Posterior cruciate ligament tibial attachment sacrifice percentage is higher in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with discoid lateral meniscus.

BACKGROUND: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) attachment may be damaged in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) using the complete resection for tibial preparation, and resection amount varies greatly among individuals. Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is one of the most common anatomic knee variants. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in PCL attachment sacrifice in CR-TKA between patients with and without DLM. METHODS: Fifty-one knees in the study group (DLM group) were matched 1:1 to 51 control knees (non-DLM group) by age, sex, and maximum width of the tibial plateau. The percentage of the sacrificed PCL attachment and the morphological parameters of the tibial plateau were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a blind manner. RESULTS: With a tibial cut simulated at a 0°, 3°, and 7° osteotomy slope, the mean PCL attachment resection percentages in the non-DLM group were 40.5%, 53.6%, and 72.6%, respectively. The corresponding resection percentages in the DLM group were 61.0% (P < 0.001), 73.3% (P < 0.001), and 85.7% (P < 0.001), respectively. The percentage of the minimum meniscus width to the maximum tibia width showed a weak positive correlation with the percentage of PCL attachment sacrifice. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly greater portion of PCL attachment was sacrificed in DLM patients undergoing CR-TKA using the complete proximal tibia resection. Attention should be paid to PCL attachment resection during CR-TKA in patients with DLM, and alternative techniques or prosthesis types should be considered.

Does Selective Posterior Tibial Slope Technique in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Result in the Elimination of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Management?

In cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA), intraoperative posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) management is necessary because retention of optimum PCL tension with high reproducibility is difficult. If PCL management is not performed appropriately, problems such as postoperative pain, poor range of motion, and a feeling of instability may occur. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) has a major influence on the tension of the PCL in CR-TKA. Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset also influences PCL tension in CR-TKA. We designed a surgical procedure in which the PTS is adjusted in association with the posterior condylar offset during surgery. The postoperative clinical results of the primary total knee arthroplasty 159 knee performed by this procedure were favorable. In addition, none of the knees required management of PCL. In our procedure, PCL management, which is the main problem in CR-TKA, is not necessary, and this may be the main advantage of the new procedure.

Short-term clinical results of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using personalized alignment.

BACKGROUND: Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prosthesis has been introduced to recreate normal knee movement by preserving both the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. However, the use of BCR total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable because of several disappointing reports. We have been performing BCR TKAs with personalized alignment (PA). This study aimed to reveal the limb alignment and soft tissue balance of FA-BCR TKAs and compare the clinical outcomes of FA-BCR TKAs with those of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Fifty BCR TKAs and 58 UKAs were included in this study. The joint component gaps of BCR TKA were evaluated intraoperatively and the postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were measured using full-length standing radiography. The short-term clinical outcomes of BCR TKAs were compared with those of UKA using the scoring system of 2011 Knee Society Scoring (KSS) and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) at an average of 2 years postoperatively (1-4yeras). RESULTS: The coronal alignment values of PA-BCR TKA were as follows: HKA angle, 177.9° ± 2.3°; MPTA, 85.4° ± 1.9°; and LDFA, 87.5° ± 1.9°. The joint component gaps at flexion angles of 10°, 30°, 60°, and 90° were 11.1 ± 1.2, 10.9 ± 1.4, 10.7 ± 1.3, and 11.2 ± 1.4 mm for the medial compartment and 12.9 ± 1.5, 12.6 ± 1.8, 12.5 ± 1.8 and 12.5 ± 1.7 mm for the lateral compartment, respectively. The patient expectation score and maximum extension angle of PA-BCR TKA were significantly better than those of UKAs. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term clinical outcomes of PA-BCR TKA were comparable or a slightly superior to those of UKAs.

Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.

Background: Patient specific implants (PSI) represent a novel innovation aimed to improve patient satisfaction and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, longitudinal patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for PSI are not well described. We sought to primarily evaluate PROMs of patients undergoing TKA with either PSI or off-the-shelf (OTS) implants at mid-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively collected cohort of 43 primary, cruciate-retaining TKAs performed with PSI (n = 23) and OTS implants (n = 20) by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, range of motion (ROM) return, reoperations, and outcomes [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) T-score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and Knee Society Score-Function (KSS-F)] were compared. Mean follow-up was 5 years. Results: TKA performed with either PSI and OTS implants demonstrated no difference in obtaining ROM by 3 months (extension 3° short of full extension vs. 0°, p = 0.16) or flexion (114° vs. 115°, p = 0.99) and final ROM was identical [0° extension to 120° flexion (p = 1)]. Although not significant (p = 0.42), 5 (22%) PSI TKA and 2 (10%) OTS implant patients required manipulation under anesthesia. KSS-F and PROMIS T-scores were higher in the PSI versus OTS TKA patients, respectively (90 vs. 73, p = 0.002; 51.6 vs. 44.5, p = 0.01). However, after multivariable analysis, none of these continuous outcome measures were significantly different (p = 0.28 for KSS and p = 0.45 for PROMIS T-score) between the groups. Conclusion: In a series of TKAs performed with PSI, no difference existed in postoperative ROM, reoperations, or patient-reported outcomes compared to OTS implants at 5 years. Surgeons may utilize the equivocal midterm results during TKA preoperative patient discussion of implant technologies.

