Voluntary head dunking after exercise-induced hyperthermia rapidly reduces core body temperature in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate field-applicable cooling methods for treatment of exercise-induced hyperthermia in dogs. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover study from June 27, 2023, to July 24, 2023, 12 working dogs exercised for 10 minutes until core body temperature reached 40.6 °C or above or ≥ 2 signs of heat stress were observed. Four different cooling protocols were evaluated: (1) neck chemical ice packs (2), (2) a wet (22 °C) neck towel, (3) wet (22 °C) axillae towels, or (4) voluntary head immersion ("dunking") into (22 °C) water. After intervention, dogs rested and were monitored for 40 minutes. RESULTS: The dunking protocol, which included limited water ingestion, produced the lowest mean core temperature in the initial 5 minutes after exercise, in the subsequent 35 minutes during which dogs cooled to baseline temperature and was the only protocol to prevent the initial postexercise temperature rise. All methods resulted in return to baseline temperature. CONCLUSIONS: Trained voluntary head dunk with limited water ingestion results in rapid cooling in field situations of exercise-induced hyperthermia in dogs with normal mental status and ability to pause panting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: "Cool first, transport second" reduces morbidity and mortality of acute heat injury. When whole-body water immersion is not an option, the trained voluntary head dunk in mentally appropriate dogs prevents postexercise rise and rapidly reduces core body temperature within the first 5 minutes. Alternatively, allowing the dog to drink controlled amounts of cool water and pouring water on the dog's head may provide some benefit but warrants further study.

Dunking rusk: innovative food soaking behaviour in Goffin's cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana).

Foraging innovations in animals involving the processing of resources that are already edible in an unprocessed state, yet of improved quality in a processed state, are rare but important to study the evolution of food preparation. Here, we present the first scientific report of food dunking behaviours in parrots by Goffin's cockatoos, a model species for innovative problem solving. Observations during lunch showed seven out of 18 cockatoos placing their food into water and soaking it prior to consumption. This was largely done with dry rusk which was eaten almost exclusively when dunked. Furthermore, their transport effort and waiting times before retrieving food from the water indicate their willingness to invest considerable time to prepare a soaked rusk piece of a higher texture quality. Our present results suggest that the function of this behaviour is to soak the food. Because only some individuals dunked food and dunking has not been observed in the wild, we believe this to be a spontaneous foraging innovation either by one or multiple individuals.

Comparative Study of Perioperative Outcomes Between Modified Blumgart Duct to Mucosa and Dunking Pancreaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the ''Achilles heel" of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) which affects perioperative as well as oncological outcomes. However, there is a lack of information about the superiority of the type of anastomosis in terms of overall morbidity and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after PD. Here, we compare the outcomes of modified Blumgart PJ with the dunking technique of PJ. METHODOLOGY: A case-control study of a prospectively maintained database of 25 consecutive patients undergoing modified Blumgart PJ (study group) and 25 patients who underwent continuous dunking PJ (control group) between January 2018 to April 2021 was done. Between groups, comparisons were made for the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, original fistula risk score, overall complications as graded by Clavien Dindo (CD), POPF, post pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and 30-day mortality at 95% confidence level. RESULTS: Among 50 patients, 30 (60%) were male. The most common indication for PD was ampullary carcinoma (44% in the study group vs. 60% in the control group). The duration of surgery was approximately 41 minutes longer in the study group compared to the control (p = 0.02), while the intraoperative blood loss was similar between the two groups (496.00 ± 226.35 ml vs 508.00 ± 180.67 ml, p = 0.84). While there was no significant difference in mean fistula risk score between the two groups, the POPF (8% vs 32%, p = 0.03), PPH (0% vs 20%, p =0.02), and overall major complications (CD≥ III) according to CD Grading (12% vs 40%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower in the study group. Similarly, the duration of hospital stay in the study group was 4.64 days shorter than the control group (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy has better perioperative outcomes in terms of procedure-specific complications like POPF, PPH, overall major postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay.

