Renal effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor anti-inflammatory drugs (coxibs) are associated with the development of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal and cardiovascular, but renal effects are less known. Objective: To assess the renal risks of coxibs compared to placebo by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials that assessed renal effects of coxibs (celecoxib, etoricoxib, lumiracoxib, parecoxib, and valdecoxib) were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and other sources up to March 2024. Two independent reviewers performed study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Random effect meta-analysis was employed to calculate the relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of renal effects of coxibs compared to placebo and inconsistency among studies (I 2 ). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: Out of 5284 retrieved records, 49 studies (comprising 46 reports) were included. Coxibs increased the risk of edema (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.15, 1.86; I 2  = 0%; 34 studies, 19,754 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and celecoxib increased hypertensive or renal events (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08, 1.43; I 2  = 0%; 2 studies, 3589 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Etoricoxib increased the risk of hypertension (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.14, 3.46; I 2  = 34%; 13 studies, 6560 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); no difference was observed when pooling all coxibs (RR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91, 1.76; I 2  = 26%; 30 studies, 16,173 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Conclusions: Coxibs likely increase the renal adverse effects, including hypertension and edema. Awareness about the renal risks of coxibs should be increased, mainly in high-risk patient.

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors alleviated depressive and anxious-like behaviors in mice exposed to lipopolysaccharide: Involvement of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation.

Depression and anxiety disorders have their pathophysiologies linked to inflammation and oxidative stress. In this context, celecoxib (CLX) and etoricoxib (ETR) inhibit cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), an enzyme expressed by cells involved in the inflammatory process and found in the brain. Studies have been using CLX as a possible drug in the treatment of depression, although its mechanisms at the central nervous system level are not fully elucidated. In this study, the effects of CLX and ETR on behavioral, oxidative, and inflammatory changes induced by systemic exposure to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were evaluated in adult male swiss mice. For ten days, the animals received intraperitoneal injections of LPS at 0.5 mg/kg. From the sixth to the tenth day, one hour after LPS exposure, they were treated orally with CLX (15 mg/kg), ETR (10 mg/kg), or fluoxetine (FLU) (20 mg/kg). Twenty-four hours after the last oral administration, the animals underwent evaluation of locomotor activity (open field test), predictive tests for depressive-like behavior (forced swim and tail suspension tests), and anxiolytic-like effect (elevated plus maze and hole board tests). Subsequently, the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and striatum were dissected for the measurement of oxidative and nitrosative parameters (malondialdehyde, nitrite, and glutathione) and quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß and IL-6). LPS induced depressive and anxious-like behavior, and treatment with CLX or ETR was able to reverse most of the behavioral changes. It was evidenced that nitrosative stress and the degree of lipid peroxidation induced by LPS were reduced in different brain areas after treatment with the drugs, as well as the endogenous defense system against free radicals was strengthened. CLX and ETR also significantly reduced LPS-induced cytokine levels. These data are expected to expand information on the role of inflammation in depression and anxiety and provide insights into possible mechanisms of COX-2 inhibitors in psychiatric disorders with a neurobiological basis in inflammation and oxidative stress.

Etoricoxib Coated Tablets: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting Conditions.

Etoricoxib is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with high selectivity for cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), exerting a pronounced anti-inflammatory effect with fewer adverse events when compared to COX-1 inhibitors. The present study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two etoricoxib-coated tablet formulations to meet regulatory requirements for a branded generic product registration in Brazil. A crossover study with an open-label, randomized design and a single-dose regimen with two treatments and two periods was conducted on healthy Brazilians of both genders. Subjects randomly received a single dose of a 90 mg etoricoxib coated tablet of test product Xumer® 90 mg (Adium S.A.) and the reference product Arcoxia® 90 mg (Merck Sharp & Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda.) under fasting conditions separated by a 14-day period. Blood samples were collected sequentially for up to 96 h following drug administration, and the concentrations of etoricoxib in plasma were determined using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed utilizing non-compartmental analysis methods. A total of 32 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 25 subjects completed the study. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf were 103.98% (95.63-113.06), 96.82% (91.82-102.09), and 95.79% (90.70-101.16), respectively. In accordance with regulatory standards, the test formulation (Xumer® 90 mg) has been deemed bioequivalent to the reference product (Arcoxia® 90 mg). As a result, these formulations can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice, with both proving to be safe and well-tolerated. The need for in vivo testing for the Xumer® 60 mg strength was waived due to the proportional similarity of the formulations and the similar in vitro dissolution profiles observed across the various strengths.

[Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor hypersensitivity]. / Hipersensibilidad selectiva a inhibidores de la ciclooxigenasa-2.

