial activation induced by diabetes was reduced by brimonidine treatment. Immunoblot and immunofluorescence assay revealed that the decrease in phospho- protein kinase B (AKT) level resulting from diabetes was also attenuated by brimonidine (p<0.05). Furthermore, brimonidine alleviated the decrease in anti-apoptotic proteins [BCL2 apoptosis regulator (BCL2) and BCL-xl] induced by diabetes (p<0.05). Elevation of phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and p53 in diabetic rats were reduced by brimonidine (p<0.05). Additionally, brimonidine treatment attenuated the upregulation of the pro-apoptotic molecule BCL-2 associated X in retinas of diabetic rats (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that topical brimonidine treatment may protect retinal ganglion cells in experimental diabetes by modulating the AKT pathway and reducing pro-apoptotic p38MAPK levels. This presents a potential neuroprotective approach in diabetes, offering the advantage of localized treatment without the added burden of oral medication.

Paracentral acute middle maculopathy and cotton wool spots in a patient with ocular migraine: A case report.

In this study, we report paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) and cotton wool spots (CWS) in a patient with ocular migraine. A 74-year-old man presented with persistent paracentral scotoma in the right eye that began a week prior. His visual acuity was 20/25 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left. Dilated fundoscopy revealed CWS in the right eye. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) showed hyper-reflective bands in the inner nuclear layer corresponding to parafoveal lesions seen on near-infrared imaging in the right eye consistent with the diagnosis of PAMM. Further laboratory studies were unremarkable, and a transthoracic echocardiogram and a carotid ultrasound were unrevealing. The patient was started on brimonidine three times daily in both eyes. The patient reported subjective improvement in the paracentral scotoma and the absence of ocular migraine symptoms at two-month follow-up. We conclude from this case that PAMM and CWS can occur simultaneously in ocular migraine, and we suggest that retinal vascular changes associated with ocular migraine may contribute to ischemia underlying both entities. Additionally, we suggest a potential therapy in brimonidine due to its proposed beneficial effects on retinal vasculature and neuroprotection.

A Comparative Study on Efficacy of Intraocular Pressure Lowering of Two Fixed-Dose Antiglaucoma Drug Combination Brinzolamide-Brimonidine Versus Latanoprost-Timolol in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Brinzolamide-Brimonidine (BB) (1%+0.2%) with the gold standard Latanoprost-Timolol (LT) (0.005%+0.5%) in treating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: A 1-year prospective study, spanning from May 2022 to May 2023, conducted at a tertiary eye-care hospital. Participants, aged 40-60, with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, requiring a >30% reduction, were enrolled. Group A (n = 100) received BB, and Group B (n = 100) received LT. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month (IOP difference from baseline), 3 and 6 months (mean diurnal variations). Results: The mean age at presentation was 55.5 ± 4.5 years in Group A and 54.7 ± 4.2 years in Group B. At 1 month, Group A exhibited a mean IOP of 18.7 mm Hg, while Group B had 17.6 mm Hg, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.53). No significant diurnal variation was observed in either group (P = 0.07). Target pressure was achieved in 88% of patients in Group A and slightly higher at 92% in Group B. Moreover, no serious side effects were reported, and compliance was higher in Group B (98%) compared to Group A (96%). Conclusion: Although LT showed slightly better and sustained IOP reduction, the difference was not statistically significant. Both BB and LT demonstrated comparable outcomes for managing POAG and OHT.

Brimonidine as a possible treatment for myopia.