Comparison of finite helical axis of the knee joint before and after bi-cruciate-preserving knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Difference in the finite helical axis of the knee joints before and after anterior cruciate ligament-preserving knee arthroplasties such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty remains unknown. This study compared the knee finite helical axes before and after bi-cruciate-preserving knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were included. Under fluoroscopy, participants performed a deep knee bend before and after surgery. A two/three-dimensional registration technique was employed to measure tibiofemoral kinematics. Femoral finite helical axis was calculated in a flexion range of 0-120° using 30° windows (early-, mid-, late-, and deep-flexion phases). FINDINGS: In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the preoperative knee vertical angle was larger than the postoperative vertical angle in mid- and deep-flexion phases. The postoperative knee vertical angle was smaller in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than in bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the preoperative horizontal angle was smaller than the postoperative horizontal angle in the early-flexion phase. However, in bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, the preoperative horizontal angle was larger than the postoperative horizontal angle in mid- and deep-flexion phases. The horizontal angle was smaller before unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than that before bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in early-, mid-, and deep-flexion phases. However, the vertical angle was larger after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than that after bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in the early-flexion phase. INTERPRETATION: The knee finite helical axes before and after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty differed from those before and after bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

The function of cruciate ligaments in bi-cruciate retaining Total knee arthroplasty with asymmetrical design.

BACKGROUND: Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with an asymmetrical design may improve knee function and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the kinematics, anteroposterior laxity, and in situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments of knees subjected to this treatment with those of healthy knees. METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor system. The kinematics during passive flexion-extension motion and anteroposterior laxity for native knee, treated knee, and treated knee with cruciate ligament transection states were investigated. The motions of the intact and treated knees during each test were repeated after anterior/posterior cruciate ligament transection to calculate the in situ force in the ligaments. FINDINGS: The screw-home movement of normal knees disappeared after treatment. The in situ force of the anterior cruciate ligament in treated knees was higher than that in intact knees at ˃15° during flexion and at 60° and 90° against an anterior force. The in situ force of the posterior cruciate ligament in treated knees was higher at 0°, 15°, and 30° during flexion and at all flexion angles against a posterior force. INTERPRETATION: The screw-home movement of normal knees decreased, and the in situ force of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments increased after treatment.

Fluoroscopic and radiostereometric analysis of a bicruciate-retaining versus a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare a bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA design in terms of kinematics, measured using fluoroscopy and stability as micromotion using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). METHODS: A total of 40 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were included in this randomized controlled trial. All patients performed a step-up and lunge task in front of a monoplane fluoroscope one year postoperatively. Femorotibial contact point (CP) locations were determined at every flexion angle and compared between the groups. RSA images were taken at baseline, six weeks, three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared postoperatively for two years. RESULTS: The BCR-TKA demonstrated a kinematic pattern comparable to the natural knee's screw-home mechanism in the step-up task. In the lunge task, the medial CP of the BCR-TKA was more anterior in the early flexion phase, while laterally the CP was more posterior during the entire movement cycle. The BCR-TKA group showed higher tibial migration. No differences were found for the clinical and functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The BCR-TKA shows a different kinematic pattern in early flexion/late extension compared to the CR-TKA. The difference between both implants is mostly visible in the flexion phase in which the anterior cruciate ligament is effective; however, both designs fail to fully replicate the motion of a natural knee. The higher migration of the BCR-TKA was concerning and highlights the importance of longer follow-up.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):35-46.

The importance of selecting a cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis for a patient with a large physiological posterior tibial slope: a case report.

For Japanese individuals, deep bending is inevitable in their daily lives, such as during seiza sitting and kneeling. Thus, achieving a good post-operative range of motion is an important factor in improving patient satisfaction. Even normal knees often have a posterior tibial slope of more than 10°. We report the case of a 76-year-old woman who underwent proximal tibial osteotomy at 8° with the Vanguard Knee cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system. She required the revision TKA 10 years later due to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene wear and breakage of the posteromedial tibial component.

