The association of obstetric anal sphincter injury and mediolateral episiotomy with increasing birth weight and duration of second stage of labour in spontaneous vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the association of mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in women with spontaneous vaginal delivery. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study with data from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, describing 541 055 women who delivered a singleton live born infant in cephalic presentation spontaneously at term. Risk indicators for OASI were tested using univariate and multivariate analysis. Additional analysis for the interaction of MLE with other risk indicators was performed. RESULTS: The rate of OASI was 4.2 % in 215 241 nulliparous and 1.4 % in 325 814 multiparous women. In nulliparous and multiparous women MLE was associated with a reduction of OASI (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.3, 95 % CI 0.30-0.34 and aOR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.30-0.34). The association of MLE with a reduced rate of OASI was stronger in high birthweight and in prolonged 2nd stage groups. In nulliparous women, the number needed to treat (NNT) for the use of MLE to prevent one OASI is 31 in general. With MLE, the OASI rate reduced from 11.5 % to 2.9 with a NNT of 12 in the group with a birth weight ≥ 4000 g and a duration of the second stage of labour of 60-120 min. The NNT is 9 In the group with a birth weight ≥ 4000 g and a duration of the second stage of labour ≥ 120 min (reduction rate of OASI from 14.2 % to 3.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Use of MLE is associated with a reduction of OASI in spontaneous vaginal delivery. In nulliparous women, an episiotomy with an anticipated birth weight > 4000 g and a duration of the 2nd stage of more than 60 min should be considered.

How time influences episiotomy utilization and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) pose significant challenges for young women following childbirth. The association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASIS remains a subject of debate and uncertainty. This study seeks to fill this gap. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed using electronic database of obstetrics department at a tertiary medical center. All vaginal deliveries and vacuum-assisted deliveries at term, with a singleton live fetus at cephalic presentation between 2015 and 2021, were included. A comparison of the rates of mediolateral episiotomy and OASIS was conducted between the periods 2015-2017 and 2018-2021. Subgroup analysis was carried out based on parity and the mode of delivery. RESULTS: Overall, the study included 18,202 women. Between 2015 and 2017, episiotomy was performed in 1,272 cases (17.5 %), compared to 1,241 cases (11.4 %) between 2018 and 2021 (p<0.0001). Conversely, a significant increase in OASIS was observed, rising from 0.3 % during 2015-2017 to 0.6 % during 2018-2021 (p=0.012). Multivariable analysis unveiled two factors significantly linked to OASIS: the temporal cohort studied, indicating an increasing trend in recent years, and the utilization of epidural analgesia, which exhibited a protective effect, while episiotomy was not associated with OASIS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a marked decline in the utilization of episiotomy over the study period, accompanied by an increase in OASIS incidence. Nevertheless, our analysis found no statistically significant link between episiotomy use and OASIS incidence.

Effects of Far Infrared Radiation and Sitz Bath on Perineal Wound Healing and Pain in Primiparous Women Undergoing an Episiotomy: A Randomized Prospective Parallel Arm Study.

Introduction Episiotomy is a common surgical procedure done during childbirth. The study aims to assess the efficacy of far-infrared (FIR) and sitz bath (SB) effects on pain relief and healing of perineal wounds in primiparous women who had undergone an episiotomy. Materials and methods A randomized prospective parallel arm study was conducted among 208 primigravida women who underwent episiotomy in a tertiary hospital in the southern part of India from December 2020 to March 2022. Participants were randomized into the FIR (n-104) and SB therapy groups (n-104) and their efficacy was assessed for pain relief and healing of perineal wounds using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, and Discharge, the Approximation Scale (REEDA) and the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS). The variables were compared using an independent two-sample t-test and chi-square test (p ≤ 0.05). Results Pain was evaluated using VAS, and by the sixth week postpartum, 90.4% (94) of the FIR group reported mild to no pain compared to 88.5% (92) of the SB group. Wound integrity assessment using the REEDA scale showed better results among the FIR group (94, 90.4%) than the SB group (93, 89.4%) on the second day postpartum. Perineal muscle tone, measured by the MOS, was slightly better in the FIR group (59, 62.8%) than the SB group (55, 59.8%) at the sixth week postpartum, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion FIR therapy reduces postpartum discomfort, promotes wound healing, and improves perineal muscle tone better than SB therapy. FIR also enhanced patient compliance and efficacy.