BACKGROUND: Myopia is becoming a huge burden on the world's public health systems. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of brimonidine in the treatment of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) and the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and myopia development. METHODS: Monocular form deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in three-week-old pigmented male guinea pigs. They were treated with 3 different methods of brimonidine administration (eye drops, and subconjunctival or intravitreal injections). Four different concentrations of brimonidine were tested for each method (2µg/µL, 4µg/µL, 20µg/µL, and 40µg/µL). All treatments continued for a period of 21 days. Tonometry, retinoscopy, and A-scan ultrasonography were used to monitor intraocular pressure, refractive error and axial length (AL), respectively. RESULTS: Treatment with subconjunctival brimonidine at 40µg/µL, and intravitreal brimonidine at 2µg/µL and 4µg/µL, inhibited the development of FDM. The myopic refraction, excessive axial length, and elevation of IOP were significantly decreased. Brimonidine in eye drops was ineffective. CONCLUSION: Brimonidine at appropriate doses significantly reduced the development of FD myopia in guinea pigs. The IOP may change with FD myopia.

Axonal protection by combination of ripasudil and brimonidine with upregulation of p-AMPK in TNF-induced optic nerve degeneration.

PURPOSE: The ROCK inhibitor ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate was shown to have axonal protective effects in TNF-induced optic nerve degeneration. The α2-adrenoreceptor agonist brimonidine was also shown to exert axonal protection. The current study aimed to elucidate whether additive axonal protection was achieved by the simultaneous injection of ripasudil and brimonidine and examine the association with AMPK activation. METHODS: Intravitreal administration was performed in the following groups: PBS, TNF, or TNF with ripasudil, with brimonidine, or with a combination of ripasudil and brimonidine. Axon numbers were counted to evaluate the effects against axon loss. Immunoblot analysis was performed to examine phosphorylated AMPK expression in optic nerves, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate the expression levels of p-AMPK and neurofilament in the optic nerve. RESULTS: Both ripasudil alone or brimonidine alone resulted in significant neuroprotection against TNF-induced axon loss. The combination of ripasudil and brimonidine showed additive protective effects. Combined ripasudil and brimonidine plus TNF significantly upregulated p-AMPK levels in the optic nerve compared with the TNF groups. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that p-AMPK is present in axons and enhanced by combination therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of ripasudil and brimonidine may have additive protective effects compared with single-agent treatment alone. These protective effects may be at least partially associated with AMPK activation.

Brimonidine Eye Drops within the Reach of Children: A Possible Foe.

Brimonidine, a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist used for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, has been shown to cause neurological side effects such as unresponsiveness, lethargy, hypoventilation, and stupor, mimicking opioid toxicity. We report one case of transient encephalopathy in a toddler, in whom accidental brimonidine toxicity was suspected and then confirmed by a toxicology study. The healthy 8-month-old girl was taken to the pediatric ER since she was drowsy and hypotonic with miosis. The computed tomography scan of her brain and toxicological workup of her blood and urine were negative. Starting from the fourth hour, the child progressively improved, and by the sixth hour, she recovered to a normal state of consciousness. A survey of available drugs within the child's reach showed the presence of brimonidine. Thus, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was applied to quantify the brimonidine in urine and plasma samples, showing levels of 8.40 ng/mL and 0.79 ng/mL, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report to determine brimonidine levels in urine and plasma using UPLC-MS/MS. Insufficient knowledge on the part of family members about the potential hazards of an apparently innocuous, topical medication such as eye drops may put children at a greater risk of poisoning. Necessary warnings should be given to parents with greater care when prescribing this medication.

Long-term intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination (RBFC), a new intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: This prospective, multicentre (23 sites in Japan), open-label study enrolled patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), OHT or exfoliative glaucoma and assigned them to one of four combination therapy cohorts, based on previous treatment(s) received: prostaglandin (PG) analogue (Cohort 1); PG analogue and beta-adrenoceptor blocker (ß-blocker) (Cohort 2); PG analogue, ß-blocker and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (Cohort 3); or other/no treatment (Cohort 4). After a ≥ 4-week screening period, eligible patients received twice-daily RBFC for 52 weeks in addition to the treatments they were already receiving. Efficacy was assessed by change in IOP from baseline through week 52. Adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored throughout. RESULTS: In total, 179 patients from Cohort 1 (n = 48), Cohort 2 (n = 44), Cohort 3 (n = 41) and Cohort 4 (n = 46) entered the RBFC treatment period. For all cohorts, mean IOP was significantly reduced at 11:00 (2 h after instillation of RBFC) through week 52 with the changes from baseline at week 52 of - 2.7 to - 4.1 mmHg across cohorts; all p < 0.001. Common ADRs were conjunctival hyperaemia (58%), allergic conjunctivitis (18%) and blepharitis (17%), most of which were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of RBFC, both alone and in combination with other anti-glaucoma agents. RBFC may offer a new treatment option for the long-term management of glaucoma and OHT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080225063. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 17 February 2020.