Cartilage assessment using preoperative planning MRI for femoral component rotational alignment.

BACKGROUND: Surgical planning of posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using computed tomography (CT) might lead to over-rotation of the femoral component because CT could not detect cartilage thickness of the posterior femoral condyle. The purpose of this study was to examine the rotational alignment difference of the femoral component between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. METHODS: For elderly varus osteoarthritic patients, 66 varus osteoarthritic knee patients that underwent primary TKA were selected. Twenty-seven young patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were selected as control. After the transepicondylar axis (CEA), the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the posterior femoral condylar line (PCL) were drawn on CT and on MRI at the same angles as CT. Then, the practical PCL was drawn on MRI considering the cartilage thickness (the cartilage PCL). The angle between the SEA and the cartilage PCL (the cartilage posterior condylar angle (PCA)) was measured as preoperative planning. To investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI measurement, the cartilage thickness on posterior femoral condyles was directly measured during TKA. RESULTS: The cartilage PCA for varus osteoarthritic patients averaged 1.3 ± 1.3°. The cartilage PCA was 1.8 ± 1.0° significantly smaller than the bone PCA (the PCA measured on CT). Meanwhile, the cartilage PCA was 0.2 ± 0.4° significantly larger than the bone PCA in young people. The preoperative angle measurement on MRI strongly correlated with the direct measurement of cartilage thickness during TKA. CONCLUSION: There was 1.8° of divergence between MRI and CT in varus osteoarthritic patients due to cartilage degeneration of the medial femoral condyle. Cartilage assessment using MRI was useful for femoral component rotational alignment.

Limited effect of anatomical insert geometry on in vitro laxity in balanced anatomic posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The present study assessed the effect of insert articular surface geometry (anatomical versus conventional insert design) on anteroposterior (AP) translation and varus-valgus (VV) laxity in balanced posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondly, we evaluated if the AP translation and VV laxity in the reconstructed knee resembled the stability of the native knee. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were used in this study. After testing the native knee, anatomical components of a PCL-retaining implant were implanted. The knee joints were subjected to anteriorly and posteriorly directed forces (at 20° and 90° flexion) and varus-valgus stresses (at 20°, 45° and 90° flexion) in both non-weightbearing and weightbearing situations in a knee kinematics simulator. Measurements were performed in the native knee, TKA with anatomical insert geometry (3° built-in varus, medial concave, lateral convex), and TKA with symmetrical insert geometry. RESULTS: In weightbearing conditions, anterior translations ranged between 2.6 and 3.9 mm at 20° flexion and were < 1 mm at 90° flexion. Posterior translation at 20° flexion was 2.7 mm for the native knee versus 4.0 mm (p = 0.047) and 7.0 mm (p = 0.02) for the symmetrical insert and the anatomical insert, respectively. Posterior translation at 90° flexion was < 1.1 mm and not significantly different between the native knee and insert types. In non-weightbearing conditions, the anterior translation at 20° flexion was 5.9 mm for the symmetrical and 4.6 mm for the anatomical insert (n.s.), compared with 3.0 mm for the native knee (p = 0.02). The anterior translation at 90° flexion was significantly higher for the reconstructed knees (anatomical insert 7.0 mm; symmetrical insert 9.2 mm), compared with 1.6 mm for the native knee (both p = 0.02). Varus-valgus laxity at different flexion angles was independent of insert geometry. A valgus force in weightbearing conditions led to significantly more medial laxity (1°-3° opening) in the native knee at 45° and 90° flexion compared with the reconstructed knee for all flexion angles. CONCLUSIONS: Insert geometry seems to have a limited effect with respect to AP translation and VV laxity, in the well-balanced PCL-retaining TKA with an anatomical femoral component. Secondly, AP translation and VV laxity in the reconstructed knee approximated the laxity of the native knee.