BACKGROUND: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are usually recommended as a safe alternative in patients with multiple hypersensitivity to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Nevertheless, both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions have been described, and the possibility of cross-reactivity with sulphonamides. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old patient who, after taking a celecoxib tablet, presented with latency of several hours a skin reaction. Previously, he had presented a minor reaction during treatment with etoricoxib without establishing the correlation at that time. The patient underwent an allergological study by means of skin tests with negative results and an oral challenged test with etoricoxib with positive results. Tolerance to sulfonamides was proven. CONCLUSIONS: We present a singular case of a cross-reactivity skin reaction to etoricoxib and celecoxib, suggesting the need to perform challenge tests to confirm the tolerance or not of each drug before allowing their use. On the contrary, trimethropim/sulfamethoxazole could be safely used in our patients, if needed.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los inhibidores de la ciclooxigenasa-2 suelen indicarse en pacientes con hipersensibilidad múltiple a los antiinflamatorios no esteroides. Sin embargo, se han descrito reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata y retardada, además de posible reactividad cruzada con sulfonamidas. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente masculino de 66 años, que acudió al servicio de Alergia por una reacción cutánea, luego de haber consumido un comprimido de celecoxib. Previamente, durante el tratamiento con etoricoxib, tuvo una reacción menor, sin establecer la correlación farmacológica. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas (intraepidérmicas y epicutáneas), con resultados negativos, y un examen de exposición oral controlada con etoricoxib, con resultado positivo. Se comprobó la tolerancia a las sulfamidas. CONCLUSIONES: El caso de reacción cutánea, mediante reactividad cruzada, entre etoricoxib y celecoxib expuesto en este artículo sugiere la necesidad de realizar pruebas de provocación para confirmar la tolerancia de cada fármaco antes de su prescripción. Por el contrario, trimetropim-sulfametoxazol pueden indicarse con seguridad, si fuese necesario.

Factores asociados con el uso de inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en una población de pacientes colombianos con espondiloartritis / Factors associated with the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in a population of Colombian patients with spondyloarthritis

RESUMEN Introducción: El uso de TNFi es cada vez más frecuente en los pacientes con espondiloartritis. Identificar tempranamente aquellos que los requerirán o poder predecir su uso puede ayudar a hacer un tratamiento más efectivo y oportuno racionalizando su uso. Objetivo: Determinar los factores qué mejor explican la indicación de TNFi en la población en estudio. Material y métodos: La asociación entre el uso de medicamentos anti-TNFα y las variables categóricas demográficas, clínicas, de laboratorio, radiológicas y de tratamiento se exploró por prueba exacta de Fisher. La asociación con las variables cuantitativas fue evaluada con t de Student o U de Mann Withney, de acuerdo con su distribución. Aquellas variables con p < 0,25 fueron ingresadas a modelos univariante de regresión logística explicativa para construir los OR crudos; aquellas con p < 0,25 se incluyeron en el modelo multivariante para construir OR ajustados. Resultados y discusión: La población está constituida por 181 pacientes. Modelo univariante: la artritis reactiva, uretritis y compromiso periférico fueron factores protectores para el uso de TNFi. Espondiloartritis axial, lumbalgia inflamatoria, dolor glúteo alternante, rigidez matinal sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, tratamiento con inhibidores COX-2, tiempo de evolución de tres arios o más y los puntajes de BASDAI y BASFI se asociaron con el uso de TNFi. Modelo multivariante: artritis reactiva (OR 0,1, IC 95% 0,012-0,86, p = 0,036), lumbalgia inflamatoria (OR 13,63, IC 95% 1,36-136, p = 0,026), sacroilitis (OR 7,71, IC 95% 1,04-57, p = 0,045, uso de coxib (OR 10,1, IC 95% 2,71-37,62, p = 0,001) y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI (4-6: OR 6,1, IC 95% 1,3-28,7, p = 0,022, mayor de 6: OR 15,8, IC 95% 2,2-113, p = 0,006) se asociaron independientemente con el uso de TNFi. El uso de coxib se asoció con la indicación de usar TNFi tanto en los pacientes con espondiloartritis axial (OR 4,2, IC 95% 1,74-10,11, p = 0,001) como periférica (OR 4, IC 95% 1,85-8,62, p < 0,001). Conclusiones: El inicio de la enfermedad en la forma de artritis reactiva se comportó como un factor protector para la necesidad posterior de usar TNFi, mientras que presentar lumbalgia inflamatoria, sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, el tratamiento con coxib y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI mayor de 4 se asociaron con el uso de estos medicamentos.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors is increasing in patients with spondyloarthritis. Early identification of those that would require them, or the ability to predict their use, could lead to a more effective and timely treatment by rationalizing their use. Objective: To determine factors that better explain the indication of TNFi in the study population. Material and methods: The association between anti-TNFα use and categorical demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological and treatment variables was explored using Pearson's Chi2 or Fisher's exact test. The association with the quantitative variables was evaluated using Student's t test or Mann Whitney U test, depending on their distribution. Those variables with P < 0.25 were entered into univariate models of explanatory logistic regression to cons truct crude ORs, and those with P < 0.25 were included in the multivariate model to construct adjusted ORs. Results and discussion: The study population includes 181 patients. In the univariate model: reactive arthritis, urethritis, and peripheral involvement were protective factors for the use of TNFi. Axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory lumbalgia, alternating gluteal pain, morning stiffness, sacroiliitis demonstrated by any method, treatment with COX-2 inhibitors, evolu tion time of three years or more, and BASDAI and BASFI scores were associated with the use of TNFi. Multivariate model: reactive arthritis (P = 0.036), inflammatory back pain (P = 0.026), sacroiliitis (P = 0.045), use of coxibs (P = 0.001) and the maximum score of BASDAI (P = 0.022, P = 0.006) were independently associated with the use of TNFi. The use of coxibs was associa ted with the indication of using TNFi in both patients with axial spondyloarthritis (P = 0.001) and peripheral (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The onset of the disease in the form of reactive arthritis behaved as a protective factor for the subsequent need to use TNFi, while presenting with inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis, demonstrated by any method, treatment with coxibs, and the maximum score of BASDAI greater than 4 associated with the use of these medications.

