Factors improving the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: MRI-targeted biopsy improves detection of significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and grade prediction. The aim of this study was to identify factors improving the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsies (TB) in detecting csPCa. METHODS: Retrospective monocenter study of patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) and diagnosed by transrectal combined biopsies (CB) with elastic MRI/ultrasound fusion. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of standardized (SB), targeted (TB) and CB for csPCa, including sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve. Univariables and logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze factors improving the diagnostic performance of TB in detecting csPCa on final histopathology. RESULTS: Two hundred four men underwent RP after CB with suspicious lesions (PI-RADS≥3) on MRI were included. csPCa was significantly associated with prostate volume, PSA density, a lesion index in the peripheral zone, with a diameter ≥ 7mm. TB were positives for 174 patients (85.3%). Prostate volume, PSA density, radiological coherence, previous biopsies, and a number of biopsies ≥ 3 were significantly associated with a cancer detection. csPCa on TB, a prostate volume <60ml, an index lesion ≥ 7mm and a peripheral zone location were significant predictive factors for diagnostic of csPCa on final histopathology. Area under the ROC curve values, sensitivities and specificities of CB and TB (adjusted model) were 0.78 [0.72-0.84], 77.3 [70.3-83.4], 78.1 [60-90.7], and 0.85 [0.79-0.90], 83.7 [77.3-88.9] and 75 [56.6-88.5] respectively. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the benefit of CB and suggests that TB for a selected population could be as effective as CB.

Indication and perspectives of radiation therapy in the setting of de-novo metastatic prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality in men. Each year, approximately 10% of prostate cancers are diagnosed metastatic at initial presentation. The standard treatment option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy with novel hormonal agent or with chemotherapy. Recently, PEACE-1 trial highlighted the benefit of triplet therapy resulting in the combination of androgen deprivation therapy combined with docetaxel and abiraterone. Radiotherapy can be proposed in a curative intent or to treat local symptomatic disease. Nowadays, radiotherapy of the primary disease is only recommended for de novo low-burden/low-volume metastatic prostate cancer, as defined in the CHAARTED criteria. However, studies on stereotactic radiotherapy on oligometastases have shown that this therapeutic approach is feasible and well tolerated. Prospective research currently focuses on the benefit of intensification by combining treatment of the metastatic sites and the primary all together. The contribution of metabolic imaging to better define the target volumes and specify the oligometastatic character allows a better selection of patients. This article aims to define indications of radiotherapy and perspectives of this therapeutic option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer.

[Oncological and functional results of focal treatment of localized prostate cancer with HIFU]. / Résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels du traitement focal du cancer de prostate localisé par HIFU.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, improved diagnosis of prostate cancer has allowed the development of focal therapy, in order to reduce the morbidity of treatments. Our study assesses the medium-term oncological and functional results of FocalOne® HIFU treatment in localized prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentre study including patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with Focal one HIFU between November 2014 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was the retreatment rate and subgroup analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of retreatment. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients were included with a median follow-up of 25.5 months. Seventy percent of patients had clinical stage T2, 64% had an ISUP score of 2 or 3 on initial biopsies and 38% were treated with hemi-ablation. Follow-up biopsies were performed in 76.6% of patients during follow-up with 21.8% having clinically significant cancers. The retreatment rate at 24 months was 37.2%, with positive biopsies being the primary criterion for retreatment. Patients with a PSA>8ng/mL had a significantly higher retreatment rate. Finally, morbidity remained acceptable with 5.8% of patients requiring reoperation for complications and 21% for de novo erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our results are in agreement with those of the literature, seeming to indicate a lower morbidity of the focal treatment by HIFU compared to the radical treatments while offering an acceptable oncological control. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing.

[Relationship between doses to anatomical structures and erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review]. / Relations entre doses dans les structures anatomiques et dysfonction érectile après radiothérapie pour un cancer de la prostate : revue systématique de la littérature.