Uveal effusion syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: This case report is applicable to the field of ophthalmology because there is a paucity of medical literature related to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of uveal effusion syndrome. This is an urgent concern because there are severe complications associated with this disease, including non-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, angle closure glaucoma, and possible blindness. This report will fill clinical knowledge gaps using a patient example. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old white male with multiple cardiovascular risk factors initially presented to the Eye Institute Urgent Care Clinic with new onset visual symptoms, including eye pain, eye lid swelling, redness, and tearing of his left eye. He had experienced a foreign body sensation in the left eye and bilateral floaters weeks prior to his presentation. The patient was examined, and vision was 20/30 in both eyes, and intraocular pressure was 46 in the right eye and 36 in the left eye. After initial assessment, including compression gonioscopy, intermittent angle closure glaucoma was suspected. He received oral diamox 500 mg, one drop of alphagan in both eyes, one drop of latanoprost in both eyes, one drop of dorzolamide in both eyes, and one drop of 2% pilocarpine in both eyes. There was only slight response in intraocular pressure. Owing to the bilateral angle closure, he underwent laser peripheral iridotomy to decrease intraocular pressure and open the angle that was found closed on gonioscopy. The patient was discharged on oral and topical glaucoma drops and scheduled for the glaucoma clinic. When he presented for follow-up in the glaucoma clinic, he was evaluated and noted to have bilateral narrow angles and intraocular pressure in the mid-twenties. A brightness scan (B-scan) was performed and was noted to have bilateral choroidal effusions, confirmed by Optos fundus photos. He was started on prednisone at 60 mg once per day (QD) with taper, continuation of oral and topical glaucoma medications, and a retina evaluation. Evaluation with a retina specialist showed resolving choroidal effusion in the left eye. He continued the prednisone taper as well as glaucoma drops as prescribed. Follow-up in the glaucoma clinic revealed a grade 3 open angle. He continued the prednisone taper, cosopt twice per day in both eyes, and discontinued brimonidine. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was performed showed results that were remarkable. No hemorrhage or mass was present. Follow-up with the retina specialist found that the choroidal effusions had resolved completely. CONCLUSION: This case report emphasizes the value in early detection, keen diagnostic evaluation, and cross-collaboration between multiple ophthalmology specialists to optimize healthcare outcomes for patients with uveal effusion syndrome.

Nummular keratitis: A rare manifestation of brimonidine allergy.

A 32-year-old male, with juvenile open-angle glaucoma on chronic antiglaucoma therapy and recently introduced brimonidine eye drops to the treatment regimen, developed bilateral follicular conjunctivitis with subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) initially resembling common infectious keratoconjunctivitis entities. The persistent nature of the conjunctivitis, the lack of positive conjunctival cultures, the absence of systemic symptoms, the full resolution of the condition upon discontinuation of antiglaucoma drops, and the commencement of topical steroids, along with the reappearance of SEIs upon reintroducing brimonidine; suggested an immune-mediated drug reaction secondary to a Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.2% formulation. The interval between the initiation of brimonidine and the onset of the drug reaction was 13 months and shortened to 1 week upon re-exposure to the drug. The condition fully resolved without further sequelae off brimonidine. Brimonidine is notoriously known for causing ocular allergic reactions, the most common being follicular conjunctivitis, but very few reports exist describing its adverse effects on the cornea. This case highlights that brimonidine may directly or indirectly induce an immune reaction affecting the cornea in the form of SEIs. Brimonidine is, thus, capable of mimicking more commonly recognized infectious disease entities causing keratoconjunctivitis. This is the second report of a similar manifestation linked to its use.

Switching to Brimonidine/Ripasudil Fixed Combination from Brimonidine + Ripasudil.

Purpose: A fixed-combination eye drop has several advantages over combination therapy, however, the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of the newly available brimonidine + ripasudil fixed-combination (BRFC) eye drops after switching from brimonidine + ripasudil is yet to be established. Therefore, this study aimed to retrospectively investigate the 6-month safety, usability, and IOP-lowering efficacy of BRFC switched from brimonidine and ripasudil. Patients and Methods: Overall, 69 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (69 eyes) receiving brimonidine + ripasudil were enrolled in this study. Brimonidine + ripasudil was discontinued, and treatment was switched to BRFC without a washout period. The IOP was compared before and at 3 and 6 months after switching to BRFC. The side effects, discontinued cases, and usability (a questionnaire survey) were also investigated. Results: The IOP was not significantly different after switching to BRFC (15.1 ± 3.3 mmHg at baseline, 15.9 ± 3.6 mmHg after 3 months, and 14.6 ± 3.3 mmHg after 6 months). Adverse reactions occurred in four patients (5.8%): allergic conjunctivitis, two patients; irritation, one patient; and blurred vision, one patient. Treatment was discontinued in five (7.2%) patients owing to allergic conjunctivitis, two patients; increased IOP, two patients; and blurred vision, one patient. In the questionnaire survey, 68 patients with eye pain, 67 with itching, 64 with conjunctival hyperemia, 64 with irritation, and 62 with blurred vision reported no change or improved conditions. Additionally, in response to the question regarding preferences for pre-treatment and fixed combinations, 14 participants (20.2%) favored pre-treatment, while 53 (76.8%) preferred fixed combinations. Conclusion: The IOP was maintained for 6 months, with satisfactory safety and comfort of use, with BRFC switched from brimonidine and ripasudil.

Improvement of objective ocular redness measured with Keratograph 5M in glaucoma patients after instilling brimonidine drops.

OBJECTIVE: To compare objective ocular redness measured using OCULUS Keratograph 5 M before and after 0.2% brimonidine instillation in glaucoma patients under topical hypotensive treatment. METHODS: 60 eyes from 60 subjects diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension under hypotensive ocular topical treatment were analyzed. Basal Ophthalmological examination was performed.Outcome variables were OCULUS Keratograph 5 M redness scores (RS) before and after 0.2% brimonidine instillation; overall, bulbar temporal (BT), bulbar nasal (BN), limbar temporal (LT), and limbar nasal (LN); non-invasive average tear film breakup time (Nia-BUT), non-invasive first tear film breakup time (Nif-BUT) and meibography. In addition, the following clinical data were collected: intraocular pressure, type, duration, amount, and preservatives/or not of hypotensive treatment, fluorescein corneal staining score and lower tear meniscus height. RESULTS: All eyes were under topical medication. All redness scores were reduced after brimonidine instillation, mean RS differences were BT 0.82 ± 0.62, BN hyperemia 1.03 ± 0.55, LN hyperemia 0.84 ± 0.49, LT hyperemia 0.71 ± 0.50 and total hyperemia 0.91 ± 0.52 (all p < 0.001). 30 min after brimonidine instillation mean overall RS reduction was 47.97 ± 12.39% (p < 0.001) and after 1 h there was a persistent reduction of overall RS of 45.92 ± 14.27% (p < 0.001). Hyperemia reduction was significant and comparable between preservative and preservative-free group 0.12 ± 0.14 (p > 0.392) and between patient with combination therapy and monotherapy 0.16 ± 0.14 (p > 0.258). CONCLUSION: A significant reduction of conjunctival hyperemia was objectively found in glaucoma patients under topical hypotensive treatment before and after brimonidine instillation. Its fast and long-lasting effect may be useful preoperatively in glaucoma patients to reduce intraoperative bleeding and associated complications.