Meloxicam and/or Etoricoxib Could Be Administered Safely in Two Equal Doses during an Open Oral Challenge in Patients with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are common. These patients require an effective and safe analgesic alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety of meloxicam and etoricoxib administered by open oral challenge in 2 equal steps in patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study of patients with a diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity who underwent an oral drug provocation test (DPT) with meloxicam or etoricoxib between January 2011 and August 2017 was conducted. The analysis was performed from a database in BD Clinic. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-eight oral provocations were performed with an alternative NSAID (203 with meloxicam and 25 with etoricoxib) in 217 patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. The median age was 38 years. Ninety-eight percent of meloxicam and 100% of etoricoxib DPTs were performed in 2 steps (without previous placebo), and 52% and 64% of meloxicam and etoricoxib DPTs, respectively, were performed with 50% of the therapeutic dose in each step. Tolerance to meloxicam was demonstrated in 192 patients (94.5%) and in 100% of patients receiving etoricoxib. CONCLUSIONS: Open oral provocation with meloxicam and etoricoxib carried out in 2 steps without placebo seems to be safe and implies less costs and less time expenditure. Also, it could be performed with 2 equal doses.

The association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and skin cancer: Different responses in American and European populations.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive systematic meta-analysis investigating the association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their subtypes with skin cancer (SC) and its subclasses (basal cell carcinoma BCC; squamous cell carcinoma SCC; melanoma; nonmelanoma skin cancer NMSC) in general, American and European populations. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to 24 February 2019. Pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate associations. RESULTS: Results based on 26 original studies including 223,619 cases and 1,398,507 controls showed both NSAIDs and nonselective Cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors to be statistically significantly associated with a reduced risk of SC, BCC, SCC and NMSC but not with melanoma. Conversely, no association was observed between selective Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors and SC or its subclasses. Further subgroup analysis showed that the results analyzed for American populations were almost the same as those for the general population. For European populations, neither NSAIDs nor its subtypes correlated significantly with susceptibility to SC or its subclasses. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NSAIDs might reduce the risk of SC, but many factors including study population, drug subtype, and disease subclass affect the significance of the association.

[Cardiovascular risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs]. / Riesgo cardiovascular de los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used drugs in clinical practice. They block cyclooxygenases (COX) enzymes, but the degree of inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 varies between them. In general, NSAIDs are classified in selective COX-2 or coxibs and non-selective or traditional NSAIDs. Both the analgesic and antiinflammatory effects, as well as the cardiovascular adverse effects, depend on the COX-2 inhibition. This paper reviews the available evidence of the increased risk of thrombotic events for both coxibs and traditional NSAID. The prothrombotic effect could be due to the inhibition of endothelial COX-2, with a decrease in production of prostacyclin and a relative increase in platelet thromboxane levels. Coxibs and diclofenac 150 mg/day seem to increase the risk of major vascular events by more than a third. Ibuprofen 2400 mg/day could slightly increase the risk of coronary events. Naproxen 1000 mg/day apparently does not increase the risk of vascular events. Besides ibuprofen and naproxen have the potential to decrease the cardioprotective effect of low doses of aspirin. Naproxen (= 1000 mg/day) and low doses of ibuprofen (= 1200 mg/day) are considered to have the most favorable thrombotic cardiovascular safety profiles of all NSAIDs. Therapeutic decisions should be based on an assessment of a person's individual risk factors, using the safest NSAIDs, at the lowest effective doses, for the shortest duration necessary to control symptoms, restricting their use in patients with increased cardiovascular risk.

Riesgo cardiovascular de los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos / Cardiovascular risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

Los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINEs) se encuentran entre los fármacos más utilizados en la práctica clínica. Actúan mediante el bloqueo de las enzimas ciclooxigenasas (COX), pero el grado de inhibición de COX-1 y COX-2 varía entre ellos. Se ha generalizado la clasificación entre COX-2 selectivos o coxibs, y los no selectivos o AINEs tradicionales. Tanto los efectos analgésico y antiinflamatorio como los efectos adversos cardiovasculares dependen de la inhibición de COX-2. Este trabajo revisa las evidencias disponibles del aumento del riesgo de eventos trombóticos tanto para los coxibs como para los AINEs tradicionales. El efecto protrombótico podría deberse a la inhibición de la COX-2 endotelial, con disminución de la prostaciclina y un incremento relativo de los niveles del tromboxano plaquetario. Los coxibs y el diclofenac, 150 mg/día, aumentarían el riesgo de eventos vasculares mayores en más de un tercio. El ibuprofeno 2400 mg/día aumentaría levemente el riesgo de eventos coronarios. El naproxeno 1000 mg/día no incrementaría el riesgo de eventos vasculares. Además, el ibuprofeno y el naproxeno tienen el potencial del disminuir el efecto cardioprotector de bajas dosis de aspirina. El naproxeno (≤ 1000 mg/día) y el ibuprofeno a bajas dosis (≤ 1200 mg/día) deberían considerarse los AINEs con el mejor perfil de seguridad cardiovascular. Las decisiones terapéuticas deben basarse en una adecuada evaluación del riesgo del paciente, utilizando los AINEs más seguros, a las menores dosis efectivas, por el menor tiempo posible que permita el control de los síntomas, restringiendo su utilización en enfermos con aumento del riesgo cardiovascular.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used drugs in clinical practice. They block cyclooxygenases (COX) enzymes, but the degree of inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 varies between them. In general, NSAIDs are classified in selective COX-2 or coxibs and non-selective or traditional NSAIDs. Both the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, as well as the cardiovascular adverse effects, depend on the COX-2 inhibition. This paper reviews the available evidence of the increased risk of thrombotic events for both coxibs and traditional NSAID. The prothrombotic effect could be due to the inhibition of endothelial COX-2, with a decrease in production of prostacyclin and a relative increase in platelet thromboxane levels. Coxibs and diclofenac 150 mg/day seem to increase the risk of major vascular events by more than a third. Ibuprofen 2400 mg/day could slightly increase the risk of coronary events. Naproxen 1000 mg/day apparently does not increase the risk of vascular events. Besides ibuprofen and naproxen have the potential to decrease the cardioprotective effect of low doses of aspirin. Naproxen (≤ 1000 mg/day) and low doses of ibuprofen (≤ 1200 mg/day) are considered to have the most favorable thrombotic cardiovascular safety profiles of all NSAIDs. Therapeutic decisions should be based on an assessment of a person´s individual risk factors, using the safest NSAIDs, at the lowest effective doses, for the shortest duration necessary to control symptoms, restricting their use in patients with increased cardiovascular risk.

