Development and validation of the BMQ-AIR©: a screening tool for assessing patients' treatment beliefs about switching to anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy.

Introduction: Despite anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy now being the preferred treatment choice across all severities of asthma, many patients are still "attached" to their short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) reliever, believing this to be the best way to control their asthma. To encourage individuals to switch to AIR, it is important to first identify the beliefs that patients hold about AIR. Objective: The aim of this paper was to describe the initial development and validation of the BMQ-AIR©, a six-item screening tool which assesses and identifies patients' treatment beliefs about switching to AIR therapy. Methods: Statements were identified from the primary literature that assessed patients' perceptions of AIR therapy and adapted from the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Internal reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing scores on BMQ-AIR© with a validated measure of medication adherence and SABA beliefs. Results: A total of 446 participants completed the online survey. The BMQ-AIR© contained two subscales with three items each. Both the Necessity and Concerns subscales demonstrated good internal reliability, with Cronbach's α-values of 0.70 and 0.69, respectively. Both subscales were negatively correlated with self-report inhaled corticosteroid adherence (Necessity: r = -0.28, p < 0.0001; Concerns: r = -0.28, p < 0.0001) and positively correlated with SRQ scores (Necessity: r = 0.51, p < 0.0001; Concerns: r = 0.44, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate that BMQ-AIR© demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity. BMQ-AIR© is a promising tool that may help tailor interventions to an individual's specific beliefs and barriers to switching to better support individuals in stopping SABA and initiating AIR therapy.

The effect of hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone on duration of shock: A propensity score-weighted analysis.

Background: The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend the use of hydrocortisone in patients who remain hemodynamically unstable despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. Fludrocortisone has been used concomitantly with hydrocortisone in some studies without a clearly defined role or known clinical benefit. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of fludrocortisone added to hydrocortisone on shock-free days for septic shock. Methods: A single-center, retrospective propensity score-weighted study was conducted to compare hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for septic shock. Adults admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) from 2015 to 2020 were included in the study. All patients received ≥200 mg/day hydrocortisone for at least 24 h ± fludrocortisone initiated within 72 h of vasopressors. The primary outcome was shock-free days by day 14. The secondary outcomes included duration of shock, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, hospital and ICU length of stay, and all-cause inhospital mortality. Results: A total of 228 patients met inclusion criteria with 212 patients retained after propensity score weighting. There was no difference between groups in 14-day shock-free days (6.3 vs. 6.1 days; P = 0.781). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed for the secondary outcomes of ICU/hospital length of stay, duration of shock, change in SOFA score, and all-cause inhospital mortality. Conclusion: The addition of fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone in septic shock did not increase shock-free days by day 14. These results suggest that the use of hydrocortisone alone may be an adequate adjunctive therapy in septic shock. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm results.

Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Addressing hypertrophic scars and keloids poses a significant challenge in the realm of preventive and curative medicine. Combination corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is presumed to enhance the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, although supportive evidence is lacking. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety profile of a combined corticosteroid and 5-FU regimen in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted for pertinent studies across various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Medline. The calculation of weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratios (RR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was executed. Additionally, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to evaluate potential bias risks. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were involved. The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment and the effectiveness based on observer assessment were significantly higher in the corticosteroid+5-FU group compared to those treated with control. A meta-analysis of scar height showed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group performed better than the control group (WMD = -0.38, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.18). There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid+5-FU group and the control group in improving scar vascularity, pliability and pigmentation. The result revealed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group of patients had less adverse effect of hypopigmentation, skin atrophy and telangiectasia than the control group. CONCLUSION: The combined use of corticosteroids and 5-FU appears to be a more effective strategy for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids, as evidenced by greater improvements in scar height and overall effectiveness, coupled with a reduced incidence of side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Local ozone injection compared to local glucocorticoid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of local ozone (O3) injection versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and methods: This double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 42 patients (9 males, 33 females; mean age: 46.7±2.1 years; range, 18 to 70 years) with mild to moderate CTS between May 2021 and June 2021. The corticosteroid group (n=21) was injected with 40 mg triamcinolone, and in the O3 group B (n=21), 4 mL of a 10 mcg/mL oxygen (O2)-O3 mixture was injected. Symptom severity and functional impairments were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters were obtained at baseline and eight weeks after the procedure. Results: The O2-O3 solution improved pain and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score after eight weeks (p<0.001); however, the change was nonsignificant compared to the corticosteroid group (p>0.05). Sensory nerve and compound muscle action potential latencies were not significantly changed eight weeks after O2-O3 injection (p>0.05), while both were significantly decreased in the steroid injection group (p<0.001). Volar bulging and median nerve cross-section surface area were not improved after O2-O3 injection, while the improvement was significant in the corticosteroid arm (p=0.02). Conclusion: Symptoms in patients with mild to moderate CTS may be alleviated by local O2-O3 injection; however, electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic indices may be unchanged. Corticosteroid local injection may alleviate patient symptoms along with electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic parameters.

