Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheterization may be required in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) for parenteral nutrition, antibiotic treatment, or blood sampling. Different venous access devices can be taken into consideration-centrally inserted central catheters (CICC), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), and femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs)-depending on the clinical conditions of the patients. Regardless of the type of access, the presence of paraplegia or tetraplegia is commonly considered a risk factor for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT). METHOD: This retrospective study analyzes the rate of CRT and other non-infectious complications associated with central venous access in a cohort of 115 patients with paraplegia or tetraplegia, most of them affected by ALS (n = 109). RESULTS: In a period of 34 months, from January 2021 to October 2023, we inserted 75 FICCs, 29 CICCs, and 11 PICCs. PICCs were inserted only in patients with preserved motility of the upper limbs. All devices were inserted by trained operators adopting appropriate insertion bundles. We had no immediate or early complication. Though antithrombotic prophylaxis was adopted only in 61.7% of patients, we had no symptomatic CRT. Other non-infectious complications were infrequent (4 out of 115 patients). CONCLUSION: These results suggest (a) that the presence of paraplegia or tetraplegia is not necessarily associated with an increased risk of CRT, (b) that the adoption of well-designed insertion bundles plays a key role in minimizing non-infectious complications, and (c) that the insertion of FICCs by direct cannulation of the superficial femoral vein at mid-thigh in paraplegic/tetraplegic patients may have the same advantages which have been described in the general population.

Incidence of fatal and non-fatal pulmonary thromboembolism after removal of tunnelled central venous haemodialysis catheters without ultrasound scan and anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter related thrombosis is a common complication of tunnelled central venous catheter (TCVC) usage. There are concerns that TCVC removal could dislodge a thrombus to cause pulmonary thromboembolism (PE). The incidence of PE following TCVC removal is unclear and so the aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of PE and whether it is high enough to warrant screening with ultrasound with a view to systemic anticoagulation prior to TCVC removal. METHODS: 1102 consecutive TCVC removals without ultrasound and systemic anticoagulation were included in this retrospective study. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Measures to identify PE events included: deaths, computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CT-PA), isotope lung perfusion scans and D-dimers blood tests within 7 days of removal. RESULTS: Of the 1102 TCVC removals, the mean age of patients was 56.9 years and 57.3% were male. The primary renal diagnosis for 24.5% of patients was diabetic nephropathy. There were seven deaths following removal, none of which had PE as a contributing cause on review of their clinical history and death certificates. Five CT-PAs and one isotope lung perfusion scan were carried out in the 7 days after TCVC removal and none had a positive finding of PE. Three patient had D-dimers measured in blood within 7 days and none of these patients were subsequently diagnosed with PE. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of fatal or non-fatal PE's occurring in the 7 days following TCVC removal. This would support the practice of removing TCVCs without the need for ultrasound screening and without a period of systemic anticoagulation.

An audit of central venous catheter insertion and management practices in two French university hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance with French guidelines for the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections in two university hospitals. METHODS: An observational audit was conducted in 7 wards using a digital tool. RESULTS: The prerequisite of hand hygiene (HH) were respected by 90% of health-care worker; 86% performed HH prior to equipment preparation and 59% repeated it prior to infusion. Wearing gloves when necessary and rinsing were respected in 46.7% and 75.6% of the observations. CONCLUSION: Findings showed an acceptable level of adherence to recommended practices for CVC management. However, barriers of unrespect evidence-based recommendations need to be investigated in depth.

A new dynamic in vitro model for evaluating antimicrobial activity against bacterial biofilms on central venous catheters.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used for intravenous medication administration. However, biofilm formation along the catheter surface is the main most important cause of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Nowadays, several antimicrobial-coated catheters are available to prevent biofilm development. In this study, we introduced a new dynamic in vitro model to evaluate the antimicrobial activity against bacterial biofilms on CVCs. Rifampicin-minocycline-coated catheters and control catheters without antimicrobial component were assembled into the model to test the antimicrobial activity on external surface and internal surface. After 1 h irrigation of Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus preculture and 23 h irrigation of Trypticase Soy Broth, the viable adherent organism was collected and counted. The enumeration results showed that the number of bacteria attached to antibacterial catheter was significantly less than that of the control catheter, both on external surface (P < 0.05) and internal surface (P < 0.05). The results were further confirmed by the scanning electron microscopy. In conclusion, the dynamic in vitro model can be applied to evaluate the antimicrobial activity against bacterial biofilms grown on the external and internal surfaces of CVCs used in clinical practice.IMPORTANCEFor the first time, a new dynamic in vitro model was constructed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity against bacterial biofilms on central venous catheters (CVCs) on both external surface and internal surface. This model could be applied to evaluate the antimicrobial activity against bacterial biofilms not only on CVCs but also other types of catheters.