Comparison Between Dunking (Invagination) Pancreaticojejunoanastomosis and Double Layer Duct to Mucosa Anastomosis After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy-Whipple Procedure for Pancreatic Cephalic Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer is malignancy with poor prognosis for quality of life and overall survival. The incidence is variant, 7.7/100,000 in Europe, 7.6/100,000 in the USA, 2.2/100.000 in Africa. The only real benefit for cure is surgery, duodenopancreatectomy. The key points for this procedure are radicality, low morbidity and low mortality, the follow up and the expected overall survival. The benchmark of the procedure is the pancreaticojejunoanastomosis, with its main pitfall, postoperative pancreatic fistula B or C. Subsequently, the manner of creation of pancreaticojejunoanastomosis defines the safety, thus the postoperative morbidity and mortality. Finally, this issue remarkably depends on the surgeon and the surgical technique creating the anastomosis. We used 2 techniques with interrupted sutures, dunking anastomosis and duct-to-mucosa double layer technique. The objective of the study was to compare these 2 suturing techniques we applied, and the aim was to reveal the risk benefit rationale for dunking either duct to mucosa anastomosis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In our last series of 25 patients suffering pancreatic head carcinoma we performed a standard dodenopancreatectomy. After the preoperative diagnosis and staging with US, CICT, tumor markers, they underwent surgery. Invagination-dunking anastomosis was performed in 15, whereas, duct-to-mucosa, double layer anastomosis was performed in 10. In the first group with dunking anastomosis, we had 6 patients with soft pancreas and 8 with narrow main pancreatic duct, less than 3 mm. In the duct-to-mucosa group there were 5 patients with soft pancreas and 4 with narrow main pancreatic duct. All other stages of surgery were unified, so the only difference in the procedure remained on the pancreatojejunoanastomosis. The onset of the postoperative pancreatic fistula was estimated with revelation of 3 fold serum level of alfa amylases from the third postoperative day in the drain liquid. RESULTS: In the duct to mucosa group there wasn't a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, while in the dunking anastomosis group we had 4 postoperative pancreatic fistula B, 26 %. One of these 4 patients experienced intraabdominal collection - abscess, conservatively managed with lavation through the drain. Comparing the groups, there was no significant difference between the groups concerning the appearance of postoperative pancreatic fistula: p>0.05, p=0.125. From all 25 patients, in 21 patients biliary stent was installed preoperatively to resolve the preoperative jaundice. All 21 suffered preoperative and postoperative reflux cholangitis, extending the intra-hospital stay. CONCLUSION: So far, there have been many trials referring to opposite results while comparing these 2 techniques in creation of the pancreticojejunoanastomosis. In our study, the duct to mucosa anastomosis prevailed as a technique, proving its risk benefit rationale. However, further large randomized clinical studies have to be conducted to clarify which of these procedures would be the prime objective in the choice of the surgeon while creating pancreatojejunoanastomosis.

32 Consecutive Cases of Whipple's Operation with Single-Layer End to Side Dunking Pancreatojejunostomy Without Any Pancreatic Fistula: Our Institutional Experience.

The aim of this paper is to study the outcome of single-layer end to side dunking pancreatojejunostomy technique in 32 patients of malignant pancreatic disease undergoing Whipple's surgery in a tertiary care oncology centre in India. From January 2013 to January 2016, 32 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for malignant diseases were analysed retrospectively. All the patients underwent standard Whipple's operation. Pancreatojejunostomy was established in a single-layer end to side dunking manner with PDS 4-0. Various patient data, i.e. preoperative symptoms and demography, intra-operative time, blood loss and need of blood transfusion, postoperative hospital stay and complications, were noted. Mean operative time was 3.5 h approximately. Mean blood loss was 328 ml approx (range 150-600 ml). Postoperative delayed gastric emptying was observed in 8 (25%) patients. Three (9.4%) patients developed superficial surgical site infection. Mean hospital stay was 16.5 days (range 13-20 days). There were no pancreatic leak or fistula and no perioperative mortality. It is a feasible technique. It achieved zero leak rates, zero mortality and minimal morbidity without compromising any oncologic principles.

Duct-to-mucosa versus dunking techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Do we need more trials? A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ is the most widely used reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Despite several randomized trials, the ideal technique of pancreaticojejunostomy remains debatable. We planned a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the two most common techniques of PJ (duct-to-mucosa and dunking) to identify the best available evidence in the current literature. METHODS: We searched the Pubmed/Medline, Web of science, Science citation index, Google scholar and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases till October 2017 for all English language randomized trials comparing the two approaches. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014 and results were expressed as odds ratio for dichotomous and mean difference for continuous variables. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Trial sequential analysis was performed using TSA version 0.9.5.5 (Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, 2016). RESULTS: A total of 8 trials were included, with a total of 1043 patients (DTM: 518; Dunking: 525). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall as well as clinically relevant POPF rate. Similarly, both groups were comparable for the secondary outcomes. Trial sequential analysis revealed that the required information size had been crossed without achieving a clinically significant difference for overall POPF; and though the required information size had not been achieved for CR-POPF, the current data has already crossed the futility line for CR-POPF with a 10% risk difference, 80% power and 5% α error. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of overall and CR-POPF rates. Further, the existing evidence is sufficient to conclude lack of difference and further trials are unlikely to result in any change in the outcome. (CRD42017074886).

Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pylorus-preserving robotic Whipple: a proposal for a standardized technique.

BACKGROUND: A number of technical improvements regarding the pancreatic anastomosis have decreased the morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains is the most feared complication, and the ideal technique for pancreatic reconstruction is undetermined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Data were collected from all consecutive robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomies (RAPD), performed by a single surgeon, at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, between September 2007 and January 2016. RESULTS: A total of 28 consecutive patients (16 male and 12 female) who underwent a RAPD were included in this study. Patients had a mean age and mean BMI of 61.5 years (SD = 12.3) and 27 kg/m2 (SD = 4.9), respectively. The mean operative time was 468.2 min (SD = 73.7) and the average estimated blood loss was 216.1 ml (SD = 113.1). The mean length of hospitalization was 13.1 days (SD = 5.4). There was no clinically significant POPF registered. CONCLUSION: Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy (TPG) represents a valid and feasible option as a pancreatic digestive reconstruction during RAPD. Initial results showed decreased incidence of POPF with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding. Our experience suggests that TPG might be safer than pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ); further studies are needed in order to confirm.

Pancreaticojejunostomy: Does the technique matter? A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite a large number of studies, the ideal technique of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains debatable. We compared the two most common techniques of PJ (duct-to-mucosa and dunking) in a randomized trial. METHODS: This open-label randomized trial was done at a tertiary care center from January 2009 to October 2015. Patients with resectable periampullary tumours with a pancreatic duct diameter ≥2 mm, requiring PD were randomly assigned to one of the two techniques using computer generated random numbers. The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate and secondary outcomes were frequency of other postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were randomized and analyzed (intention-to-treat analysis), 97 in duct-to-mucosa and 96 in dunking group. Both groups were comparable for baseline demographic and clinical profiles. The incidence of POPF in the entire study group was 23.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (24.7% vs 22.9%, P = 0.71). Similarly, the incidence of grades B and C (clinically significant) POPF was comparable (16.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.57). Both groups were comparable with respect to the secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The duct-to-mucosa technique of PJ after PD is not superior to the dunking technique with respect to POPF rate. (CTRI/2010/091/000531).

Binding Pancreaticojejunostomy Compared with Dunking Pancreaticojejunostomy

PURPOSE: Pancreatic fistulas are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of controlling pancreatic fistula formation by binding pancreaticojejunostomy into the operative procedure, as proposed by Peng, which results in a 3 cm invagination of the pancreatic remnant by the jejunal segment bearing electrically-destroyed mucosa reinforced by inner and outer sutures. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Surgery of Daejeon St. Mary's hospital between April 2007 and May 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-one patients were included in the study; 16 patients underwent dunking pancreaticojejunostomy and 15 patients underwent binding pancreaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic data, pre-operative characteristics, underlying pathologies, pancreatic textures, and duct diameters. The mean operative time did not differ between the two groups (388+/-29 min vs. 459+/-21 min, p=0.060). No difference existed in the post-operative course except for the degree of complications. In contrast to the dunking group, in which 2 cases of grade III/V pancreatic fistulas occurred, the binding group had no severe complications. In addition, transformation of amylase data measured from Jackson-Pratt drains into a natural logarithm demonstrated significant differences on post-operative (POD) days 1, 3, and 7 between the dunking and binding groups (POD1, 6.97+/-0.41 vs. 6.10+/-0.44 [p=0.037]; POD3, 6.97+/-0.41 vs. 6.10+/-0.44 [p=0.032]; POD7, 4.69+/-0.35 vs. 3.88+/-0.25 [p=0.034], respectively). CONCLUSION: Bindning pancreaticojejunostomy is equivalent to dunking pancreaticojejunostomy with respect to operative difficulties, and more effective in preventing complications related to pancreatic fistulas.

Binding Pancreaticojejunostomy Compared with Dunking Pancreaticojejunostomy

PURPOSE: Pancreatic fistulas are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of controlling pancreatic fistula formation by binding pancreaticojejunostomy into the operative procedure, as proposed by Peng, which results in a 3 cm invagination of the pancreatic remnant by the jejunal segment bearing electrically-destroyed mucosa reinforced by inner and outer sutures. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Surgery of Daejeon St. Mary's hospital between April 2007 and May 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-one patients were included in the study; 16 patients underwent dunking pancreaticojejunostomy and 15 patients underwent binding pancreaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic data, pre-operative characteristics, underlying pathologies, pancreatic textures, and duct diameters. The mean operative time did not differ between the two groups (388+/-29 min vs. 459+/-21 min, p=0.060). No difference existed in the post-operative course except for the degree of complications. In contrast to the dunking group, in which 2 cases of grade III/V pancreatic fistulas occurred, the binding group had no severe complications. In addition, transformation of amylase data measured from Jackson-Pratt drains into a natural logarithm demonstrated significant differences on post-operative (POD) days 1, 3, and 7 between the dunking and binding groups (POD1, 6.97+/-0.41 vs. 6.10+/-0.44 [p=0.037]; POD3, 6.97+/-0.41 vs. 6.10+/-0.44 [p=0.032]; POD7, 4.69+/-0.35 vs. 3.88+/-0.25 [p=0.034], respectively). CONCLUSION: Bindning pancreaticojejunostomy is equivalent to dunking pancreaticojejunostomy with respect to operative difficulties, and more effective in preventing complications related to pancreatic fistulas.