Higher patellofemoral compressive force does not affect anterior knee pain in anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: In vivo prospective analysis of guided motion prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of the present study are 1) to measure intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force in patients undergoing anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and to assess the relationship between intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force and patient reported outcome measurements and 2) to compare patellofemoral compressive force and patient reported outcome measurements among patients who underwent anatomical bi-cruciate retaining, cruciate retaining, and bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, 20 patients who underwent cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, and 24 patients who underwent bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty were assessed. Patient reported outcome measurements were evaluated at 1.5 years after surgery. FINDINGS: Intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force was significantly lower with anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty than with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty at 60° to 140° of flexion and nearly equivalent to intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force with bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty at all knee flexion angles examined. With anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, there were no significant correlations between intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force and almost all patient reported outcome measurements except for 2011 Knee Society Score expectations, which was positively correlated with patellofemoral compressive force at 10° of flexion, and Patella score quadriceps strength, which was negatively correlated with patellofemoral compressive force at 60° of flexion. INTERPRETATION: There were no significant correlations between intraoperative patellofemoral compressive force and anterior knee pain after anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Evidence level: 3.

A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide a short term comparison in radiological and clinical outcome between Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR)- and Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The cohort consists of 122 patients undergoing a TKA with PSI, equally distributed over the BCR- and CR-TKA group. Perioperative conditions were observed and radiological images were analysed pre-, 6-weeks, and 1-year postoperative to quantify alignment differences between BCR- and CR-TKA. Preoperatively predicted templates were compared with the implanted size to determine predictive value. In addition mean range of motion and revision rates were determined in both groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in amount of outliers in component alignment between BCR- and CR-TKA. Outliers of the Hip-Knee-Ankle-Axis (HKA-axis) occurred significantly more frequent (P = 0.009) in the BCR-group (37.7%) compared to CR-TKA (18.0%). No clinically relevant differences regarding the predictive sizing of implant components was obtained. No significant differences were observed in revision rates (P = 1.000) and ROM (p = 0.425) between the BCR-groep and CR-group at 2-years FU. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that although the HKA-axis was not fully restored, bi-cruciate retaining surgical technique for BCR-TKA is safe and effective with comparable radiological and clinical outcome as CR TKA. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow up on the HKA-axis alignment and clinical parameters are needed to confirm the presented results and should focus on possible cut off values concerning leg axis in order to define in what patients a BCR-TKA can safely be used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Retrospective Case Controlled Study.

Mid-flexion stability in the anteroposterior plane is achieved with a medial congruent insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the intraoperative kinematics, especially for mid-flexion femorotibial anteroposterior (AP) stability, between newly developed medial congruent (MC) inserts and cruciate-retaining (CR) inserts in navigated cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing CR-TKA using an image-free navigation system were enrolled. AP kinematics, the AP translation under manual maximum stress to the knee joint at 45° flexion, rotational kinematics, and varus-valgus laxity were evaluated using a navigation system and statistically compared between the MC and CR inserts. RESULTS: AP kinematic analysis showed that the femoral position with the CR insert was significantly anterior at a maximum extension to 45° flexion compared with the MC insert (p < 0.05). The amount of AP translation at 45° flexion with the MC insert was significantly smaller than that with the CR insert (p < 0.05). Rotational kinematics found that the tibial position at maximum extension was significantly externally rotated with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts. Varus-valgus laxity was comparable between the MC and CR inserts. CONCLUSION: The current results showed that greater mid-flexion AP stability was achieved with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts in CR-TKA. Intraoperative kinematics with the MC inserts more closely resembled those with preoperative conditions in CR-TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective comparative study.

Erratum to "Greater postoperative relatively medial loose gap at 90° of flexion for varus knees improves patient-reported outcome measurements in anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty" [The Knee 27(5) (2020) 1534-1541]".

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to measure the intraoperative joint gap using tensor device and pre- and, postoperative joint stability at 0, 30 and 90° of flexion using stress radiography and to identify whether these factors influence patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) in anatomical bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Fifty-three knees with preoperative varus osteoarthritis of the knee underwent anatomical BCR TKA with oblique 3° angle femorotibial joint line. The intraoperative medial and lateral joint gap using a tensor device and gap difference (lateral minus medial; varus laxity) were also calculated. Postoperative joint stability was measured using stress radiographs. PROM was also evaluated at 1.5 years postoperatively. The effect of intraoperative and postoperative joint stabilities on PROMs were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. RESULTS: Intraoperative greater difference between medial joint gap at 140° and 0° of flexion showed significant positive correlation with postoperative function of patellofemoral joint. Intraoperative varus laxity at extension improved postoperative symptoms in 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS); greater postoperative lateral stability at 30 and 90° of flexion with the varus stress test was associated with the better patient expectation in 2011 KSS. Postoperative medial laxity at 90° of flexion with the valgus stress test positively correlated with the patient expectation and satisfaction in 2011 KSS. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should notice that the postoperative lateral stability and medial laxity at 90° of flexion improved PROM in anatomical BCR TKA.

