Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1268253, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37841719

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mental health promotion and screenings are recommended as part of standard preventive care. Mexican immigrants in the U.S. are at high risk for mental health illness especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, however access to mental health prevention for this population has been limited, which results in important implementation and equity gaps. The Ventanilla de Salud (VDS) program provides preventive services through Mexican consulates in the U.S. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess capability, opportunity, and motivation for promotores to implement mental health programming through the VDS, leveraging early experiences of ongoing mental health prevention efforts. Methods: This was a qualitative study using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Behavior Change model (COM-B). We conducted 9 focus groups with 40 VDS promotores and 6 semi-structured interviews with program stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Results: We found high levels of interest from the leadership, partners, and promotores to provide mental health services through the VDS. Early implementation of a mental health strategy that included training sessions for promotores and mental health promotion, screenings and referrals for VDS users was ongoing. We identified facilitators and barriers that could affect capability, opportunity, and motivation to provide mental health services. Facilitators included promotores' extensive knowledge about the importance of mental health, promotores service mindset and commitment to provide services to VDS users, and general support from the VDS network and partners. Barriers included promotores' turnover, need for additional economic compensation, burnout, competing priorities, and lack of mental health professionals to provide clinical services or supervision. Additional investments are recommended to support promotores' well-being. Conclusion: The main lesson learned from this study was that investing in VDS promotores' training, resources, and well-being is key to their capability, opportunity and motivation to provide mental health services for Mexican immigrants in the US. Results from this study can be applied to improve the ongoing VDS mental health strategy and increase its impact on the mental health of Mexican immigrants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Humans , Pandemics , Health Promotion , Mental Health
2.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1302669, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317683

ABSTRACT

Background: Robust data comparing long COVID in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients in middle-income countries are limited. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Brazil, including hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Long COVID was diagnosed at 90-day follow-up using WHO criteria. Demographic and clinical information, including the depression screening scale (PHQ-2) at day 30, was compared between the groups. If the PHQ-2 score is 3 or greater, major depressive disorder is likely. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors and protective factors for long COVID. Results: A total of 291 hospitalized and 1,118 non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included. The prevalence of long COVID was 47.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression showed female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 4.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51-8.37), hypertension (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.52-5.69), PHQ-2 > 3 (OR = 6.50, 95% CI 1.68-33.4) and corticosteroid use during hospital stay (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.20-5.04) as predictors of long COVID in hospitalized patients, while female sex (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.95-3.27) and PHQ-2 > 3 (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 2.52-6.16) were predictors in non-hospitalized patients. Conclusion: Long COVID was prevalent in both groups. Positive depression screening at day 30 post-infection can predict long COVID. Early screening of depression helps health staff to identify patients at a higher risk of long COVID, allowing an early diagnosis of the condition.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Retrospective Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
3.
Confl Health ; 14: 13, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32140176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Zanmi Lasante Depression Symptom Inventory (ZLDSI) is a screening tool for major depression used in 12 primary care clinics in Haiti's Central Plateau. Although previously validated in a clinic-based sample, the present study is the first to evaluate the validity and clinical utility of the ZLDSI for depression screening in a school-based population in central Haiti. METHODS: We assessed depressive symptoms in a school-based sample of transitional age youth (18-22 years; n = 120) with the ZLDSI. Other mental health-related assessments included a modified Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID) for current Major Depressive Episode, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and selected items adapted from the Global School-Based Health Survey mental health module. Diagnostic assignments of major depressive episode (MDE) were based on modified SCID interviews. RESULTS: The ZLDSI demonstrated good overall accuracy in identifying current MDE (Area under the Curve = .92, 95% CI = .86, .98, p < .001). We ascertained ≥12 as the optimal cut-off point to screen for depression with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73.9%. In addition, the ZLDSI was associated with other measures of depressive symptoms, suggesting that it demonstrates construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings support that the ZLDSI has clinical utility for screening for depression among school-going transitional age youth.

4.
J. bras. psiquiatr ; J. bras. psiquiatr;68(2): 65-71, abr.-jun. 2019. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019991

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivos Calcular a prevalência de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal em grávidas de baixo risco, no termo da gestação, avaliar seus preditores e desfechos materno-fetais. Para tal, avaliar-se-á a aplicabilidade da Escala de Rastreio de Depressão Pós-Parto (PDSS 24) nessa fase da gravidez. Métodos A PDSS 24 e um questionário sociodemográfico, psicossocial e médico (antecedentes obstétricos e patológicos) foram autoaplicados a 403 grávidas (37-40 semanas de gestação), com idade média de 30,5 anos (DP = 4,67). Por meio do processo clínico, foram recolhidos dados de resultados materno-fetais. Resultados A PDSS 24 possui propriedades psicométricas adequadas para a deteção de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal. A prevalência de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal foi de 41,7%. Grávidas com níveis de escolaridade inferiores, não casadas, cuja gravidez não foi planejada e com antecedentes de acontecimentos de vida significativos apresentam risco duas vezes superior de sintomatologia depressiva no período pré-natal. Grávidas cujo apoio social percebido ao longo da gravidez não correspondeu ao desejado e com história prévia de depressão apresentam cerca de três vezes maior risco sintomatologia depressiva no período pré-natal. Para desfechos materno-fetais (pré-eclâmpsia, restrição de crescimento fetal, Apgar 1º/5º minuto, tipo de parto, percentil de peso, oligoâminos e necessidade de cuidados intensivos), as diferenças foram não significativas. Conclusão O rastreio da depressão pré-natal deve ser realizado na gravidez. Porém, no termo da gestação o uso da PDSS 24 como ferramenta de deteção de sintomatologia depressiva deve ser feito com cautela. A elevada prevalência de sintomas relacionados com o sono nessa fase da gestação pode conduzir ao sobre diagnóstico, usando a PDSS 24.