Evaluating Short-Term Outcomes of Tunneled and Non-Tunneled Central Venous Catheters in Hemodialysis.

Background: The necessity of using central venous catheters (CVCs) in hemodialysis, coupled with their associated complications, remains a critical concern in nephrology. This study aims to compare the short-term prognosis of tunneled (T-CVC) and non-tunneled (NT-CVC) CVCs in acute hemodialysis patients, specifically focusing on infection rates, malpositioning, and lumen thrombosis within the first three weeks post-insertion. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 176 CVCs placed between January and December 2023 at the Policlinico di Modena and the Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara. Patient demographics, CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and comorbid conditions were recorded at the time of catheter placement. Outcomes assessed included catheter-related infections, malpositioning, and lumen thrombosis. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were performed to evaluate differences between T-CVCs and NT-CVCs. Results: The sample comprised 43% females with a mean age of 69.3 years (SD 13.9) and a mean CHADS-VASC score of 3.72 (SD 1.4). Hypertension (90%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. Of the 176 CVCs, 127 were T-CVCs and 49 were NT-CVCs. Infection rates were 3.15% for T-CVCs and 8.16% for NT-CVCs (p = 0.07). Malpositioning occurred in 0.79% of T-CVCs and 4.08% of NT-CVCs (p = 0.47). There was one case of lumen thrombosis in the NT-CVC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a significant divergence in infection-related catheter survival favoring T-CVCs after ten days (p = 0.034). Conclusions: While non-tunneled CVCs do not significantly alter short-term prognosis compared to tunneled CVCs, the latter show a better infection-related survival rate beyond ten days. Therefore, primary insertion of T-CVCs may be preferable when resources and clinical conditions permit, although NT-CVCs remain a viable option when immediate T-CVC insertion is challenging.

An ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for tunneled central venous catheter insertion can be safely performed by junior residents.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular catheterization (UGSC) of the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) for long-term tunneled central venous catheter (tCVC) insertion may be safer than the internal jugular vein approach due to its superior field of view. We examined the clinical outcomes of tCVC insertions performed by junior residents through UGSC of the BCV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2023, we assessed clinical outcomes and compared the experience levels of surgeons conducting tCVC insertions. Surgeons were categorized into three groups: junior residency (JR), senior residency (SR), and board-certified pediatric surgeons (BCPS). RESULTS: 177 tCVC insertions were done on 146 patients. Intraoperative complications included 6 cases of arterial puncture, 1 case of pneumothorax, 1 case of over insertion of catheter tip, and 1 case of suspected hemothorax. Distribution across groups was as follows: 28 cases (15.8%) in JR group, 92 (52.0%) in SR group, and 57 (32.2%) in BCPS group. Although the JR group exhibited longer operation times than the BCPS group, no significant differences in intraoperative complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Junior residents can safely perform UGSC for tCVC insertion. However, careful consideration of complications such as arterial or thoracic puncture is essential and case selection should be based on experience.

Current surgical practice for central venous access to deliver chemotherapy and enteral access for nutritional support in pediatric patients with an oncological diagnosis.

Central venous access through tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) are one of the cornerstones of modern oncologic practice in pediatric patients since CVCs provide a reliable access route for the administration of chemotherapy. Establishing best practices for CVC management in children with cancer is essential to optimize care. This article reviews current best practices, including types of devices, their placement, complications, and long-term outcomes. Additionally, nutrition status and nutritional support are also very important determinants of outcomes and care in pediatric surgical oncology patients. We review current nutritional assessment, support, access for enteral and parenteral nutrition delivery, and their complications, mainly from a surgical perspective. Overall, access surgery, whether for CVCs, or for enteral access can be challenging, and best practice guidelines supported by current though limited evidence are necessary to minimize complications and optimize outcomes.

Central Venous Catheter Misplacement Into Pleural Cavity Causing Hypertensive Pleural Effusion: A Case Report.

Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a routine procedure in the management of critically ill patients. We report a clinical case of inadvertent placement of an internal jugular vein CVC into the right pleural cavity, despite employing clinical and imaging-based techniques to ensure proper catheter positioning. Infusion of fluids and vasopressors through this misplaced catheter led to hypertensive pleural effusion and subsequent cardiorespiratory arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after two cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. While multiple imaging modalities are recommended for confirming appropriate CVC placement, each method has inherent limitations. This case highlights the imperative need for a high index of suspicion to avert such complications and pretends to review some of each method's limitations.