Greater postoperative relatively medial loose gap at 90° of flexion for varus knees improves patient-reported outcome measurements in anatomical bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to measure the intraoperative joint gap using tensor device and pre- and, postoperative joint stability at 0, 30 and 90° of flexion using stress radiography and to identify whether these factors influence patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) in anatomical bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Fifty-three knees with preoperative varus osteoarthritis of the knee underwent anatomical BCR TKA with oblique three-degree angle femorotibial joint line. The intraoperative medial and lateral joint gap using a tensor device and gap difference (lateral minus medial; varus laxity) were also calculated. Postoperative joint stability was measured using stress radiographs. PROM was also evaluated at 1.5 years postoperatively. The effect of intraoperative and postoperative joint stabilities on PROMs were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. RESULTS: Intraoperative greater difference between medial joint gap at 140° and 0° of flexion showed significant positive correlation with postoperative function of patellofemoral joint. Intraoperative varus laxity at extension improved postoperative symptoms in 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS); greater postoperative lateral stability at 30 and 90° of flexion with the varus stress test was associated with the better patient expectation in 2011 KSS. Postoperative medial laxity at 90° of flexion with the valgus stress test positively correlated with the patient expectation and satisfaction in 2011 KSS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should notice that the postoperative lateral stability and medial laxity at 90° of flexion improved PROM in anatomical BCR TKA.

Leveraging subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling to assess effect of anterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty during walking gait.

Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has several potential advantages including improved anteroposterior knee stability compared to contemporary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have explored whether there is significant differences of knee biomechanics following bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared to posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. In the present study, subject-specific lower extremity musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics models for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were developed based on the musculoskeletal modeling framework using force-dependent kinematics method and validated against in vivo telemetric data. The experiment data of two subjects who underwent total knee arthroplasty were obtained for the SimTK "Grand Challenge Competition" repository, and integrated into the musculoskeletal model. Five walking gait trials for each subject were used as partial inputs for the model to predict the knee biomechanics for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The results revealed significantly greater range of anterior/posterior tibiofemoral translation, and significantly more posterior tibial location during the early phase of gait and more anterior tibial location during the late phase of gait were found in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty without anterior cruciate ligament when compared to the bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. No significant differences in tibiofemoral contact forces, rotations, translations, and ligament forces between bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during normal walking gait, albeit slight differences in range of tibiofemoral internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior translation were observed. The present study revealed that anterior cruciate ligament retention has a positive effect on restoring normal knee kinematics in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Preservation of anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty and knee implant designs interplay each other and both contribute to restoring normal knee kinematics in different types of total knee arthroplasty. Further evaluation of more demanding activities and subject data from patients with bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty via musculoskeletal modeling may better highlight the role of the anterior cruciate ligament and its stabilizing influence.

Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Restore Native Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics During Gait.

Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design preserves both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to restore normal posterior femoral rollback and joint kinematics. Abnormal knee kinematics and "paradoxical" anterior femoral translation in conventional TKA designs have been suggested as potential causes of patient dissatisfaction. However, there is a paucity of data on the in vivo kinematics and articular contact behavior of BCR-TKA. This study aimed to investigate in vivo kinematics, articular contact position, and pivot point location of the BCR-TKA during gait. In vivo kinematics of 30 patients with unilateral BCR-TKA during treadmill walking was determined using validated dual fluoroscopic imaging tracking technique. The BCR-TKA exhibited less extension than the normal healthy knee between heel strike and 48% of gait cycle. Although the average external rotation trend observed for BCR TKA was similar to the normal healthy knee, the range of motion was not fully comparable. The lowest point of the medial condyle showed longer anteroposterior translation excursion than the lateral condyle, leading to a lateral-pivoting pattern in 60% of BCR TKA patients during stance phase. BCR-TKA demonstrated no statistical significant differences in anterior-posterior translation as well as varus rotation, when compared to normal healthy knees during the stance phase. However, sagittal plane motion and tibiofemoral articular contact characteristics including pivoting patterns were not fully restored in BCR TKA patients during gait, suggesting that BCR TKA does not restore native tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1929-1937, 2019.