A Novel Combination Strategy of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation and Corticosteroid Injection for Treating Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Comparison Study.

INTRODUCTION: The best treatment yielding clinical benefits was still equivocal and controversial for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (PF). This study aimed to propose a novel combination strategy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and corticosteroid injection (CI) for recalcitrant PF, and to compare its therapeutic effects with CI alone and continued conservative management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with recalcitrant PF who underwent combined strategy (RFA + CI), CI alone, and continue conservative treatment at our institution between October 2021 and February 2023. The technical pearls were described elaborately. A comparison of demographic data and clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS), Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), and plantar fascia thickness, were conducted among the three groups. RESULTS: Seventy-one eligible patients were enrolled in this study, with 17 in the combined strategy group, 25 in the CI group, and 29 in the continued conservative treatment group. Both the combined strategy group and the CI group showed significant improvements in VAS scores, AOFAS-AHS scores, and significant reductions in plantar fascia thickness during the 12-month follow-up period compared to those preoperatively (P < 0.05). The combined strategy group achieved comparable immediate pain relief to the CI group after the intervention ([25.7 ± 15.7] vs. [20.6 ± 17.6], P = 0.850). However, the combined strategy group demonstrated superior improvement in symptom and function compared to the CI group at the 3-month (VAS: [21.9 ± 13.5] vs. [39.6 ± 20.4]; AOFAS-AHS: [77.9 ± 12.4] vs. [60.5 ± 17.4], P < 0.05) and 12-month follow-up (VAS: [15.7 ± 12.0] vs. [56.8 ± 17.5]; AOFAS-AHS: [84.5 ± 10.7] vs. [53.8 ± 12.4], P < 0.05). Obvious adverse effects or complications were not identified in either group, while two cases (11.8%) in the combined strategy group and five cases (20.0%) in the CI group experienced unsatisfactory symptom remission. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced and detailed a novel combination strategy involving ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA and CI for treating recalcitrant PF. The strategy is both effective and safe in alleviating pain and enhancing function throughout the entire treatment course.

Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Post Intra-Articular Injection.

Background: Disease-modifying treatments are not currently developed to target the underlying causes of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular (IA) injections are commonly used for patients that do not respond to non-pharmacological treatments, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, or pain medications to address solely KOA symptoms. Utilizing TKA as an endpoint in the KOA disease progression provides a basis to determine efficacy of this treatment pathway. The primary objective is to evaluate a large national database to determine the time between first injection and total knee arthroplasty in patients solely administered intra-articular IA, CS, and HA. Methods: A retrospective query was performed on a national, all-payer claims database (PearlDiver, Colorado Springs, CO, USA), a composite of over 160 million Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant orthopedic records across all states and territories of the United States spanning 2016 to 2022. The database was queried to produce three distinct cohorts for analysis (PRP, HA, and CS). A 4:1 case match was conducted to compare cohorts receiving a subsequent TKA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis analyzed the TKA-free survival of patients within each group at 6 months and 1 to 4 years. The log-rank test was performed for comparisons between survival cohorts. Results: The PRP cohort had a total population of 3240 patients, of which 71 (2.2%) received a subsequent TKA. The corticosteroid cohort had a total population of 1,382,572, of which 81,271 (5.9%) received a subsequent TKA. The HA cohort had a total population of 164,000, of which 13,044 (8.0%) received a subsequent TKA. Due to the low population within the PRP group, this group was excluded from comparison. The mean time to TKA from first injection in the HA group was 377.8 days, while in the corticosteroid group it was 370.0 days. The proportions of TKA-free survival for CS and HA when compared at 4 years post-injection was similar between groups (p = 0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: Patients that received only IA-corticosteroids or IA-hyaluronic acid had a similar length of time between the first injection and the total knee arthroplasty associated with the injected joint. This evidence provides information for clinicians and patients alike when contemplating these non-surgical injection modalities for KOA. The similarity observed between these treatments supports the need for future research to determine whether there is any potential for reduction in healthcare costs for KOA treatment prior to TKA.