Rare Central Venous Catheter Malpositions: A Case Series.

Central venous catheters are a procedure that provides vascular access, allowing the application of various clinical treatments and the measurement of some hemodynamic values. It provides access to the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein, and, femoral vein with a large-bore catheter. There are mechanical, infectious, and thromboembolic complications resulting from central venous catheter placement and care. Central venous catheter malposition is a rare catheter complication that may be encountered. The location of the central venous catheter can be evaluated with imaging techniques such as posteroanterior chest radiograph, ultrasonography, central venous catheter waveform, and transesophageal echocardiography. Five malposition cases detected by imaging after the central venous catheter procedure in our clinic are presented.

Subclavian line infiltration causing neck compartment syndrome and bradycardic arrest: A case report.

Unrecognized central venous catheter (CVC) infiltration is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication. For instance, a malpositioned subclavian line can infuse into the mediastinum, pleural cavity, or interstitial space of the neck. We present the case of a 30-year-old male with gunshot wounds to the right chest, resuscitated with an initially functional left subclavian CVC, which later infiltrated into the neck causing compression of the carotid sinus and consequent bradycardic arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved following intravenous epinephrine, cardiac massage, and emergency neck exploration and cervical fasciotomy. Our case highlights the importance of frequent reassessment of lines, especially those placed during fast-paced, high-intensity clinical situations. We recommend being mindful when using rapid transfusion devices as an interstitial catheter may not mount enough back pressure to trigger the system's alarm before significant tissue damage or compartment syndrome occurs.

Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison between PICC and PICC-port.

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and new type of arm-port, the PICC-port, are currently used for neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment in patients with breast cancer. We aimed to compare Quality of Life (QoL) of patients receiving one of these two devices investigating overall satisfaction, psychological impact, as well as the impact on professional, social and sport activities, and local discomfort. METHODS: We did a prospective observational before-after study of PICCs versus PICC-ports. Adult (aged ≥ 18 years) females with breast cancer candidate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. The primary outcome was QoL according to the Quality-of-Life Assessment Venous Device Catheters (QLAVD) questionnaire assessed 12 months after device implantation. RESULTS: Between May 2019 and November 2020, of 278 individuals screened for eligibility, 210 were enrolled. PICC-ports were preferred over PICCs with a QLAVD score of 29 [25; 32] vs 31 [26; 36.5] (p = 0.014). Specifically, most QLAVD constructs related to psychological impact, social aspects, and discomfort were in favor of PICC-ports vs PICC, especially in women under the age of 60. Overall, pain scores at insertion and during therapy administration were not significantly different between the two groups, as well as infection, secondary malpositioning, thrombosis, or obstruction of the device. CONCLUSIONS: In women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, PICC-ports were overall better accepted than PICCs in terms of QoL, especially in those who were younger. Device-related complications were similar.

Feasibility of a new ultrasound guided procedure to ensure the correct position of the central venous catheter tip.

BACKGROUND: Safety of central venous catheter (CVC) placement relies on some general aspects, including selection of the right vessel, correct lumen targeting while inserting the needle, check the position of catheter tip, and post-procedure check for complications. All these four points can be guided by bedside ultrasound, but the best technique to ensure the position of the CVC tip is still uncertain. METHODS: We investigated feasibility of a novel ultrasound technique consisting of focused view of guidewire tip in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) to calculate the CVC depth in adult patients needing CVC placement in emergency. Direct visualization of the guidewire in the CAJ was used to calculate how deep the CVC needed to be inserted. In those patients without a valid CAJ window, a bubble test in the right atrium was performed to position the CVC tip. In all cases chest radiography confirmed the CVC position. RESULTS: The procedure was performed in 37 patients and CVC was correctly placed in all cases. Within the group, in 25 patients the CVC depth (21.5 ± 6.0 cm) was successfully measured. In other 11 patients the correct CVC tip position was confirmed by the bubble test. In only one case it was not possible to use ultrasound for incomplete CAJ and right atrium views. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a new ultrasound method to ensure the correct CVC tip position. This protocol could potentially become a standard method reducing costs, post-procedural irradiation, and time of CVC placement in emergency.

Randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments: a scoping review protocol.