Analysis of episiotomy incidence and risk factors in vaginal deliveries: a single-center.

Introduction: Episiotomy is a surgical procedure involving the enlargement of the posterior vagina to facilitate the delivery of the baby. This study aims to further investigate the associated risk factors for episiotomy and the specific indications for its use in spontaneous labor. Methodology: This institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 349 vaginal births with a ratio of 1:4 from January 2020 to December 2020. We recruited study participants using consecutive sampling techniques. The sample size was calculated with a hypothesis test for two population proportions (one-sided test formula). Adjusted odds ratio with the corresponding 95% confidence interval was used to declare the significance of variables. Results: In our multivariate analysis, it was found that pregnant women who underwent instrumental delivery (P-value=.00; OR=25.63; 95% CI: 5.76-114.0) and those with fetal birth weight >3,000 grams (P-value=.00; OR=11.31; 95% CI: 3.96-32.32) had the highest risk of undergoing an episiotomy. Subsequently, the duration of the second stage of labor >30 minutes (P-value=.049; OR=16.34; 95% CI: 1.01-264.48) was associated with a slightly increased risk of episiotomy. Fetal head circumference >34 cm was not found to be risk of an increased risk of episiotomy in this study. However, pregnant women aged >30 years (P-value=.049; OR=0.306; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99) showed a reduced risk of episiotomy. Conclusion: The prevalence of episiotomy practice in this study exceeds the recommended threshold set by the World Health Organization (WHO). Instrumental delivery, high birth weight, and prolonged second-stage labor emerged as significant factors influencing episiotomy practice. Hence, further interventions are warranted to mitigate the prevalence of episiotomy practice.

The Effect of Perineum Massage Applied With and Without an Instrument in the Active Phase of Labor Birth Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Perineal massage during labor reduces the need for episiotomy and shortens the length of the episiotomy. Pregnant women should be offered instrumented (EPI-NO) or manual perineal massage in labor. This study was conducted to determine the effect of perineal massage applied with (EPI-NO) and without an instrument during the active phase of labor on episiotomy rate and episiotomy length in women who gave birth vaginally. METHODS: The study included 101 pregnant women aged 18-35 years, with gestational ages between 38 and 42 weeks and indications for vaginal delivery. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: EPI-NO massage, manual massage, and control. The perineal massage was administered during the active labor phase (4- to 8-cm dilation) for 20 min in the intervention groups. Postpartum episiotomy rates and lengths were recorded using standardized forms. The research data were collected using the Introductory Information Form and Birth Assessment Form. RESULTS: The episiotomy rate was found to be 33.3% in group I, 75.0% in group II, and 74.4% in the Control group, and a statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). The mean episiotomy length of the women was 1.5 cm (mean ± SD: 1.50 ± 1.20) for group I, 3 cm (mean ± SD 2.70 ± 1.50) for group II, and 3.5 cm (mean ± SD 3.10 ± 2.00) for the control group (p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: Perineal massage with EPI-NO was the most effective method at decreasing the episiotomy rate and shortening the episiotomy length compared with other groups.