US-Guided Interventional Procedures for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

In patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with recurrent pain, symptoms may be caused by several conditions involving not just the joint, but also the surrounding soft tissues including tendons, muscles, bursae, and peripheral nerves. US and US-guided interventional procedures are important tools in the diagnostic work-up of patients with painful THA given that it is possible to reach a prompt diagnosis both directly identifying the pathological changes of periprosthetic structures and indirectly evaluating the response and pain relief to local injection of anesthetics under US monitoring. Then, US guidance can be used for the aspiration of fluid from the joint or periarticular collections, or alternatively to follow the biopsy needle to collect samples for culture analysis in the suspicion of prosthetic joint infection. Furthermore, US-guided percutaneous interventions may be used to treat several conditions with well-established minimally invasive procedures that involve injections of corticosteroid, local anesthetics, and platelet-rich plasma or other autologous products. In this review, we will discuss the clinical and technical applications of US-guided percutaneous interventional procedures in painful THA that can be used in routine daily practice for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Infiltrative Treatment of Morton's Neuroma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Morton's neuroma (MN) is one of the most frequent neurological pathologies in feet, affecting approximately 4% of the general population. The treatment of MN can be surgical, conservative, and infiltrative, with different substances used in the injections for MN, as steroids, sclerosing solutions, and others. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of current infiltrative therapy for Morton's neuroma and, additionally, to define adverse effects of this therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, Epistemonikos, Web of Science (WOS), SPORTSDiscus and Cochrane Library. This search involved the application of all types of infiltrative treatment applicable to MN. The search was limited to original data describing clinical outcomes and pain using the Visual Analogue pain Scale (VAS) or the Johnson Satisfaction Scale, between February and June 2023. RESULTS: Twelve manuscripts were selected (six randomized controlled trials and six longitudinal observational studies) involving 1,438 patients. Capsaicin was reported to produce a VAS score reduction of 51.8%. Corticosteroids also reported a high level of efficacy. Alcohol and Hyaluronic Acid injections are well tolerated, but the effects of their application need further research. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids, sclerosant injections, hyaluronic acid and capsaicin have been shown to be effective in reducing the pain related to MN.

Comparing autologous blood, corticosteroid, and a combined injection of both for treating lateral epicondylitis: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Because lateral epicondylitis is a common musculoskeletal disorder that affects the forearm's extensor tendons, an effective therapeutic approach should reverse the degeneration and promote regeneration. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of autologous blood (AB) injection, corticosteroid (CS) injection, and a combined injection of both in treating lateral epicondylitis (LE), hypothesizing that the combined approach might offer immediate symptom resolution and a lower recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis were systematically distributed among three distinct therapeutic injection groups. Those in the AB group were administered 1 ml of autologous venous blood mixed with 2 ml of 2% prilocaine HCl. Participants in the CS category were given 1 ml of 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate mixed with 2 ml of 2% prilocaine HCl. Meanwhile, patients in the combined group received a mixture containing 1 ml each of autologous venous blood and 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate along with 1 ml of 2% prilocaine HCl. Prior to receiving their respective injections, a comprehensive assessment of all participants was carried out. Follow-up assessments were subsequently conducted on days 15, 30, and 90 utilizing metrics of the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) and measurements of hand grip strength (HGS). RESULTS: One patient dropped out from the combined group, and 119 patients completed the trial. No complications were recorded during the course of follow-up. By day 15, all groups had demonstrated significant PRTEE improvement, with CS showing the most pronounced reduction (p = 0.001). However, the benefits of CS had deteriorated by day 30 and had deteriorated further by day 90. The AB and AB + CS groups demonstrated sustained improvement, with AB + CS revealing the most effective treatment, achieving a clinically significant improvement in 97.4% of the patients. The improved HGS parallelled the functional enhancements, as it was more substantial in the AB and AB + CS groups (p = 0.001), corroborating the sustained benefits of these treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that while AB and CS individually offer distinct benefits, a combined AB + CS approach optimizes therapeutic outcomes, providing swift and sustained functional improvement with a lower recurrence rate. These findings have substantial clinical implications, suggesting a balanced, multimodal treatment strategy for enhanced patient recovery in LE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized clinical trial, level 1 evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06236178.

The remarkable antitumor efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in patients with refractory thymomas.