BACKGROUND: The significance of vascular access devices for patients in the emergency department (ED) is undeniable. When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) stand out as the most reliable sources of evidence compared with other study designs. AIM: To explore and synthesise the findings from RCTs related to vascular access devices in the ED setting. METHODS: A systematic search will be conducted in electronic medical databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, CINAHL and Embase databases. All RCTs focusing on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters and intraosseous catheters, published in English and Chinese in peer-reviewed journals within the past decade, will be included. CONCLUSION: This scoping review will summarise the current state of evidence for vascular access devices in the ED setting. This will identify gaps in the literature and, in turn, assist clinicians and researchers in pinpointing areas for future exploration and provide a valuable guide for future research.

A case report of cardiac tamponade after a road accident: think beyond trauma.

Background: Cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening compression of the heart caused by the accumulation of fluid in the pericardial sac. Although central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern medicine, they carry a certain risk of complications including cardiac tamponade. Case summary: A 12-year-old female was involved in a road accident reporting multiple severe traumatic injuries, including a left humerus fracture and subdural haemorrhage. After 2 days in the intensive care unit, she suddenly developed hypotension and cardiac tamponade was diagnosed. Analysis of the pericardial fluid showed high glucose levels comparable to the parenteral nutrition that she was receiving. Retraction of the CVC allowed resolution of the effusion. Discussion: Cardiac tamponade is a rare but serious adverse event after CVC insertion, mostly among younger patients. Awareness of this risk allows physicians to promptly recognize and treat this dangerous complication.

The use of peripheral vasopressors and its implications for hospital medicine.

Vasopressor medications for circulatory shock have historically been administered through central venous catheters due to concern for extravasation injury when given peripherally. However, recent studies have demonstrated the safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications at lower doses and for a limited duration. Peripheral use of vasopressors is appealing to both patients and providers, as obtaining central access is an invasive procedure associated with the risk of pneumothorax, bleeding, and infection. Furthermore, waiting to initiate these medications until central access is obtained can lead to delays in care. Conversely, valid concerns remain regarding the risk of tissue extravasation associated with peripheral vasopressors, which can be life and limb threatening. We discuss the guidelines and data for optimal dose, duration, intravenous line (IV) size, IV location, and nursing IV site monitoring for peripheral vasopressors. We then explore adverse events associated with peripheral vasopressors. Finally, we describe how this practice change may impact hospital medicine providers.

Implementation frameworks, strategies and outcomes in optimizing central venous access device practice in paediatrics: A scoping review.

Paediatric patients with complex or acute conditions may require a central venous access device, however, almost one-third of these devices have associated complications (e.g. infections). Implementation of evidence-based practices regarding central venous access devices can reduce and potentially prevent complications. AIMS: This scoping review aimed to explore recent interventional research in CVAD management through an implementation lens. DESIGN: This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Studies were included if they were written in English, published in 2012 to July 2023, involved children and were relevant to the study aims. Risk of bias was appraised by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. DATA SOURCES: Searches were undertaken in EMBASE, CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). RESULTS: Of the 1769 studies identified in a systematic search, 46 studies were included. Studies mostly focused on health professionals and central venous access device maintenance and had quantitative pre-post study designs. Adherence to implementation frameworks was lacking, with many studies employing quality improvement approaches. Implementation strategies were typically multipronged, using health-professional education, bundles and working groups. Bundle compliance and reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infections were the most featured outcomes, with most studies primarily focusing on effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSION: Translation of evidence-based practices to the clinical setting is difficult and current adoption of implementation frameworks (apart from 'quality improvement') is limited. Implementation strategies are diverse and dependent on the local context, and study outcomes typically focus on the effectiveness of the physical intervention, rather than measuring the implementation effort itself. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENTS: Future intervention research requires a more uniform and deliberate application of implementation frameworks and strategies. IMPACT: Greater exploration of relationships between frameworks and strategies and implementation and service outcomes is required to increase understanding of their role in maximizing resources to improve health care. Adhered to best reporting guidelines as per PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Removal of fractured peripherally inserted central venous catheter in the leg of a neonate.

An infant with a corrected gestational age of 38 weeks, weighing 3.1 kg, was referred to our pediatric surgical department because of a fractured peripherally inserted central venous catheter in the left lower limb with the end retracting into the deep venous system. An operation was undertaken to remove the PICC. Because the central venous catheter was, unintentionally, placed in the left small saphenous vein and thus positioned in the left femoral vein, the left great saphenous vein was incised to gain access. Subsequently, the catheter could be removed successfully. Fracturing of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter is a rare occurance. Removal depends on vessel size, location and experertise.