Could a simple manual technique performed by a midwife reduce the incidence of episiotomy and perineal lacerations? A non-randomized pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Women experience medical interventions, episiotomy, and perineal lacerations during childbirth, impacting their physical, psychological, and sexual well-being. This study compares the perineal status of prospective women who had the midwifery intervention of perineal myofascial release during childbirth, to a matched retrospective control sample of women who received standard care during childbirth. METHODS: A non-randomized pilot study with prospective data collected for 50 women after informed verbal consent was obtained to having the midwifery intervention of perineal myofascial release during childbirth, and the matched retrospective data for the control group of 49 women were collected from a random sample generated from the medical records. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, regression, and chi-squared analyses. Retrospective trial registration was granted with The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZTR. RESULTS: Women were six times (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.0-0.37) less likely to have a non-intact perineum and twice (OR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.35-0.56) less likely to have an episiotomy if they were in the intervention group. Chi-squared analysis found no statistically significant differences between groups for normal vaginal birth and instrumental births, excluding cesareans and waterbirth [χ2(1)= -0.37, p=0.542]. CONCLUSIONS: This study found perineal myofascial release benefits women by reducing perineal trauma and episiotomy. However, there were no significant differences in the duration of the active pushing stage of labor or mode of birth. This study has shown some promise in obtaining data for a larger, definitive, randomized controlled trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ANZTR. IDENTIFIER: ID ACTRN12623000807651.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Guidelines recommend episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery with an optimal incision angle of 60° to protect the anal sphincter. The "Episiometer" is a new device promising a 60° incision angle. We compared the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and post-repair suture angle of episiotomies made with conventional "eyeballing" versus Episiometer guided during instrumental delivery. METHODS: We conducted this randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care teaching institute in southern India after ethical committee approval, trial registration, and informed consent. We randomized (block) 328 pregnant women aged 18 years and above with term, singleton fetuses delivered by instruments into Episiometer-guided (164) or conventional episiotomy (164) groups (allocation concealed). We compared the OASI (identified clinically) and the suture angle measured from the midline (assessor blinded) in the two groups. We followed up on the subjects at 6 and 12 weeks to assess perineal pain and fecal/flatus incontinence. RESULTS: The incidence of OASI of 0.61% in the Episiometer group was significantly lower compared with 4.88% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 5.6; p = 0.02; adjusted risk ratio = 5.9; CI 0.7-46.1; p = 0.09). A significantly higher proportion of subjects (59.1%) in the Episometer group had a post-suture angle between 36 and 40° compared with 36.6% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 21.8, p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the perineal pain or Wexner score during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Episiometer-guided episiotomy during instrumental delivery resulted in a significantly higher suture angle and lower obstetric anal sphincter injuries than with conventional eyeballing.

A Systematic Review of the Use of Routine Versus Selective Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth.

Episiotomy is a common obstetric surgical procedure involving an incision to enlarge the vaginal opening, facilitating the delivery of the fetus during the second stage of labor. Hence, the current review was conducted to assess the impact of using selective versus routine episiotomy during vaginal birth on birth outcomes. This systematic review used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews and research syntheses. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and SCOPUS were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from relevant studies. Four studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The findings suggest selective episiotomy is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes than routine episiotomy in certain contexts. However, results varied, indicating the importance of tailoring episiotomy practices to specific patient populations and healthcare settings. To conclude, the review supports the use of selective episiotomy over routine episiotomy during vaginal birth, as it is associated with fewer adverse maternal outcomes.

Trends and determinants of the use of episiotomy in a prospective population-based registry from central India.