PURPOSE: During prostatic radiotherapy, damage to several anatomical structures could be the cause of erectile dysfunction: corpora cavernosa, internal pudendal arteries, penile bulb, and neurovascular bundles. Numerous studies have analysed the correlations between the dose received by these structures and erectile function. The objective of this article is to make a systematic review on current knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed in the Medline database using the search engine PubMed. Keywords for the search included: erectile dysfunction, penile bulb, corpora cavernosa, cavernosum, neurovascular bundles, radiation therapy, cancer, prostate cancer. The selected articles must study a correlation between erectile dysfunction and the dose received by anatomical structures. A total of 152 articles were identified. Of these 152 articles, 45 fulfilled the defined selection criteria. RESULTS: For corpora cavernosa, seven studies were identified, only two studies demonstrated a significant correlation between the dose received by corpora cavernosa and the occurrence of erectile dysfunction. For penile bulb, only 15 of 23 studies showed a correlation. A mean dose on the penile bulb greater than 20Gy was found to be predictive of erectile dysfunction. None of the eight trials concerning neurovascular bundles succeeded to show a correlation between dose and erectile dysfunction. Only one study evaluated the relationship between the dose received by internal pudendal arteries and erectile dysfunction but was found to be negative. However, vessels-sparing studies showed good results on erectile function preservation without compromising the target volume. CONCLUSION: We currently have little data to show a correlation between erectile dysfunction and sexual structures. It would be necessary to have additional prospective studies evaluating the impact of an optimization on these sexual structures on erectile dysfunction.

[Which non pharmacological interventions should be offered to patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer? A systematic review]. / Quelles interventions non médicamenteuses proposer aux patients traités par hormono-suppression pour un cancer de la prostate ? Revue systématique de la littérature.

AIM: Prostate cancer is a frequent disease and one of the main treatments used is androgen deprivation therapy, which is a therapy with disabling side effects. Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are evidenced based, non-invasive interventions on human health. They are classified into five categories (physical, psychological, nutritional, digital, elemental). The NPIs sphere is booming and still remains underused in this context. METHODS: A systematic review concerning randomized controlled trials was executed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We used the "Medline" and "Kalya Research" databases. After searching and selecting eligible publications, we included 37 randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: The majority of articles concerned physical NPIs with 30 clinical studies, 3 publications dealt with nutritional NPIs, 2 with psychological NPIs and 2 articles concerned elemental NPIs. No publication about digital NPI was found. All of the studies aimed to manage and improve the side effects of treatment. No elemental NPI has demonstrated benefit. Only one psychological NPI and one nutritional NPI were effective. Five types of physical NPI protocols have shown efficacy. The main benefits related to physical abilities, body composition, osteoporosis, quality of life, fatigue, reduced cardiovascular risk and finally anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: Non-pharmacological interventions, especially physical ones, are effective in managing and reducing the side effects associated with androgen deprivation therapy and should be offered to patients in this context.

Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the correlation of Gleason score (GS) and ISUP grade determined by prostate biopsies (PBx) and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens according to the biopsy technique: ultrasound randomised (RBx) vs. MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted (TBx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and June 2018, we retrospectively included patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer (PCa) histopathologically proven by RBx and/or TBx. All patients had a prebiopsy MRI by a single radiologist (using PI-RADS score), then transrectal RBx (12cores, blinded to MRI lesions) and TBx (2-4 cores/target) with elastic MRI/ultrasound fusion (UroStation™, Koelis, Grenoble, France). Histological findings were compared: PBx vs. RP. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients underwent RP after RBx and/or TBx. ISUP concordance rate was better with the association RBx+TBx 49% (51/104) vs. 43.3% with TBx (P=0.07) and 43.3% with RBx (P=0.13). With RBx, 50% of the patients were downgraded (52/104) against 42.3% (44/104) with TBx (P=0.088). The association RBx+TBx significantly decreased the rate of downgrading of the ISUP score compared to the ISUP score of RP 35.6% (37/104) vs. RBx (50%, P=0.0001) and vs. TBx (42.3%, P=0.016). CONCLUSION: In half of cases, the ISUP score was underestimated in RBx compared to RP specimens. Adding TBx to RBx significantly reduced downgrading. The combination of both biopsy techniques appeared to be the best protocol to get closer to ISUP score and GS of the RP specimens. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: C.