Stair Climbing and High Knee Flexion Activities in Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: In Vivo Kinematics and Articular Contact Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) preserves both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to restore normal posterior femoral rollback and joint kinematics. However, there is limited information regarding articular contact behavior in the contemporary BCR TKA design during high knee flexion activities. This study aimed to investigate the articular knee contact performance in unilateral BCR TKA patients during strenuous flexion activities. METHODS: Twenty-nine unilateral BCR TKA patients were evaluated for both knees during single deep lunges, step-ups, and sit-to-stand (STS) using a validated combined computer tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Medial and lateral condylar contact positions were quantified during weight-bearing flexion. RESULTS: Contact excursions of the lateral condyle in BCR TKAs were significantly more anteriorly located than the contralateral non-operated knees during STS (-4.9 ± 3.1 vs -9.7 ± 4.6 mm, P < .05), single deep lunge (-5.7 ± 3.2 vs -10.0 ± 4.5 mm, P < .05), and step-ups (-4.8 ± 3.6 vs -9.1 ± 3.9 mm, P < .05). Contact points of BCR TKAs indicated reduced femoral external rotation during STS (2.1 ± 4.8° vs 7.7 ± 5.4°, P < .05), single deep lunges (1.8 ± 4.8° vs 7.0 ± 7.1°, P < .05), and step-ups (0.1 ± 4.1° vs 6.2 ± 4.9°, P < .05). Medial pivoting patterns were observed in only 59%, 56%, and 48% of the BCR TKA knees for step-ups, STS, and single deep lunge, respectively. CONCLUSION: The contemporary BCR TKA design demonstrated asymmetric femoral rollback, medial translation, as well as lateral pivoting in about half of the patient cohort, suggesting that in vivo tibiofemoral kinematic parameters were not fully restored in BCR patients during strenuous flexion activities.

In-vivo elongation of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL and PCL) sacrifice in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been considered a potential factor leading to abnormal knee kinematics. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA design allows retention of both ACL and PCL. However, there is a limited data on the ACL/PCL in-vivo elongation characteristics of BCR TKA. The study aimed to evaluate and compare the in-vivo elongation patterns of ACL/PCL between BCR TKA and contralateral non-implanted knee and to explore potential factors leading to the changed elongation patterns between limbs. ACL/PCL elongations of both knees during sit-to-stand were measured in 29 unilateral BCR TKA patients using a validated dual fluoroscopic tracking technique. Joint gap changes of the BCR TKA knees relative to the contralateral knee were quantified. BCR TKA and the contralateral non-implanted knee exhibited similar ACL elongation at extension and clinical anterior knee laxity. However, BCR TKA showed significantly greater PCL elongation during flexion than the non-implanted knee. Variation of changed elongation was observed for both ACL and PCL, suggesting a heterogeneous restoration of normal ACL/PCL functions. A significant correlation was found between extension joint gap change and the change of ACL elongation, highlighting the importance of precise joint line restoration and soft tissue balancing during BCR TKA surgery. Our findings suggest that BCR TKA did not fully restore "near-normal" cruciate ligament elongation patterns and anteroposterior stability. Considerable heterogeneity remains in the retained ligament elongation patterns and warrants further investigations of multifactorial factors to optimize ACL/PCL functions in BCR TKA. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3239-3246, 2018.

In-vivo analysis of sliding distance and cross-shear in Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Polyethylene remains the most popular bearing material for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite its widespread use, wear continue to be one of major factors implicated in revision surgery. Sliding distance, cross-shear, and contact stress are the major factors influencing polyethylene wear. As previous studies have either relied on wear simulations, computational modeling, or in vitro measurements to quantify sliding distance and cross-shear, in vivo subject-specific sliding distance and cross-shear after bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA has not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to quantify the 6°-of-freedom (6DOF) in vivo kinematics, sliding distance, and cross-shear in BCR TKA patients during gait. Twenty-nine unilateral BCR TKA patients performed level walking on a treadmill under dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) surveillance. Cumulative normalized sliding distances between the lateral and medial compartments did not change significantly (p > 0.05) during the gait cycle. Although the total normalized sliding distance was similar between the lateral and medial compartments, the cross-shear at the lateral compartment differed significantly from that at the medial compartment (p < 0.001). Significant differences in the relative length positions of the peak sliding distance and cross-shear were found between the lateral and medial bearing components. The flexion-extension motion of the reconstructed knee was more associated with the linear displacements (anterior-posterior, R2 = 0.6; lateral-medial, R2 = 0.8, proximal-distal, R2 = 0.7) than the angular displacement (varus-valgus, R2 = 0.18; internal-external rotation, R2 = 0.28). Despite some differences in peak sliding distance and cross-shear positons, our results suggest similar articular contact patterns between the lateral and medial compartments in BCR TKA patients during gait. The data could provide insights into understanding the potential wear patterns in BCR TKAs.