BACKGROUND: Findings from research and recommendations from the World Health Organization favor restrictive use of episiotomy, but whether this guidance is being followed in India, and factors associated with its use, are not known. This study sought to document trends in use of episiotomy over a five-year period (2014-2018); to examine its relationship to maternal, pregnancy, and health-system characteristics; and to investigate its association with other obstetric interventions. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected by the Maternal Newborn Health Registry, a prospective population-based pregnancy registry established in Central India (Nagpur, Eastern Maharashtra). We examined type of birth and use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries from 2014 to 2018, as well as maternal and birth characteristics, health systems factors, and concurrent obstetric interventions associations with its use with multivariable Poisson regression models. RESULTS: During the five-year interval, the rate of episiotomy in vaginal birth rose from 13 to 31% despite a decline in assisted vaginal birth. Associations with episiotomy were found for the following factors: prior birth, multiple gestations, seven or more years of maternal education, higher gestational age, higher birthweight, delivery by an obstetrician (as compared to midwife or general physician), and birth in hospital (as compared to clinic or health center). After adjusting for these factors, year over year rise in episiotomy was significant with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (AIRR) of 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.12; p = 0.002]. We found an association between episiotomy and several other obstetric interventions, with the strongest relationship for maternal treatment with antibiotics (AIRR 4.23, 95% CI 3.12-5.73; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Episiotomy in this population-based sample from central India steadily rose from 2014 to 2018. This increase over time was observed even after adjusting for patient characteristics, obstetric risk factors, and health system features, such as specialty of the birthing provider. Our findings have important implications for maternal-child health and respectful maternity care given that most women prefer to avoid episiotomy; they also highlight a potential target for antibiotic stewardship as part of global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT01073475.

Episiotomy is a surgical procedure to widen the vaginal opening for childbirth. It was once commonly used worldwide. However, because the procedure can cause pain to mothers and place them at risk for infections and serious tears to the vagina­especially when the cut is directly downward­research suggests it should be used sparingly. As such, it is now less often practiced in high-income countries, but whether the same is true in India is not known. To answer this question, we used a large population-based pregnancy registry, the Maternal Newborn Health Registry, from Central India (Nagpur) to assess the frequency of episiotomy use between 2014 and 2018 and if there were certain maternal characteristics, features of the health care system, and other pregnancy interventions that were related with its use. Over this five-year period, the use of episiotomy during vaginal birth rose more than two-fold. It was more often used on women who had never delivered a baby before, were further along in pregnancy, had higher levels of education, had heavier babies, or were carrying more than one baby. Obstetricians were more likely to perform episiotomy than midwives or general physicians and it was more likely to be performed in hospitals than in clinics or primary health centers. This rise during the five-year interval was significant even when accounting for these patient and provider characteristics, suggesting a shift in medical practice. Because this was an observational study more research is needed to determine if the associations we found are causal.

Female genital mutilation/cutting in women delivering in France: An observational national study.

OBJECTIVE: International migration from source countries has meant that clinicians in high income countries, that is, receiving countries, are increasingly caring for affected women affected by female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of FGM/C among women at childbirth, and its association with pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This was an observational study using data from a cross-sectional population-based study from the French National Perinatal Survey of 2021 (ENP) conducted in all maternity units in mainland France and including all women delivering a live birth during 1 week in March 2021 (N = 10 928). We estimated the FGM/C prevalence using (i) the diagnosed cases and (ii) the indirect prevalence estimated by UNICEF in each source country. We compared population characteristics and perinatal outcomes between women diagnosed with FGM/C and two groups: (i) women originating in source countries and diagnosed as without FGM/C and (ii) all women without diagnosis of FGM/C whatever the country of birth. RESULTS: Diagnosed prevalence of FGM/C was 95% (95% CI: 0.78-1.14] and the indirect computed estimation prevalence was estimated at 1.53% (95% CI: 1.31-1.77) in 113 and 183 women, respectively. Labor and delivery outcomes were globally similar in women with FGM/C and the other two groups. Only episiotomy was more frequently performed in women with FGM/C than in the other two groups. CONCLUSION: In receiving countries, obstetric outcomes of women with FGM/C can be similar to those of other women, which does not preclude need of further research and training to provide the most appropriate care, including enhanced attention to diagnosis.

Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion After Vaginal Delivery Comparing Routine Versus Restrictive Episiotomy: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion following vaginal birth after routine and restrictive episiotomy. METHODS: This study consists of two cohorts of pregnant women prospectively enrolled between September 2015 and December 2017 at a university hospital. The pregnant women were subject to a randomized controlled trial, in which participants received a restrictive episiotomy protocol versus a routine episiotomy protocol for vaginal delivery. Levator ani avulsion was evaluated by four-dimensional ultrasound screening. RESULTS: Sixty-one post-partum primipara women were enrolled in our study. Thirty-two women (52.5%) had undergone routine episiotomy whereas 29 women (47.5%) had gone through restrictive episiotomy. Right mediolateral episiotomies were performed in all cases. The rate of anal sphincter tear was 12.5% in the routine episiotomy group versus 13.8% in the restrictive episiotomy group (p = 1.00). Levator ani avulsion was detected in 9.4% of the routine episiotomy group (only on the right side) and in 10.3% of the restrictive episiotomy group (p = 1.00). No bilateral levator avulsion was detected in either of the groups. There were no statistical differences in the distances of the bladder neck descent, cystocele descent, uterine descent, rectocele descent, and the ballooning of the genital hiatus area between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our pilot study, there was no reduction of the rate of levator ani avulsion in women with restrictive episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy. There were no differences in pelvic floor ultrasound parameters between the two groups.

Antenatal Perineal Training for Injuries Prevention: Follow Up after Puerperium.

Background and Objectives: This retrospective analysis investigated the impact of preparation of the pelvic floor for childbirth with stretching balloons and perineal massage on the risk of pelvic floor injuries. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 150 primiparous women who accessed private clinics in Padua (Italy) in the period 2019-2023 regarding the rate of perineal trauma and postpartum dysfunction across three groups: the balloon stretching group (BSG, N = 50, 33.3%), the perineal massage group (PMG, N = 39, 26.0%), and the control group (CG, 61, 40.7%). Results: Prenatal perineal training had a significant impact on reducing the rate of perineal injury and episiotomy (27.5% in BSG vs. 48.7% in PMG and 68.3% in CG, p = 0.008, respectively, 9.8% vs. 26% and 40%, p = 0.046) and the duration of the second stage of labor (BSG and PMG had a shorter duration compared to CG with a mean difference of -0.97892 h, p < 0.001, respectively, -0.63372 h, p = 0.002). Patients who carry out the preparation with the stretching balloon are less likely to develop urinary and anal incontinence and pain during intercourse. Specifically, the rate of urinary incontinence in BSG stands at around 23.5% compared to 43.6% in PMG (p = 0.345) and 55% in CG (p = 0.034). Dyspareunia in BSG was detected in 11.8% of cases compared to 35.5% in PMG (p = 0.035) and 61.7% in CG (p < 0.01). Symptomatology inherent to the posterior compartment was reported in 9.8% of cases in BSG vs. 23.11% in PMG (p = 0.085) and 33.3% in CG (p = 0.03%). Conclusions: Stretching balloons and perineal massage can be chosen as tools to prevent and reduce the rates of obstetric trauma during childbirth and to reduce the use of episiotomies as well as protect against the development of dysfunctions of the pelvic floor.

Comparison of photobiomodulation with cryotherapy in the immediate postpartum period of parturients with grade I, grade II lacerations and/or episiotomy in reducing perineal and vulvar and edema: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal delivery has several benefits for the parturient; however, during labor, some injuries, such as lacerations and/or episiotomy, can occur. Perineal pain may occur in the puerperium and can be aggravated in cases of perineal injury during childbirth, potentially impacting the physical and emotional aspects of the parturient. For this reason, it is necessary to use techniques that can relieve pain and edema in the immediate postpartum period, directly influencing recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reduction of pain and improvement in healing using two techniques, namely photobiomodulation and cryotherapy, performed in the immediate postpartum period of up to 12 h, in parturients who suffered grade I and II lacerations and/or episiotomy. METHODS: Data collection was carried out through an evaluation questionnaire. Photobiomodulation was applied using the red and infrared laser from the DMC brand. The EVA and McGill scales were used for pain assessment, and the REEDA scale was used for the evaluation of edema and healing. RESULTS: The techniques were evaluated and applied to 56 patients, with 28 in each group (cryotherapy and LBI). Patients who received photobiomodulation showed superior improvement compared to cryotherapy. In the immediate postpartum period, there was a greater reduction in pain in favor of photobiomodulation (p = 0.008); and after 24 h, the difference was even more significant (p < 0.001).

Pulsating electromagnetic fields for perineal lacerations and surgical wounds healing in the postpartum: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to assess the possible benefits of Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR) in the treatment of spontaneous perineal lacerations and episiotomies in the postpartum. METHODS: We performed a prospective, non-pharmacologic, non-profit, monocentric interventional study on women who had a spontaneous laceration and/or an episiotomy at delivery. The TMR device treatment was accepted by 52 women, while 120 women underwent standard care. Patients were visited 1 day postpartum, before starting the treatment; then a follow-up visit was performed at 3 weeks, 5 weeks, and 3 months after delivery. The main endpoint was the time required for complete healing of the laceration and/or the episiotomy. Secondary endpoints were the prevalence of dehiscence, infections, urinary discomfort, urinary leakage, and the quality of restoration of sexual function. RESULTS: In the treatment group the REEDA score was significantly better both at 3- and 5-weeks postpartum follow-up. At 3 weeks and 5 weeks postpartum, we observed a significantly better outcome in the treatment group for all subjective complaints and perineal complications associated with lacerations and episiotomies. The percentage of patients who scored above the cutoff for sexual dysfunction was significantly better in the treatment group (83.3%) than in the control group (31.8%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With this pilot study, we introduced low dose Pulsating Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) as a novel conservative and not pharmacological approach to reduce complications of perineal lesions. Our results demonstrated to significantly improve perineal wound healing and to ameliorate the sexual function in the postpartum.

Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma-A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postnatal perineal pain is prevalent following childbirth and can impact women both physically and emotionally. The aim of the study was to study the effect of collegial midwifery assistance on perineal pain and pain medication 1 month after birth and to investigate the associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of intercourse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A follow-up questionnaire was sent 1 month postpartum to women with a first spontaneous vaginal birth participating in a randomized controlled trial (Oneplus trial). Data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020. Differences in perineal pain between women attended by one or two midwives were analyzed according to intention-to-treat using bivariate analyses. Associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of sexual intercourse were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The category no tear/first-degree tear was compared separately to each of the other tear categories. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962. RESULTS: Out of 2233 women, 1762 responded within 30-60 days postpartum. Of women in the no tear/first-degree tear category, 27.7% reported perineal pain during the past week, in contrast to women with OASI, where 64.2% reported perineal pain. Women with OASI experienced the highest odds of perineal pain (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.72-7.47) compared to those with no tear/first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45-2.41), women with an episiotomy (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.87), and those with minor second-degree tears (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.94). Women with episiotomy reported the highest odds ratios for dissatisfaction with tear healing (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92-6.31). No significant differences in perineal pain and pain medication were observed between women allocated to collegial midwifery assistance and those allocated to standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Women with OASI reported the highest odds of perineal pain 30-60 days after birth compared to women with no tear or first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears. Women subjected to an episiotomy reported highest odds ratios of dissatisfaction with tear healing.

Case report: Perineal swelling: A rare case of scar endometriosis.

We report a rare case of episiotomy site scar endometriosis manifested as painful perineal swelling near the anus for 2 years affecting daily routine activity, especially during menses. A 33-year-old female, para 2 with both vaginal deliveries with last child birth 8 years back. A 2.5 × 3 cm firm, tender nodule was present on the posterior vulva at the right mediolateral episiotomy site. Trans-perineal and trans-anal ultrasound scan was done, anal sphincter involvement was ruled out and the nodule was excised with free margins. histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of scar endometriosis. The key takeaway from this case is endometriosis can present after 8 years of vaginal delivery. The timely diagnosis and treatment is necessary as delay may cause anal sphincter involvement or malignant transformation.

The impact of Reiki practice on episiotomy recovery and perineal pain: A randomized controlled study.

Energy therapies are complementary methods focused on revealing the existing energy and restoring the individual's (recipient's) energy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of Reiki practice applied to postpartum women who had spontaneous childbirth without instrumental delivery on postpartum episiotomy recovery and perineal pain. The research was randomized controlled at a hospital in pre-test post-test design. 86 postpartum women in total were included in the research, (n=40) in intervention group and (n=46) in control group. On the postpartum 1st day, 2nd day, 7th day and 14th day, episiotomy recovery of the intervention and control group was assessed with REEDA Scale and perineal pain was assessed with Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The tree sessions of Reiki for 35-40 minutes were applied to intervention group on the postpartum 1st day, 2nd day and 7th day. (Clinical Trial Registry and Registration Number: NCT05486624). The REEDA Scale average oedema scores of the control group postpartum women were higher than intervention group. The control group had higher pain average than the intervention group. The Reiki applied to postpartum women who had spontaneous childbirth without instrumental delivery had a positive impact on episiotomy recovery due to its impact on oedema and it reduced perineal pain.

Les thérapies énergétiques sont des méthodes complémentaires axées sur la révélation de l'énergie existante et la restauration de l'énergie de l'individu (du destinataire). Le but de cette étude était d'étudier l'impact de la pratique du Reiki appliquée aux femmes en post-partum ayant eu un accouchement spontané sans accouchement instrumental sur la récupération par épisiotomie post-partum et les douleurs périnéales. La recherche a été randomisée et contrôlée dans un hôpital selon une conception pré-test et post-test. Au total, 86 femmes en post-partum ont été incluses dans la recherche, (n = 40) dans le groupe d'intervention et (n = 46) dans le groupe témoin. Les 1er, 2e, 7e et 14e jours post-partum, la récupération par épisiotomie du groupe d'intervention et du groupe témoin a été évaluée avec l'échelle REEDA et la douleur périnéale a été évaluée avec le questionnaire abrégé sur la douleur de McGill. Les séances d'arbres de Reiki pendant 35 à 40 minutes ont été appliquées au groupe d'intervention les 1er, 2e et 7e jours post-partum. (Registre des essais cliniques et numéro d'enregistrement : NCT05486624). Les scores moyens d'œdème sur l'échelle REEDA des femmes en post-partum du groupe témoin étaient plus élevés que ceux du groupe d'intervention. Le groupe témoin présentait une douleur moyenne plus élevée que le groupe d'intervention. Le Reiki appliqué aux femmes en post-partum ayant eu un accouchement spontané sans accouchement instrumental a eu un impact positif sur la récupération par épisiotomie en raison de son impact sur l'œdème et de la réduction des douleurs périnéales.

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and secular trends of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in vacuum and forceps deliveries in Norway, both with and without episiotomy. DESIGN: Population-based real-world data collected during 2001-2018. SETTING: Medical Birth Registry Norway. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Nulliparous women with singleton foetuses in a cephalic presentation delivered by either vacuum or forceps (n = 70 783). METHODS: Logistic regression analyses were applied to the OASIS prevalence in six 3-year time periods. Both crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OASIS prevalence. RESULTS: The OASIS prevalence in vacuum and forceps deliveries decreased from 14.8% during 2001-2003 to 5.2% during 2016-2018. The overall reduction between the first and last 3-year time period was 61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CIs = 0.35-0.43). The only exception to this decreasing trend in OASIS was found in forceps deliveries performed without an episiotomy. The OASIS prevalence was approximately twofold higher in forceps compared to vacuum deliveries (aOR = 1.92, 95% CIs = 1.79-2.05). Performing either a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was associated with a 45% decrease in the prevalence of OASIS relative to no episiotomy (aOR = 0.55, 95% CIs = 0.52-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Opting for vacuum rather than forceps delivery in conjunction with a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy could significantly lower the OASIS prevalence in nulliparous women.