BACKGROUND: Some case reports have found that corticosteroid treatments shrunk thymoma lesions remarkably after the failure of chemotherapy or surgery. However, few studies have comprehensibly evaluated the antitumor effects of corticosteroids in patients with invasive thymomas. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 13 consecutively enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic thymomas treated via corticosteroid monotherapies from January 2010 to March 2021 in our institute. A Cox's proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 13-115 months). The median initial dose of corticosteroid was 0.90 mg/kg/day prednisolone equivalent (range, 0.4-1.1 mg/kg/day). Of the 13 cases, 7 (53.8%, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81) exhibited a partial response and 5 (38.5%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.68) stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-9.6 months]. The median overall survival was 25.3 months (95% CI: 7.1-not attained). The median duration of corticosteroid use was 3 months (range, 1-64 months). Patients with WHO subtype B thymomas exhibited a better overall response rate to corticosteroids than did patients with other disease subtypes (75%, 95% CI: 0.19-0.99). Adverse events of Grade 3 or more were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids are clinically valuable for patients with thymomas.

Methylprednisolone dosing for pediatric critical asthma: a single-center cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (MP) dosing regimens and clinical outcomes for children hospitalized for critical asthma (CA). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was performed of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for CA between September 2015 and October 2019. Patients 5-to 17-year-olds, initiated on continuous nebulized albuterol, and prescribed at least one dose of IV MP were included. The primary outcome was to characterize PICU MP dosing. Cohorts were then compared by MP dosing: conservative-dose methylprednisolone (CDMP, ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/dose every 6 h) and standard-dose methylprednisolone (SDMP, > 0.5 mg/kg/dose every 6 h). Clinical efficacy endpoints were the duration of continuous nebulized albuterol and PICU length of stay (LOS). Safety endpoints included corticosteroid-related adverse events. RESULTS: Of 168 children studied, 50 (29.8%) were prescribed CDMP and 118 (70.2%) SDMP. The overall mean MP dose was 31.3 ± 19.6 mg (weight-adjusted: 0.77 ± 0.32 mg/kg/dose). Compared to those prescribed SDMP, those prescribed CDMP had a shorter median duration of continuous nebulized albuterol (12.8 [IQR: 10.5-20] versus 17.3 [IQR: 11.3-29.7] hours, p = 0.019) and median PICU LOS (0.9 [IQR: 0.7-1.4] versus 1.2 [IQR: 0.9-1.8] days, p = 0.012). No corticosteroid-related adverse events were observed. In adjusted models, weight-adjusted IV MP dose was not associated with PICU LOS or duration of continuous nebulized albuterol. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous MP dosing for pediatric CA varied widely in our study sample. Prospective, controlled trials are required to validate our observations including clinical efficacy and safety endpoints.

Real-world approaches to outpatient treatment of status migrainosus: A survey study.

OBJECTIVES: Identify how the American Headache Society (AHS) membership manages status migrainosus (SM) among outpatients. BACKGROUND: SM is defined as a debilitating migraine attack lasting more than 72 h. There is no standard of care for SM, including whether a 72-h duration is required before the attack can be treated as SM. METHODS: The Refractory Headache Special Interest Group from AHS developed a four-question survey distributed to AHS members enquiring (1) whether they treat severe refractory migraine attacks the same as SM regardless of duration, (2) what their first step in SM management is, (3) what the top three medications they use for SM are, and (4) whether they are United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) certified. The survey was conducted in January 2022. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Responses were received from 196 of 1859 (10.5%) AHS members; 64.3% were UCNS certified in headache management. Respondents treated 69.4% (136/196) of patients with a severe refractory migraine attack as SM before the 72-h period had elapsed. Most (76.0%, 149/196) chose "treat remotely using outpatient medications at home" as the first step, 11.2% (22/196) preferred procedures, 6.1% (12/196) favored an infusion center, 6.1% (12/196) sent patients to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care, and 0.5% (1/196) preferred direct hospital admission. The top five preferred medications were as follows: (1) corticosteroids (71.4%, 140/196), (2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (50.1%, 99/196), (3) neuroleptics (46.9%, 92/196), (4) triptans (30.6%, 60/196), and (5) dihydroergotamine (DHE) (21.4%, 42/196). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals with expertise in headache medicine typically treated severe migraine attacks early and did not wait 72 h to fulfill the diagnostic criteria for SM. Outpatient management with one or more medications for home use was preferred by most respondents; few opted for ED referrals. Finally, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, neuroleptics, triptans, and DHE were the top five preferred treatments for home SM management.