ABSTRACT Objectives The aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of depressive symptomatology in full-term pregnancy (low risk), evaluate their predictors and maternal-fetal outcomes. To this end, the applicability of Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS 24) will be evaluated, at full-term pregnancy. Methods PDSS 24 and a sociodemographic, psychosocial, pathological and obstetrical background questionnaire were self-administered to 403 pregnant women (37-40 weeks gestation), with a mean age of 30.5 years (SD = 4.67). Data from maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes were collected from the patient clinical process. Results PDSS 24 revealed adequate psychometric properties to screening depressive symptomatology in full-term pregnancy. The prevalence of depressive symptomatology was 41.7%. Pregnant women with lower study levels, who weren't married, whose pregnancy was unplanned and with a previous history of significant life events present twice the risk to present depressive symptomatology. Pregnant women who hadn't received the desired social support in pregnancy and with a history of depression present about a 3-fold increased risk to present depressive symptomatology. For maternal-fetal outcomes (pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, Apgar score at 1st/5th minute, type of delivery, weight percentile, oligohydramnios and need for neonatal intensive care), the differences were not significant. Conclusion Screening for prenatal depression should be conducted during pregnancy. However, in full-term pregnancy women, the use of PDSS 24 as a screening tool for depressive symptomatology should be done with caution. The high prevalence of sleep-related symptoms, in full-term pregnancy, may lead to overdiagnosis, using PDSS 24.

5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 45: 85-90, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28274345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether the cut-point 10 for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) depression screen used in primary care populations is equally valid for Mexicans (M), Ecuadorians (E), Puerto Ricans (PR) and non-Hispanic whites (W) from inner-city hospital-based primary care clinics; and whether stressful life events elevate scores and the probability of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Over 18-months, a sample of persons from hospital clinics with a positive initial PHQ2 and a subsequent PHQ9 were administered a stressful life event questionnaire and a Structured Clinical Interview to establish an MDD diagnosis, with oversampling of those between 8 and 12: (n=261: 75 E, 71 M, 51 PR, 64 W). For analysis, the sample was weighted using chart review (n=368) to represent a typical clinic population. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis selected cut-points maximizing sensitivity (Sn) plus specificity (Sp). RESULTS: The optimal cut-point for all groups was 13 with the corresponding Sn and Sp estimates for E=(Sn 73%, Sp 71%), M=(76%, 81%), PR=(81%, 63%) and W=(80%, 74%). Stressful life events impacted screen scores and MDD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Elevating the PHQ9 cut-point for inner-city Latinos as well as whites is suggested to avoid high false positive rates leading to improper treatment with clinical and economic consequences.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Patient Health Questionnaire/standards , Safety-net Providers/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/ethnology , Adult , Ecuador/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico/ethnology , Middle Aged , New York City/ethnology , Puerto Rico/ethnology
6.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 19(3): 562-571, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27757694

ABSTRACT

This paper examined the prevalence of depressive symptomotology among women of Mexican ancestry (N = 205), over the age of 18, of diverse incomes and nativity. We examined differences in rates of diagnosis by Spanish/English preference and the sensitivity and specificity of three common measures: the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), and depression questions from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Short Form (MDD CIDI-SF); PHQ9 was used as the "gold standard" measure. Results indicated 18-32 % of participants met criteria for depression with higher rates found among Spanish preference participants. The K-10 had significantly higher sensitivity (0.81) but lower specificity (0.79) than the MDD CIDI-SF items (0.57 and 0.89, respectively). This study suggests that the K-10 and MDD CIDI-SF measures are complementary to each other for screening of depressive symptomatology. Implications for cultural and linguistic assessment of depression are further discussed.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Depression/ethnology , Mexican Americans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Language , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Fam Pract ; 32(4): 431-5, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26040311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that postpartum depression (PPD) has an impact on infant development with repercussions in the child's cognitive, socioemotional and conduct regulation. Screening for this disorder with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has been recommended because this significantly identifies more cases of PPD than usual clinical evaluation. AIM: To evaluate the use of the EPDS to screen mothers attending well child care visits with their infants during the first 6 months of age and identifying the factors associated with its use in the largest private health care network in Chile. METHODS: Cross-sectional study, conducted by random sampling of the children's medical charts from a universe of 5700 infants aged 1-6 months that attended the health care network during 2009 and 2011. Estimated sample size: 500 medical charts, assuming a recording frequency of the EPDS of 5% (confidence level of 95% and power of 80%). The descriptive data analysis of the variables was carried out using a uni and multivariate analysis. All values of P < 0.05 were considered significant (Software SPSS 17.0). RESULTS: A total of 1940 visits, belonging to 503 medical charts of infants under 6 months of age were reviewed. The use of the EPDS to screen mothers was recorded in nine medical charts (1.7% of the infant population). The only variable that was significantly associated with the recording of the EPDS was the background of previous depression in the mother (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The record of the use of EPDS on mothers of infants seen in the private health care network is much less than what is recommended.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Mothers/psychology , Chile/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Primary Health Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
8.
J Transcult Nurs ; 24(4): 378-86, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23835893