[Morbidity of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized cancer prostate]. / Morbidité du curage ganglionnaire pelvien étendu au cours de la prostatectomie totale laparoscopique robot assistée.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the morbidity specific of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a 8 year retrospective study. MATERIAL: We carried out a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective study on 342 consecutive patients who underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, from July 2010 to March 2018. Postoperative complications were recorded up to 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: Thirty (8.8%) patients had at least one complication related to lymphadenectomy including 1 vascular injury (0.3%), 7 injuries of the obturator nerve (2%), 5 venous thromboembolic complications (1.5%) including 4 pulmonary embolisms, 10 symptomatic lymphoceles (2.9%) and 8 lymphoedemas (2.3%). Of these complications, 13 were classified Clavien 1 (43.3%), 8 Clavien 2 (26.7%), 7 Clavien 3a (23.3%) and 2 Clavien 3b (6.7%). In univariate analysis a high age (P=0.04), high BMI (P<0.01) and pT stage (P=0.02) were significantly associated with complication whereas in multivariate analysis, only age (P=0.02) and BMI (P<0.01) lived were. In univariate analysis high BMI (P=0.04) and lymph node involvement (P=0.04) were associated with lymphatic complication. We did not find any other specific risk factor for the other complications. CONCLUSION: With 8.8% of overall complications related to lymphadenectomy and 5% of complication classified Clavien grade 2 or higher, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy was not very morbid. Age and BMI were risk factors for a overall complication. BMI and lymph node involvement were risk factors for lymphatic complications. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Prostate cancer, androgen deprivation, and risk of COVID-19 infection : A systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Cancer de Prostate, déprivation androgénique, et risques d'infection par la COVID-19 : revue systématique et méta-analyse.

INTRODUCTION: Male gender has been shown to be a risk factor for COVID-19 infection, and men are more likely to develop severe disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on the incidence of infection and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed after searching PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.org databases, between January 2020 and March 2022. Analyses were interpreted through forest plots for the following parameters: risk of infection, hospitalization, intensive care admission, and SARS-CoV-2-related death, with random or fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review and ten in the meta-analysis. Seven studies evaluated risk of infection in patients on ADT: OR=1.11 (95 % IC : [0.48-2.58] ; P=0.81). Six studies evaluated the risk of hospitalization in patients on ADT: TDA : OR=1.58 (95 % IC : [0.94-2.64] ; P=0.08). Seven studies evaluated risk of ICU admission in patients on ADT: OR=0.90 (95 % IC : [0.71-1.13] ; P=0.37). Nine studies evaluated mortality risk in patients on ADT: OR=1.07 (95 % IC : [0.61-1.87] ; P=0.82). CONCLUSION: ADT does not protect against SARS-CoV-2 in prostate cancer patients, nor does it protect against hospitalization, ICU admission, or mortality. These results remain questionable given the retrospective nature of the majority of studies included in our meta-analysis.

Biochemical relapse predictive factors in patients with lymph node metastases during radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: There are no clear recommendations for the management of patients with lymph node invasion discovered during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). Adequate risk stratification could personalize post-surgical adjuvant treatment. Our objective was to identify predictive factors for biochemical relapse (BCR) in patients with lymph node (LN) invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy(RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RP for high-risk PCa with LN invasion in two academic centres between 2008 and 2019 were included. Patients with metastatic disease or extrapelvic LN involvement were excluded. Following data were collected retrospectively: age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, clinical and pathological stage, number of metastatic LN and LN density. Outcome was BCR during follow-up. BCR-free survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and its association with relevant variables was determined with log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Median (IQR) age, PSA and follow-up were 64.5 years (55-78), 9.2ng/mL (4.4-20) and 16.1 months (6-27.5), respectively. Twenty patients (77%) had BCR after surgery, accounting for 24-month BCR-free survival of 65%. Patients with LN density > 15% had better survival rates than those with ≤ 15% (40% vs. 0%, respectively, at 24 months; P=0.06) without reaching significance. Cox proportional Hazards analysis could not evidence predictive factors of BCR free-survival. CONCLUSIONS: LN density seemed associated with BCR-free survival within patients with high-risk PCa and positive LN at RP. However, extraprostatic extension, number of positive LN and positive surgical margins were not independent risk factors for BCR. Larger prospective studies with centralized pathological reviews are needed. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Comparison of systematic, targeted and combined prostate biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI lesion]. / Comparaison des biopsies de prostate systématiques, ciblées et combinées pour le diagnostic de cancer de prostate en cas de lésion à l'IRM.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study is to compare the performance of systematic, targeted and combined biopsies in the same cohort for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included patients coming for first series of prostate biopsies, from January 2016 to May 2020, with at least one PI-RADS lesion ≥3 on MRI. All patients underwent 12 systematic biopsies, combined with at least 2 biopsies per target lesion, using the MRI/3D ultrasound fusion system Urostation® (Koelis). RESULTS: We included 234 patients. Combined biopsies allowed a better detection rate of csCaP (59.4%) compared to systematic biopsies (55.6%, P=0.01) and targeted biopsies alone (44.4%, P<0.001). The same is true for the overall prostate cancer (CaP) rate: 65.4% for the combined biopsies versus 61.1% for the systematic biopsies (P=0.002) and 49.1% for the targeted biopsies (P<0.001). The detection rates of clinically non-significant prostate cancer (ncsCaP) were similar (6% vs. 5.6% vs. 4.7% for combined, systematic and targeted biopsies respectively). Targeted biopsies found 10 (4.3%) CaP undiagnosed by systematic biopsies including 6 (2.6%) csCaP, and an upgraded ISUP score for 17 (7.3%) patients. Systematic biopsies found 38 (16.2%) CaP undiagnosed by targeted biopsies including 33 (14.1%) csCaP, and allowed an upgraded ISUP score for 19 (8.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: Combined biopsies provide the best detection rate for csCaP in our study.

[Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer]. / Impact des marges chirurgicales positives après prostatectomie radicale chez les patients atteints d'un cancer de la prostate localisé pT2.

INTRODUCTION: Few data are available regarding positive surgical margins (PSM) in patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer (PC). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of PSM on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) for patients who underwent PC for pT2 tumor without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We included each patient who underwent radical prostatectomy for pT2N0 PC between 1988 and 2018. Primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BR). BRFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors associated with BR and PSM. RESULTS: Overall, 2429 patients were included whom 420 patients had PSM (17.3%). Median follow-up was 116 months. BRFS at 10 years was 66.6% in case of PSM, and 84% in the negative margins group (P<0.0001). Parameters associated with BR were preoperative PSA level (P<0.0001), Gleason score (P<0.0001), tumor volume in biopsies, and margins length (P<0.04). CONCLUSION: PSM in pT2N0 CP are associated with poor prognosis in terms of BR. Nevertheless, only a small number of pT2R1 cancer will present biological recurrence. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients therefore represents a risk of overtreatment, with the risk of adverse effects inherent to irradiation. Clinical and biological monitoring in case of PSM seems acceptable.

[Radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason 6 (ISUP 1) prostate cancer: 10-year follow-up]. / Recul à 10 ans des patients opérés pour un cancer de prostate Gleason 6 (ISUP1).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate extraprostatic extension and 10 years cancer specific survival in a population of patients with Gleason 6 (ISUP 1) prostate cancer (PCa) treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) in two French third referral centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data were extracted from 2 university hospital databases according to the following criteria: PCa classified ISUP 1 following both biopsy (PB) and surgery (RP) between 1998 and 2008. Pathology slides of patients having presented an extraprostatic extension and/or a recurrence were reviewed by a uropathologist. RESULTS: Among the 534 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 66 (12.2%) had a pT3 stage. One patient out of 198 who received lymph node dissection had a positive node. Median follow-up was 10.3 years. Only one patient presented with metastatic progression. No cancer specific death was observed. An independent pathologist reviewed the slides of 58 out of the 70 patients who presented pT3 disease and/or a recurrence (in 12 cases, pathological material was not available). After review, all pT3b stages and 12 pT3a (out of 14) were upgraded to ISUP2 or higher. Similarly, the patient with a positive node and the patient who progressed towards a metastatic disease were both upgraded to ISUP 3. CONCLUSION: No pT3b or pN+stage was associated with ISUP 1 PCa in our study. With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, biological progression was the only type of progression observed.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: Making the punishment fit the crime.

BACKGROUND: Focal therapy is recently gaining popularity as an intermediate option between active surveillance and whole-gland treatment for localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: This comprehensive review aims to present the different focal therapy technologies available to date while tackling the rationale for focal treatment, its indications, principles and outcomes of each technique. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was done. Keywords used for research were: "prostate cancer"; "focal therapy"; "focal treatment"; "High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound"; "cryotherapy"; "photodynamic therapy"; "focal laser ablation"; "irreversible electroporation"; "focal brachytherapy" and "gold nanoparticle directed therapy". Accepted languages were English and French. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Choosing the best candidate for focal therapy is crucial (localized small to medium sized Gleason≤7 lesions). Focal high-intensity focal ultrasound has shown excellent survival rates at 5 years, while maintaining good functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function). Focal cryotherapy, one of the oldest focal treatments for prostate cancer, has shown good oncologic outcomes, with good continence rates and fair erectile function rates. Focal laser ablation seems a safe and feasible technique, with promising results. Irreversible electroporation has demonstrated good survival outcomes with no biochemical recurrence or disease relapse in the preliminary studies. Focal brachytherapy has a good toxicity profile, a good biochemical outcome, and gives a sustained quality of life. Finally, gold nanoparticle directed therapy is safe and is being studied in current trials. CONCLUSION: While proven to be safe in terms of continence and sexual aspects, the challenge remains to better assess oncological outcomes of these techniques in randomized longer follow-up studies.

[Place of molecular imaging in the management of prostate cancer]. / Place de l'imagerie moléculaire dans la prise en charge du cancer de la prostate.

In the management of prostate cancer in recent years, innovative therapies have appeared requiring precise and reliable disease detection. In 2021, new generation imaging (PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, PET/MRI) have their place at all stages of the prostate cancer natural history to help target the lesion(s) and guide therapy and improve the results obtained. PSMA PET/CT is currently the leader in this type of imaging with a complete offer during the disease: both from diagnosis, to recurrence or in the oligo-metastatic and metastatic stage resistant to castration with a pivotal role in the PSMA theranostic approach. However, multiparametric MRI also has many detection advantages when the prostate is left in place, which suggests the potential major benefit of hybrid PSMA PET/MRI imaging.

[High-intensity focused ultrasound for locally prostate cancer: An Afro-Caribbean single-center study]. / Ultrasons focalisés de haute intensité pour le traitement du cancer localisé de la prostate : étude mono-centrique caribéenne.