Early vestibular rehabilitation training of peripheral acute vestibular syndrome-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of early vestibular rehabilitation training combined with corticosteroids initiated within 2 weeks, compared with corticosteroid treatment, after the peripheral acute vestibular syndrome (pAVS) onset. Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. From inception to January 24, 2024. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews approved this study (CRD42023422308). Results: Five studies involving 235 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The subjective outcome measure Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was pooled for a meta-analysis and was statistically significantly in favor of early vestibular rehabilitation training (early VRT) plus corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone: at one-month follow-up (p = 0.00) and 12 months follow-up (p = 0.01). DHI was a critical outcome for measuring the differences in effect of early VRT. The objective outcome measures of caloric lateralization, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, and posturography were gathered for a narrative synthesis. Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that early VRT in combination with corticosteroids was more effective for treating pAVS than corticosteroid treatment alone. No adverse effects were reported for early VRT.

Adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy and treatment escalation in the Swedish adult asthma population.

BACKGROUND: Patients with uncontrolled asthma should be evaluated for medication adherence. This study aimed to identify characteristics associated with poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and to explore adherence prior to treatment escalation. METHODS: This nationwide longitudinal cohort study included adult asthma patients (n = 30880) with a healthcare visit including Asthma Control Test (ACT) and registered in the Swedish National Airway Register between 1 July 2017 and 28 February 2019 (index date). Patient data was crosslinked to other national registers. Treatment steps two years pre- and one year post-index, were identified by prescribed drugs. Poor adherence was defined as Medication Possession Ratio <80 %. RESULTS: Poor adherence was identified in 73 % of patients in treatment steps 2-5, where of 35 % had uncontrolled asthma (ACT≤19). In adjusted models, poor adherence was associated with better disease control; ACT≤19 (OR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.71-0.84), short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) overuse (0.69, 0.61-0.79) and exacerbations (0.79, 0.70-0.89) in steps 2-3. Among patients with uncontrolled asthma, poor adherence was associated with SABA overuse (1.71, 1.50-1.95), exacerbations (1.29, 1.15-1.46), current smoking (1.38, 1.21-1.57) and inversely associated with asthma management education (0.85, 0.78-0.93. Similar results were observed in steps 4-5. When investigating post-index treatment, 53 % remained stationary, 30 % stepped down and 17 % escalated treatment. Prior to escalation, 49 % had poor adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Poor ICS adherence was associated with better asthma control. Among uncontrolled patients, poor adherence was associated with SABA overuse and exacerbations. Our result highlights the importance of asthma management education to improve adherence in uncontrolled patients.

Awareness of Side Effects of Corticosteroids among Users and Nonusers in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory medications that are used to reduce inflammation and inhibit the immune system in a variety of disorders, including allergies, asthma, systemic lupus erythematous, eczema, inflammatory bowel disease, and swollen joints or muscles. The goal of this study was to assess the level of awareness and sources of information about the side effects of corticosteroids among the general population in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia using an electronic questionnaire. A non-probability convenience sampling technique was used. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for data analysis. Results: The study included 755 participants from Saudi Arabia (67.3% females and 32.7% males). Around 26.8% reported using corticosteroids, and 73.9% were aware of the side effects of glucocorticoids. Among steroid users (202 participants), the most common conditions were allergies (36.1%), asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (21.8%), and skin diseases (27.7%). The majority of respondents (57.9%) used steroids for less than 2 weeks, and topical application (52.5%) was the most common form. Only 30.7% received information about side effects at the time of prescription. The most reported side effects were truncal obesity, moon face, skin thinning, bruising, and slower wound healing. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of promoting awareness and knowledge regarding the side effects of corticosteroids in Saudi Arabia. While overall awareness levels were relatively satisfactory, specific side effects require further attention in educational efforts.

Successful Avoidance of Cicatricial Tracheobronchial Stenosis in a Patient With Endobronchial Tuberculosis by Early Administration of Systemic High-Dose Corticosteroids: A Case Report.

A 63-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our hospital due to dry cough, fever, hoarseness, stridor, and difficulty breathing. Chest computed tomography showed circumferential wall thickening in the trachea, carina, right main bronchus, and right upper lobe bronchus, and granular and nodular shadows in right S2. Flexible laryngofiberscopy showed yellowish dry respiratory secretions adhering to the subglottis. Bronchoscopic findings showed that the tracheobronchial mucosa was swollen, hyperemic, and covered with yellowish-white, cheese-like materials, and ulcerative lesions with white coatings were observed from the subglottis to the trachea, carina, right main bronchus, and right upper lobe bronchus. A diagnosis of endobronchial tuberculosis (EBTB) was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing, and cultures were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In addition to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy, intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone reduced her severe respiratory symptoms and prevented cicatricial tracheobronchial stenosis. Early administration of systemic high-dose corticosteroids may be effective for EBTB patients with severely active tracheobronchial mucosal and submucosal lesions.