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the reliability, validity, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the Spanish Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS-Spanish Version) for Mexican women. The scale was administered at 6 weeks (T1; n = 149) and between 4 and 6 months postpartum (T2; n = 156). Women also completed the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) and the mood module of the Standardized Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). At both time points, the internal consistency value of the PDSS-Spanish Version was α = .96. Concurrent validity was adequate, compared with the BDI-II (T1: r = .75; T2: r = .74, ps < .01) and the SCID (T1: r = .43; T2: r = .36, ps < .01). Based on receiver operator characteristic curves, cutoff scores on the PDSS-Spanish Version of 60 for depressive symptoms (BDI-II as gold standard) and 80 for major depression (SCID) showed high sensitivity (>88.9%) but low specificity (60.9% to 70.6%). More parsimonious values are obtained at a cutoff of 77 for subsyndromal depression and 95 for major depression. The choice for using different cutoff scores may depend on the purpose of using the instrument. Overall, the psychometric properties for the PDSS-Spanish Version in Mexican women are similar to the ones obtained in Hispanic women in the United States.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/ethnology , Adult , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Mexico , Postnatal Care , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
9.
Cienc. enferm ; 16(1): 37-47, 2010. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-577076

ABSTRACT

La depresión postparto (DPP) puede ser difícil de detectar, principalmente porque las madres no informan los síntomas depresivos que pueden estar sintiendo a los profesionales de salud. El objetivo de este estudio fue poner a prueba la versión en español de la Escala de Depresión Postparto (PDSS) en una población de mujeres de Arica, Chile. El muestreo incluyó una muestra por conveniencia de 179 mujeres con dos o más semanas de postparto que asistieron a Consultorios de Atención Primaria. Se obtuvieron datos sobre características socio-demográficas y reproductivas y se aplicó el PDSS para pesquisar DPP. El 46,4 por ciento de las mujeres presentaron síntomas significativos de DPP. “Pensamientos suicidas” y “Pérdida del yo” fueron los síntomas más mencionados (34,1 por ciento y 26,3 por ciento, respectivamente). La gran mayoría de las participantes obtuvo un índice de inconsistencia de respuesta bajo; lo que indica que el cuestionario fue entendible. Se obtuvo un coeficiente de confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach) de .96. Seis de las siete dimensiones del PDSS-versión en español contribuyeron excelentemente a clasificar las participantes con depresión de las sin depresión. La validez de constructo se exploró a través del grado de interrelación entre escalas, encontrándose una alta correlación entre éstas. El análisis de factores reveló ocho componentes en la matriz con varianza explicada de 67,85 por ciento. Se concluye que el PDSS-versión en español obtuvo una adecuada confiabilidad al ser puesto a prueba en esta población. Se recomienda seguir poniendo a prueba este instrumento en mujeres de otras regiones de Chile.


Postpartum depression (PPD) can be difficult to detect; mainly because mothers do not report depressive symptoms they may be feeling to health care providers. The objective of this study was to test the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) Spanish version in a group of women in Arica, Chile. The convenience sample included 179 women with 2 or more weeks postpartum attending Primary Care Clinics. Data on reproductive and sociodemographic characteristics were obtained. The PDSS was utilized for assessment of PPD. Symptoms of postpartum depression was found among 46.4 percent of the women. “Suicidal thoughts” and “Loss of self” were the most commonly reported symptoms (34.1 percent and 26.3 percent respectively). The majority of the participants obtained a low Inconsistent Responding Index, indicating that the scale was understood. A reliability coefficient of .96 was obtained (Cronbach Alpha). Six of the seven dimensions of the PDSS-Spanish Version distinguished between groups by depression status. Construct validity was tested using degree of interrelatedness among the scales, identifying those correlated highly with each other. Factor analysis revealed eight components with explained variance of 67.85 percent. It is concluded that the PDSS-Spanish Version obtained an adequate reliability in this population. Recommendation is for further assessment of this tool among women in other regions of Chile.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Chile
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL