Collage of cases and brief review of the laboratory diagnosis and molecular testing in autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is an acquired heterogenous clinical entity with variable presentations like acute haemolysis or mild, chronic haemolysis compounded with acute exacerbation in winters or fatal uncompensated haemolysis. A step-wise approach to the diagnosis and characterisation of AIHA should be undertaken, firstly the diagnosis of haemolysis followed by the establishment of immune nature with the aid of direct agglutination tests (DAT). Simultaneously the other causes of immune haemolysis need to be excluded too. In light of advancements in diagnostics, a wide array of investigations can be used like absolute reticulocyte count, bone marrow responsiveness index to establish the evidence of haemolysis, sensitive gel technology, enhanced DAT assays, e.g., modified DAT with low ionic strength saline solution (LISS) at 4°C, DAT assays utilizing reagents such as anti-IgA and anti-IgM and DAT by flowcytometry, to detect RBC bound autoantibodies (Abs) and monospecific DAT to establish immune causes of haemolysis and characterisation of the autoantibodies. The compensatory role of bone marrow and synchronous pathologies like clonal lymphoproliferation, dyserythropoiesis, fibrosis are important factors in the evolution of the disease and aid in the customisation of treatment modalities. The laboratory work up should aim to diagnose underlying diseases like chronic lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases. Also, tests like autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndromes (ALPS) screening panel and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for RBC membrane disorders, RBC enzymopathies, and congenital dyserythropoietic aneamia have found their place. It is incumbent upon the clinicians to use the all-available diagnostic modalities for the accurate diagnosis, prognostication and customisation of the therapy.

The enhanced direct antiglobulin test in current practice has a limited impact on management of adult patients.

INTRODUCTION: The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) identifies immunoglobulin IgG and/or complement onthe red blood cell surface, allowing discrimination between immune and non-immunehemolysis. When the DAT is negative but there is clinical suspicion for immunehemolysis, an enhanced DAT can be sent to an immunohematology referencelaboratory (IRL). METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study assessed the volume of enhanced DATs at a large tertiarycare center and evaluated their impact on patient care. Enhanced DATs were sent on21 adult patients (January 2019 - January 2021) at the University of Pittsburgh MedicalCenter and Allegheny Health Network. Laboratory and clinical data were collected andanalyzed. RESULTS: Four out of 21 patients had positive tests (DAT and other serologic tests) at the localIRL. Enhanced DAT testing yielded positive results in an additional 5 patients butnegative or invalid results for 2 patients. High-dose steroid therapy was started in 12patients prior to receipt of enhanced DAT results. Enhanced DAT testing was sent amedian of 5 days after initiation of steroid therapy. For the patients trialed on steroids,the enhanced DAT results impacted medical decision-making in only 3 patients, and inonly one of those patients was the enhanced DAT positive despite a negative DAT at alocal IRL. In the non-steroid treated patients, enhanced DAT results did not contributeto clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION: Enhanced DATs generally did not impact medical decision-making in adults withhemolytic anemia.