Perfil dos pacientes com urticária e angioedema por anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais do Serviço de Alergia e Imunologia do Hospital do Servidor Público do Estado de São Paulo / Profile of patients with urticaria and angioedema caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the Allergy and Immunology Division of Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo

Objetivos: Identificar pacientes com história de urticária e angioedema desencadeados por anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINEs), no Serviço de Alergia e Imunologia do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, classificá-los como seletivos e não seletivos e avaliar a tolerabilidade ao inibidor de COX-2 (etoricoxib 90 mg). Métodos: Os indivíduos com múltiplas reações desencadeadas por AINE, de grupos diferentes, foram submetidos a teste de provocação oral com Etoricoxib 90 mg. Pacientes com história de urticária e/ou angioedema a um único grupo de AINE, ou com primeiro episódio, realizaram testes de provocação oral com outro grupo de AINE, para classificá-los em seletivo ou não. Resultados: Estudou-se 43 pacientes, com idade entre 18 e 71 anos, predomínio do sexo feminino (77%). A maioria dos pacientes apresentavam reações a múltiplos AINE (não seletivos) e 2 (5%) a um único AINEs (seletivos). Observou-se sintomas alérgicos em 53%, com predomínio da rinite (61%). Os fármacos mais implicados foram: dipirona (39%), diclofenaco (18%) e AAS (14%). Todos os pacientes apresentaram teste com etoricoxib 90 mg negativo. Conclusão: A maioria dos pacientes apresentou reação não seletiva, e todos os pacientes apresentaram teste com etoricoxib 90 mg negativo, demonstrando segurança e ser uma boa opção terapêutica.

Objectives: To identify patients with a history of urticaria and angioedema caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the Allergy and Immunology Division of Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, to classify them as selective or nonselective, and to evaluate their tolerability to cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (etoricoxib 90 mg). Methods: Patients with multiple reactions induced by NSAIDs, from different groups, were subjected to oral provocation test with etoricoxib 90 mg. Patients with a history of urticaria and/or angioedema induced by only one group of NSAIDs, or experiencing their first episode, were subjected to oral provocation test with another NSAID group to classify them as selective or non-selective. Results: A total of 43 patients aged 18-71 years, predominantly female (77%), were studied. The majority of patients showed reactions to multiple NSAIDs (non-selective); only 2 (4.6%) reacted to only one NSAID (selective). Allergic symptoms were observed in 53% of the patients, mainly rhinitis (61%). The drugs most frequently involved were dipyrone (39%), diclofenac (18%) and acetylsalicylic acid (14%). The etoricoxib 90 mg test resulted negative for all patients. Conclusion: The majority of patients showed nonselective reactions, and all of them showed negative etoricoxib 90 mg tests, demonstrating the safety and appropriateness of this treatment option.

Impact of parecoxib on hospital discharge: retrospective analysis of Brazilian health insurance / Impacto de parecoxibe na desospitalização: análise retrospectiva da saúde suplementar no Brasil

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adequate postoperative pain and renal colic control is critical for patients' recovery and to decrease hospitalization costs and the use of resources. So, this study aimed at evaluating hospitalization time of patients treated with parecoxib sodium versus other non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs to manage postoperative pain of appendectomy or fractures and renal colic. METHODS: This is a retrospective data analysis of Brazilian private hospitals medical bills, including patients treated with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs to decrease post-appendectomy pain (n=1618), post orthopedic fracture pain (n=2858 and renal colic (n=6555), between January and June 2014. Mean hospitalization time was evaluated according to each group of drugs. Mean difference among groups was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis method. RESULTS: Mean hospitalization time for patients submitted to appendectomy was 1.95 days with parecoxib versus 2.20 with other non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (p= 0.006). For patients submitted to orthopedic fracture surgery, mean time was 1.75 days with parecoxib versus 1.93 days with other anti-inflammatory drugs (p=0.008). Parecoxib has also significantly decreased hospitalization time for renal colic as compared to other drugs (25.2h versus 32.9h; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Parecoxib sodium has provided shorter hospitalization time with possible decrease in use of resources and costs and should be considered a choice for such painful conditions.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O controle adequado da dor pós-operatória e cólica renal é fundamental para a recuperação do paciente e redução de custos relacionados à hospitalização e utilização de recursos. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o tempo de hospitalização entre pacientes tratados com parecoxibe sódico versus outros fármacos anti-inflamatórios não esteroides, no manuseio da dor pós-operatória associada à apendicectomia ou fraturas e cólica renal. MÉTODOS: Uma análise retrospectiva de dados de contas médicas de hospitais privados no Brasil foi realizada, incluindo pacientes tratados com anti-inflamatório não esteroide para redução da dor pós-apendicectomia (n=1.618), dor pós-fratura ortopédica (n=2.858) e cólica renal (n=6.555), entre janeiro e junho de 2014. O período médio de internação foi avaliado de acordo com cada grupo de fármacos. A diferença média entre os grupos foi avaliada utilizando o método de Kruskal-Wallis. RESULTADOS: O tempo médio de permanência hospitalar para pacientes submetidos à apendicectomia foi de 1,95 dias com parecoxibe versus 2,20 com outros anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (p = 0,006). Para pacientes submetidos a cirurgias de fraturas ortopédicas, o tempo médio foi de 1,75 dias com parecoxibe versus 1,93 dias para outros anti-inflamatórios (p=0,008). Parecoxibe também apresentou redução significativa no tempo de internação hospitalar para cólica renal em comparação com outros fármacos (25,2h versus 32,9h; p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Parecoxibe sódico demonstrou menor tempo de permanência hospitalar com possível redução na utilização de recursos e custos, devendo ser considerado como uma escolha para estas condições dolorosas.

Meloxicam temporally inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1 and VEGFR-2 during alveolar bone repair in rats.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role during angiogenesis and bone repair. This study investigated whether the use of meloxicam alters bone repair via downregulation of VEGF and receptor expression. METHODS: One hundred twenty male Wistar rats had their maxillary right incisor extracted. Animals were divided into a control group (CG; n = 60) and a meloxicam-treated group (TG; n = 60) that received either a single daily intraperitoneal injection of 0.9% NaCl or meloxicam 3 mg/kg, respectively, for 7 consecutive days. Alveolar bone repair was evaluated histomorphometrically, whereas VEGF and its receptors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test with P < 0.05. RESULTS: Bone volume density increased significantly (P = 0.001) in both groups with a strong correlation between treatment and periods (P = 0.003). In the TG, a small amount of bone formation occurred compared with the CG between 3 and 21 days. No significant differences in the number of VEGF-positive cells per square millimeter (P = 0.07) and VEGF messenger RNA (mRNA) expression (P = 0.49) were found between groups. Immunostained cells per square millimeter and mRNA expression for VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001) and VEGFR-2 (P < 0.001 for both analysis) showed a strong interaction between treatment groups and periods. In the TG, immunostained cells per square millimeter and mRNA expression for VEGFR-1 were, respectively, 89% and 37% lower from 3 to 10 days compared with the CG, whereas for VEGFR-2, these values were 252% and 60%, respectively, from 3 to 7 days. CONCLUSION: In rat alveolar bone repair, meloxicam did not affect VEGF expression but downregulated VEGFR expression, which may cause a delay in the bone repair/remodeling process.

Evaluación clínica, epidemiológica y terapéutica en 14 casos de carcinoma inflamatorio mamario canino / Clinical, Epidemiological and Therapeutic Evaluation in 14 Cases of Inflammatory Breast Cancer in Canines / Avaliação clínica, epidemiológica e terapêutica em 14 casos de carcinoma inflamatório mamário canino

Con el objetivo de evaluar los aspectos clínicos, edad, raza, presencia de metástasis, protocolo quimioterapéutico, utilización de inhibidores de COX-2 y sobrevida en caninas diagnosticadas con carcinoma inflamatorio, en el Hospital Veterinario de Uberaba (HVU), se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de las historias clínicas de 14 hembras caninas atendidas en el HVU entre julio de 2011 y julio de 2012, con diagnóstico de carcinoma inflamatorio mamario. Las razas acometidas fueron mestizo, poodle, terrier brasilero, teckel y pastor belga. Edad media: 11,1 años. En 7 animales fueron detectados focos de metástasis a distancia. De ellos 5 pacientes recibieron como único tratamiento inhibidores de COX-2 y apenas 4 recibieron tratamiento quimioterapéutico. El protocolo, constituido por piroxicam, ciclofosfamida, carboplatina y doxorrubicina, presentó el mayor tiempo de sobrevida (210 días). En conclusión, el carcinoma inflamatorio es una enfermedad de mal pronóstico, poco tiempo de sobrevida, y ocasiona alteraciones sistémicas que disminuyen la respuesta terapéutica. Aparentemente la modalidad terapéutica más indicada es la asociación de inhibidores de COX-2 y quimioterapéuticos; sin embargo, son necesarios estudios clínicos controlados para evaluar estas sugestiones.

With the aim of evaluating clinical aspects, age, breed, presence of metastasis, chemotherapeutical protocol, use of COX-2 inhibitors and survival rate in female dogs diagnosed with inflammatory carcinoma at the Hospital Veterinario de Uberaba (HVU), a retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of 14 female dogs seen at HVU between July, 2011 and July, 2012 and diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer. The breeds included were crossbred, poodle, Brazilian terrier, teckel and Belgian shepherd. Average age: 11.1 years. Outbreaks of distant metastasis were detected in 7 animals, out of which 5 patients received COX-2 inhibitors as sole treatment and only 4 received chemotherapeutical treatment. The protocol, constituted by piroxicam, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin and doxorubicin showed the highest survival time (210 days). In conclusion, inflammatory carcinoma is a disease of bad prognosis, short survival time and produces systemic alterations that reduce therapeutic response. Apparently, the most accurate therapeutic form is the association of COX-2 inhibitors and chemotherapeutics; however, controlled clinical studies are needed in order to evaluate these suggestions.

Com o objetivo de avaliar os aspectos clínicos, idade, raça, presença de metástase, protocolo químico-terapêutico, utilização de inibidores de COX-2 e sobrevida em caninas diagnosticadas com carcinoma inflamatório, no Hospital Veterinário de Uberaba (HVU), se realizou uma análise retrospectiva das histórias clínicas de 14 fêmeas caninas atendidas no HVU entre julho de 2011 e julho de 2012, com diagnóstico de carcinoma inflamatório mamário. As raças acometidas foram SRD, poodle, terrier brasileiro, teckel e pastor belga. Idade média: 11,1 anos. Em 7 animais foram detectados focos de metástase a distância. Deles, 5 pacientes receberam como único tratamento inibidores de COX-2 e apenas 4 receberam tratamento químico-terapêutico. O protocolo, constituído por piroxicam, ciclofosfamida, carboplatina e doxorrubicina, apresentou o maior tempo de sobrevida (210 dias). Em conclusão, o carcinoma inflamatório é uma doença de mal prognóstico, pouco tempo de sobrevida, e ocasiona alterações sistêmicas que diminuem a resposta terapêutica. Aparentemente a modalidade terapêutica mais indicada é a associação de inibidores de COX-2 e químico-terapêuticos; contudo, estudos clínicos controlados são necessários para avaliar estas sugestões.

Inibição seletiva da ciclo-oxigenase-2: riscos e benefícios / Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2: risks and benefits

Os anti-inflamatórios inibidores das ciclo-oxigenases (COX) representam a classe de fármacos mais comumente utilizada. A COX corresponde a uma classe de enzimas conservadas evolutivamente e tem duas isoformas principais: a COX-1 e a COX-2. Seus subprodutos têm papel fundamental na inflamação e na percepção da dor. Há uma grande discussão entre a inibição seletiva ou não da COX pelo fato de a mesma, além de participar dos eventos inflamatórios, ter papel fundamental na manutenção da homeostase do organismo. A inibição seletiva da COX-2 surgiu com o intuito de reduzir os efeitos deletérios gastrintestinais de uma inibição não seletiva; em contrapartida, a inibição exclusiva da COX-2 associou-se a sérios eventos cardiovasculares, por causar um desequilíbrio entre a produção de prostaciclina e tromboxano. O objetivo deste trabalho é revisar a literatura a esse respeito, apontando os prós e os contras da inibição seletiva ou não das enzimas ciclo-oxigenases.

The cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors are the most common drugs used worldwide. COX corresponds to an evolutionarily conserved class of enzymes and has two main isoforms: COX-1, which is largely associated with physiological functions, and COX-2, which is largely associated with pathological functions. Their subproducts have an important role in inflammation and pain perception. The COX-2 selective inhibition was designed to minimize gastrointestinal complications of non-selective inhibition. However, this exclusive COX-2 inhibition was associated with serious cardiovascular events, for causing an imbalance between prostacyclin and thromboxane production. The objective of this study is to discuss the mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects, pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of the selective or nonselective COX inhibitors.

Dosagem de proteína C reativa em cadelas compiometra associada à SRIS/Sepse antes e apósadministração de Firocoxib (Previcox®) / Determination of C-reactive protein in bitches with SIRS/Sepsisassociated to pyometra before and after Firocoxib (Previcox®) treatment

A piometra é uma afecção de grande importância na clínica médica e cirúrgica de animais de companhia,podendo ocasionar graves efeitos deletérios, sobre tudo quando associada à Síndrome daResposta Inflamatória Sistêmica (SRIS). A proteína C reativa (PCR)é uma proteína de fase aguda,que aumenta em condições de danos teciduais, podendo ser útil na avaliação de pacientes em SRIS;em caso de resposta terapêutica favorável, seus valores diminuem de forma contínua. O uso de antiinflamatóriosesteroidais e não-esteroidais (AINE) tem sido pesquisado como ferramenta terapêuticana atenuação dos efeitos gerados pela SRIS. O AINE firocoxib apresenta mecanismo de ação baseadona inibição da cicloxigenase-2, não havendo estudos relacionando seu uso em cães sépticos. Essa pesquisaverificou a eficácia do firocoxib (Previcox®) na evolução da SRIS de 16 cadelas com piometrapor meio da dosagem de PCR e outros parâmetros laboratoriais. Os valores da PCR foram significativamentemenores nos animais submetidos ao tratamento com o firocoxib, sugerindo que o uso deanti-inflamatórios pode ser importante auxiliar na estabilização da paciente com piometra e no controleda resposta inflamatória sistêmica.(AU)

Pyometra is a disease of great importance in medicine and surgery of companion animals and cancause serious deleterious effects, especially when associated with systemic inflammatory responsesyndrome (SIRS). C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein that increases in conditions oftissue damage and may be useful in evaluating patients with SIRS, in case of favorable therapeuticresponse, their values decrease continuously. The use of anti-inflammatory and non-steroidal drugs(NSAIDs) has been investigated as a therapeutic tool in mitigating the effects generated by SIRS. TheNSAID provides firocoxib mechanism of action based on the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2, there areno studies linking its use in septic dogs. This research verified the effectiveness of firocoxib (Previcox®) in the evolution of SIRS, 16 bitches with pyometra by dosage PCR and other laboratory parameters.The values of CRP were significantly lower in animals subjected to treatment with firocoxib, suggestingthat the use of anti-inflammatory drugs may be important to assist in stabilizing the patient with pyometra and control of systemic inflammatory response.(AU)

Dosagem de proteína C reativa em cadelas compiometra associada à SRIS/Sepse antes e apósadministração de Firocoxib (Previcox®) / Determination of C-reactive protein in bitches with SIRS/Sepsisassociated to pyometra before and after Firocoxib (Previcox®) treatment

A piometra é uma afecção de grande importância na clínica médica e cirúrgica de animais de companhia,podendo ocasionar graves efeitos deletérios, sobre tudo quando associada à Síndrome daResposta Inflamatória Sistêmica (SRIS). A proteína C reativa (PCR)é uma proteína de fase aguda,que aumenta em condições de danos teciduais, podendo ser útil na avaliação de pacientes em SRIS;em caso de resposta terapêutica favorável, seus valores diminuem de forma contínua. O uso de antiinflamatóriosesteroidais e não-esteroidais (AINE) tem sido pesquisado como ferramenta terapêuticana atenuação dos efeitos gerados pela SRIS. O AINE firocoxib apresenta mecanismo de ação baseadona inibição da cicloxigenase-2, não havendo estudos relacionando seu uso em cães sépticos. Essa pesquisaverificou a eficácia do firocoxib (Previcox®) na evolução da SRIS de 16 cadelas com piometrapor meio da dosagem de PCR e outros parâmetros laboratoriais. Os valores da PCR foram significativamentemenores nos animais submetidos ao tratamento com o firocoxib, sugerindo que o uso deanti-inflamatórios pode ser importante auxiliar na estabilização da paciente com piometra e no controleda resposta inflamatória sistêmica.

Pyometra is a disease of great importance in medicine and surgery of companion animals and cancause serious deleterious effects, especially when associated with systemic inflammatory responsesyndrome (SIRS). C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein that increases in conditions oftissue damage and may be useful in evaluating patients with SIRS, in case of favorable therapeuticresponse, their values decrease continuously. The use of anti-inflammatory and non-steroidal drugs(NSAIDs) has been investigated as a therapeutic tool in mitigating the effects generated by SIRS. TheNSAID provides firocoxib mechanism of action based on the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2, there areno studies linking its use in septic dogs. This research verified the effectiveness of firocoxib (Previcox®) in the evolution of SIRS, 16 bitches with pyometra by dosage PCR and other laboratory parameters.The values of CRP were significantly lower in animals subjected to treatment with firocoxib, suggestingthat the use of anti-inflammatory drugs may be important to assist in stabilizing the patient with pyometra and control of systemic inflammatory response.

Uso combinado da laserterapia de baixa potência e da inibição da ciclooxigenase-2 na reepitelização de ferida incisional em pele de camundongos: um estudo pré-clínico / Combined use of low level laser therapy and cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibition on skin incisional wound reepithelialization in mice: a preclinical study

FUNDAMENTOS: A laserterapia de baixa potência e os inibidores seletivos da ciclooxigenase-2 (ICOX2) vem sendo muito utilizados para modular a resposta inflamatória, entretanto, os seus efeitos na reepitelização de feridas não são bem compreendidos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os efeitos isolados e combinados da laserterapia de baixa potência e da ICOX2 na reepitelização de ferida incisional na pele de camundongos. MÉTODO: Foi induzida uma ferida de 1 cm no dorso de cada camundongo, que foram divididos em quatro grupos (N=20): Controle, Laserterapia, Tratados com celecoxib e Terapia conjugada. Os animais dos grupos celecoxib e Terapia conjugada foram tratados com celecoxib por 10 dias antes da incisão cutânea. As feridas experimentais foram irradiadas com laserterapia de baixa potência He-Ne (632nm, dose: 4J/cm2) em varredura, por 12 segundos durante três dias consecutivos nos grupos Laserterapia e Terapia conjugada. Os animais foram sacrificados no 3º dia de pós-operatório. Amostras das feridas foram coletadas e coradas (Tricromio de Masson) para análise histomorfométrica. RESULTADOS: Tanto o grupo Laserterapia, quanto o grupo celecoxib, mostrou aumento da reepitelização cutânea em relação ao grupo Controle, entretanto, o grupo Terapia conjugada não apresentou diferenças. Quanto à queratinização o grupo Laserterapia e Terapia conjugada apresentaram redução dos queratinócitos, comparados com o grupo Controle. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados mostram que o uso da laserterapia de baixa potência e da ICOX2 isoladamente aumentam as células epiteliais, mas somente a laserterapia de baixa potência reduziu os queratinócitos cutâneos. O tratamento conjugado restabelece a reepitelização inata e dimunui a queratinização, embora ocorra uma acelerada contração da ferida com melhora na organização da ferida na pele de camundongos.