INTRODUCTION: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has proved to be effective in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The aim of this prospective study is to assess their first oncological and functional results in an Afro-Caribbean population. METHODS: From May 2018 to January 2020, 77 patients issued from French West Indies were included. Several treatments were carried out: whole-gland treatment hemi or focal ablation; in a primary setting (group I) or a salvage therapy (group II). PSA level was assessed at 2, 6, 9 and 12 months. MpMRI and post HIFU biopsy were performed between 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Continence, urinary end erectile functions were assessed by ICS, IPSS and IIEF scores. RESULTS: Groupe I included 71.2% patients, group II, 28.8%. The median age was 75.4 years [IQR 69.6-79.4]. The median follow-up was 8.3 months [IQR 3.5-12.25]. At inclusion, PSA was 7.7ng/ml [IQR 5.5-11.2] in group I, and 5.9ng/ml [IQR 4.4-7.9] in group II. In the whole population, there was 73.5% negative biopsies; 14.7% of the biopsies were positive in treated zone and 11.8% in non-treated zone. Regarding morbidities, urinary incontinence appeared in 7.5% and erectile dysfunction rate was 13.2%. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals the first experience of HIFU by Focal One® device in an Afro-Caribbean population. It seems to be a safe and reproducible treatment with acceptable oncological results and low genitourinary morbidity. Long term follow-up and a higher number of patients are necessary to validate these results.

[Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer prognosis]. / Impact carcinologique des marges positives après prostatectomie totale.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer on oncological results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a study where all patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2004 and December 2018 for prostate cancer were included. The preoperative, postoperative data and the carcinological results collected were analyzed. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients with a median age of 65 years (IQR : 62-69) were included. The median follow-up was 43.6 months (IQR: 19.4-79.3). The overall rate of PSM was 33.5%. PSM was associated with biochemical recurrence (P<0.001). Overall mortality was not associated with positive margins. A clinical stage> T1c was an independent predictor of PSM on multivariate analysis (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: PSM would increase the risk of biochemical recurrence with no impact on survival. Clinical stage>T1c was an adverse predictor for PSM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Should we perform systematic biopsies in case of suspicious MRI for prostate cancer in 2020? A review of literature.

CONTEXT: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now recommended before performing prostate biopsies, looking for suspicious lesions to perform targeted biopsies (TB). However, the association or exclusive performance of systematic biopsies (SB), criticized for its morbidity and for the detection of insignificant cancers, remains debated. OBJECTIVE: To perform a literature review to answer three questions: (1) In the presence of a suspicious MRI lesion, should we always perform SB in addition to TB? (2) Can we avoid SB when considering focal treatment? (3) Is there an increase in adverse events when associating SB with TB? SOURCES: A non-systematic literature review was carried out on Medline in April 2020 using the keywords "MRI", "PROSTATE CANCER", "SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY", "TARGETED BIOPSY", "ADVERSE EVENTS". The references of the selected articles were analyzed for additional articles. Selection of Studies published in the last five years were analyzed and retained if the available data made it possible to answer one of the three questions asked. RESULTS: In biopsy-naive patients, the added value of SB to TB for detection of significative cancer varied from +5 to+7% and was reduced to +1 to +3% in the case of a previous series of negative biopsies. For patients under active surveillance, this added value was higher, ranging from +8% to +17%. MRI has a negative predictive value of 85 to 95%, but this value drops to 55% for the detection of secondary or tertiary foci. The use of SB is necessary if focal treatment is considered. Serious complications from biopsies requiring hospitalization range from 1.4 to 6.9% and are increased by the number of previous biopsy series performed more than by the number of biopsies per series. CONCLUSION: In the presence of a suspicious MRI lesion, SB is indicated in addition to TB but can be discussed in patients with previous negative biopsies. They are necessary if focal treatment is considered to aid surgical planning. Severe complications from biopsies do not seem to increase when SB are associated to TB, but rather with the number of biopsy series performed.

[Active surveillance of prostate cancer: treatement-free survival according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria]. / Surveillance active du cancer de prostate : survie sans traitement curatif selon critères d'éligibilité stricts ou élargis.

AIM: Overtreatment is an actual problem in low risk localized prostate cancer (PC) management. Active surveillance (AS) is a solution to limit this problem, but eligibility criteria remained discussed. The aim was to assess possibilities of widening selection criteria for patient in AS, studying curative treatment free survival (CTFS) according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients beginning AS between 2008 and 2014, for Gleason 6 localized PC, PSA<15ng/ml,