BACKGROUND: Low level laser therapy and cyclooxygenase-2 (ICOX2) selective inhibitors have been widely used to modulate inflammatory response; however, their effect on wound reepithelialization are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the isolated and combined effects of low level laser therapy and ICOX2 in the reepithelization of skin incisional wounds in mice. METHODS: We induced a 1-cm wound on the back of each mouse, which were divided into four groups (N = 20): control, laser therapy, treated with celecoxib and combined therapy. The animals in the celecoxib and combined therapy groups were treated with celecoxib for 10 days before skin incision. The experimental wounds were irradiated with He-Ne low power laser (632nm, dose: 4J/cm2) in scanning for 12 seconds during three consecutive days in the laser therapy and combined therapy groups. The animals were sacrificed 3 days after surgery. Samples of the wounds were collected and stained (Masson's Trichrome) for histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: Both the laser therapy group and the celecoxib group showed an increase in skin reepithelialization compared to the control group; however, the combined therapy group showed no differences. As for keratinization, the laser therapy and combined therapy groups showed a reduction in keratinocytes compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The results show that the use of low level laser therapy and ICOX2 in isolation increases epithelial cells, but only low level laser therapy reduced skin keratinocytes. The combined treatment restores innate epithelialization and decreases keratinization in spite of accelerating wound contraction with improvement in the organization of the wound in the skin of mice.

Lumiracoxib for acute postoperative dental pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials / Lumiracoxibe para dor dental aguda e pós-operatória: uma revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Lumiracoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug that has been used to treat acute dental pain, mainly in postsurgical settings, in which the greatest levels of pain and discomfort are experienced during the first 24 hours. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lumiracoxib for treating acute postsurgical dental pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review developed at the Brazilian Cochrane Centre, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and Embase databases. A manual search was also performed. Only randomized controlled trials were included, and these were selected and assessed by two researchers with regard to the risk of bias. RESULTS: Three clinical trials with 921 participants were included. Lumiracoxib 400 mg produced onset of analgesia in a shorter time than shown by lumiracoxib 100 mg, celecoxib 200 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg. There was no difference between lumiracoxib 400 mg and rofecoxib 50 mg. In two studies, the mean time taken to attain onset of analgesia for the placebo was not estimated because the number of participants who reached onset was too small. CONCLUSION: There is evidence with a moderate risk of bias that recommends the use of lumiracoxib for acute postoperative dental pain. However, the adverse effects are not completely known. Given that lumiracoxib is currently available in only three countries, further studies are likely to be rare and discouraged.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: O lumiracoxibe é um anti-inflamatório que tem sido utilizado no tratamento de dor dental aguda, principalmente no cenário pós-cirúrgico, no qual níveis mais elevados de dor e desconforto são sentidos durante as primeiras 24 horas. Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a eficácia e a segurança do lumiracoxibe no tratamento da dor dental aguda e pós-operatória. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Revisão sistemática desenvolvida no Centro Cochrane do Brasil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada busca eletrônica nas bases de dados PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) e Embase. Também foi realizada busca manual. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados foram incluídos e foram selecionados e avaliados por dois pesquisadores quanto ao risco de viés. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos três ensaios clínicos com 921 participantes. O lumiracoxibe 400 mg mostrou menor tempo de início de analgesia que o lumiracoxibe 100 mg, celecoxibe 200 mg e ibuprofeno de 400 mg. Não houve diferença entre lumiracoxibe 400 mg e rofecoxibe 50 mg. Em dois estudos o tempo médio de início de analgesia para o placebo não foi estimado, pois o número de participantes que a alcançou foi pequeno. CONCLUSÃO: Há evidências, com moderado risco de viés, que recomendam o uso de lumiracoxibe para a dor dental aguda e pós-operatória. No entanto, os efeitos adversos não são completamente conhecidos. Considerando que o lumiracoxibe está disponível em apenas três países, provavelmente a realização de pesquisas futuras será rara e desestimulada.

Treatment with paracetamol, ketorolac or etoricoxib did not hinder alveolar bone healing: a histometric study in rats

Prostaglandins control osteoblastic and osteoclastic function under physiological or pathological conditions and are important modulators of the bone healing process. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and consequently prostaglandins synthesis. Experimental and clinical evidence has indicated a risk for reparative bone formation related to the use of non-selective (COX-1 and COX-2) and COX-2 selective NSAIDs. Ketorolac is a non-selective NSAID which, at low doses, has a preferential COX-1 inhibitory effect and etoricoxib is a new selective COX-2 inhibitor. Although literature data have suggested that ketorolac can interfere negatively with long bone fracture healing, there seems to be no study associating etoricoxib with reparative bone formation. Paracetamol/acetaminophen, one of the first choices for pain control in clinical dentistry, has been considered a weak anti-inflammatory drug, although supposedly capable of inhibiting COX-2 activity in inflammatory sites. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether paracetamol, ketorolac and etoricoxib can hinder alveolar bone formation, taking the filling of rat extraction socket with newly formed bone as experimental model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The degree of new bone formation inside the alveolar socket was estimated two weeks after tooth extraction by a differential point-counting method, using an optical microscopy with a digital camera for image capture and histometry software. Differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA after confirming a normal distribution of sample data. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Histometric results confirmed that none of the tested drugs had a detrimental effect in the volume fraction of bone trabeculae formed inside the alveolar socket.